Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic safety assessment of trains running on high-speed railway bridges with chloride-induced corroding piers

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the lifetime assessment of the running safety of a train in aggressive environments and earthquake-prone areas, the effects of corrosion on seismic performance must be considered. Research on the running safety of trains, including corrosion damage, is limited, despite the fact that seismic safety assessment of trains on high-speed railway bridges has been extensively examined. In this work, the running safety of a train was evaluated using a time-varying corroded bridge finite-element model established in OpenSees. Two pier types were considered, and three ground-motion types were selected for performing seismic performance evaluations. Subsequently, the seismic response of the corroded bridge-track structure under an earthquake was analyzed. The spectrum intensity was used as the structural response index for the running safety assessment of trains under earthquakes, and the long-term safety of trains on bridges with different pier heights and earthquake types, considering different corroding deterioration, was evaluated. The results indicate that under low-level earthquakes, piers are primarily in a linear elastic state and least influenced by corrosion; whereas under high-level earthquakes, the running safety of trains on a bridge significantly deteriorates after corrosion, particularly for high-pier bridges, mainly because the corroded piers are more likely to yield lower post-yield stiffness. The results of this study suggest that in the seismic safety assessment of trains on corroded bridges, time-varying seismic performance characteristics should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhai W M, Xia H. Train-Track-Bridge Dynamic Interaction: Theory and Engineering Application. Beijing: Science Press, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  2. He X, Wu T, Zou Y, et al. Recent developments of high-speed railway bridges in China. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2017, 13: 1584–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. He X, Kawatani M, Hayashikawa T, et al. Numerical analysis on seismic response of Shinkansen bridge-train interaction system under moderate earthquakes. Earthq Eng Eng Vib, 2011, 10: 85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Montenegro P A, Calçada R, Vila Pouca N, et al. Running safety assessment of trains moving over bridges subjected to moderate earthquakes. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2016, 45: 483–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shao G, Jiang L, Chouw N. Experimental investigations of the seismic performance of bridge piers with rounded rectangular cross-sections. Earthq Struct, 2014, 7: 463–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen L, Jiang L, Qin H, et al. Nonlinear seismic assessment of isolated high-speed railway bridge subjected to near-fault earthquake scenarios. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2019, 15: 1529–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xia H, Han Y, Zhang N, et al. Dynamic analysis of train-bridge system subjected to non-uniform seismic excitations. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 2006, 35: 1563–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. China National Railway Administration. Code for Design of High Speed Railway (in Chinese). Beijing: China Railway Press, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gu Q, Liu Y, Guo W, et al. A practical wheel-rail interaction element for modeling vehicle-track-bridge systems. Int J Str Stab Dyn, 2019, 19: 1950011

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu H, Yu Z, Guo W. A Fast Modeling technique for the vertical train-track-bridge interactions. Shock Vib, 2019, 2019: 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu H, Yu Z, Guo W, et al. A novel method to search for the wheel-rail contact point. Int J Str Stab Dyn, 2019, 19: 1950142

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo W, Bai Z, Wang X, et al. A combination strategy of hollow-closed-wall in-filled trench and elastic bearing for reducing environmental vibration induced by high-speed train. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2020, 133: 106136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo W, Zeng C, Gou H, et al. Rotational friction damper’s performance for controlling seismic response of high speed railway bridge-track system. Comput Modeling Eng Sci, 2019, 120: 491–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Akiyama M, Frangopol D M, Ishibashi H. Toward life-cycle reliability-, risk- and resilience-based design and assessment of bridges and bridge networks under independent and interacting hazards: Emphasis on earthquake, tsunami and corrosion. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2020, 16: 26–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaal G C M. Prediction of deterioration of concrete bridges. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Delft: TU Delft, Netherlands, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wallbank E J. The performance of concrete in bridges: A survey of 200 highway bridges, London, 1989

