Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geobiological approach to evaluating marine carbonate source rocks of hydrocarbon

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluating the pre-Jurassic marine source rocks in China has been difficult because these rocks are generally too high- or over-maturated for most traditional methods to work. As to the remaining parameter TOC (%), its lower limit for recognizing the carbonate source rocks in China has been in dispute. Nineteen Phanerozoic sections in the Middle-Upper Yangtze Platform and the Guizhou-Hunan-Guangxi Basin have been studied in search for a different approach to complementing the traditional evaluation method for these source rocks. We have applied a geobiological approach to tracing the organic carbon (OC) output and accumulation from the living stage (primary productivity) to the post-mortem deposited remains, and finally to the preserved burial organics. Four biological and geological parameters are employed to represent the OC of the three stages. A series of proxies of these parameters are discussed and integrated to establish a geobiological evaluation system independent of TOC and other traditional methods. Here we use the Guangyuan section in Sichuan as an example for the geobiological evaluation. Our results indicate that in the argillaceous rocks, the geobiological parameters show the qualified source rocks in accordance with high TOC values; but in the carbonates, the good source rocks delineated by the geobiological parameters have a wide range of TOC, from 0.03% to 1.59%, mostly <0.3%. We suggest that it is still premature to set TOC=0.3% or 0.5% as the lower limit for the pre-Jurassic carbonate source rocks in South China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mu S L, ed. Explotation Theory, Technology and Practice for Oil and Gas in China’s Marine Strata (in Chinese). Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2009. 752

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jin Z J, Wang Q C. Prediction on the Petroleum Formation, Enrichment and Distribution of the Typical Congruent Basins in China (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2007. 381

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qing J Z. The Petroleum Source Rocks of China (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2005. 614

    Google Scholar 

  4. Francois R, Honojo S, Manganini S J. Biogenic barium fluxes to the deep sea: Implications for palaeoproductivity reconstruction. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 1995, 5: 289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes J M, Strauss H, Kaufman A J. The abundance of δ13C in marine organic matter and isotopic fractionation in the global biogeochemical cycle of carbon during the past 800 Ma. Chem Geol, 1999, 161: 103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McManus J, William M B, Silke S. Molybdenum and uranium geochemistry in continental margin sediments: Paleoproxy potential. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 2006, 70: 4643–4662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyers S R, Sageman B B, Lyons T W. Organic carbon burial rate and the molybdenum proxy: Theoretical framework and application to Cenomanian-Turonian oceanic anoxic event 2. Paleoceanography, 2005, 20: 2002–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rimmer S M. Geochemical paleoredox indicators in Devonian-Mississippian black shales, Central Appalachian Basin (USA). Chem Geol, 2004, 206: 373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Siebert C, McManus J, Bice A, et al. Molybdenum isotope signatures in continental margin marine sediments. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2006, 241: 723–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tyson R V. The “productivity versus preservation” controversy: cause, flaws, and resolution. In: Harris N B, ed. The Deposition of Organic-carbon-rich Sediments: Models, Mechanisms, and Consequences. Oklahoma: Soc Sediment Geol, 2005. 17–33

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vető I, Péter O, István F, et al. Extension of carbon flux estimation to oxic sediments based on sulphur geochemistry and analysis of benthic foraminiferal assemblages: A case history from the Eocene of Hungary. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol, 2007, 248: 119–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xie S C, Yin H F, Xie X N, et al. On the geobiological evaluation of hydrocarbon source rocks. Front Earth Sci China, 2007, 1: 389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yin H F, Xie S C, Qing J Z, et al. Discussion on geobiology, biogeology, and geobiofacies. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2008, 51: 1516–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ziegler A M. Silurian marine communities and their environmental significance. Nature, 1965, 207: 270–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boucot A J. Principles of Benthic Marine Paleoecology. New York: Academic Press, 1981. 463

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yin H F, Ding M H, Zhang K X, et al. Dongwuan-Indosinian (Late Permian-Middle Triassic) Ecotratigraphy of the Yangtze Region and its Margins (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 1995. 338

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cisne J L, Rabe B D. Coenocorrelation: Gradient analysis of fossil communities and its application in stratigraphy. Lethaia, 1978, 11: 341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dodd J R, Stanton R J. Paleoecology, Concepts and Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981. 559

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grice K, Cao C Q, Love G D, et al. Photic zone euxinia during the Permian-Triassic superanoxic event. Science, 2005, 307: 706–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Summons R E, Jahnke J J, Hope J M, et al. 2-Methylhopanoids as biomarkers for cyanobacterial oxygenic photosynthesis. Nature, 1999, 400: 554–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xie S C, Lai X L, Huang X Y, et al. Principles, methodology and application of molecular stratigraphy. J Stratigr, 2007, 31: 209–221

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mucci A, Sundby B, Gehlen M, et al. The fate of carbon in continental shelf sediments of Eastern Canada: A case study. Deep-Sea Res, 2000, 47: 733–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ibach L E J. Relationship between sedimentation rate and total organic carbon content in ancient marine sediments. AAPG Bull, 1982, 66: 170–188

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tyson R V, Pearson T H. Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia: An overview. In: Tyson R V, Pearson T H, eds. Modern and Ancient Continental Shelf Anoxia. Geol Soc Spec Publ, 1991, 58: 1–24

