Skip to main content
Log in

Freezing and Frost Damage of Potato Plants: a Case Study on Growth Recovery, Yield Response, and Quality Changes

  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between the severity of natural freezing and frost damage (FFD) and the observed growth recovery and field production of Superior potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) was investigated under screen house conditions. Potato plants were damaged by accidental freezing and frost during the early phase of shoot growth, 40 days after planting in highland summer crop areas in Korea. The observations of FFD were classified visually into “severe” (>75%), “moderate” (50%), “mild” (<25%), and “no FFD”, based on the percentage of the area of the shoots which was damaged. The early vegetative growth recovery, in terms of groundcover, was reduced as the level of FFD increased. At 28 days after a freezing and frost damage (DAFF), the potato plants with mild or no symptoms had produced more groundcover than the plants with moderate or severe symptoms. At 35 DAFF, groundcover was the same across all levels of severity, at nearly 100%. Despite the slower canopy development, plants with FFD achieved a higher fresh shoot weight and total chlorophyll content, whereas physiological growth indices such as photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of leaves were not different among levels of FFD at 60 DAFF. The number of lateral stems and days to tuberization increased significantly as the level of FFD increased; however, the harvest index, the number of tubers per plant, and seed tuber production were all reduced in plants with severe FFD. In addition, the tubers from plants with severe FFD had an increased ratio of length to width and 40% more tuber eyes than tubers from undamaged plants. The elongated tubers also showed an increase in cell division, demonstrated by higher numbers of cells in the cortical zones. The aforementioned measurements were obtained from natural event and led to a deduction that Superior has a capacity to recover from FFD, unless the plants were severely damaged (>75%) early in the season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beresford BC (1967) Effect of simulated hail damage on yield and quality of potatoes. Am Potato J 44:347–354

  • Boydston RA, Seymour MD, Brown CR, Alva AK (2006) Freezing behavior of potato (Solanum tuberosum) tubers in soil. Am J Potato Res 83:305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown PH (2007) The canon of potato science: 37. Stolonization, tuber induction and tuberization. Potato Res 50:363–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SC (1973) Compounding of Luft’s epon embedding medium for use in electron microscopy with reference to anhydride: epoxide ratio adjustment. Mikroskopie 29:337–342

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang DC, Park CS, Kim SY, Kim SJ, Lee YB (2008) Physiological growth responses by nutrient interruption in aeroponically grown potatoes. Am J Potato Res 85:315–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang DC, Hur OS, Park CS, Kim SY (2011) Field performance, yield components and nitrogen utilization efficiency of potato plants grown from hydroponic small tubers. Hortic Environ Biotech 52:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorange G, Pennec ML (1989) Ultrastructural characteristics of spermatogenesis in Pecten maximus (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Invert Reprod Dev 15:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner FP, Pearce RB, Mitchell RL (1985) Physiology of crop plants. Iowa State Univ, Ames, Iowa, pp 66–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin PB (1967) The control and branch growth on potato tubers: I. Anatomy of buds in relation to dormancy and correlative inhibition. J Exp Bot 18:78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greaves JA, Wilson JM (1987) Assessment of the frost sensitivity of wild and cultivated potato species by chlorophyll fluorescence analysis. Potato Res 30:381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker WJ (1981) Compendium of potato diseases. Amer. Phytopath. Soc, St. Paul, Minnesota, pp 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignacio I, Domeno I, Muro J (2011) Effect of defoliation by simulated hail damage on yield of potato cultivars with different maturity performed in Spain. Am J Potato Res 88:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KMA (2010) http://web.kma.go.kr/eng/index.jsp

  • Li PH, Huner NAP, Toivio-Kinnucan M, Chen HH, Palta JP (1981) Potato freezing injury and survival, and their relationships to other stress. Am Potato J 58:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milthorpe FL (1963) Some aspects of plant growth. In: Ivins JD, Milthorpe FL (eds) The growth of the potato. Butterworths, London, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavek MJ, Thornton RE (2009) Planting depth influences potato plant morphology and economic value. Am J Potato Res 86:56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaisted PH (1957) Growth of the potato tuber. Plant Physiol 32:445–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raviv M, Blom TJ (2001) The effect of water availability and quality on photosynthesis and productivity of soilless-grown cut roses. Sci Hortic 88:257–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rich AE (1950) The effect of various defoliants on potato vines and tubers in Washington, 1948. Am Potato J 27:87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich AE (1983) Noninfectious diseases. Potato diseases. Academic, New York, pp 154–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross RW, Rowe PR (1965) Frost resistance among the Solanum species in the IR-1 potato collection. Am Potato J 42:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater JW (1963) Mechanisms of tuber initiation. In: Ivins JD, Milthorpe FL (eds) The growth of the potato. Butterworths, London, pp 114–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern KR (1994) Metabolism in plants. Introductory plant biology. Wm. C. Brown Communications, Iowa, pp 144–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundbom E, Strand M, Hallgren JE (1982) Temperature-induced fluorescence changes: a screening method for frost tolerance of potato (Solanum sp). Plant Physiol 70:1299–1302

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vos J, Groenwold J (1989) Characteristics of photosynthesis and conductance of potato canopies and the effects of cultivar and transient drought. Field Crop Res 20:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellik WJ, Slosser JE, Kirby RD (1981) Effects of simulated insect defoliation on potatoes. Am Potato J 58:627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wille MJ, Kleinkopf GE (1992) Effect of simulated hail damage on yield and quality of russet burbank potatoes. Am Potato J 69:705–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors of this study would like to thank the Gangwon Potato Seed Distribution Center for making available the potato fields with damage from freezing and frost. A grateful acknowledgement should also be given to Deok Hyun Cho and Hyun Jin Kim for their data collection. Financial support for this study was provided by the RDA-HARC potato research program (project no. PJ006364201010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Chil Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, D.C., Sohn, H.B., Cho, J.H. et al. Freezing and Frost Damage of Potato Plants: a Case Study on Growth Recovery, Yield Response, and Quality Changes. Potato Res. 57, 99–110 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-014-9253-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-014-9253-5

Keywords

Navigation