HSS Journal ®

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 235–239 | Cite as

Effect of Pelvic Osteotomy in the Skeletally Immature on Acetabular Coverage

Current Topics Concerning Joint Preservation and Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip

Abstract

Background

Although pelvic osteotomy in children has been effective in re-establishing containment of the hip joint, its impact on hip joint development with respect to acetabular coverage is ill defined.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of acetabular overcoverage in patients who had pelvic osteotomy during childhood and its impact on patient function.

Patients and Methods

Between 1980 and 2008, all patients who had a pelvic osteotomy done at our institution for non-neuropathic hip dysplasia (DDH) or secondary to Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease (LCP) prior to skeletal maturity were reviewed. A clinical assessment and the WOMAC, UCLA Activity Score, Marx activity score, and SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaires were completed. A standardized AP pelvic X-ray was performed to determine the acetabular coverage, signs of retroversion, and degenerative changes.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (32 hips) were identified, of which 14 (9 DDH, 5 LCP) agreed to participate. Impingement sign was positive in eight patients (six DDH, two LCP). Crossover and ischial spine signs were each present in ten hips. Tonnis grades were: 0 in 1 hip, 1 in 10 hips, 2 in 2 hips, and 3 in 1 hip. The mean Tonnis angle was 11.6 ± 8.6°. The mean CE angle was 24.0 ± 15.9° with six hips having a CE angle <20° and one hip with a CE angle >40°. There was no correlation between crossover sign or ischial sign and Tonnis grade (p = 0.739), hip pain (p = 0.520), or impingement sign (p = 1.00).

Conclusions

Acetabular overcoverage is common in patients who underwent pelvic osteotomy during childhood. No correlation was identified between retroversion and hip pain in our patient cohort.

Keywords

pelvic osteotomy acetabular coverage retroversion pediatric 

References

  1. 1.
    Allen DJ, Beaule PE, Ramadan O, Doucette S. Prevalence of associated deformities and hip pain in patients with cam type femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91B:589-594.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:228-241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87B:1012-1018.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1988;1:95-108.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bohm P, Brzuske A. Salter innominate osteotomy for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in children: results of seventy-three consecutive osteotomies after twenty-six to thirty-five years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002 84-A: 178-186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Carlisle JC, Schoenecker PE. Incidence and characteristics of femoral deformities in the dysplastic hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:128-134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cobb J, Logishetty K, Davda K, Iranpour F. Cams and pincer impingement are distinct, not mixed: the acetabular pathomorphology of femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2143-2151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dora C, Mascard E, Mladenov K, Seringe R. Retroversion of the acetabular dome after Salter and triple pelvic osteotomy for congenital dislocation of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2002;11:34-40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giori NJ, Trousdale RT. Acetabular Retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop. 2003;417:263-269.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grudziak JS, Ward WT. Dega osteotomy for the treatment of congenital dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A: 845-854.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haidar RK, Jones RS, Vergroesen DA, Evans GA. Simultaneous open reduction and Salter innominate osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:471-476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang SC, Wang JH. A comparative study of nonoperative versus operative treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in patients of walking age. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:181-188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ito H, Ooura H, Kobayashi M, Matsuno T. Middle-term results of Salter innominate osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;156-164.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jamali AA, Maldenov K, Meyer DC, Martinez A, Beck M, Ganz R, Leunig M. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the "cross-over-sign". J Orthop Res. 2007;25:758-765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, Ganz R, Leunig M. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis : a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2008;466:677-683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim WY, Hutchinson CE, Andrew JG, Allen PD. The relationship between acetabular retroversion and osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:727-729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lamontagne M, Kennedy MJ, Beaule PE. The Effect of Cam FAI on Hip and Pelvic Motion during Maximum Squat. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2009;467:645-650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    LeBel ME, Gallien R. The surgical treatment of teratologic dislocation of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14:331-336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leunig M, Beaule PE, Ganz R. The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2009;467:616-622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li PL, Ganz R. The morphology of congenital acetabular dysplasia. One in six is retroverted. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2003 416: 245-253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:213-218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mast JW, Brunner RL, Zebrack J. Recognizing acetabular version in the radiographic presentation of hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004;418:48-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mayo KA, Trumble SJ, Mast JW. Results of periacetabular osteotomy in patients with previous surgery for hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1999;363:73-80.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murphy SB, Ganz R, Muller ME. The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome. J Bone Joint Surg. 1995;77A:985-989.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Myers SR, Eijer H, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1999;363:93–99.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nehme A, Oakes D, Perry MJ, Hawatmeth SI, Trousdale RT. Acetabular morphology in bladder exstrophy complex. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:125-130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    PEMBERTON PA. PERICAPSULAR OSTEOTOMY OF THE ILIUM FOR TREATMENT OF CONGENITAL SUBLUXATION AND DISLOCATION OF THE HIP. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965;47:65-86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81B:281-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robb CA, Datta A, Nayeemuddin M, Bache CE. Assessment of acetabular retroversion following long term review of Salter’s osteotomy. Hip International. 2009;19:8-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salter RB. Role of innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip in the older child. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966;48:1413-1439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Salter RB. Innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 1961;43B:518-539.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sankar WN, Flynn JM. The development of acetabular retroversion in children with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28:440-443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2003;407:241-248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Steel HH. Triple osteotomy of the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg. 1973;55A:343-350.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sutherland DH, Greenfield R. Double innominate osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:1082-1091.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thomas SR, Wedge JH, Salter RB. Outcome at forty-five years after open reduction and innominate osteotomy for late-presenting developmental dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2341-2350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tonnis D. Normal Values of the hip of the Hip Joint for the evaluation of x-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop. 1976;119:39-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tonnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81A:1747-1770.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    van Bergayk AB, Garbuz DS. Quality of life and sports-specific outcomes after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84B:339-343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. 1993;Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint: with special reference to teh complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;83:Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yasunaga Y, Yamasaki T, Matsuo T, Ishikawa M, Adachi N, Ochi M. Crossover sign after rotational acetabular osteotomy for dysplasia of the hip. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15:463-469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sulaiman Al-Moussa
    • 1
  • Paul Moroz
    • 1
  • Paul E. Beaulé
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.University of Ottawa, The Ottawa HospitalOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations