Skip to main content
Log in

About dielectric relaxation in highly cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Ionics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of lithium salt on dynamics in highly cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) has been investigated. The elaboration uses results of dielectric relaxation studies. It turns out that competition of electric and structural relaxation coins conductivity mechanism. Neat cross-linked PEO with low mesh size can be transferred in super-cooled liquid state. Then, cross-linked PEO behaves like a hydrogen-bonded liquid since crystallization is strongly suppressed. As a result, one observes slow Debye-like relaxation at low temperature. It disappears after addition of salt since interaction of salt with polymer chains is stronger than the hydrogen-bonded network in the neat polymer. Analysis of tangent-loss spectra shows: Particle density governing dc conductivity does not depend on temperature at low concentration of added salt. It increases with temperature for neat cross-linked PEO and PEO loaded with sufficiently high concentration of salt. Prevention of crystallization requires a tight network of cross-links. Scaled representations of relevant impedance data for neat cross-linked PEO over extended ranges of frequency and temperature reveal that electric and structural relaxations are independent of temperature to good approximation at low and high frequency. There is a range of damped network oscillations, sandwiched between these limits, where relaxation becomes dependent on temperature. This range lessens with temperature. It does not occur at all in salt-comprising cross-linked PEO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kammer HW (2018) Dielectric relaxation in PEO-based polymer electrolytes. Ionics 24:1415–1428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kammer HW (2018) About impedance spectra and dynamics of charge carriers in neat poly(ethylene oxide) structures. Ionics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2548-9

  3. Lou N, Yang WY, Li XP, Wang P, Chrys W, Sokolov Alexei P, Xiong H (2013) Dielectric relaxation and rheological behavior of supra-molecular liquids. Macromolecules 46:3160–3166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang WY, Agapov AL, Fei F, Kunlun H, Yu X, Mays J, Sokolov AP (2012) Decoupling of ionic transport from segmental relaxation in polymer electrolytes. PhysRevLett 108:088303

    Google Scholar 

  5. Money BK, Hariharan K, Swenson J (2014) Relation between structural and conductivity relaxation in PEO and PEO based electrolytes. Sold State Ionics 262:785–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Golodnitzki D, Strauss E, Peled E, Greenbaum S (2015) Review – on order and disorder in polymer electrolytes. J Eletrochem Soc 162:A2551–A2566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dasari MP, Sambasiva RK, Murali KP, Gopala KG (2011) Barium niobate layered perovskites: dielectric impedance and electric modulus characteristics. Acta Phys Polon 119:387–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jianjun L, Chun-Gang D, Wei-Guo Y, Mei WN, Smith RW, Hardy JR (2003) Dielectric permittivity and electric modulus in Bi2Ti4O11. J Chem Phys 119:2812–2819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shujahedeen BA (2015) Study on electrical percolation phenomenon from the dielectric and electric modulus analysis. Bull Mater Sci 38:1597–1602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Do C, Laukenheimer P, Diddens D, Gölz M, Weiß M, Loidl A, Sun XG, Allgaier J, Ohl M (2013) Li+ transport in PEO-based electrolytes: neutron scattering, dielectric spectroscopy and dynamic simulations. Phys Rev Letters 111:018301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jangu C, Wang JHH, Wang D, Fahs G, Heflin JR, Moore RB, Colby RH, Long TE (2015) Imidazole-containing triblock copolymers with a synergy of ether and imidazolium sites. J Mater Chem C 3:3891–3901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aziz SB (2015) Study of electric percolation phenomena from dielectric and electric modulus analysis. Bull Mater Sci 38:1597–1602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng S, Smith DM, Pan Q, Wang S, Li CY (2015) Anisotropic ion transport in nanostructured solid polymer electrolytes. RSC Adv 5:48793–48810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carvalho M, Guegan P, Cheradame H, Gomes AS (2000) Variation of the mesh size of PEO-based networks filled with TFSILi: from an Arrhenius to WLF type conductivity behavior. European Polym J 36:401–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dormidontova EF (2002) Role of competitive PEO-water and water-water hydrogen-bonding in aqueous solution PEO behavior. Macromolecules 35:987–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Floriano MA, Angell CA (1989) On the relaxation between Debye and nonexponential relaxation in supercooled monohydric alcohols and water. J Chem Phys 91:2537–2544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh Lokandra P, Richert R (2012) Watching hydrogen-bonded structures in an alcohol convert from rings to chains. Phys Rev Lett 109:167802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang YY, Griffin PJ, Holt A, Fan F, Sokolov AP (2014) Observation of slow Debye-like relaxation in hydrogen-bonded liquids by dynamic light scattering. J Chem Phys 140:104510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Debye, Polar Molecules, Chemical Catalog Company, New York (1929), reprinted by Dover Publishers New York, 1945

  20. Marcolongo A, Marzari N (2017) Ionic correlations and failure of Nernst-Einstein relation in solid-state electrolytes. Phy Rev Materials 1:025402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Samiullah MH, Reichert D, Zinkevich T, Kressler J (2013) NMR characterization of PEG networks synthesized by CuAAC using reactive oligomers. Macromolecules 46:6922–6930

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pulst M, Kressler J, (2014) Characterization of linear and cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide), MSc Thesis M. Pulst, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

  23. Nazmul H, Master Thesis, Martin-Luther-University, Halle/Saale, Germany, 2016

  24. Liang YH, Wang CC, Chen CY (2008) Synthesis and characterization of a new network polymer electrolyte containing polyether in the main chains and side chains. Eur Polym J 44:2376–2384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Professor J. Kressler and his students of Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, for providing impedance data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Werner Kammer.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix. Impedance spectra—phenomenological background

Appendix. Impedance spectra—phenomenological background

The summarizing view is appended for illustration of impedance spectra. In the following, we are chiefly focusing on impedance spectra of polar polymers. One observes frequently in imaginary part Z″(ω) of those spectra two characteristic frequencies, indicating extreme values of imaginary part Z″

$$ {\omega}_{\mathrm{min}}^{Z"}<\omega <{\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"} $$
(24)

The main dipolar relaxation peak appears at frequency ωZ"max. In frequency range (24), polarization develops or electric relaxation that is local and non-local motions of charged entities appears, respectively. It depends critically on crossing of Z′ and Z″ at \( {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"} \) or beyond it. Long-range electric relaxation can be observed only if

$$ {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"}={\omega}_{cross}^{Z\hbox{'}-Z"} $$
(25)

One observes only local relaxation if

$$ {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"}<{\omega}_{cross}^{Z\hbox{'}-Z"} $$
(26)

Imaginary part of permittivity ε″, closely related to conductivity σ′, varies with frequency according to power law ε" ∝ ω-n with n ≤ 1

$$ {\varepsilon}^{"}\propto {\omega}^{-n}\kern0.6em with\;n\le 1 $$
(27)

in range (24). Power law (27) characterizes polarization relaxation in low-frequency range. Exponent n = 1 gives Debye relaxation. We call relaxation Debye-like when n < 1 but close to unity.

Real part of impedance Z′ does not exhibit extreme values. It approaches Ohm’s resistance of the bulk, Rb, in the limit ω → 0. Generally, we may say Z′ reflects stored dipoles in the system whereas imaginary part focuses on mobile dipoles. In the same way, one may see components of permittivity. dc conductivity constitutes an example, σdcε″.

The ratio of the two impedance components represents the tangent-loss spectrum of dipolar medium

$$ \left(\tan \delta \right)\left(\omega \right)=\frac{Z^{\hbox{'}}\left(\omega \right)}{Z^{"}\left(\omega \right)} $$
(28)

One immediately recognizes that (tanδ)(ω) will have a maximum at frequency where Z″ displays its minimum. Thus, we observe in Debye-like relaxation (tanδ)max at

$$ {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{\tan \delta }={\omega}_{\mathrm{min}}^{Z"} $$
(29)

Characteristic frequency \( {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{\tan \delta } \) shifts to lower frequency when polarization relaxation is sufficiently far from Debye-like relaxation. Analogously to inequality (26), we have

$$ {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{\tan \delta }<{\omega}_{\mathrm{min}}^{Z"} $$
(30)

We note frequency ωmaxtan δ represents the longest relaxation time 1/ωmaxtan δ.

