Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of 3D size and shape descriptors of irregular granular particles from projected 2D images

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Macroscopic mechanical properties of granular materials are closely related to particle morphology. For practical reasons, the morphological features are commonly examined from projected two-dimensional (2D) images of the three-dimensional (3D) particles. This brings forward the need for quantifying the correlations between the 2D and 3D particle descriptors. This paper addresses these correlations for irregular granular particles. Three-dimensional images of sand particles were acquired through microfocus X-ray computed tomography, based on which 3D surfaces of the particles were reconstructed using spherical harmonic analyses. The 3D particle size and shape descriptors were subsequently evaluated. All-around projection and random projection of the particles onto 2D planes were undertaken numerically to obtain the projected 2D images and thus the corresponding 2D size and shape descriptors. The results indicate that there are close correlations between 3D and 2D size descriptors averaged from the all-around projections. 2D and 3D shape descriptors can be approximately fitted with a linear relationship. The mean value of 2D descriptors of the tested sands obtained from a series of independent random-projection tests is essentially identical to that from the all-around projections; except that the data from the random-projection tests show a larger scatter. In light of the relationships among the descriptors, a novel and promising approach to predict the cumulative distribution of 3D descriptors from that of 2D descriptors evaluated from a random-projection test is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alshibli KA, Druckrey AM, Al-Raoush RI, Weiskittel T, Lavrik NV (2015) Quantifying morphology of sands using 3D imaging. J Mater Civil Eng 27(10):04014275-1–04014275-10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altuhafi F, Coop M (2011) Changes to particle characteristics associated with the compression of sands. Géotechnique 61(6):459–471. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altuhafi F, O’Sullivan C, Cavarretta I (2013) Analysis of an image-based method to quantify the size and shape of sand particles. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(8):1290–1307

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett PJ (1980) The shape of rock particles, a critical review. Sedimentology 27(3):291–303

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blair SC, Berge PA, Berryman JG (1996) Using two-point correlation functions to characterize microgeometry and estimate permeabilities of sandstones and porous glass. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 101(B9):20359–20375

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bowman ET, Soga K, Drummond W (2001) Particle shape characterisation using Fourier descriptor analysis. Géotechnique 51(6):545–554. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2001.51.6.545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brechbühler C, Gerig G, Kübler O (1995) Parametrization of closed surfaces for 3-D shape description. Comput Vis Image Underst 61(2):154–170

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown DJ, Vickers GT (1998) The use of projected area distribution functions in particle shape measurement. Powder Technol 98:250–257

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cavarretta I, O’Sullivan C, Coop MR (2009) Applying 2D shape analysis techniques to granular materials with 3D particle geometries. In: 6th international conference on the micromechanics of granular media, 13–17 July 2009, Golden, CO

  10. Cepuritis R, Garboczi EJ, Jacobsen S, Snyder KA (2017) Comparison of 2-D and 3-D shape analysis of concrete aggregate fines from VSI crushing. Powder Technol 309:110–125

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cepuritis R, Garboczi EJ, Jacobsen S (2017) Three-dimensional shape analysis of concrete aggregate fines produced by VSI crushing. Powder Technol 308:410–421

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cho GC, Dodds J, Santamarina J (2006) Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: natural and crushed sands. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 132(5):591–602

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clark MW (1981) Quantitative shape analysis: a review. Math Geol 13(4):303–320

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fonseca J, O’Sullivan C, Coop MR, Lee PD (2012) Noninvasive characterization of particle morphology of natural sands. Soils Found 52(4):712–722

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garboczi EJ (2002) Three-dimensional mathematical analysis of particle shape using xray tomography and spherical harmonics: application to aggregates used in concrete. Cem Concr Res 32:1621–1638

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garboczi EJ, Bullard JW (2017) 3D analytical mathematical models of random star-shape particles via a combination of X-ray computed microtomography and spherical harmonic analysis. Adv Powder Technol 28:325–339

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2010) Digital image processing. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grigoriu M, Garboczi EJ, Kafali C (2006) Spherical harmonic-based random fields for aggregates used in concrete. Powder Technol 166:123–138

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guida G, Viggiani GMB, Casini F (2019) Multi-scale morphological descriptors from the fractal analysis of particle contour. Acta Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00772-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo N, Zhao J (2013) The signature of shear-induced anisotropy in granular media. Comput Geotech 47:1–15

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Hobson EW (1931) The theory of spherical and ellipsoidal harmonics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Koay CG (2011) Analytically exact spiral scheme for generating uniformly distributed points on the unit sphere. J Comput Sci 2:88–91

    Google Scholar 

  23. Köhler U, List J, Witt W (2007) Comparison of laser diffraction and image analysis under identical dispersing conditions. PARTEC, Nuremberg

    Google Scholar 

  24. Krumbein WH, Sloss LL (1963) Stratigraphy and sedimentation. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp 106–113

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kutay ME, Ozturk HI, Abbas AR, Hu C (2011) Comparison of 2D and 3D image-based aggregate morphological indices. Int J Pavement Eng 12(4):421–431

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lai Z, Chen Q (2019) Reconstructing granular particles from X-ray computed tomography using the TWS machine learning tool and the level set method. Acta Geotech 14:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu X, Garboczi EJ, Grigoriu M, Lu Y, Erdoğan Sinan T (2011) Spherical harmonic-based random fields based on real particle 3D data: improved numerical algorithm and quantitative comparison to real particles. Powder Technol 207:78–86

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mahmoud E, Gates L, Masad E, Erdoğan S, Garboczi E (2010) Comprehensive evaluation of AIMS texture, angularity, and dimension measurements. J Mater Civ Eng 22(4):369–379

    Google Scholar 

  29. Masad E, Olcott D, White T, Tashman L (2001) Correlation of fine aggregate imaging shape indices with asphalt mixture performance. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1757:148–156

    Google Scholar 

  30. Masad E, Saadeh S, Al-Rousan T, Garboczi E, Little D (2005) Computations of particle surface characteristics using optical and X-ray CT images. Comput Mater Sci 34:406–424

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nakata Y, Hyodo M, Murata H, Yasufuku N (1998) Flow deformation of sands subjected to principal stress rotation. Soils Found 38(2):115–128

    Google Scholar 

  32. Powers MC (1953) A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles. J Sediment Petrol 23(2):117–119

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rasband WS (2016) ImageJ. U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/. Accessed 10 Mar 2017

  34. Shen L, Makedon FS (2006) Spherical mapping for processing of 3-D closed surfaces. Image Vis Comput 24(7):743–761

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stock SR (2008) Recent advances in X-ray microtomography applied to materials. Int Mater Rev 53(3):129–181

    Google Scholar 

  36. Su D, Yan WM (2018) 3D characterization of general-shape sand particles using microfocus X-ray computed tomography and spherical harmonic functions, and particle regeneration using multivariate random vector. Powder Technol 323(1):8–23

    Google Scholar 

  37. Su D, Yan WM (2018) Quantification of angularity of general-shape particles by using Fourier series and a gradient-based approach. Constr Build Mater 161(2018):547–554

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sympatec, Germany (2008). Windox 5.4.1.0—operating instructions, pp 475–476

  39. Thomas MC, Wiltshire RJ, Williams AT (1995) The use of Fourier descriptors in the classification of particle shape. Sedimentology 42:635–645

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tutumluer E, Pan T (2008) Aggregate morphology affecting strength and permanent deformation behavior of unbound aggregate materials. J Mater Civ Eng 20(9):617–627

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vickers GT (1996) The projected areas of ellipsoids and cylinders. Powder Technol 86:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wadell H (1932) Volume, shape, and roundness of rock particles. J Geol 40:443–451

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wnek M, Tutumluer E, Moaveni M, Gehringer E (2013) Investigation of aggregate properties influencing railroad ballast performance. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2374:180–189

    Google Scholar 

  44. Xie YH, Yang ZX, Barreto D, Jiang MD (2017) The influence of particle geometry and the intermediate stress ratio on the shear behavior of granular materials. Granular Matter 19(2):34–48

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yan WM (2009) Fabric evolution in numerical direct shear test. Comput Geotech 36(4):597–603

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yan WM, Dong JJ (2011) Effect of particle grading on the response of an idealized granular assemblage. Int J Geomech 11(4):276–285

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yan WM, Su D (2018) Inferring 3D particle size and shape characteristics from projected 2D images: lessons learned from ellipsoids. Comput Geotech 104(12):281–287

