Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Iridium oxide-based chemical sensor for in situ pH measurement of oilfield-produced water under subsurface conditions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Ionics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a pH sensor for monitoring hydrogen ion activity in situ in oilfield-produced water under subsurface conditions. An iridium oxide film was prepared, and the performance of the iridium oxide film was evaluated in produced water using a series of high salinities, temperatures, and pressures. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were employed to assess the morphology and oxidation state of the iridium oxide film. A series of open-circuit potential (OCP) measurements were performed to access the sensitivity and stability of the iridium oxide film electrode in produced water. Research results indicated that the pH sensor exhibits a very high sensitivity in the environment with varied interference ions, including Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Cl−, and SO4 2−, and the existence of sodium chloride in produced water made a slight positive shift of potential. The iridium oxide film-based pH sensor exhibited a near-Nernstian response at −57.9 mV/pH in produced water. An increase in temperature from 24 to 80 °C decreased the pH potential. Compared with the theoretical Nernst equation, the iridium oxide sensor showed fair Nernstian behavior at high temperatures. The iridium oxide pH sensor was accurately investigated under high pressure; the sensor seems independent of pressure, and the slope is the same at different potentials under a wide range of pressures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schlumberger (2008) Quantitative fluid measurements at reservoir conditions, in real time. http://www.slb.com/insitu.aspx

  2. Min SK, Samaranayake CP, Sastry SK (2011) In situ measurement of reaction volume and calculation of pH of weak acid buffer solutions under high pressure. J Phys Chem B 115(20):6564–6571. doi:10.1021/jp1110295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitamura Y, Itoh T (1987) Reaction volume of protonic ionization for buffering agents. Prediction of pressure dependence of pH and pOH. J Solut Chem 16(9):11. doi:10.1007/bf00652574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xian C, Raghuraman B, Carnegie AJ, Goiran P-O, Berrim A (2008) Downhole pH as a novel measurement tool in carbonate formation evaluation and reservoir monitoring. Petrophysics 49(2): 159-171.

  5. Steegstra P, Ahlberg E (2012) Influence of oxidation state on the pH dependence of hydrous iridium oxide films. Electrochim Acta 76:26–33. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang RH, Zhang XT, Hu SM (2008) Zr/ZrO2 Sensors for in situ measurement of pH in high-temperature and -pressure aqueous solutions. Anal Chem 80(8):2982–2987. doi:10.1021/ac070684u

  7. Kriksunov LB, Macdonald DD, Millett PJ (1994) Tungsten/tungsten oxide pH sensing electrode for high temperature aqueous environments. J Electrochem Soc 141(11):3002–3005. doi:10.1149/1.2059272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katsube T, Lauks I, Zemel JN (1981) pH-sensitive sputtered iridium oxide films. Sensors Actuators 2:399–410. doi:10.1016/0250-6874(81)80060-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lauks I, Yuen MF, Dietz T (1983) Electrically free-standing IrOitx thin film electrodes for high temprature, corrosive environment pH sensing. Sensors Actuators 4:375–379. doi:10.1016/0250-6874(83)85047-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dobson JV, Snodin PR, Thirsk HR (1976) EMF measurements of cells employing metal-metal oxide electrodes in aqueous chloride and sulphate electrolytes at temperatures between 25–250 °C. Electrochim Acta 21(7):527–533. doi:10.1016/0013-4686(76)85143-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kreider K (1991) Iridium oxide thin-film stability in high-temperature corrosive solutions. Sensors Actuators B Chem 5(1–4):165–169. doi:10.1016/0925-4005(91)80239-G

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yao S, Wang M, Madou M (2001) A pH electrode based on melt-oxidized iridium oxide. J Electrochem Soc 148(4):H29–H36. doi:10.1149/1.1353582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Glab S, Hulanicki A, Edwall G, Ingman F (1989) Metal-metal oxide and metal-oxide electrodes as pH sensor. Crit Rev Anal Chem 21(1):29–47. doi:10.1080/10408348908048815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang W-D, Cao H, Deb S, Chiao M, Chiao JC (2011) A flexible pH sensor based on the iridium oxide sensing film. Sensors Actuators A Phys 169(1):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2011.05.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Neff J, Lee K, DeBlois E (2011) Produced water: overview of composition, fates, and effects. In: Lee K, Neff J (eds) Produced water. Springer, New York, pp 3–54. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0046-2_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Teruaki Katsube IRL, van der Spiegel J, Zemel JN (1983) High temperature and high pressure pH sensors with sputtered iridium oxide films. Jpn J Appl Phys 22:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yiwen Pan WESJ (2008) Experimental and theoretical constraints on pH measurements with an iridium oxide electrode in aqueous fluids from 25 to 175 °C and 25 MPa. J Solut Chem 37:12

    Google Scholar 

  18. USGS http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/prov/prodwat/data.htm

  19. Sanjines R, Aruchamy A, Levy F (1989) Thermal stability of sputtered iridium oxide films. J Electrochem Soc 136(6):4

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chalamala BR, Yi W, Reuss RH, Aggarwal S, Gnade BE, Ramesh R, Bernhard JM, Sosa ED, Golden DE (1999) Effect of growth conditions on surface morphology and photoelectric work function characteristics of iridium oxide thin films. Appl Phys Lett 74(10):1394–1396. doi:10.1063/1.123561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Department of Energy through the National Energy Technology Laboratory under contract number DE-FE0009878. The authors appreciate the aid of Liz Bustamante for her assistance in editing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, 87801, USA

    Jianjia Yu, Ning Liu & Robert Lee

  2. Department of Chemistry, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, 87801, USA

    Munawar Khalil

Authors
  1. Jianjia Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Munawar Khalil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ning Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianjia Yu or Ning Liu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 239 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, J., Khalil, M., Liu, N. et al. Iridium oxide-based chemical sensor for in situ pH measurement of oilfield-produced water under subsurface conditions. Ionics 21, 855–861 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-014-1214-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-014-1214-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation