Skip to main content
Log in

Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause

  • INVITED UPDATE
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gastrointestinal tract perforation is an emergent condition that requires prompt surgery. Diagnosis largely depends on imaging examinations, and correct diagnosis of the presence, level, and cause of perforation is essential for appropriate management and surgical planning. Plain radiography remains the first imaging study and may be followed by intraluminal contrast examination; however, the high clinical efficacy of computed tomographic examination in this field has been well recognized. The advent of spiral and multidetector-row computed tomographic scanners has enabled examination of the entire abdomen in a single breath-hold by using thin-slice sections that allow precise assessment of pathology in the alimentary tract. Extraluminal air that is too small to be detected by conventional radiography can be demonstrated by computed tomography. Indirect findings of bowel perforation such as phlegmon, abscess, peritoneal fluid, or an extraluminal foreign body can also be demonstrated. Gastrointestinal mural pathology and associated adjacent inflammation are precisely assessed with thin-section images and multiplanar reformations that aid in the assessment of the site and cause of perforation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V Maniatis H Chryssikopoulos A Roussakis et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePerforation of the alimentary tract: evaluation with computed tomography Abdom Imaging 25 373–379 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002610000022 Occurrence Handle10926189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. P Ongolo-Zogo O Borson P Garcia et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAcute gastrointestinal peptic ulcer perforation: contrast-enhanced and thin-section spiral CT findings in 10 patients Abdom Imaging 24 329–332 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002619900509 Occurrence Handle10390552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. RB Jeffrey MP Federle S Wall (1983) ArticleTitleValue of computed tomography in detecting occult gastrointestinal perforation J Comput Assist Tomogr 7 825–827 Occurrence Handle6886134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. JC Stapakis D Thickman (1992) ArticleTitleDiagnosis of pneumoperitoneum: abdominal CT vs. upright chest film J Comput Assist Tomogr 16 713–716 Occurrence Handle1522261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. CH Chen HS Huang CC Yang et al. (2001) ArticleTitleThe features of perforated peptic ulcers in conventional computed tomography Hepatogastroenterology 48 1393–1396 Occurrence Handle11677972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. H Lee SD Vibhakar EM Bellon (1983) ArticleTitleGastrointestinal perforation: early diagnosis by computed tomography J Comput Assist Tomogr 7 226–229 Occurrence Handle6833552

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. PJ Fultz J Skucas CL Weiss (1992) ArticleTitleCT in upper gastrointestinal perforation secondary to peptic ulcer disease Gastrointest Radiol 17 5–8 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01888496 Occurrence Handle1544559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. GM Glazer JN Buy AA Moss et al. (1981) ArticleTitleCT detection of duodenal perforation AJR 137 333–336 Occurrence Handle6789642

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. GA Hofer AJ Cohen (1989) ArticleTitleCT signs of duodenal perforation secondary to blunt abdominal trauma J Comput Assist Tomogr 13 430–432 Occurrence Handle2723173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. J Shilyansky RF Pearl M Kreller et al. (1997) ArticleTitleDiagnosis and management of duodenal injury in children J Pediatr Surg 32 880–886 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-3468(97)90642-4 Occurrence Handle9200092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. R Grassi A Pinto G Rossi et al. (1998) ArticleTitleConventional plain film radiology ultrasonography and CT in jejuno-ileal perforation Acta Radiol 39 52–56 Occurrence Handle9498870

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MM Horrow DS White DO, JC Horrow (2003) ArticleTitleDifferentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CT Radiology 227 46–51 Occurrence Handle12615997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. PM Rao JT Rhea RA Novelline (1997) ArticleTitleSensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations J Comput Assist Tomogr 21 686–692 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00004728-199709000-00002 Occurrence Handle9294553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. EJ Balthazar AJ Megibow SE Siegel et al. (1991) ArticleTitleAppendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CT Radiology 180 21–24 Occurrence Handle2052696

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. PM Rao JT Rhea RA Novelline (1997) ArticleTitleHelical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination Radiology 202 139–144 Occurrence Handle8988203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. R Wijetunga BT Tan JC Rouse et al. (2001) ArticleTitleDiagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis Radiology 221 7474–753

    Google Scholar 

  17. D Oliak R Sinow S French et al. (1999) ArticleTitleComputed tomography scanning for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis Am Surg 65 959–964 Occurrence Handle10515543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. M Saeki (1988) ArticleTitleComputed tomographic analysis of colonic perforation; “dirty mass” a new computed tomographic finding Emerg Radiol 5 140–145

    Google Scholar 

  19. DH Hulnick AJ Megibow EJ Balthazar et al. (1987) ArticleTitlePerforated colorectal neoplasms: correlation of clinical, contrast enema, and CT examinations Radiology 164 611–615 Occurrence Handle3615859

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. HA Shaffer (1992) ArticleTitlePerforation and obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract. Assessment by conventional radiology Radiol Clin North Am 30 405–426 Occurrence Handle1535864

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. KC Cho SR Baker KC Cho SR Baker (1994) ArticleTitleExtraluminal air. Diagnosis and significance Radiol Clin North Am 32 829–844 Occurrence Handle8084998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. RP Rice VM Thompson RK Gegaudas (1982) ArticleTitleThe diagnosis and significance of extraluminal gas in the abdomen Radiol Clin North Am 20 819–837 Occurrence Handle6758034

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. GG Ghahremani GG Ghahremani (1993) ArticleTitleRadiologic evaluation of suspected gastrointestinal perforations Radiol Clin North Am 31 1219–1234 Occurrence Handle8210347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. MJ Foley GG Ghahremani LF Rogers (1982) ArticleTitleReappraisal of contrast media used to detect upper gastrointestinal perforations. Comparison of water-soluble media with barium sulfate Radiology 144 231–237 Occurrence Handle7089273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. KC Cho SR Baker (1994) ArticleTitleExtraluminal air. Diagnosis and significance Radiol Clin North Am 32 829–844 Occurrence Handle8084998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cimmino CV, Sholes DK Jr (1952) Gas in the lessor sac in perforated peptic ulcer. AJR 68;19–21

    Google Scholar 

  27. SY Han JM Tishler (1984) ArticleTitlePerforation of the abdominal segment of the esophagus AJR 143 751–754 Occurrence Handle6332476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. ME Healy RE Mindelzun (1984) ArticleTitleLesser sac pneumoperitoneum secondary to perforation of the intraabdominal esophagus AJR 142 325–326 Occurrence Handle6607600

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. InstitutionalAuthorNameCho (2000) Manifestations of intraperitoneal air MA Meyers (Eds) Dynamic radiology of the abdomen Springer-Verlag New York 309–331

    Google Scholar 

  30. KC Cho SR Baker (1781) ArticleTitleAir in the fissure for the ligamentum teres: new sign of intraperitoneal air on plain radiographs Radiology 91 489–492

    Google Scholar 

  31. MA Meyers (2000) The extraperitoneal spaces: normal and pathologic anatomy MA Meyers (Eds) Dynamic radiology of the abdomen Springer-Verlag New York 333–492

    Google Scholar 

  32. MA Meyers F Volberg B Katzen et al. (1973) ArticleTitleHaustral anatomy and pathology: a new look. I. Roentgen identification of normal patterns and relationships Radiology 108 497–504 Occurrence Handle4723648

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. MA Meyers F Volberg B Katzen et al. (1973) ArticleTitleHaustral anatomy and pathology: a new look. II. Roentgen identification of normal patterns and relationships Radiology 108 505–512 Occurrence Handle4723649

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. JD Stahl SM Goldman SD Minkin et al. (1977) ArticleTitlePerforated duodenal ulcer and pneumomediastinum Radiology 124 23– 25 Occurrence Handle866643

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. JJ Roh JS Thompson RK Harned et al. (1983) ArticleTitleValue of pneumoperitoneum in the diagnosis of visceral perforation Am J Surg 146 830–833 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(83)90353-7 Occurrence Handle6650772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. B Felson JF Wiot (1973) ArticleTitleAnother look at pneumoperitoneum Semin Roentgenol 8 437–443 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0037-198X(73)90113-2 Occurrence Handle4751076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. RE Miller GJ Becker RD Slabaugh (1981) ArticleTitleNonsurgical pneumoperitoneum Gastrointest Radiol 6 73–74 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01890224 Occurrence Handle7262500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. V Dunn JA Nelson (1979) ArticleTitleJejunal diverticulosis and chronic pneumoperitoneum Gastrointest Radiol 4 165–168 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01887518 Occurrence Handle110640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. AJ Greenstein D Mann T Heimann et al. (1987) ArticleTitleSpontaneous free perforation and perforated abscess in 30 patients with Crohn’s disease Ann Surg 205 72–76 Occurrence Handle3541802

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. GG Ghahremani RM Gore (1989) ArticleTitleCT diagnosis of postoperative abdominal complications Radiol Clin North Am 27 787–804 Occurrence Handle2657856

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. DA Hele M Molly RH Pearl et al. (1997) ArticleTitleAppendectomy: a contemporary appraisal Ann Surg 225 252–261 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199703000-00003 Occurrence Handle9060580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. SP Bugis NP Blair ER Letwin (1992) ArticleTitleManagement of blunt and penetrating colon injuries Am J Surg 163 547–550 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(92)90408-J Occurrence Handle1575317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. MA Meyers GG Ghahremani (1975) ArticleTitleComplications of fiberoptic endoscopy. II. Colonoscopy Radiology 115 301–307 Occurrence Handle1144743

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. T Miki S Ogata M Uto et al. (2004) ArticleTitleMultidetector-row CT findings of colonic perforation: direct visualization of ruptured colonic wall Abdom Imaging 29 659–662 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00261-003-0159-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Furukawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furukawa, A., Sakoda, M., Yamasaki, M. et al. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause. Abdom Imaging 30, 524–534 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0289-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-004-0289-x

Keywords

Navigation