Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Role of CT in the diagnosis of jejunal–ileal perforations

  • Abdominal Radiology
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the computed tomography (CT) signs of free and covered small-bowel perforations and the potential of CT in recognising the aetiology.

Materials and methods

Thirty-five patients with surgically proven small-bowel perforation were retrospectively evaluated. Fundamental signs (extraluminal air, solution of continuity) and secondary signs (thickening of the mesentery, free or perilesional fluid, wall thickening) were considered.

Results

CT alterations were found in 31/35 (88.6 %) patients: extraluminal air (30/35, 85.7 %), solution of continuity (11/35, 31.4 %), intra-abdominal fluid (27/35, 77.1 %), thickening of the mesentery (20/35, 57.1 %), and wall thickening (14/35, 40 %). In 25/35 cases (71.4 %) pneumoperitoneum was detected, associated with secondary signs (23/25, 82 %), confirmed as free perforations at surgery. In 5/35 patients (14.2 %), peri-intestinal air bubbles and secondary signs were evident, while in 1/35 cases (2.8 %) only secondary signs were seen, namely covered perforations. In 4/35 patients (11.4 %) with a covered perforation, the CT scan was negative. The nature of the perforations was completely recognisable in 26/31 cases (83.9 %), partially identifiable in 4/31 (12.9 %), not evident in 1/31 (3.2 %).

Conclusion

CT investigation is essential in the recognition of a small-bowel perforation and in the definition of its nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zissin R, Osadchy A, Gayer G (2009) Abdominal CT findings in small bowel perforation. Br J Radiol 82(974):162–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahajan G, Kotru M, Sharma R et al (2011) Usefulness of histopathological examination in nontraumatic perforation of small intestine. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1837–1841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim HC, Shin HC, Park SJ et al (2004) Traumatic bowel perforation: analysis of CT findings according to the perforation site and the elapsed time since accident. Clin Imaging 28:334–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kimchi NA, Broide E, Shapiro M et al (2002) Non-traumatic perforation of the small intestine. Report of 13 cases and review of the literature. Hepatogastroenterology 49:1017–1022

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giancarlo Dal Pozzo (1999) Compendio di tomografia computerizzata e TC spirale. UTET Ed

  6. Urban BA, Fishman EK (2000) Tailored helical CT evaluation of acute abdomen. Radiographics 20:725–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furukawa A, Sakoda M, Yamasaki M et al (2005) Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause. Abdom Imaging 30:524–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saku M, Yoshimitsu K, Murakami J et al (2006) Small bowel perforation resulting from blunt abdominal trauma: interval change of radiological characteristics. Radiat Med 24:358–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh JP, Steward MJ, Booth TC et al (2010) Evolution of imaging for abdominal perforation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:182–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herlinger H, Maglinte D, Birnbaum B et al (2001) Clinical imaging of the small intestine. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 73

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stapakis JC, Thickman D (1992) Diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum: abdominal CT vs. upright chest film. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:713–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffrey RB, Federle MP, Wall S (1983) Value of computed tomography in detecting occult gastrointestinal perforation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:825–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho KC, Baker SR (1994) Extraluminal air: diagnosis and significance. Radiol Clin N Am 32:829–844

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Meo JH, Fulcher AS, Austin RF Jr (1995) Anatomic CT demonstration of the peritoneal spaces, ligaments, and mesenteries: normal and pathologic processes. Radiographics 15:755–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hainaux B, Agneessens E, Bertinotti R et al (2006) Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation. Am J Roentgenol 187:1179–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghekiere O, Lesnik A, Millet I et al (2007) Direct visualization of perforation sites in patients with a non-traumatic free pneumoperitoneum: added diagnostic value of thin transverse slices and coronal and sagittal reformations for multi-detector CT. Eur Radiol 17:2302–2309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee H, Vibhakar SD, Bellon EM (1983) Gastrointestinal perforation: early diagnosis by computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:226–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thornton E, Lala MM, Siewert B et al (2011) Patterns of fat stranding. Am J Roentgenol 197:W1–W14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr, Lane MJ et al (1996) The misty mesentery on CT: differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:61–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Okino Y, Kiyosue H, Mori H et al (2001) Root of the small bowel mesentery: correlative anatomy and CT features of pathologic conditions. Radiographics 21:1475–1490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Coakley FV, Hricak H (1999) Imaging of peritoneal and mesenteric disease: key concepts for the clinical radiologist. Clin Radiol 54:563–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Angelelli G, Macarini L (1992) TC del tratto gastoenterico. Ed. Minerva medica

  23. Brody JM, Leighton DB, Murphy BL et al (2000) CT of blunt trauma bowel and mesenteric injury: typical findings and pitfalls in diagnosis. Radiographics 20:1525–1536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gayer G, Petrovitch I, Jeffrey RB (2011) Foreign objects encountered in the abdominal cavity at CT. Radiographics 31:409–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Coulier B, Tancredi MH, Ramboux A (2004) Spiral CT and multidetector-row CT diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine caused by ingested foreign bodies. Eur Radiol 14:1918–1925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rajagopalan AE, Pickleman J (1982) Free perforation of the small intestine. Ann Surg 196:576–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghahremani GG (1993) Radiologic evaluation of suspected gastrointestinal perforations. Radiol Clin N Am 31:1219–1234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maniatis V, Chryssikopoulos H, Roussakis A et al (2000) Perforation of the alimentary tract: evaluation with computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 25:373–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Angelelli G, Moschetta M, Cosmo T et al (2012) CT diagnosis of the nature of bowel obstruction: morphological evaluation of the transition point. Radiol Med 117:749–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Angelelli G, Moschetta M, Binetti F et al (2010) Prognostic value of MDCT in malignant large-bowel obstructions. Radiol Med 115:747–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Moschetta M, Stabile Ianora AA, Pedote P et al (2009) Prognostic value of multidetector computed tomography in bowel infarction. Radiol Med 114:780–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Catalano O (1996) Computed tomography in the study of gastrointestinal perforation. Radiol Med 91:247–252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pinto A, Grassi R, Rossi G et al (1998) Computed tomography in the diagnosis of jejuno–ileal perforation. Personal experience. Radiol Med 96:602–606

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmutz GR (1996) Imagerie de l’abdomen aigu. Masson Ed

  35. Sota O, Tomohiro F, Koji H et al (2010) 64-slice multidetector computed tomography evaluation of gastrointestinal tract perforation site: detectability of direct findings in upper and lower GI tract. Eur Radiol 20:1396–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Grassi R, Romano S, Pinto A et al (2004) Gastro-duodenal perforations: conventional plain film, US and CT findings in 166 consecutive patients. Eur J Radiol 50:30–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Marirosa Cristallo Lacalamita, Marco Moschetta, Maria Elisabetta Mancini, Arnaldo Scardapane, Giuseppe Angelelli declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DIM-Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Diagnostic Imaging, Aldo Moro University of Bari Medical School, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy

    Marirosa Cristallo Lacalamita, Marco Moschetta, Maria Elisabetta Mancini, Arnaldo Scardapane & Giuseppe Angelelli

Authors
  1. Marirosa Cristallo Lacalamita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Moschetta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Elisabetta Mancini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arnaldo Scardapane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giuseppe Angelelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marirosa Cristallo Lacalamita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lacalamita, M.C., Moschetta, M., Mancini, M.E. et al. Role of CT in the diagnosis of jejunal–ileal perforations. Radiol med 119, 651–657 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0375-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0375-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation