Skip to main content
Log in

Undrained monotonic shear behavior of sand mixed with a small amount of fines content

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There exists no clear consensus about the effect of fines on the undrained monotonic shear behavior of mixed soil. The contribution of fines in the force transfer mechanism differs compared to sand. There have been conflicting conclusions regarding the role of fines in the undrained shear strength of mixed soil. Some preceding studies completely ignored the role of fines regarding fines as void, whereas some studies applied a factor to consider the role of fines. Therefore, a series of undrained monotonic triaxial tests have been performed on sand containing a small amount of fines content (fc = 0–20%) to scrutinize the effect of fines on the shear behavior of mixed soil. The test results show that the steady/critical-state lines (SSL/CSL) for sand move downwards with increased fines content in terms of global void ratio, e. But, as the void ratio is expressed in terms of equivalent intergranular void ratio \(\left( {e_{c} } \right)_{{{\text{eq}}}}\), all the SSL/CSL gets normalized. The contribution factor, b, is computed as 0.21–0.28 for plastic and non-plastic fines, respectively, via the back-analysis method. This suggests that the fines contribute differently to the force transfer mechanism of the mixed soil. Also, fine particles in sand affect the critical internal angle, M, differently. The result reveals that the critical internal angle, M, decreases for plastic fines and increases for non-plastic fines. Finally, triaxial test data from several studies have been combined with the data from this study to propose a simplified method to compute the contribution factor, b. The proposed method is based on the void size distribution of host sand and fine particle, termed grain size ratio, \(\chi\). The grain size ratio is a ratio of \(D_{{10, {\text{host}} {\text{sand}}}}\) to \(D_{{50,{\text{ fines}}}}\). Finally, an empirical equation, \(b = 0.8883 - 0.207\ln \left( \chi \right)\), has been proposed to compute the b value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aberg B (1992) Void ratio of noncohesive soils and similar materials. J Geotech Eng 118(9):1315–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amini F, Qi GZ (2000) Liquefaction testing of stratified silty sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(3):208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ASTM D (2011) Standard test method for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Belkhatir M, Missoum H, Arab A, Della N, Schanz T (2011) Undrained shear strength of sand-silt mixture: effect of intergranular void ratio and other parameters. KSCE J Civ Eng 15(8):1335–1342

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Benahmed N, Nguyen TK, Hicher PY, Nicolas M (2015) An experimental investigation into the effects of low plastic fines content on the behaviour of sand/silt mixtures. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 19(1):109–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bobei DC, Lo SR (2005) Reverse behaviour and critical-state of sand with small amount of fines. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering: geotechnology in harmony with the global environment, vol 2. AA Balkema Publishers, pp 475–478

  7. Bobei DC, Lo SR, Wanatowski D, Gnanendran CT, Rahman MM (2009) Modified state parameter for characterizing static liquefaction of sand with fines. Can Geotech J 46(3):281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan CK (1985) Instruction manual, CKC E/P cyclic loading triaxial system user’s manual. Soil Engineering Equipment Company, San Francisco

  9. Chang CS, Deng Y (2019) Revisiting the concept of inter-granular void ratio in view of particle packing theory. Géotech Lett 9(2):121–129

  10. Georgiannou VN, Burland JB, Hight DW (1990) The undrained behaviour of clayey sands in triaxial compression and extension. Geotechnique 40(3):431–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goudarzy M, Rahman MM, König D, Schanz T (2016) Influence of non-plastic fines content on maximum shear modulus of granular materials. Soils Found 56(6):973–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jefferies M, Been K (2006) Soil liquefaction: a critical-state approach. Taylor

  13. Karim ME, Alam MJ (2016) Undrained monotonic and cyclic response of sand-silt mixtures. Int J Geotech Eng 10(3):223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kenney TC (1977) “Residual strength of mineral mixture. In: Proceedings 9th international conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 155–160

  15. Kim U, Ahn T (2011) Undrained shear behavior of sandy soil mixtures. J Korean Geoenviron Soc 12(8):13–24

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim U (2010) Evaluation of monotonic and cyclic shear strength of mixture with various sand and fines and application to design parameters. Yamaguchi University

  17. Kim U, Masayuki H, Chikashi K, Orense RP (2006) Effect of fines content on the monotonic shear behavior of sand-clay mixtures. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on geomechanics and geotechnics of particulate media - geomechanics and geotechnics of particulate media, pp 133–38

