Skip to main content
Log in

Questions as a tool for bridging science and everyday language games

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research has shown how students can shift between different ways of communicating about natural phenomena. The point of departure in this text is that school science comprises science ways to communicate as well as everyday ways to communicate. In school science activities transitions, from for example everyday ways to explain to science ways to explain, occur and the purpose of this paper is to show what role questions play in these transitions. Data consists of video observations of a group of 24 students, 15 years of age, doing their ordinary school science work without my interference in their planning. Relevant conversations including questions were transcribed. The analysis was made by examining the establishment of relations between utterances in the transcribed conversations. Relations that bridge science and everyday language games are described in the results. Questions that were formulated in an everyday language game illustrate the difficulties of making transitions to a science language game. Without teacher guidance, students’ questions are potential promoters for making the topic drift and to develop into something totally different from the topic as planned by the teacher. However, questions promote transitions to an everyday language game. These can be used by teachers for example to adjust an everyday explanation and guide students in making science knowledge useful in daily life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The following markings was used when transcribing: (.) = short break; = = following turn comes without break; : = prolonged sound; ( ) [single parenthesis] = said with silent voice/difficult to hear; (( )) [double parenthesis] = my comment; ____ [underline] = with emphasis.

References

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1997). Toward a first nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum. Science Education, 81, 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anward, J. (1983). Språkbruk och språkutveckling i skolan. Lund: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gisselberg, K. (1991). Vilka frågor ställer elever och vilka elever ställer frågor. Diss. No 31. Umeå: Umeå universitet.

  • Lundin, M., & Lindahl, M. (2005). Experiences and their role in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 1(7), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Östman, L. (2003). Transaktion, sociokulturella praktiker och meningsskapande: ett forskningsprogram. In L. Östman (Ed.), Erfarenhet och situation i handling –en rapport från projektet Lärande i naturvetenskap och teknik (pp. 91–118). Uppsala: Uppsala universitet, Pedagogiska institutionen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2005). Talking science. Language and learning in science classrooms. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoultz, J. (2000). Att samtala om/i naturvetenskap. Kommunikation, kontext och artefakt. Diss. No 67. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Education and Pshychology.

  • Szybek, P. (2002). Science education – an event staged on two stages simultaneously. Science & Education, 11, 525–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wistedt, I. (1990). Vardagskunskaper och skolmatematik. Report from research project Vardagskunskaper och skolmatematik.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyndhamn, J., & Säljö, R. (1997). Word problems and mathematical reasoning – a study of children’s mastery of reference and meaning in textual realities. Learning and Instruction, 7, 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank my supervisors Mats Lindahl and Kerstin Bergqvist for valuable support and reviewers for helpful comments on drafts of this text. Swedish national graduate school in science and technology education research made this paper possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattias Lundin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lundin, M. Questions as a tool for bridging science and everyday language games. Cult.Scie.Edu. 2, 265–279 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9043-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9043-8

Keywords

Navigation