  17. Li C, Li H N, Hao H, et al. Seismic fragility analyses of sea-crossing cable-stayed bridges subjected to multi-support ground motions on offshore sites. Eng Struct, 2018, 165: 441–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li C, Hao H, Li H, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete bridges with chloride induced corrosion subjected to spatially varying ground motions. Int J Str Stab Dyn, 2016, 16: 1550010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li C, Liu Y, Li H N. Fragility assessment and optimum design of a steel-concrete frame structure with hybrid energy-dissipated devices under multi-hazards of earthquake and wind. Eng Struct, 2021, 245: 112878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Du Y G, Clark L A, Chan A H C. Residual capacity of corroded reinforcing bars. Mag Concrete Res, 2005, 57: 135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo W, Wang Y, Liu H, et al. Running safety assessment of trains on bridges under earthquakes based on spectral intensity theory. Int J Str Stab Dyn, 2021, 21: 2140008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yalçyn H, Ergun M. The prediction of corrosion rates of reinforcing steels in concrete. Cement Concrete Res, 1996, 26: 1593–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vu K A T, Stewart M G. Structural reliability of concrete bridges including improved chloride-induced corrosion models. Struct Saf, 2000, 22: 313–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu T, Weyers R W. Modeling the dynamic corrosion process in chloride contaminated concrete structures. Cement Concrete Res, 1998, 28: 365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Akiyama M, Frangopol D M. Long-term seismic performance of RC structures in an aggressive environment: Emphasis on bridge piers. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2014, 10: 865–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu S T. Research on shear behavior of corroded RC beams (in Chinese). Dissertation for Master’s Degree. Changsha: Central South University, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  27. Afsar Dizaj E, Kashani M M. Influence of ground motion type on nonlinear seismic behaviour and fragility of corrosion-damaged reinforced concrete bridge piers. Bull Earthquake Eng, 2022, 20: 1489–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Biondini F, Vergani M. Damage modeling and nonlinear analysis of concrete bridges under corrosion. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, 2012

  29. Guo W, Hu Y, Hou W, et al. Seismic damage mechanism of CRTS-II slab ballastless track structure on high-speed railway bridges. Int J Str Stab Dyn, 2020, 20: 2050011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo W, Hu Y, Gou H, et al. Simplified seismic model of CRTS II ballastless track structure on high-speed railway bridges in China. Eng Struct, 2020, 211: 110453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo W, Wang Y, Zeng C, et al. Moving safety evaluation of high-speed train on post-earthquake bridge utilizing real-time hybrid simulation. J Earthq Eng, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.1999869

  32. Guo W, Gao X, Hu P, et al. Seismic damage features of high-speed railway simply supported bridge-track system under near-fault earthquake. Adv Struct Eng, 2020, 23: 1573–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kent D C, Park R. Flexural members with confined concrete. J Struct Div, 1971, 97: 1969–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yassin Mohd H M. Nonlinear analysis of prestressed concrete structures under monotonic and cyclic loads. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Berkeley: University of California, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  35. Priestly M N, Seible F, Calvi G M. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges. New York: John Wiley, 1996

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Brown J, Kunnath S K. Low-cycle fatigue behavior of longitudinal reinforcement in reinforced concrete bridge columns. Technical Report. New York: U.S. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhai Z, Guo W, Yu Z, et al. Experimental and numerical study of S-shaped steel plate damper for seismic resilient application. Eng Struct, 2020, 221: 111006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Luo X. Study on methodology for running safety assessment of trains in seismic design of railway structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2005, 25: 79–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Luo X, Miyamoto T. Method for running safety assessment of railway vehicles against structural vibration displacement during earthquakes. Quart Rep RTRI, 2007, 48: 129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Luo X, Miyamoto T. Examining the adequacy of the spectral intensity index for running safety assessment of railway vehicles during earthquakes. In: World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2008

  41. Railway Technical Research Institute. Seismic Design Code for Railway Structures (Displacement limits). Tokyo, 2006

  42. Ishiyama Y. Motions of rigid bodies and criteria for overturning by earthquake excitations. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 1982, 10: 635–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Guo.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52278546, 52022113, and 52108433), the Fundamental Scientific Research Expenses of IME, China Earthquake Administration (Grant No. 2020EEEVL0403), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (Grant No. 2022ZZTS0625), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2021JJ40587), the Open Foundation of the National Engineering Research Center of High-Speed Railway Construction Technology (Grant No. HSR202004), and the Technology Research and Development Program Project of China Railway Group Limited (Grant No. 2021-Special-04-2). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this study are those of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, W., Wang, Y., Liu, H. et al. Seismic safety assessment of trains running on high-speed railway bridges with chloride-induced corroding piers. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 320–335 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2193-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2193-x

Keywords

Navigation