Skip to main content
Log in

Advances in the study of the systematics of Actinidia Lindley

  • Review
  • Published:
Frontiers of Biology in China

Abstract

Actinidia (Actinidiaceae) is of economic importance for its edible fruits. Traditional taxonomy divided the genus into four sections, Leiocarpae Dunn, Maculatae Dunn, Strigosae Li, and Stellatae Li. However, phylogenetic studies based on morphology and molecular markers have posed challenges to the four-section scheme. It appears that the natural classification of the genus points to the existence of two groups, one comprising Leiocarpae, and the other Maculatae, Strigosae, and Stellatae. Single- or low-copy genes would probably be useful in untangling the perplexity and the reticulate evolution of the genus. However, any phylogenetic studies must be firmly based on sound taxonomy and identification. Population sampling throughout the distribution range of the taxa should be carried out in order to study the variation pattern of the morphology and, ultimately, to clarify the confusion existing in some taxa. A combination of morphometrics and molecular data is highly desirable for resolving the uncertainty in Actinidia taxonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APG (The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) (1998). An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 85: 531–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APG (The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group) (2003). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 141: 399–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chat J, Jáuregui B, Petit R J, Nadot S (2004). Reticulate evolution in kiwifruit (Actinidia, Actinidiaceae) identified by comparing their maternal and paternal phylogenies. American Journal of Botany, 91: 736–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cipriani G, Testolin R, Gardner R (1998). Restriction-site variation of PCR-amplified chloroplast DNA regions and its implication for the evolution and taxonomy of Actinidia. Theoretical and Apllied Genetics, 96: 389–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist A (1981). An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. (Reprinted 1993). New York: Columbia University Press, 1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui Z X, Huang H W, Xiao X G (2002). Actinidia in China. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis P H, Heywood V H (1963). Principles of angiosperm taxonomy. Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd Ltd, 78–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H (2005). Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nature Review Genetics, 6: 361–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dressler S, Bayer C (2004). Actinidiaceae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. Families and Genera of Vascular Plants 6. Berlin: Springer, 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn S T (1911). A revision of the genus Actinidia, Lindl. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Botany, 39: 394–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engler A, Diels L (1936). Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 11th ed. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson A R (1990). Botanical nomenclature: Actinidia chinensis, Actinidia deliciosa, and Actinidia setosa. In: Warrington I J, Weston G C, eds. Kiwifruit: science and management. Auckland: Ray Richards Publ. and New Zealand Soc. Hort. Sci., 36–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson A R, Ferguson L R (2003). Are kiwifruit really good for you. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 610: 131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson A R, Huang H W (2007). Genetic resources of kiwifruit: domestication and breeding. Horticultural Reviews, 33: 1–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson D, Sang T (2001). Speciation through homoploid hybridization between allotetraploids in peonies (Paeonia). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98: 3915–3919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilg E (1893). Dilleniaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Teil 3, Abt. 6, Lief 80. Lepzig: Verlag Wilhelm Engelmann, 100–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilg E, Werdermann E (1925). Actinidiaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien Vol. 21. Lepzig: Verlag Wilhelm Engelman, 36–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui Y L (1981). A comparative morphological observations of Actinidia chinensis Planch. var. chinensis and A. chinensis Planch. var. hispida. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 19: 304–307 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • He Z C, Li J Q, Cai Q, Wang Q (2005). The cytology of Actinidia, Saurauia and Clematoclethra (Actinidiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 147: 369–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Z C, Zhang X Y, Zhong Y, Ye L (2000)a. Phylogenetic relationships of Actinidia and related genera based on micromorphological characters of foliar trichomes. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 47: 627–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Z C, Zhong Y, Liu H T, Tang X H, Ye L, Huang D S, Xu L M (2000)b. Quantitative taxonomic analyses of Actinidia (Actinidiaceae) in China based on micromorphological characters of foliar trichomes. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 38: 121–136 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch A M, Longeon A, Guyot M (2002). Fraxin and esculin: two coumarins specific to Actinidia chinensis and A. deliciosa (kiwifruit). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 30: 55–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Li J, Lang P, Wang S (1999). Systematic relationships in Actinidia as revealed by cluster analysis of digitized morphological descriptors. Acta Horticulturae, 498: 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang H W, Li Z Z, Li J Q, Kubisiak T L, Layne D R (2002). Phylogenetic relationships in Actinidia as revealed by RAPD analysis. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science, 127: 759–766

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang H W, Wang S M, Jiang Z W, Zhang Z H, Gong J J (2003). Exploration of Actinidia genetic resources and development of kiwifruit industry in China. In: Huang H W, ed. Advances in Actinidia research (II), 7–21

  • Jia B, Zhu L W, Yu X, Lu L J, Wang Y F (2005). RAPD analysis on germplasm resources in genus Actinidia. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 32: 381–384 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z W, Wang S M, Zhang Z H, Huang H W (2004). Pollen morphology of Actinidia and its systematic significance. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 42: 245–260 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman W J, Zevenbergen M J, Van Den Berg R G (2001). Species relationships in Lactuca s. l. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints. American Journal of Botany, 88: 1881–1887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lars H, Pia E (2008). Relationships in Scorpidium (Calliergonaceae, Bryophyta), especially between S. cossonii and S. scorpioides. Taxon, 57: 121–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J Y, Mummenhoff K, Bowman J L (2002). Allopolyploidization and evolution of species with reduced floral structures in Lepidium L. (Brassicaceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99: 16835–16840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H L (1952). A taxonomic review of the genus Actinidia. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University, 33: 1–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H L (1976). Actinidiaceae. In: Flora of Taiwan Volume 2. Taipei: Epoch Publishing Co., Ltd., 585–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J Q, Cai Q, Huang H W (2000). On the phylogeny of the genus Actinidia Lindley. In: Huang H W, ed. Advances in Actinidia research. Beijing: Science Press, 80–86 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J Q, Huang H W, Sang T (2002). Molecular phylogeny and infrageneric classification of Actinidia (Actinidiaceae). Systematic Botany, 27: 408–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J Q, Li X W, Soejarto D D (2007)a. Actinidiaceae. In: Wu C Y, Raven P, eds. Flora of China Volume (12). Beijing: Science Press and St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 334–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X W, Li J Q, Soejarto D D (2007)b. New synonyms in Actinidiaceae from China. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 45(5): 633–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z Z, Gong J J, Wang Y, Jiang Z W, Huang H W (2005). Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in Actinidia as revealed by AFLP analysis. In: Huang H W, ed. Advances in Actinidia research (III). Beijing: Science Press, 172–196 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z Z, Li L L, Huang H W, Jiang Z W, Li J Q, Tomas L K (2003). Genetic diversity and specific relationships in the genus Actinidia based on RAPDs and PCR-RFLPs of mt DNA. In: Huang H W, ed. Advances in Actinidia research (II). Beijing: Science Press, 245–261 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang C F (1975). Classification of Actinidia chinensis Planch. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 13: 32–35 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang C F (1984). Actinidia. In: Feng K M, ed. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, 49(2). Beijing: Science Press, 196–268, 309-324 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang C F, Ferguson A R (1984). Emendation of the latin name of Actinidia chinensis Pl. var. hispida C. F. Liang. Guihaia, 4(3): 181–182 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lihova J, Marhold K, Tribsch A, Stuessy T F (2004). Morphometric and AFLP Re-evaluation of Tetraploid Cardamine amara (Brassicaceae) in the Mediterranean. Systematic Botany, 29: 134–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley J (1836). A natural system of botany. 2nd ed. London: Longman, 439

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchior H (1964). Actindiaceae. In: Engler A, ed. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. 12 (Band II). Berlin: Gebrüder Bortraeger, 160

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen V, Chase M W, Hoot S B, Morton C M, Soltis D E, Bayer C, Fay M F, Bruijn A Y, Sullivan S, Qiu Y L (2000). Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Systematic Biology, 49(2): 306–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah A, Li D Z, MÖller M, Gao L M, Hollingsworth M L, Gibby M (2008). Delimitation of Taxus fuana Nan Li & R. R. Mill (Taxaceae) based on morphological and molecular data. Taxon, 57: 211–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Soejarto D D (1980). Revision of South American Saurauia (Actinidiaceae). Fieldiana Botany, New Series, 2: 1–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Soejarto D D (2004). Actinidiaceae. In: Smith N, Mori S A, Henderson A, Stevenson D W, Heald S V, eds. Flowering Plants of the Neotropics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner D M, Fajardo D, Bryan G J (2007). Species limits of Solanum berthaultii Hawkes and S. tarijense Hawkes and the implications for species boundaries in Solanum sect. Petota. Taxon, 56: 987–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan A L (1969). Flowering plants: origin and dispersal. Edinburgh: Oliver & Body

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan A L (1997). Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Testolin R, Cipriani G, Ferguson A R, Gardner R C (1997). Molecular approaches to systematics of Actinidia. Acta Horticulturae, 444: 97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Testolin R, Ferguson A R (1997). Isozyme polymorphism in the genus Actinidia and the origin of the kiwifruit genome. Systematic Botany, 22: 685–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne R F (1983). Proposed new realignements in the angiosperms. Nordic Journal of Botany, 3: 85–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tieghem P (1899). Sur les genres Actinidia et Saurauia consideres comme types d’une famille nouvelle, les Actinidiacees. Annales des Sciences Naturelles: Botanique et Biologie Vegetale, Series 8, 10: 137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Webby R F, Wilson R D, Ferguson A R (1994). Leaf flavonoids of Actinidia. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 22: 277–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodland D W (2000). Contemporary Plant Systematics. 3rd ed. Berrien Springs, MI, USA: Andrews University Press, 569

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu C Y (1977). Actinidia. Flora Yunnanica Volume 1. Beijing: Science Press, 57–74(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z Y, Lu A M, Tang Y C, Chen Z D, Li D Z (2003). The families and genera of angiosperms in China-A comprehensive analysis. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Z T(1991). Studies on the phylogenetic relationship between Actinidia chinensis and A.deliciosa using cladistic analysis. Guihaia, 11(1): 36–39 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z Y (1987). A study on the pollen morphology of Actinidiaceae and its systematic position. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 25: 9–23 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Zhou Z Q, Lin Q B, Pan K Y, Li M Y (2008). Phylogenetic analysis of Paeonia sect. Moutan (Paeoniaceae) based on multiple DNA fragments and morphological data. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 46(4): 563–572

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianqiang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, X., Li, J. & Soejarto, D.D. Advances in the study of the systematics of Actinidia Lindley. Front. Biol. China 4, 55–61 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-008-0110-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-008-0110-2

Keywords

Navigation