Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial distribution of bacterial community in EGSB reactor treating synthetic sulfate-containing wastewater at low organic loading rate

  • Article
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Given that the consumption of organic substances entails costly biodesulfurization, the characteristics of the bacterial community in a reactor should be determined to increase the desulfurizing rate under low organic loading condition. In this study, the bacterial community distribution in the expanded granular sludge bed reactor used to treat sulfate-containing wastewater with low organic loading rate was determined by polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) and 16S rDNA clone library analyses. DGGE results showed that the predominant bacteria were stable and accounted for ~90 % sulfate removal efficiency. Differences in band positions and intensities indicated that the distribution and abundance of bacteria were affected by their positions in the reactor. Typical bands were identified in the bacterial community comprising Desulfovibrio, Desulfomicrobium, Thiomonas, Acinetobacter, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi. Their functions in the reactor were also discussed. The possible links between the functional and microbial responses were also investigated based on the characteristic and spatial distribution of each bacterium in consortium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheng YX, Cao HB, Li YP et al (2010) Effects of various pretreatments on biological sulfate reduction with waste activated sludge as electron donor and waste activated sludge diminution under biosulfidogenic condition. J Hazard Mater 179:918–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liamleam W, Annachhatre AP (2007) Electron donors for biological sulfate reduction. Biotechnol Adv 25:452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi E, Rim JM (1991) Competition and inhibition of sulfate reducers and methane producers in anaerobic treatment. Water Sci Technol 23:1259–1264

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joke G, Brigitte B, Ludo D et al (2006) DsrB gene-based DGGE for community and diversity surveys of sulfate-reducing bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 66:194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sipma J, Osuna MB, Lettinga G et al (2007) Effect of hydraulic retention time on sulfate reduction in a carbon monoxide fed thermophilic gas lift reactor. Water Res 41:1995–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sahinkaya E (2009) Microbial sulfate reduction at low (8 °C) temperature using waste sludge as a carbon and seed source. Int Biodeter Biodegrad 63:245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolicka D, Jarzynowska L (2012) Microbiological reduction of sulphates in salty environments and mineralogical characterization of the transformation products. Geomicrobiol J 29:528–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wattiau P, Renard ME, Ledent P et al (2001) A PCR test to identify bacillus subtilis and closely related species and its application to the monitoring of wastewater biotreatment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:816–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujii T, Watanabe S, Horikoshi M et al (2011) PCR-DGGE analysis of bacterial communities in funazushi, fermented crucian carp with rice, during fermentation. Fish Sci 77:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ji GD, Liao B, Tao HC et al (2009) Analysis of bacteria communities in an up-flow fixed-bed (UFB) bioreactor for treating sulfide in hydrocarbon wastewater. Bioresour Technol 100:5056–5062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YM, Chon DH, Kim HS et al (2012) Investigation of bacterial community in activated sludge with an anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) to decrease the generation of excess sludge. Water Res 46:4292–4300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. APHA (1989) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Isabel NG, Wang ET, Florina R et al (2006) Characterization of bacterial community associated to biofilms of corroded oil pipelines from the southeast of Mexico. Anaerobe 12:122–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao YG, Wang AJ, Ren NQ (2010) Effect of carbon sources on sulfidogenic bacterial communities during the starting-up of acidogenic sulfate-reducing bioreactors. Bioresour Technol 101:2957–2959

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herto DA, Tsukasa I, Satoshi O (2007) Functional bacterial and archaeal community structures of major trophic groups in a full-scale anaerobic sludge. Water Res 41:1554–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tatsunori N, Shinya S, Yoko Y et al (2002) Successive changes in community structure of an ethylbenzene-degrading sulfate-reducing consortium. Water Res 36:2813–2823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thangaraj K, Atya K, Hemant JP (2008) Characterization of diverse acinetobacter isolates for utilization of multiple aromatic compounds. Bioresour Technol 99:2488–2494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Juan PM, Rovira R, Alvarez-Hornos FJ et al (2010) Bacterial community analysis of a gas-phase biotrickling filter for biogas mimics desulfurization through the rRNA approach. Chemosphere 80:872–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sass H, Cypionka H, Babenzien HD (1997) Vertical distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria at the oxic-anoxic interface in sediments of the oligotrophic lake Stechlin. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 22:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karen B, Werner M, Ulrich S (2000) Behavior of sulfate reducing bacteria under oligotrophic conditions and oxygen stress in partical-free systems related to drinking water. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 32:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sara B, Lorenzo B, Daniele D et al (2009) Biodiversity of prokaryotic communities in sediments of different sub-basins of the Venice lagoon. Res Microbiol 160:307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stefan JG, Frederick CMJ, Yitzhak H et al (2004) Similarity of bacterial communities in sawdust- and straw-amended cow manure composts. FESM Microbiol Lett 233:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cord S, von Claudia W, Regin H et al (2002) Microbial structure of an anaerobic bioreactor population that continuously dechlorinates 1,2-dichloropropane. FESM Microbiol Ecol 39:229–237

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vossoughi M, Shaken M, Alem Zaden I (2004) Performance of anaerobic baffled reactor treating synthetic wastewater influenced by decreasing COD/SO4 ratios. Chem Eng Proc 42:811–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cox HHJ, Deshusses MA (2002) Co-treatment of H2S and toluene in a biotrickling filter. Chem Eng J 87:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Daniel K, Andreas T, Heribert C (1998) Strategies of sulfate-reducing bacteria to escape oxygen stress in a cyanobacterial mat. FESM Microbiol Ecol 25:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  27. Knut F, Daniel K, Ulrike S et al (1996) A common pathway of sulfide oxidation by sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 144:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by The National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2011AA060702, 2011AA060904) and the Open Funding Project of the National Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering (2012KF-07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuxing Sheng or Hongbin Cao.

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, K., Cao, X., Sheng, Y. et al. Spatial distribution of bacterial community in EGSB reactor treating synthetic sulfate-containing wastewater at low organic loading rate. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 54–61 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-0043-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-013-0043-2

Keywords

Navigation