Abstract
This is a study of teaching about the human body. It is based on transcribed material from interviews with 15-year-old students and teachers about their experiences of sex education and from recordings of classroom interactions during a dissection. The analysis is focused on the relationship between what students are supposed to learn about the biological body and their expressed experiences and meaning making of bodies in the schoolwork. The results indicate that the negotiations associated with the encounters between the bodies of the classroom (student, teacher, and animal bodies) are important for what directions meaning making takes and what students are afforded to learn about bodies, biologically as well as in terms of values. We suggest that these negotiations should be taken into account at schools, be regarded as an important part of the learning processes in science education and in that way open up for new possibilities for students’ meaning making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alsop, S. (Ed.). (2005). Beyond Cartesian dualism. Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1043–1047.
Arnaudin, M., & Mintzes, J. (1985). Students’ alternative conceptions of the human circulatory system: A cross-age study. Science Education, 69, 721–733.
Biesta, G., & Burbules, N. C. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bloom, J. D. (1992). The development of scientific knowledge in elementary school children: A context of meaning perspective. Science Education, 76, 399–413.
Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 282–295.
Butler, J. (1999). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
Cakici, Y. (2005). Exploring Turkish upper primary level pupils’ understanding of digestion. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 79–100.
Davies, B. (2000). A body of writing, 1990–1999. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Descartes, R., & Marc-Wogau, K. (1990). Valda skrifter ([Ny utg.] ed.). Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
Dewey, J. (1922/1996). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. In L. Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey 1882–1953: The electronic edition (Middle Works, Vol. 14). Charlottesville: VA: InteLex Corporation.
Dewey, J. (1934/1996). Art as experience. In L. Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey 1882–1953: The electronic edition (Later Works, Vol. 10). Charlottesville: VA: InteLex Corporation.
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949/1996). Knowing and the known. In L. Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey1882–1953: The electronic edition (Later Works, Vol. 16). Charlottesville: VA: InteLex Corporation.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.
Hildebrand, G. M. (2001, March). Con/testing Learning Models. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching. St. Louise, MO, USA.
Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008). The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science. Research in Science Education, 38, 45–65.
Lemke, J. J. (1990). Talking science. Language, learning, and values. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Lidar, M., Lundqvist, L., & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology. Science Education, 90, 148–163.
Lundegård, I. (2007). Self, values, world—Young people in dialogue on sustainable development. In J. Öhman (Ed.), Values and democracy in education for sustainable development—Contributions from Swedish research (pp. 123–144). Stockholm: Liber.
Lundin, M. (2007). Questions as a tool for bridging science and everyday language games. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 265–279.
Lundqvist, E., Almqvist, J., & Östman, (2009). Epistemological norms and companion meanings in science classroom communication. Science Education, 93, 859–874.
Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
National Agency for Education (2006/2007). Compulsory school syllabuses 2000. Skolverket. http://www3.skolverket.se/ki03/front.aspx?sprak=EN&ar=0607&infotyp=23&skolform=11&id=3878&extraId=2087 [2009, 2009-08-21].
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Öhman, J., & Östman, L. (2007). Continuity and change in moral meaning-making: A transactional approach. Journal of Moral Education, 36, 151–168.
Östman, L. (1998). How companion meanings are expressed by science education discourse. In D. A. Roberts & L. Ösman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 54–70). New York London: Teaching College Press.
Reiss, M. J., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Andersen, A. M., Bartoszeck, A., Carvalho, G. S., Chen, S.-Y., et al. (2002). An international study of young peoples’ drawings of what is inside themselves. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 58.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/Science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Ledermann (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Roberts, D. A., & Östman, L. (Eds.). (1998). Problems of meaning in science curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge.
Sages, R., & Szybek, P. (2000). A Phenomenological study of students’ knowledge of biology in a Swedish comprehensive school. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 31, 155–187.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.
Sullivan, S. (2000). Reconfiguring gender with John Dewey: Habit, bodies, and cultural change. Hypatia, 15, 23.
Sullivan, S. (2001). Living across and through skins. Transactional bodies, pragmatism and feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Swedish Research Council. (2002). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
Szybek, P. (2002). Science education—An event staged on two stages simultaneously. Science & Education, 11, 525–555.
Tobin, K. G., & Roth, W.-M. (2007). The culture of science education: Its history in person. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Wickman, P.-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88, 325–344.
Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education. Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601–623.
Wickman, P.-O. & Ligozat, F. Scientific literacy as action: Consequences for content progression. In Linder, C., Östman, L., Roberts, D.A., & Wickman, P.-O. (Eds.) Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum (in press).
Zembylas, M. (2004). The emotional characteristics of teaching: an ethnographic study of one teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 185–201.
Zembylas, M. (2005). Discursive practices, genealogies, and emotional rules: A poststructuralist view on emotion and identity in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 935–948.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orlander, A.A., Wickman, PO. Bodily experiences in secondary school biology. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 6, 569–594 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9292-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9292-4