Abstract
Bacteria are often exposed to multiple stimuli in complex environments, and their efficient chemotactic decisions are critical to survive and grow in their native environments. Bacterial responses to the environmental stimuli depend on the ratio of their corresponding chemoreceptors. By incorporating the signaling machinery of individual cells, we analyze the collective motion of a population of Escherichia coli bacteria in response to two stimuli, mainly serine and methyl-aspartate (MeAsp), in a one-dimensional and a two-dimensional environment, which is inspired by experimental results in Y. Kalinin et al., J. Bacteriol. 192(7):1796–1800, 2010. Under suitable conditions, we show that if the ratio of the main chemoreceptors of individual cells, namely Tar/Tsr, is less than a specific threshold, the bacteria move to the gradient of serine, and if the ratio is greater than the threshold, the group of bacteria moves toward the gradient of MeAsp. Finally, we examine the theory with Monte Carlo agent-based simulations and verify that our results qualitatively agree well with the experimental results in Y. Kalinin et al. (2010).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alt W (1980) Biased random walk models for chemotaxis and related diffusion approximations. J Math Biol 9(2):147–177
Aminzare, Z, Sontag ED (2013) Remarks on a population-level model of chemotaxis: advection-diffusion approximation and simulations. arXiv preprintarXiv:1302.2605
Barkai N, Leibler S Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature, 387(6636):913–917
Berg HC, Brown DA (1972) Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239(5374):500–504
Berg HC, Tedesco PM (1975) Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 72(8):3235–3239
Berg HC, Turner L (1990) Chemotaxis of bacteria in glass capillary arrays. Escherichia coli, motility, microchannel plate, and light scattering. Biophys J 58(4):919–930
Bray D, Bourret RB (1995) Computer analysis of the binding reactions leading to a transmembrane receptor-linked multiprotein complex involved in bacterial chemotaxis. Mol Biol Cell 6(10):1367–1380
Bren A, Welch M, Blat Y, Eisenbach M (1996) Signal termination in bacterial chemotaxis: CheZ mediates dephosphorylation of free rather than switch-bound CheY. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93(19):10090–10093
Clausznitzer D, Oleksiuk O, Løvdok L, Sourjik V, Endres RG (2010) Chemotactic response and adaptation dynamics in Escherichia coli. PLoS Comput Biol 6(5):e1000784
Demir M, Douarche C, Yoney A, Libchaber A, Salman H (2011) Effects of population density and chemical environment on the behavior of Escherichia coli in shallow temperature gradients. Phys Biol 8(6):63001
Edgington MP, Tindall MJ (2018) Mathematical analysis of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis Signalling pathway. Bull Math Biol 80(4):758–787
Endres RG, Wingreen NS (2006) Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through assistance neighborhoods. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(35):13040–13044
Endres RG, Oleksiuk O, Hansen CH, Meir Y, Sourjik V, Wingreen NS (2008) Variable sizes of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor signaling teams. Mol Syst Biol 4(1):211
Erban R, Othmer HG (2004) From individual to collective behavior in bacterial chemotaxis. SIAM J Appl Math 65(2):361–391
Erban R, Othmer HG (2005) From signal transduction to spatial pattern formation in E. coli: a paradigm for multiscale modeling in biology. Multiscale Model. Simul., 3(2):362–394
Gosztolai A, Barahona M (2020) Cellular memory enhances bacterial chemotactic navigation in rugged environments. Commun Phys 3(1):1–10
Hansen CH, Sourjik V, Wingreen NS (2010) A dynamic-signaling-team model for chemotaxis receptors in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(40):17170–17175
Hu B, Tu Y (2013) Precision sensing by two opposing gradient sensors: how does Escherichia coli find its preferred pH level? Biophys J 105(1):276–285
Hu B, Tu Y (2014) Behaviors and strategies of bacterial navigation in chemical and nonchemical gradients. PLoS Comput Biol 10(6):1003672
Jiang L, Ouyang Q, Tu Y (2010) Quantitative modeling of Escherichia coli chemotactic motion in environments varying in space and time. PLoS Comput Biol 6(4):1000735
Kalinin YV, Jiang L, Tu Y, Wu M (2009) Logarithmic sensing in Escherichia coli bacterial chemotaxis. Biophys J 96(6):2439–2448
Kalinin Y, Neumann S, Sourjik V, Wu M (2010) Responses of escherichia coli bacteria to two opposing chemoattractant gradients depend on the chemoreceptor ratio. J Bacteriol 192(7):1796–1800
Keller EF, Segel LA (1971) Model for chemotaxis. J Theor Biol 30(2):225–234
Keymer JE, Endres RG, Skoge M, Meir Y, Wingreen NS (2006) Chemosensing in Escherichia coli: two regimes of two-state receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(6):1786–1791
Lai R-Z, Gosink KK, Parkinson JS (2017) Signaling consequences of structural lesions that alter the stability of chemoreceptor trimers of dimers. J Mol Biol 429(6):823–835
Lan G, Schulmeister S, Sourjik V, Tu Y (2011) Adapt locally and act globally: strategy to maintain high chemoreceptor sensitivity in complex environments. Molecular Syst Biol 7(1):475
Lazova MD, Ahmed T, Bellomo D, Stocker R, Shimizu TS (2011) Response rescaling in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(33):13870–13875
Lipkow K (2006) Changing cellular location of CheZ predicted by molecular simulations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2(4):39
Lipkow K, Andrews SS, Bray D (2005) Simulated diffusion of phosphorylated CheY through the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 187(1):45–53
Long Z, Quaife B, Salman H, Oltvai ZN (2017) Cell-cell communication enhances bacterial chemotaxis toward external attractants. Sci Rep 7(1):1–12
Macnab RM, Koshland DE (1972) The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 69(9):2509–2512
Mello BA, Tu Y (2005) An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes: under-standing bacterial chemotaxis responses to multiple stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(48):17354–17359
Mello BA, Tu Y (2007) Effects of adaptation in maintaining high sensitivity over a wide range of backgrounds for Escherichia coli chemotaxis. Biophys J 92(7):2329–2337
Menolascina F, Rusconi R, Fernandez VI, Smriga S, Aminzare Z, Sontag ED, Stocker R (2017) Logarithmic sensing in Bacillus subtilis aerotaxis. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 3:16036
Monod J, Wyman J, Changeux J-P (1965) On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J Mol Biol 12(1):88–118
Neumann S, Hansen CH, Wingreen NS, Sourjik V (2010) Differences in signalling by directly and indirectly binding ligands in bacterial chemotaxis. The EMBO J 29(20):3484–3495
Othmer HG, Stevens A (1997) Aggregation, blowup and collapse: the ABC s of generalized taxis. SIAM J Appl Math 57(4):1044–1081
Othmer HG, Dunbar SR, Alt W (1988) Models of dispersal in biological systems. J Math Biol 26:263–298
Painter KJ, Maini PK, Othmer HG (2000) Development and applications of a model for cellular response to multiple chemotactic cues. J Math Biol 41(4):285–314
Park J, Aminzare Z (2020) A Mathematical Description of Bacterial Chemotaxis in Response to Two Stimuli. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.00688
Rousset M, Samaey G (2013) Individual-based models for bacterial chemotaxis in the diffusion asymptotics. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23(11):2005–2037
Salman H, Libchaber A (2007) A concentration-dependent switch in the bacterial response to temperature. Nat Cell Biol 9(9):1098
Shimizu TS, Delalez N, Pichler K, Berg HC (2006) Monitoring bacterial chemo-taxis by using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer: absence of feedback from the flagellar motors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(7):2093–2097
Shoval O, Goentoro L, Hart Y, Mayo A, Sontag E, Alon U (2010) Fold-change detection and scalar symmetry of sensory input fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(36):15995–16000
Shoval O, Alon U, Sontag E (2011) Symmetry invariance for adapting biological systems. SIAM J Appl Math 10(3):857–886
Simms SA, Stock AM, Stock JB (1987) Purification and characterization of the s-adenosylmethionine: glutamyl methyltransferase that modifies membrane chemoreceptor proteins in bacteria. J Biol Chem 262(18):8537–8543
Sourjik V, Berg HC (2002) Receptor sensitivity in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(1):123–127
