Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of ground motion type on nonlinear seismic behaviour and fragility of corrosion-damaged reinforced concrete bridge piers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two identical reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers including a rectangular and a circular section are considered. The influence of corrosion damage, non-stationary characteristics of ground motions, and cross-sectional shape on nonlinear dynamic behaviour, failure mechanism and failure probability of these piers is investigated. An advanced modelling technique, capable of modelling coupled influence of inelastic buckling and low-cycle fatigue degradation of reinforcement, is employed to simulate the nonlinear structural behaviour of the piers. The considered bridge piers with various mass loss ratios (as a measure of corrosion) are subjected to a series of static pushover analyses and incremental dynamic analyses under three different suites of ground motions such as, Far-Field (FF), Near-Field With Pulse (NFWP), and Near-Field with No Pulse (NFNP). Furthermore, an advanced matching algorithm is used to investigate the effect of non-stationary content of near-field earthquake records including the presence of large pulses in ground motion time series on the nonlinear dynamic behaviour of the corrosion-damaged RC bridge piers. Finally, fragility curves are developed for each corroded bridge pier with different corrosion ratios subjected to each ground motion suite. Analyses results show that the failure mechanism of the corrosion-damaged bridge piers significantly depends on the cross-sectional shape and ground motion type. It is concluded that while both of the piers with slight corrosion levels are much more vulnerable under NFWP ground motions than those under FF and NFNP ground motions; the probability of failure of the extremely corroded bridge piers is approximately the same regardless of ground motion type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afsar Dizaj E, Kashani MM (2020a) Numerical investigation of the influence of cross-sectional shape and corrosion damage on failure mechanisms of RC bridge piers under earthquake loading. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00883-3

  • Afsar Dizaj E, Kashani MM (2020b) Nonlinear structural performance and seismic fragility of corroded reinforced concrete structures: modelling guidelines. Eur J Environ Civil Eng (in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2021.1896582

  • Alexander NA, Chanerly AA, Crew AJ, Bhattacharaya S (2014) Obtaining spectrum matching time series using a Reweighted Volterra Series Algorithm (RVSA). Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(4):1663–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alipour A, Shafei B, Shinozuka M (2011) Performance evaluation of deteriorating highway bridges located in high seismic areas. J Bridge Eng 6:597–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2013) Report card for America's Infrastructure. http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/bridges/

  • Bagheri M, Hosseini SA, Keshtegar B, Correira AFO, Trung NT (2020) Uncertain time-dependent reliability analysis of corroded RC structures applying three-term conjugate method. Eng Fail Anal 115:104599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billah AHMM, Alam MS (2018) Seismic performance evaluation of multi-column bridge bents retrofitted with different alternatives using incremental dynamic analysis. Eng Struct 165:441–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondini F, Frangopol DM (2009) Lifetime reliability-based optimization of reinforced concrete cross-sections under corrosion. Struct Saf 31:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondini F, Camnasio E, Titi A (2015) Seismic resilience of concrete structures under corrosion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2015(44):2445–2466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camnasio E (2013) Lifetime performance and seismic resilience of concrete structures exposed to corrosion. Ph.D thesis, Polytechnic University of Milan, Italy

  • Choe DE, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D, Haukaas T (2008) Probabilistic capacity models and seismic fragility estimates for RC columns subject to corrosion. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(3):383–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe DE, Gardoni P, Rosowsky D, Haukaas T (2009) Seismic fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges subject to corrosion. Struct Saf 31(4):275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coronelli D, Gambarova P (2004) Structural assessment of corroded reinforced concrete beams: modeling guidelines. J Struct Eng 130(8):1214–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui F, Zhang H, Ghosn M, Xu Y (2018) Seismic fragility analysis of deteriorating RC bridge substructures subject to marine chloride-induced corrosion. Eng Struct 155:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng P, Zhang C, Pei S, Jin Z (2018) Modeling the impact of corrosion on seismic performance of multi-span simply-supported bridges. Constr Build Mater 185:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal RP, Maekawa K (2002) Reinforcement stability and fracture of cover concrete in reinforced concrete members. J Struct Eng 128(10):1253–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dizaj EA, Madandoust R, Kashani MM (2018a) Probabilistic seismic vulnerability analysis of corroded reinforced concrete frames including spatial variability of pitting corrosion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 114:97–112

  • Dizaj EA, Madandoust R, Kashani MM (2018b) Exploring the impact of chloride-induced corrosion on seismic damage limit states and residual capacity of reinforced concrete structures. Struct Infrastruct Eng 14(6):714–729

  • Du YG, Clark LA, Chan AHC (2005a) Residual capacity of corroded reinforcing bars. Mag Conc Res 57(3):135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du YG, Clark LA, Chan AHC (2005b) Effect of corrosion on ductility of reinforcing bars. Mag Conc Res 57(7):407–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faroz SA, Pujari NN, Ghosh S (2016) Reliability of a corroded RC beam based on Bayesian updating of the corrosion model. Eng Struct 126:457–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA P695 (2009) Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Firouzi A, Abdolhosseini M, Ayazian R (2020) Service life prediction of corrosion-affected reinforced concrete columns based on time-dependent reliability analysis. Eng Fail Anal 117:104944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaal GCM (2004) Prediction of deterioration of concrete bridges. PhD thesis, TU Delft

  • Ge X, Dietz MS, Alexander NA et al (2020) Nonlinear dynamic behaviour of severely corroded reinforced concrete columns: shaking table study. Bull Earthq Eng 18:1417–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00749-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh J, Padgett JE (2010) Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves. J Struct Eng 136(12):1497–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh J, Sood P (2016) Consideration of time-evolving capacity distributions and improved degradation models for seismic fragility assessment of aging highway bridges. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 154:197–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu X, Guo H, Zhou B, Zhang W, Jiang C (2018) Corrosion non-uniformity of steel bars and reliability of corroded RC beams. Eng Struct 167:188–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo A, Yuan W, Lan Ch, Guan X, Li H (2015) Time-dependent seismic demand and fragility of deteriorating bridges for their residual service life. Bull Earthq Eng 13(8):2389–2409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9722-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAZUS-MH MR5 (2010) Earthquake loss estimation methodology. Technical and user’s manual. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division. Washington, DC