Electric modulus M* is defined by inverse permittivity, M* = (ε*)−1. One may formulate the imaginary part of modulus by M” = CoωZ’ (ω)with capacity Co of the empty cell. It exhibits a maximum at

$$ {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{M"}={\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"} $$
(A9)

for Debye-like relaxation. Comparison of equalities (25) and (32) shows that electric modulus reflects long-range electric relaxation. In distance to Debye-like relaxation, frequency\( {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{M"} \) shifts to higher frequency

$$ {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{M"}>{\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"} $$
(33)

One easily confirms Eq. (32) for Debye-like relaxation. It is M″max at ω = \( {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{M"} \). Moreover, components of Z* cross at \( {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"} \). Hence, it follows

$$ M{"}_{\mathrm{max}}={C}_o{\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"}Z{"}_{\mathrm{max}} $$
(34)

when Eq. (32) is obeyed. In conclusion, one may state tangent-loss spectra acquire dielectric relaxation and electric-modulus spectra do so for electric relaxation.

The sample in impedance spectroscopy has resistance Rb and capacitance Cb = εCo. Additional capacities may occur when polarization appears in the system. Polarization causes double-layer capacities in in-homogeneities regions of the system, preferably in the interfacial region electrolyte-electrode.

Structural in-homogeneities in sample generate double-layer capacity, Cdl, responsible for polarization effect. Taking this into account, besides bulk capacity Cb, leads to a slightly generalized Debye approximation with more than one relaxation time. Main relaxation frequency \( {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"} \) is seen as average over distribution of relaxation times. Accordingly, response of the dielectric sample to action of an alternating electric field is coined by relaxation time τmax and capacity ratio AC

$$ {\tau}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"}={R}_b{C}_b\kern0.48em {A}_C\equiv \frac{2{C}_b}{C_{dl}}=\frac{\lambda }{d} $$
(35)

where λ and 2d represent double-layer and sample thickness, respectively. Capacities are given by Cb = εεoA/2d and Cdl = εεoA/λ. We may say characteristic quantities (35) provide an acceptable means for elucidating impedance spectra under condition

$$ {A}_C<<1\ obeyed\ together\ with\ equations\ (29)\ and\ (32) $$
(36)

Under action of periodic electric field, controversial effects occur in the low-frequency regime (24): One observes polarization caused by boundaries or interfacial areas between different phases and electric conductance; actually fluctuation-dissipation rules flowing effects. In other words, depending on structural homogeneity of the system, short-range and long-range relaxations are observed in low-frequency range (24). For frequencies beyond \( {\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{Z"} \), relaxations are trap-controlled; only short-range relaxations appear. These effects are in our model related to capacity ratio AC and to time constant RbCb, respectively. Therefore, we may express these quantities adequately by characteristic quantities of impedance spectra. In the low-frequency range, we may unify the two components of impedance as follows

$$ \left(\frac{Z^{"}}{R_b}\right)\left(\omega \right)=\omega \tau \left(\frac{Z^{\hbox{'}}}{R_b}\right)\left(\omega \right)+\frac{A_C}{\omega \tau} $$
(37)

Accordingly, one verifies (Z″/Rb)min at \( \left({\omega}_{\mathrm{min}}^{Z"}\tau \right)=\sqrt{A_C} \) with (Z′/Rb) = 1 in the low-frequency region. It follows

$$ \left(\frac{Z^{"}}{R_b}\right)\left({\omega}_{\mathrm{min}}^{Z"}\right)=2\sqrt{A_C}=\left(\frac{Z^{"}}{Z^{\hbox{'}}}\right)\left({\omega}_{\mathrm{max}}^{\tan \delta}\right) $$
(38)

Capacity ratio AC is closely related to tangent-loss spectra

$$ {A}_C=\frac{1}{{\left(2\tan \delta \right)}_{\mathrm{max}}^2} $$
(39)

This result leads straightforwardly to Rb

$$ 2{R}_b=Z{{\prime\prime}_{min}}^{.}{\left( tan\delta \right)}_{max} $$
(40)

We emphasize again, relationships (39) and (40) are good approximations when proposition (36) is obeyed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kammer, HW. About dielectric relaxation in highly cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide). Ionics 25, 2633–2643 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2795-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-018-2795-9

Keywords

Navigation