Spiro, P. A., Parkinson, J. S., Othmer, H. G.: A model of excitation and adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 94(14):7263–7268
Springer WR, Koshland DE (1977) Identification of a protein methyltransferase as the cheR gene product in the bacterial sensing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 74(2):533–537
Stock JB, Koshland DE (1978) A protein methylesterase involved in bacterial sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 75(8):3659–3663
Stroock DW (1974) Some stochastic processes which arise from a model of the motion of a bacterium. Z Wahrscheinlichkeitstheor verw Geb 28(4):305–315
Terwilliger TC, Wang JY, Koshland DE (1986) Kinetics of receptor modification. The multiply methylated aspartate receptors involved in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem 261(23):10814–10820
Tindall MJ, Maini PK, Porter SL, Armitage JP (2008) Overview of mathematical approaches used to model bacterial chemotaxis II: bacterial populations. Bull Math Biol 70(6):1570
Tu Y, Shimizu TS, Berg HC (2008) Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(39):14855–14860
Vladimirov N, Sourjik V (2009) Chemotaxis: how bacteria use memory. Biol Chem 390(11):1097–1104
Vladimirov N, Løvdok L, Lebiedz D, Sourjik V (2008) Dependence of bacterial chemotaxis on gradient shape and adaptation rate. PLoS Comput. Biol 4(12):e1000242
Wadhams GH, Armitage JP (2004) Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5(12):1024–1037
Welch M, Oosawa K, Aizawa S-L, Eisenbach M (1993) Phosphorylation-dependent binding of a signal molecule to the flagellar switch of bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90(19):8787–8791
Xin X, Othmer HG (2012) A trimer of dimer based model for the chemotactic signal transduction network in bacterial chemotaxis. Bull Math Biol 74(10):2339–2382
Xue C (2015) Macroscopic equations for bacterial chemotaxis: integration of detailed biochemistry of cell signaling. J Math Biol 70(1):1–44
Xue C, Othmer HG (2009) Multiscale models of taxis-driven patterning in bacterial populations. SIAM J Appl Math 70(1):133–167
Xue C, Yang X (2016) Moment-flux models for bacterial chemotaxis in large signal gradients. J Math Biol 73(4):977–1000
Yang Y, Sourjik V (2012) Opposite responses by different chemoreceptors set a tunable preference point in Escherichia coli pH taxis. Molecular Microbiol 86(6):1482–1489
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor Eduardo Sontag for sharing the Matlab codes for one-dimensional space (used in Aminzare and Sontag (2013)) and Professor Hans Othmer for helpful discussions. This work is partially supported by the University of Iowa Old Gold Fellowship and Simons Foundation (712522) to ZA. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous referee who provided valuable suggestions and comments to improve this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
A brief description of Monte Carlo simulation: In a one-dimensional (respectively, two-dimensional) channel, we locate an ensemble of 100,000 agents in the center of the channel \(x=200\) (respectively, \((x,y) = (200, 800)\)) at time \(t=0\). At each time step, the individuals choose a direction +1 or -1 (respectively, \((\cos (\theta ), \sin (\theta ))\), \(\theta \in [0, 2\pi )\)) at random, and move in that direction with a constant speed \(\nu >0\). At each time step, the internal dynamics of each individual are computed by Euler method. At the end of each time step, we choose a number between 0 and 1 randomly and compare the number with the probability of change from run to tumble in interval of length dt, namely \(\lambda (a) dt\). If the turn occurs, the cell moves in the opposite direction with a probability of 0.5 (respectively, rotates by \(\theta \in [0, 2\pi )\), where \(\theta \) is chosen at random). If a cell is located outside the spatial domain, we relocate the cell by imposing reflecting boundary conditions.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, J., Aminzare, Z. A Mathematical Description of Bacterial Chemotaxis in Response to Two Stimuli. Bull Math Biol 84, 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00965-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-021-00965-6