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yan WM, Su D (2018) Novel approach to evaluate the elongation index and flatness index of three-dimensional particles from projected two-dimensional images. Géotechn Lett 8(4):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yan WM, Zhang L (2013) Fabric and the critical state of idealized granular assemblages subject to biaxial shear. Comput Geotech 49:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao B, Wang J (2016) 3D quantitative shape analysis on form, roundness, and compactness with μCT. Powder Technol 291:262–275

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou B, Wang J (2017) Generation of a realistic 3D sand assembly using X-ray microcomputed tomography and spherical harmonic-based principal component analysis. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 41:93–109

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhou B, Wang J, Zhao B (2015) Micromorphology characterization and reconstruction of sand particles using micro X-ray tomography and spherical harmonics. Eng Geol 184(14):126–137

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zingg T (1935) Beitrag zur schotteranalyse. Schweiz mineral petrogr Mitt 15:52–56

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 51878416 and 51478273.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Su.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Spherical harmonic functions and their derivatives

The real-form expressions of the spherical harmonic functions \( Y_{n}^{m} (\theta^{\prime},\varphi^{\prime}) \) are

$$ Y_{n}^{m} (\theta^{\prime},\varphi^{\prime}) = \sqrt {\frac{{\left( {2n + 1} \right)\left( {n - m} \right)!}}{{4\pi \left( {n + m} \right)!}}} P_{n}^{m} (\cos \theta^{\prime})\cos (m\varphi^{\prime})\quad {\text{for}}\;m \ge 0 $$
(26a)
$$ Y_{n}^{m} (\theta^{\prime},\varphi^{\prime}) = \sqrt {\frac{{\left( {2n + 1} \right)\left( {n - \left| m \right|} \right)!}}{{4\pi \left( {n + \left| m \right|} \right)!}}} P_{n}^{\left| m \right|} (\cos \theta^{\prime})\sin (\left| m \right|\varphi^{\prime})\quad {\text{for}}\;m < 0 $$
(26b)

In the above equations, \( P_{n}^{m} (\cos \theta^{\prime}) \) is the associated Legendre function with degree \( n \) and order \( m \), which is given by

$$ P_{n}^{m} (x) = \left( { - 1} \right)^{m} \left( {1 - x^{2} } \right)^{m/2} \frac{{{\text{d}}^{m} }}{{{\text{d}}x^{m} }}p_{n} (x) $$
(27)

In Eq. (27), \( p_{n} (x) \) is the Legendre polynomial of degree \( n \), given by

$$ p_{n} (x) = \frac{1}{{2^{n} n!}}\frac{{{\text{d}}^{n} }}{{{\text{d}}x^{n} }}\left( {x^{2} - 1} \right)^{n} $$
(28)

Similar to [15], differentiating both sides of Eq. (1a) with respect to \( \theta^{\prime} \) gives,

$$ x^{\prime}_{{\theta^{\prime}}} (\theta^{\prime} ,\varphi^{\prime}) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty } {\sum\limits_{m = - n}^{n} {c_{xn}^{m} \frac{{\partial Y_{n}^{m} (\theta^{\prime},\varphi^{\prime})}}{{\partial \theta^{\prime}}}} } $$
(29)

where

$$ \frac{{\partial Y_{n}^{m} (\theta^{\prime},\varphi^{\prime})}}{{\partial \theta^{\prime}}} = \sqrt {\frac{{\left( {2n + 1} \right)\left( {n - m} \right)!}}{{4\pi \left( {n + m} \right)!}}} \frac{{\partial P_{n}^{m} (\cos \theta^{\prime})}}{{\partial \theta^{\prime}}}\cos (m\varphi^{\prime})\quad {\text{for}}\;m \ge 0 $$
(30a)
$$ \frac{{\partial Y_{n}^{m} (\theta^{\prime},\varphi^{\prime})}}{{\partial \theta^{\prime}}} = \sqrt {\frac{{\left( {2n + 1} \right)\left( {n - \left| m \right|} \right)!}}{{4\pi \left( {n + \left| m \right|} \right)!}}} \frac{{\partial P_{n}^{\left| m \right|} (\cos \theta^{\prime})}}{{\partial \theta^{\prime}}}\sin (\left| m \right|\varphi^{\prime})\quad {\text{for}}\;m < 0 $$
(30b)

In above equations, the derivate of \( P_{n}^{m} (\cos \theta^{\prime}) \) with respect to \( \theta^{\prime} \) can be obtained from the recurrence relation of the associated Legendre functions,

$$ \frac{{\partial P_{n}^{m} (\cos \theta^{\prime})}}{{\partial \theta^{\prime}}} = - \frac{1}{{\sin \theta^{\prime}}}\left[ {\left( {n + 1} \right)\cos \theta^{\prime}P_{n}^{m} (\cos \theta^{\prime}) - \left( {n - m + 1} \right)P_{n + 1}^{m} (\cos \theta^{\prime})} \right] $$
(31)

Differentiating both sides of Eq. (1a) with respect to \( \varphi^{\prime} \) gives,

$$ x^{\prime}_{{\varphi^{\prime}}} (\theta^{\prime} ,\varphi^{\prime}) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty } {\sum\limits_{m = - n}^{n} {c_{xn}^{m} \frac{{\partial Y_{n}^{m} (\theta^{\prime},\varphi^{\prime})}}{{\partial \varphi^{\prime}}}} } $$
(32)

where

$$ \frac{{\partial Y_{n}^{m} (\theta^{\prime},\varphi^{\prime})}}{{\partial \varphi^{\prime}}} = - m\sqrt {\frac{{\left( {2n + 1} \right)\left( {n - m} \right)!}}{{4\pi \left( {n + m} \right)!}}} P_{n}^{m} (\cos \theta^{\prime})\sin (m\varphi^{\prime})\quad {\text{for}}\;m \ge 0 $$
(33a)
$$ \frac{{\partial Y_{n}^{m} (\theta^{\prime},\varphi^{\prime})}}{{\partial \varphi^{\prime}}} = \left| m \right|\sqrt {\frac{{\left( {2n + 1} \right)\left( {n - \left| m \right|} \right)!}}{{4\pi \left( {n + \left| m \right|} \right)!}}} P_{n}^{\left| m \right|} (\cos \theta^{\prime})\cos (\left| m \right|\varphi^{\prime})\quad {\text{for}}\;m < 0 $$
(33b)

The derivations of \( y (\theta^{\prime} ,\varphi^{\prime}) \) and \( z (\theta^{\prime} ,\varphi^{\prime}) \) with respect to \( \theta^{\prime} \) and \( \varphi^{\prime} \) can be obtained by the same token.

Appendix B: Symbols

a, b, c:

3D principal dimensions

\( a_{xn} \), \( a_{yn} \), \( a_{zn} \):

Amplitude of the Fourier/SH coefficients of degree \( n \)

\( A \) :

Area of 2D images

\( {\text{AI}}_{\text{r}} \) :

Radius angularity index

\( {\text{AI}}^{{ 2 {\text{D}}}} \), \( {\text{AI}}^{{ 3 {\text{D}}}} \):

2D, 3D angularity indices

\( {\text{AR}}^{{ 2 {\text{D}}}} \), \( {\text{AR}}^{{ 3 {\text{D}}}} \):

2D, 3D aspect ratios

\( C_{x}^{{ 2 {\text{D}}}} \), \( C_{x}^{{ 3 {\text{D}}}} \):

2D, 3D convexity

d1, d2:

2D principal dimensions

\( d_{\text{m}}^{{ 2 {\text{D}}}} \), \( d_{\text{m}}^{{ 3 {\text{D}}}} \):

2D, 3D mean dimensions

EI:

Elongation index

FI:

Flatness index

\( K \) :

Total number of points on the hemisphere

n :

Projection direction vector

nx, ny, nz:

Cartesian coordinates of a point on the surface of the unit sphere

N :

Total number of harmonics/the maximum degree of SH series

\( P \) :

Perimeter of 2D images

\( S^{{2{\text{D}}}} \), \( S^{{ 3 {\text{D}}}} \):

2D, 3D sphericity

\( S_{\text{p}} \) :

Surface area of a particle

\( V_{\text{p}} \) :

The volume of a particle

\( Y_{n}^{m} (\theta^{\prime},\varphi^{\prime}) \) :

Spherical harmonic functions

\( \varphi \), \( \varphi^{\prime} \):

Azimuthal angle

\( \theta \), \( \theta^{\prime} \):

Polar angle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, D., Yan, W.M. Prediction of 3D size and shape descriptors of irregular granular particles from projected 2D images. Acta Geotech. 15, 1533–1555 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00845-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00845-3

Keywords

Navigation