Abstract
In this paper, we explore how the application of multimedia design principles may inform the development of educational multi-user virtual environments (MUVEs). We look at design principles that have been shown to help learners manage cognitive load within multimedia environments and conduct a conjectural analysis of the extent to which such principles can help manage cognitive load in the highly immersive “beyond multimedia” environments that 3-D educational MUVEs represent. We frame our discussion as a design practice analysis of the River City MUVE, a science inquiry environment that has middle school students collaborating to develop and test hypotheses regarding illnesses sweeping a virtual town. We analyze the current River City interface design using a framework describing cognitive overload scenarios and associated approaches to manage cognitive load. We also discuss the potential difficulties that may be seen as multimedia principles are applied to 3-D MUVEs. Our discussion describes a blueprint for research implementations that we are undertaking to systematically investigate the effect of an educational MUVE interface design based on multimedia principles—implementations that we hope will provide an action framework for other MUVE researchers to use in their own studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barab, S. A., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzan, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 86–108.
Bowers, A. (1987). Creative C.O.W. or a MOO is worth a thousand words. Pointer, 32(1), 9–13.
Brdicka, B. (1999). Multi user virtual environment and its possible use in education. Retrieved 9/28, 2003, from http://www.it.pedf.cuni.cz/~bobr/MUVE/muveen.htm.
Brown J. S., Collins A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Research, 18, 32–42.
Bruckman, A. (2000). Uneven achievement in a constructivist learning environment. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2005). Making learning meaningful: An exploratory study of using multi-user environments (MUVEs) in middle school science. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Montreal, Canada.
Clarke, J., Dede, C., Ketelhut, D., & Nelson, B. (2006). A design-based research strategy to promote scalability for educational innovations. Educational Technology, 46(3), 27–36.
Dede, C. (2003). Multi-user virtual environments. Educause Review, 38(3), 60–61.
Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., & Reuss, K. (2003). Motivation, usability, and learning outcomes in a prototype museum-based multi-user virtual environment. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences.
Falsetti, J. (1995). What the Heck is a MOO? and what’s the story with all those cows? Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. 29th, Long Beach, CA, March 26–April 1, 1995.
Fanderclai, T. L. (1995). MUDs in education: New environments, new pedagogies. Computer Mediated Education Magazine, 2(1), 8.
Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2005). The multimedia principle. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 117–133). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Herman, A., Coombe, R. J., & Kaye, L. (2006). Your second life? Cultural Studies, 20(2/3), 184–210.
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 217–239). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 402–412.
Lorch, R. F. (1989). Text signaling devicing and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 209–234.
Lorch, R. F., & Lorch, E. P. (1996). Effects of headings on text recall and summarization. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 261–278.
Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 377.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.
Mayer, R. E. (2005a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005b). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1–16). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 484–490.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 444–452.
Mayer, R. E., & Clark, R. C. (2007). Using rich media wisely. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.) Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 311–322). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187–198.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 638.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389–401.
Nelson, B. (2007). Exploring the use of individualized, reflective guidance in an educational multi-user virtual environment. The Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 83–97.
Nelson, B., Ketelhut, D., Clarke, J., Bowman, C., & Dede, C. (2005). Design-based research strategies for developing a scientific inquiry curriculum in a multi-user virtual environment. Educational Technology, 45(1), 21–27.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–287.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell: ACER Press.
Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, B.C., Erlandson, B.E. Managing cognitive load in educational multi-user virtual environments: reflection on design practice. Education Tech Research Dev 56, 619–641 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9082-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9082-1