Abstract
NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography are two premium methods for determining the atomic structures of macro-biomolecular complexes. Each method has unique strengths and weaknesses. While the two techniques are highly complementary, they have generally been used separately to address the structure and functions of biomolecular complexes. In this review, we emphasize that the combination of NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography offers unique power for elucidating the structures of complicated protein assemblies. We demonstrate, using several recent examples from our own laboratory, that the exquisite sensitivity of NMR spectroscopy in detecting the conformational properties of individual atoms in proteins and their complexes, without any prior knowledge of conformation, is highly valuable for obtaining the high quality crystals necessary for structure determination by X-ray crystallography. Thus NMR spectroscopy, in addition to answering many unique structural biology questions that can be addressed specifically by that technique, can be exceedingly powerful in modern structural biology when combined with other techniques including X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Kendrew J C, Bodo G, Dintzis H M, et al. A three-dimensional model of the myoglobin molecule obtained by x-ray analysis. Nature, 1958, 181: 662–666, 1:CAS:528:DyaG1cXnt1KktQ%3D%3D, 10.1038/181662a0, 13517261
Muirhead H, Perutz M F. Structure of Haemoglobin. A Three-Dimensional Fourier Synthesis of Reduced Human Haemoglobin at 5-5 a Resolution. Nature, 1963, 199: 633–638, 1:CAS:528:DyaF3sXks1ems7s%3D
Wuthrich K. NMR of proteins and nucleic acids. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1986
Wuthrich K. Protein structure determination in solution by NMR spectroscopy. J Biol Chem, 1990, 265: 22059–22062, 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FptlSgsw%3D%3D, 2266107
Wagner G. An account of NMR in structural biology. Nat Struct Biol, 1997, 4(Suppl): 841–844, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmsFaqtrY%3D, 9377155
Fu R, Cross T A. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of protein and polypeptide structure. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 1999, 28: 235–268, 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXkt1erurw%3D, 10.1146/annurev.biophys.28.1.235, 10410802
Tycko R. Biomolecular solid state NMR: advances in structural methodology and applications to peptide and protein fibrils. Annu Rev Phys Chem, 2001, 52: 575–606, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXksFKlsLo%3D, 10.1146/annurev.physchem.52.1.575, 11326075
McDermott A E. Structural and dynamic studies of proteins by solid-state NMR spectroscopy: rapid movement forward. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2004, 14: 554–561, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXotFCrtr8%3D, 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.09.007, 15465315
Cavanagh J, Fairbrother W J, III AGP, Skeleton NJ Protein NMR spectroscopy: principles and practice. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996
Mittag T, Forman-Kay J D. Atomic-level characterization of disordered protein ensembles. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2007, 17: 3–14, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhvVOqu78%3D, 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.01.009, 17250999
Eliezer D. Biophysical characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2009, 19: 23–30, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXit1OmsLs%3D, 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.12.004, 19162471
MacArthur M W, Driscoll P C, Thornton J M. NMR and crystallography—complementary approaches to structure determination. Trends Biotechnol, 1994, 12: 149–153, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXlslCitrc%3D, 10.1016/0167-7799(94)90074-4, 7764895
Brunger A T. X-ray crystallography and NMR reveal complementary views of structure and dynamics. Nat Struct Biol, 1997, 4(Suppl): 862–865, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmsFaqt7o%3D, 9377160
Bax A. Two-dimensional NMR and protein structure. Annu Rev Biochem, 1989, 58: 223–256, 1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXlslSht7s%3D, 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.001255, 2673010
Bax A, Grzesiek S. Methodological advances in protein NMR. Acc Chem Res, 1993, 26: 131–138, 1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXhvVOitL8%3D, 10.1021/ar00028a001
Kay L E, Gardner K H. Solution NMR spectroscopy beyond 25 kDa. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 1997, 7: 722–731, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmvVGmsLo%3D, 10.1016/S0959-440X(97)80084-X, 9345633
Zuiderweg E R. Mapping protein-protein interactions in solution by NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry, 2002, 41: 1–7, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXoslygsr8%3D, 10.1021/bi011870b, 11771996
Carlomagno T. Ligand-target interactions: what can we learn from NMR? Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 2005, 34: 245–266, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXlslCku7o%3D, 10.1146/annurev.biophys.34.040204.144419, 15869390
Takeuchi K, Wagner G. NMR studies of protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 2006, 16: 109–117, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhsFOjsrg%3D, 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.01.006, 16427776
Kay L E. Protein dynamics from NMR. Nat Struct Biol, 1998, 5(Suppl): 513–517, 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXks1ent70%3D, 10.1038/755, 9665181
Ishima R, Torchia D A. Protein dynamics from NMR. Nat Struct Biol, 2000, 7: 740–743, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmsFWlu7o%3D, 10.1038/78963, 10966641
Palmer A G 3rd. Nmr probes of molecular dynamics: overview and comparison with other techniques. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct, 2001, 30: 129–155, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXkvVaqsbo%3D, 10.1146/annurev.biophys.30.1.129, 11340055
Case D A. Molecular dynamics and NMR spin relaxation in proteins. Acc Chem Res, 2002, 35: 325–331, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXosFCqsL4%3D, 10.1021/ar010020l, 12069616
Korzhnev D M, Kay L E. Probing invisible, low-populated States of protein molecules by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: an application to protein folding. Acc Chem Res, 2008, 41: 442–451, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXitVamu7s%3D, 10.1021/ar700189y, 18275162
Markwick P R, Malliavin T, Nilges M. Structural biology by NMR: structure, dynamics, and interactions. PLoS Comput Biol, 2008, 4: e1000168, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000168, 18818721
Lu J, Machius M, Dulubova I, et al. Structural basis for a Munc13-1 homodimer to Munc13-1/RIM heterodimer switch. PLoS Biol, 2006, 4: e192, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040192, 16732694
Yu C, Feng W, Wei Z, et al. Myosin VI undergoes cargo-mediated dimerization. Cell, 2009, 138: 537–548, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhsVChs7nF, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.030, 19665975
Yan J, Pan L, Chen X, et al. The structure of the harmonin/sans complex reveals an unexpected interaction mode of the two Usher syndrome proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 4040–4045, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXjsFWitrc%3D, 10.1073/pnas.0911385107, 20142502
Wen W, Yu J, Pan L, et al. Lipid-Induced Conformational Switch Controls Fusion Activity of Longin Domain SNARE Ykt6. Mol Cell, 2010, 37: 383–395, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXlt1Kktbk%3D, 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.024, 20159557
Doerks T, Bork P, Kamberov E, et al. L27, a novel heterodimerization domain in receptor targeting proteins Lin-2 and Lin-7. Trends Biochem Sci, 2000, 25: 317–318, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXks12nuro%3D, 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01599-1, 10871881
Feng W, Long J F, Fan J S, et al. The tetrameric L27 domain complex as an organization platform for supramolecular assemblies. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2004, 11: 475–480, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjsVCqs7o%3D, 10.1038/nsmb751, 15048107
Buss F, Spudich G, Kendrick-Jones J. Myosin VI: cellular functions and motor properties. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2004, 20: 649–676, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVaqu7fF, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.012103.094243, 15473855
Sweeney H L, Houdusse A. What can myosin VI do in cells? Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2007, 19: 57–66, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpvVOgsg%3D%3D, 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.12.005, 17175153
Morris S M, Arden S D, Roberts R C, et al. Myosin VI binds to and localises with Dab2, potentially linking receptor-mediated endocytosis and the actin cytoskeleton. Traffic, 2002, 3: 331–341, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XjvFCgtbw%3D, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30503.x, 11967127
Reiners J, Wolfrum U. Molecular analysis of the supramolecular usher protein complex in the retina. Harmonin as the key protein of the Usher syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2006, 572: 349–353, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXislGjsL8%3D
Grillet N, Xiong W, Reynolds A, et al. Harmonin mutations cause mechanotransduction defects in cochlear hair cells. Neuron, 2009, 62: 375–387, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmsFWjtLw%3D, 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.006, 19447093
Verpy E, Leibovici M, Zwaenepoel I, et al. A defect in harmonin, a PDZ domain-containing protein expressed in the inner ear sensory hair cells, underlies Usher syndrome type 1C. Nat Genet, 2000, 26: 51–55, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmsVKku78%3D, 10.1038/79171, 10973247
Weil D, El-Amraoui A, Masmoudi S, et al. Usher syndrome type I G (USH1G) is caused by mutations in the gene encoding SANS, a protein that associates with the USH1C protein, harmonin. Hum Mol Genet, 2003, 12: 463–471, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXisFSksrg%3D, 10.1093/hmg/ddg051, 12588794
Adato A, Michel V, Kikkawa Y, et al. Interactions in the network of Usher syndrome type 1 proteins. Hum Mol Genet, 2005, 14: 347–356, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXkt1WksA%3D%3D, 10.1093/hmg/ddi031, 15590703
Rossi V, Banfield D K, Vacca M, et al. Longins and their longin domains: regulated SNAREs and multifunctional SNARE regulators. Trends Biochem Sci, 2004, 29: 682–688, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXpslGis7Y%3D, 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.10.002, 15544955
Kweon Y, Rothe A, Conibear E, et al. Ykt6p is a multifunctional yeast R-SNARE that is required for multiple membrane transport pathways to the vacuole. Mol Biol Cell, 2003, 14: 1868–1881, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXktFKiu74%3D, 10.1091/mbc.E02-10-0687, 12802061
McNew J A, Sogaard M, Lampen N M, et al. Ykt6p, a prenylated SNARE essential for endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi transport. J Biol Chem, 1997, 272: 17776–17783, 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXksFyjsrk%3D, 10.1074/jbc.272.28.17776, 9211930
Meiringer C T, Auffarth K, Hou H, et al. Depalmitoylation of Ykt6 prevents its entry into the multivesicular body pathway. Traffic, 2008, 9: 1510–1521, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVyksbrI, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00778.x, 18541004
Tochio H, Tsui M M, Banfield D K, et al. An autoinhibitory mechanism for nonsyntaxin SNARE proteins revealed by the structure of Ykt6p. Science, 2001, 293: 698–702, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXls1Knsr0%3D, 10.1126/science.1062950, 11474112
Fukasawa M, Varlamov O, Eng W S, et al. Localization and activity of the SNARE Ykt6 determined by its regulatory domain and palmitoylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 4815–4820, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjsFCjurg%3D, 10.1073/pnas.0401183101, 15044687
Pylypenko O, Schonichen A, Ludwig D, et al. Farnesylation of the SNARE protein Ykt6 increases its stability and helical folding. J Mol Biol, 2008, 377: 1334–1345, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXjs1Smtrs%3D, 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.099, 18329045
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, W., Pan, L. & Zhang, M. Combination of NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography offers unique advantages for elucidation of the structural basis of protein complex assembly. Sci. China Life Sci. 54, 101–111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-011-4137-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-011-4137-2