  25. Huang J H, Luo G M, Bai X, et al. Organic fraction of the total carbon burial flux deduced from carbon isotopes across the Permo-Triassic boundary at Meishan, Zhejiang Province, China. Front Earth Sci China, 2007, 1: 425–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tait V. Elements of Marine Ecology. 3rd ed. London: Butterworths Scientific, 1981. 345

    Google Scholar 

  27. Takeda S, Ramaiaha N, Mikia M, et al. Biological and chemical characteristics of high-chlorophyll, low-temperature water observed near the Sulu Archipelago. Deep-Sea Res, 2007, 54: 81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Paytan A, Kastner M, Chavez F P. Glacial to interglacial fluctuations in productivity in the equatorial Pacific as indicated by marine barite. Science, 1996, 274: 1355–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McManus J, Berelson W M, Klinkhammer G P. Geochemistry of barium in marine sediments: Implications for its use as a paleoproxy. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1998, 62: 3458–3473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Murray R W, Leinen M. Scavenged excess aluminum and its relationship to bulk titanium in biogenic sediment from the central equatorial Pacific Ocean. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1996, 60: 3869–3878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tonger, Liu W H, Xu Y C. The discussion on anoxic environments and its geochemical identifying indices. Acta Sediment Sin, 2004, 22: 365–372

    Google Scholar 

  32. Watanabe S, Tada R, Ikehara K, et al. Sediment fabrics, oxygenation history, and circulation modes of Japan Sea during the Late Quaternary. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimat Palaeoecol, 2007, 247: 50–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Raiswell R, Buckley F, Berber R A, et al. Degree of pyritization of iron as a paleoenvironmental indicator of bottom-water oxygenation. J Sediment Petrol, 1988, 58: 812–819

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hatch J R, Leventhal J S. Relationship between inferred redox potential of the depositional environment and geochemistry of the Upper Pennsylvanian (Missourian) stark shale member of the Dennis Limestone, Wabaunsee County, Kansas, USA. Chem Geol, 1992, 99: 65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jones B, Manning D A C. Comparison of geochemical indices used for the interpretation of palaeoredox conditions in ancient mudstones. Chem Geol, 1994, 111: 111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Berner R A. The long-term carbon cycle, fossil fuels and atmospheric composition. Nature, 2003, 426: 323–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kump L R, Arthur M A. Interpreting carbon isotope excursions: Carbonates and organic matter. Chem Geol, 1999, 161: 181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zheng Y F, Chen J F. The Geochemistry of Stable Isotopes (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2000. 231

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou L, Huang J H, Archer C, et al. Molybdenum isotope composition from Yangtze block continental margin and its indication to organic burial rate. Front Earth Sci China, 2007, 1: 417–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Raiswell R, Berner R A. Pyrite formation in euxinic and semi-euxinic sediments. Am J Sci, 1985, 285: 710–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mozley P S, Burns S J. Oxygen and carbon isotopic composition of marine carbonate concretions: An overview. J Sediment Petrol, 1993, 61: 73–83

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huggett J M, Gale A S, Evans S. Carbonate concretions from the London Clay (Ypresian, Eocene) of Southern England and the exceptional preservation of wood-boring communities. J Geol Soc, 2000, 157: 187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Woo K S, Khim B K. Stable oxygen and carbon isotopes of carbonate concretions of the Miocene Yeonil Group in the Pohang Basin, Korea: Types of concretions and formation condition. Sedimen Geol, 2006, 183: 15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Dymond J, Suess E, Lyle M. Barium in the deep-sea sediment: A geochemical proxy for paleoproductivity. Paleoceanography, 1992, 7: 163–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Deuser W G, Brewer P G, Jickells T D, et al. Biological control of the removal of abiogenic particles from the surface ocean. Science, 1983, 219: 388–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Raiswell R A. Geochemical framework for the application of stable sulfur isotopes to fossil pyritization. J Geol Soc, 1997, 154: 343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou L, Zhang H Q, Wang J, et al. Assessment on redox conditions and organic burial of siliciferous sediments at the latest Permian Dalong Formation in Shangsi, Sichuan, South China. J China Univ Geosci, 2008, 19: 496–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang H, Wang Y B, Chen L, et al. Calci-microbialite as a potential source rock and its geomicrobiological processes. Front Earth Sci China, 2007, 1: 438–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gehman H M Jr. Organic matter in limestones. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1962, 26: 885–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yan J X. Origin of Permian Chihsian carbonates from South China and its geological implications (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Sediment Sin, 2004, 22: 579–587

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yan J X, Liu X Y. Geobiological interpretation of the oxygen-deficient deposits of the middle Permian marine source rocks in South China: A working hypothesis (in Chinese with English abstract). Earth Sci—J China Univ Geosci, 2007, 32: 789–796

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China

    HongFu Yin, ShuCheng Xie, JiaXin Yan, ChaoYong Hu, WenKun Qie & Xuan Qiu

  2. State Key Laboratory of Geological Process and Mineral Resources, China University of Geoscience, Wuhan, 430074, China

    JunHua Huang

  3. Wuxi Institute of Petroleum Geology, SINOPEC, Wuxi, 214151, China

    Tenger

Authors
  1. HongFu Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. ShuCheng Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. JiaXin Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. ChaoYong Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. JunHua Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tenger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. WenKun Qie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xuan Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HongFu Yin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yin, H., Xie, S., Yan, J. et al. Geobiological approach to evaluating marine carbonate source rocks of hydrocarbon. Sci. China Earth Sci. 54, 1121–1135 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-011-4236-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-011-4236-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation