Skip to main content
Log in

Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Signals are writing devices that emphasize aspects of a text's content or structure without adding to the content of the the text. Findings are reviewed for studies of several different types of signaling devices, including: titles, headings, previews, overviews, summaries, typographical cues, recall sentences, number signals, importance indicators, and summary indicators. Most investigations have examined how the presence of signals in a text affects subsequent memory for the text. Virtually all types of signals produce better memory for information they cue in a text, whereas memory for unsignaled information often is unaffected. Less attention has been directed to signaling effects on other cognitive processes, such as attention, basic reading processes, and comprehension. It is argued that an understanding of how signals influence these processes will contribute to the application of signaling research to reading and writing instruction and to our general understanding of reading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bock, M. (1980). Some effects of titles on building and recalling text structures.Discourse Processes 3: 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., and Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 11: 717–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., Meyer, B. J. F., and Penland, M. J. (1982). Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading.J. Educat. Psychol. 74: 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L. W., Dansereau, D. F., Spurlin, J. E., and Holley, C. D. (1983). Effects of headings on text processing.J. Educat. Psychol. 75: 292–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashen, V. M., and Leicht, K. L. (1970). Role of the isolation effect in a formal educational setting.J. Educat. Psychol. 61: 484–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., and Stordahl, K. E. (1955). The effect of organization aids on comprehension and retention.J. Educat. Psychol. 46: 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, P., and Foster, J. (1975). Typographic cueing as an aid to learning from typewritten text.Prog. Learn. Educat. Tech. 12: 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouse, J. H., and Idstein, P. (1972). Effects of encoding cues on prose learning.J. Educat. Psychol. 63: 309–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee-Lucas, D., and DiVesta, F. J. (1980). Learner-generated organizational aids: Effects on learning from text.J. Educat. Psychol. 72: 304–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Relevance assignment in discourse comprehension.Discourse Processes 2: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doctorow, M., Wittrock, M. C., and Marks, C. (1978). Generative processes in reading comprehension.J. Educat. Psychol. 70: 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooling, D. J., and Lachman, R. (1971). Effects of comprehension on retention of prose.J. Exper. Psychol. 88: 216–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooling, D. J., and Mullet, R. L. (1973). Locus of thematic effects in retention of prose.J. Exper. Psychol. 97: 404–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. J. (1979). The use of visual cues in text. In Kolers, P. A. Wrolstad, M. E. and Bouma H., (eds.),Processing of Visible Language, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. L., and Barker, A. S. (1974). Effectiveness of highlighting for retention of text material.J. Appl. Psychol. 59: 358–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frase, L. T. (1969). Paragraph organization of written materials: The influence of conceptual clustering upon the level and organization of recall.J. Educat. Psychol. 60: 394–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frase, L. T., and Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Typographical cues that facilitate comprehension.J. Educat. Psychol. 71: 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A., Dinnel, D. L., Halpain, D. R., McKee, T. K., Corkill, A. J., and Wise, S. L. (1988). Effects of across-chapter signals on recall of text.J. Educat. Psychol. 80: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M. (1978). Capturing readers' attention by means of typographical cuing strategies.Educat. Technol. 18: 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., and DiVesta, F. J. (1979). Control of prose processing via instructional and typographical cues.J. Educat. Psychol. 71: 595–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, E. T., Alexander, P. A., and Schallert, D. L. (1987). The author's role in cueing strategic processing of college textbooks.Red. Res. Instruct. 27: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. R. (1988).Strategies for Understanding Information Organization in Discourse, paper presented at the Psychonomics Society Convention, Chicago.

  • Guthrie, J. T. (1988). Locating information in documents: Examination of a cognitive model.Read. Res. Quart. 23: 178–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., Bartlett, S., and Branthwaite, A. (1980). Underlining can make a difference-sometimes.J. Educat. Res. 73: 218–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., Goldie, M., and Steen, L. (1979). The role and position of summaries: Some issues and data.Educat. Rev. 31: 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., Kenely, J., Owen, G., and Trueman, M. (1980). The effect of headings on children's recall from prose text.Brit. J. Educat. Psychol. 5: 304–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., Morris, P., and Trueman, M. (1981). Headings in text.Remed. Educat. 16: 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., and Trueman, M. (1982). The effects of summaries on the recall of information from prose: Five experimental studies.Human Learn 1: 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., and Trueman, M. (1985). A research strategy for text designers: The role of headings.Instruct. Sci. 14: 99–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershberger, W. (1964). Self-evaluational responding and typographical cueing: Techniques for programing self-instructional reading materials.J. Educat. Psychol. 55: 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershberger, W., and Terry, D. F. (1965). Typographical cuing in conventional and programmed texts.J. Appl. Psychol. 49: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, C. D., Dansereau, D. F., Evans, S. H., Collins, K. W., Brooks, L., and Larson, D. (1981). Utilizing intact and embedded headings as processing aids with nonnarrative text.Contemp. Educat. Psychol. 6: 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idstein, P., and Jenkins, J. R. (1972). Underlining versus repetitive reading.J. Educat. Res. 65: 321–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., and van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of discourse comprehension and production.Psychol. Rev. 85: 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I. S., and Guthrie, J. T. (1984). Prose comprehension and text search as a function of reading volume.Read. Res. Quart. 19: 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, G. R., Mabry, J. E., and Gustafson, L. M. (1955). The relationship of patterning (underlining) to immediate retention and to acceptability of technical material.J. Appl. Psychol. 39: 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, G. R., Shuford, E. H., and Nichols, W. H. (1958). The relation of format organization to learning.Educat. Res. Bull. 37: 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozminsky, E. (1977). Altering comprehension: The effect of biasing titles on text comprehension.Mem. Cognit. 5: 482–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhavy, R. W. (1972). Effects of embedding orienting stimuli in a prose passage.Psychonom. Sci. 28: 213–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loman, N. L., and Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose.J. Educat. Psychol. 75: 402–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, R. F., Jr. (1985). Effects on recall of signals to text organization.Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 23: 374–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, R. F., Jr., and Chen, A. H. (1986). Effects of number signals on reading and recall.J. Educat. Psychol. 78: 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, R. F., Jr., and Lorch, E. P. (1985). Topic structure representation and text recall.J. Educat. Psychol. 77: 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, R. F., Jr., and Lorch, E. P. (1986). On-line processing of summary and important signals in reading.Discourse Processes 9: 489–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, R. F., Jr., Lorch, E. P., and Matthews, P. D. (1985). On-line processing of the topic structure of a text.J. Mem. Lang. 24: 350–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension.Educat. Psychol. 19: 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Dyck, L. K., and Cook, J. L. (1984). Techniques that help readers build mental models from scientific text: Definitions pretraining and signaling.J. Educat. Psychol. 76: 1089–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin-Cook, N. (1981). Summaries: Further issues and data.Educat. Rev. 33: 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J. F. (1975).The Organization of Prose and Its Effects on Memory Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., and Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students.Read. Res. Quart. 16: 72–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. J. F., and Rice, E. (1982). The interaction of reader strategies and the organization of text.Text 2: 155–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nist, S. L., and Hogrebe, M. C. (1987). The role of underlining and annotating in remembering textual information.Read. Res. Instruct. 27: 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. P. (1962). Some organizational aids and their effect upon comprehension.J. Commun. 12: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. W., Krane, A. R., and Kendall, J. R. (1981). Triggering a schema: The role of italics and intonation in the interpretation of ambiguous discourse.Am. Educat. Res. J. 18: 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proger, B. B., Carter, C. E., Jr., Mann, L., Taylor, R. G., Jr., Bayuk, R. J., Jr., Morris, V. R., and Reckless, D. E., (1973). Advance and concurrent organizers for detailed verbal passages used with elementary school pupils.J. Educat. Res. 66: 451–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, L. M., and Anderson, J. R. (1980). A comparison of texts and their summaries: Memorial consequences.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 19: 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickards, J. P., and August, G. J. (1975). Generative underling strategies in prose recall.J. Educat. Psychol. 67: 860–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schallert, D. L. (1976). Improving memory for prose: The relationship between depth of procession and context.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 15: 621–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyridakis, J. H., and Standal, T. C. (1986). Headings, previews, logical connectives: Effects on reading comprehension.J. Tech. Writing Commun. 16: 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyridakis, J. H., and Standal, T. C. (1987). Signals in expository prose: Effects on reading.Read. Res. Quart. 22: 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. P. (1965). Review of the historical, empirical, and theoretical status of the von Restorff phenomenon.Psychol. Bull. 63z; 410–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, R. H. W. (1979). Typographic access structures for educational texts. In Kolers, P. A. Wrolstad, M. E. and Bouma, H. (eds.),Processing of Visible Language, Vol. 1, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, R. H. W. (1980). Graphic aspects of complex texts: Typography as macro-punctuation. In Kolers, P. A. Wrolstad, M. W. and Bouma, H. (eds.),Proceeding of Visible Language, Vol. 2, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 242–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, S. C. (1986). The relationship of headings, questions, and locus of control to multiple-choice test performance.J. Read. Behav. 18: 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuill, N., and Joscelyne, T. (1988). Effect of organizational cues and strategies on good and poor comprehenders' story understanding.J. Educat. Psychol. 80: 152–158.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorch, R.F. Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educ Psychol Rev 1, 209–234 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320135

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320135

Key words

Navigation