  • Imperatore S, Rinaldi Z, Drago C (2017) Degradation relationships for the mechanical properties of corroded steel rebars. Constr Build Mater 148:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashani MM, Barmi AK, Malinova S (2015a) Influence of inelastic buckling on low-cycle fatigue degradation of reinforcing bars. Constr Build Mater 94:644–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashani MM, Lowes L, Crewe AJ, Alexander NA (2015b) Phenomenological hysteretic model for corroded reinforcing bars including inelastic buckling and low-cycle fatigue degradation. Comput Struct 156:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashani MM, Lowes LN, Crewe AJ, Alexander NA (2016) Nonlinear fibre element modelling of RC bridge piers considering inelastic buckling of reinforcement. Eng Struct 116:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashani MM, Málaga-Chuquitaype C, Yang S, Alexander NA (2017) Influence of non-stationary content of ground-motions on nonlinear dynamic response of RC bridge piers. Bull Earthq Eng 15(9):3897–3939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashani MM, Salami MR, Goda K, Alexander N (2018) Nonlinear flexural behaviour of RC columns including bar buckling and fatigue degradation. Mag Concr Res 70(5):231–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashani MM, Ge X, Dietz MS, Crewe AJ, Alexander NA (2019a) Significance of non-stationary characteristics of ground-motion on structural damage: shaking table study. Bull Earthq Eng 17(9):4885–4907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00668-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashani MM, Maddocks J, Afsar Dizaj E (2019b) Residual capacity of corroded reinforced concrete bridge components: a state-of-the-art review. J Bridge Eng 24(7):03119001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman DE, Moehle JP (2000) Seismic performance of well-confined concrete bridge columns. PEER 1998/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley

  • Li C, Hao H, Li H, Bi K (2015) Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete bridges with chloride induced corrosion subjected to spatially varying ground motions. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 6:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Hajirasouliha I, Marshall AM (2018) Direct displacement-based seismic design of flexible-base structures subjected to pulse-like ground motions. Eng Struct 168:276–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park RJ (1988) Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson SS (1965) Fatigue: a complex subject-some simple approximations. Exp Mech 5(7):193–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna F (2011) OpenSees: a framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Comput Sci Eng 13(4):58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meda A, Mostosi A, Rinaldi Z, Riva P (2016) Corroded RC columns repair and strengthening with high performance fiber reinforced concrete jacket. Mater Struct 49(5):1967–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni Choine M, Kashani MM, Lowes LN, O’Connor A, Crewe AJ, Alexander NA (2016) Nonlinear dynamic analysis and seismic fragility assessment of a corrosion damaged integral bridge. Int J Struct Integr 7(2):227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley M, Paulay T (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pu W, Wu M, Huang B, Zhang H (2018) Quantification of response spectra of pulse-like near-fault ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 104:117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajput AS, Sharma UK, Engineer K (2019) Seismic retrofitting of corroded RC columns using advanced composite materials. Eng Struct 181:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao AS, Lepech MD, Kiremidjian A (2017) Development of time-dependent fragility functions for deteriorating reinforced concrete bridge piers. Struct Infrastruct Eng 13(1):67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1198401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salami MR (2016) Seismic performance of buildings considering mainshock-aftershocks: improvement in record selection and advanced nonlinear fibre beam-column model for RC framed structures. PhD Thesis, University of Bristol

  • Scott B, Park R, Priestley M (1982) Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. ACI J 79(1):13–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun B, Xiao RC, Ruan WD, Wang PB (2020) Corrosion-induced cracking fragility of RC bridge with improved concrete carbonation and steel reinforcement corrosion models. Eng Struct 208:110313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titi A, Biondini F, Frangopol DM (2014) Lifetime resilience of aging concrete bridges under corrosion. In: The 7th international conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management, IABMAS

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchi F, Belletti B (2021) Capacity assessment of existing RC columns. Buildings 11(4):161. https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.20.00044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallbank EJ (1989) The performance of concrete in bridges: a survey of 200 highway bridges, London

  • Xu JG, Wu G, Feng DC, Cotsovos DM, Lu Y (2020) Seismic fragility analysis of shear-critical concrete columns considering corrosion induced deterioration effects. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 134:106165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalciner H, Sensoy S, Eren O (2012) Time-dependent seismic performance assessment of a single-degree-of-freedom frame subject to corrosion. Eng Fail Anal 19:109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan W, Guo A, Li H (2017) Seismic failure mode of coastal bridge piers considering the effects of corrosion-induced damage. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 93:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Song H, Lim S, Akiyama M, Frangopol DM (2019) Reliability estimation of corroded RC structures based on spatial variability using experimental evidence, probabilistic analysis and finite element method. Eng Struct 192:30–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Sritharan S (2007) Modeling of strain penetration effects in fiber-based analysis of reinforced concrete structures. ACI Struct J 104(2):133–141

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EAD: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, finite element modelling, writing original draft. MMK: supervision, validation, methodology, review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebrahim Afsar Dizaj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have participated in (a) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final version. This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue. The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afsar Dizaj, E., Kashani, M.M. Influence of ground motion type on nonlinear seismic behaviour and fragility of corrosion-damaged reinforced concrete bridge piers. Bull Earthquake Eng 20, 1489–1518 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01297-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01297-5

Keywords

Navigation