  18. Kim U, Kim D, Li Z (2016) Influence of fines content on the undrained cyclic shear strength of sand-clay mixtures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 83:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ladd RS (1978) Preparing test specimens using undercompaction. Geotech Test J 1(1):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lade PV, Yamamuro JA (1997) Effects of nonplastic fines on static liquefaction of sands. Can Geotech J 34(6):918–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitchell JK (1976) Fundamentals of soil behavior, 3rd edn. Wiley

  22. Mohammadi A, Qadimi A (2015) A simple critical-state approach to predicting the cyclic and monotonic response of sands with different fines contents using the equivalent intergranular void ratio. Acta Geotech 10(5):587–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0318-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Murthy TG, Loukidis D, Carraro JAH, Prezzi M, Salagado R (2008) Undrained monotonic response of clean and silty sands. Geotechnique 58(6):536–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Naeini SA, Baziar MH (2004) Effect of fines content on steady-state strength of mixed and layered samples of a sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(3):181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ni Q, Tan TS, Dasari GR, Hight DW (2004) Contribution of fines to the compressive strength of mixed soils. Géotechnique 54(9):561–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pitman TD, Robertson PK, Sego DC (1994) Influence of fines on the collapse of loose sands. Can Geotech J 31(5):728–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Porcino DD, Diano V, Triantafyllidis T, Wichtmann T (2020) Predicting undrained static response of sand with non-plastic fines in terms of equivalent granular state parameter. Acta Geotech 15(4):867–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Poulos SJ (1981) The steady-state of deformation. J Geotech Eng Div 107(5):553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rahman MM, Lo SR (2007) On intergranular void ratio of loose sand with small amount of fines. In: 16th South East Asian geotechnical conference (2007 SEAG), pp 255–60

  30. Rahman MM, Lo SR (2008) The prediction of equivalent granular steady-state line of loose sand with fines. Geomech Geoeng 3(3):179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rahman MM, Baki MAL, Lo SR (2014) Prediction of undrained monotonic and cyclic liquefaction behavior of sand with fines based on the equivalent granular state parameter. Int J Geomech 14(2):254–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rahman MM, Lo SR, Gnanendran CT (2008) On equivalent granular void ratio and steady-state behaviour of loose sand with fines. Can Geotech J 45(10):1439–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rahman MM, Lo SR, Baki MAL (2011) Equivalent granular state parameter and undrained behaviour of sand-fines mixtures. Acta Geotech 6(4):183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rees SD (2010) Effects of fines on the undrained behaviour of christchurch sandy soils. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/3940

  35. Seed, Raymond B. and Harder Jr, Leslie F (1990) SPT-based analysis of cyclic pore pressure generation and undrained residual strength. In: H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symposium, pp 351–76

  36. Skempton AW (1954) The pore-pressure coefficients a and b. Geotechnique 4(4):143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Society Japanese Geotechnical (1996) Geotechnical aspects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken–Nambu Earthquake

  38. Stamatopoulos CA (2010) An experimental study of the liquefaction strength of silty sands in terms of the state parameter. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(8):662–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Thevanayagam S, Mohan S (2000) Intergranular state variables and stress-strain behaviour of silty sands. Geotechnique 50(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thevanayagam S, Ravishankar K, Mohan S (1997) Effects of fines on monotonic undrained shear strength of sandy soils. Geotech Test J 20(4):394–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thevanayagam S, Shenthan T, Mohan S, Liang J (2002) Undrained fragility of clean sands, silty sands, and sandy silts. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(10):849–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang Z-L, Dafalias YF, Li X-S, Makdisi FI (2002) State pressure index for modeling sand behavior. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(6):511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang J, Wei LM (2012) Collapse of loose sand with the addition of fines: the role of particle shape. Geotechnique 62(12):1111–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang S, Lacasse S, Sandven R (2006) Determination of the transitional fines content of mixtures of sand and non-plastic fines. Geotech Test J 29(2):102–107

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zlatović S and Ishihara K (1995) On the influence of nonplastic fines on residual strength. In: First international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, pp 239–244

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Korea institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry(IPET) through Agricultural Foundation and Disaster Response Technology Development Program, funded by ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MAFRA)(321067–3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongseong Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tamang, B., Kim, U., Jin, J. et al. Undrained monotonic shear behavior of sand mixed with a small amount of fines content. Acta Geotech. 18, 2915–2927 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01776-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01776-2

Keywords

Navigation