Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Roles of Aesthetic Experience in Elementary School Science

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of aesthetic experiences for learning was examined in elementary school science. Numerous authors have argued for a science education also involving aesthetic experiences, but few have examined what this means empirically. Recordings of children’s talk with each other and with the teacher during hands-on activities in nine different science units were made. How the children and teachers used aesthetic judgements and how these judgements were part of aesthetic experiences of the science assignments were analysed. For the analysis a pragmatist perspective was used, especially drawing on Dewey and the later Wittgenstein. The results showed how aesthetic judgements occurred in moments of anticipation and moments when the science activities were brought to fulfilment. In this way children used aesthetic judgements normatively about what belonged in science class and what to include and exclude. In this way aesthetic judgements were an important part of learning how to proceed in science class. In using aesthetic judgements the children also talked about their own place in science class and whether they belonged there or not. In this way aesthetic experience is tightly related to learning science as participation. Learning science also meant learning a special kind of aesthetics, that is, learning how to distinguish the science context from other contexts. The fact that children liked or disliked something outside school did not necessarily mean that it was experienced aesthetically in the same way in school, but needed to be re-learnt. What these results mean for science education is discussed at length. The connection between aesthetics and learning to observe is also briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Carbonic acid” [kolsyra] is a literal translation of the words children used to describe this phenomenon. We have chosen this literal translation because the everyday expression that is used in Swedish to say that a beverage is “carbonated” is to say that it is “with carbonic acid.” So it is natural for Swedish children to name bubbles that appear in water as “carbonic acid,” although the term has no meaning as to the chemical composition of the bubbles.

  2. The original Swedish word Nicolai used was “pyssla,” which has a connotation of tinkering in a cosy way. We have found no corresponding word in English.

References

  • Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1043–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, J. D. (1992). The development of scientific knowledge in elementary school children: A context of meaning perspective. Science Education, 76, 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934/1980). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience & education. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1971). Problem-solving in the arts and sciences. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 5, 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girod, M., & Wong, D. (2002). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: Case studies of three fourth grades. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 199–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2007). Transformation through language use: Children’s spontaneous metaphors in elementary school science. Science & Education (in press).

  • Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology. Science Education, 90, 148–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure, A. A., & Zitlow, C. S. (1991). Not just the facts: Aesthetic response in elementary content area studies. Language Arts, 68, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86, 548–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accomodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1989). Discovering. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). From “truth” to “invented reality”: A discourse analysis of high school physics students’ talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szybek, P. (1999). Staging science. Some aspects of the production and distribution of science knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

  • Säljö, R., & Bergqvist, K. (1997). Seeing the light: Discourse and practice in the optics lab. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 385–405). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, A. I. (Ed.) (1996). The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, L. H. T., & Pines, A. L. (1983). How “rational” is rationality? Science Education, 67, 37–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickman, P.-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88, 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002a). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002b). Induction as an empirical problem: How students generalize during practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1966). Lectures and conversations on aesthetics, psychology and religious belief. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D., Pugh, K., & the Dewey Ideas Group at Michigan State University. (2001). Learning science: A Deweyan perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Britt Jakobson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jakobson, B., Wickman, PO. The Roles of Aesthetic Experience in Elementary School Science. Res Sci Educ 38, 45–65 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8

Keywords

Navigation