Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cams and Pincer Impingement Are Distinct, Not Mixed: The Acetabular Pathomorphology of Femoroacetabular Impingement

  • Basic Research
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Many impinging hips are said to have a mix of features of femoral cam and an overcovered acetabulum causing pincer impingement. Correction of such a mixed picture by reduction of the cam lesion and the acetabular rim is the suggested treatment.

Questions/purposes

We therefore asked two questions: (1) Is the acetabulum in cam impingement easily distinguishable from the pincer acetabulum, or is there a group with features of both types of impingement? (2) Is version or depth of socket better able to distinguish cam from pincer impingement?

Methods

We analyzed the morphologic features of the acetabulum and rim profile of 20 normal, healthy hips, 20 with cams and 20 with pincers on CT. Pelvises were digitized, orientated to the best-fit acetabular plane, and a rim profile was plotted.

Results

Cam hips were shallower than normal hips, which in turn were shallower than pincer hips (84° ± 5° versus 87° ± 4° versus 96° ± 5°, respectively). The rim planes of cam, normal, and pincer hips had similar version (23°, 24°, 25°), but females were 4° more anteverted than males.

Conclusions

We concluded cam and pincer hips are distinct pathoanatomic entities. Cam hips are slightly shallower than normal, whereas pincers are deeper.

Clinical Relevance

Before performing surgery for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement, surgeons should consider measuring the acetabular depth. The cam acetabulum is shallower than normal and may be rendered pathologically shallow by acetabular rim resection leading to early joint failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2A–C
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen D, Beaule PE, Ramadan O, Doucette S. Prevalence of associated deformities and hip pain in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:589–594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1286–1292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1012–1018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bredella MA, Stoller DW. MR imaging of femoroacetabular impingement. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2005;13:653–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clohisy JC, Beaule PE, O’Malley A, Safran MR, Schoenecker P, AOA symposium. Hip disease in the young adult: current concepts of etiology and surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2267–2281.

  8. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Beaule PE, Kim YJ, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ, Leunig M, Schoenecker PL, Millis MB. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(suppl 4):47–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clohisy JC, Knaus ER, Hunt DM, Lesher JM, Harris-Hayes M, Prather H. Clinical presentation of patients with symptomatic anterior hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:638–644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clohisy JC, McClure JT. Treatment of anterior femoroacetabular impingement with combined hip arthroscopy and limited anterior decompression. Iowa Orthop J. 2005;25:164–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Crawford JR, Villar RN. Current concepts in the management of femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1459–1462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dandachli W, Nakhla A, Iranpour F, Kannan V, Cobb JP. Can the acetabular position be derived from a pelvic frame of reference? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:886–893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dandachli W, Richards R, Sauret V, Cobb JP. The transverse pelvic plane: a new and practical reference frame for hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2006;11:322–326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Giori NJ, Trousdale RT. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:263–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Green NE, Beauchamp RD, Griffin PP. Epiphyseal extrusion as a prognostic index in Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:900–905.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Baena FM, Barrett AR, Cobb JP. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement: the imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1513–1518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ito K, Leunig M, Ganz R. Histopathologic features of the acetabular labrum in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:262–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ito K, Minka MA 2nd, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect: a MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jaberi FM, Parvizi J. Hip pain in young adults: femoroacetabular impingement. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(7 suppl 3):37–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, Ganz R, Leunig M. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:677–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kassarjian A, Brisson M, Palmer WE. Femoroacetabular impingement. Eur J Radiol. 2007;63:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khanduja V, Villar RN. The arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:1035–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kohnlein W, Ganz R, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Acetabular morphology: implications for joint-preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:682–691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Larson CM, Giveans MR. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: early outcomes measures. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:540–546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laude F, Boyer T, Nogier A. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74:127–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lavigne M, Parvizi J, Beck M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R, Leunig M. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part I. Techniques of joint preserving surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:61–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lazennec JY, Charlot N, Gorin M, Roger B, Arafati N, Bissery A, Saillant G. Hip-spine relationship: a radio-anatomical study for optimization in acetabular cup positioning. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26:136–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leunig M, Beaule PE, Ganz R. The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:616–622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leunig M, Ganz R. [Femoroacetabular impingement: a common cause of hip complaints leading to arthrosis] [in German]. Unfallchirurg. 2005;108:9–10, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Maheshwari AV, Malik A, Dorr LD. Impingement of the native hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2508–2518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maruyama M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D’Antonio JA. The Frank Stinchfield Award. Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:52–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:181–185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Murphy SB, Kijewski PK, Millis MB, Harless A. Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;261:214–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nelitz M, Guenther KP, Gunkel S, Puhl W. Reliability of radiological measurements in the assessment of hip dysplasia in adults. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:331–334.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Parvizi J, Leunig M, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:561–570.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Philippon MJ, Schenker ML. A new method for acetabular rim trimming and labral repair. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:293–297, ix.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Philippon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, Maxwell RB, Ganz R, Leunig M. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1571–1580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Reijman M, Hazes JM, Pols HA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Acetabular dysplasia predicts incident osteoarthritis of the hip: the Rotterdam study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:787–793.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K. Retroversion of the acetabulum: a cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:281–288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Siebenrock KA, Schoeniger R, Ganz R. Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion: treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:278–286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sink EL, Gralla J, Ryba A, Dayton M. Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28:806–811.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sponseller PD, Jones KB, Ahn NU, Erkula G, Foran JR, Dietz HC 3rd. Protrusio acetabuli in Marfan syndrome: age-related prevalence and associated hip function. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:486–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Standaert CJ, Manner PA, Herring SA. Expert opinion and controversies in musculoskeletal and sports medicine: femoroacetabular impingement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:890–893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tannast M, Kubiak-Langer M, Langlotz F, Puls M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA. Noninvasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:122–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis—what the radiologist should know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1540–1552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tanzer M, Noiseux N. Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:170–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Thompson MS, Dawson T, Kuiper JH, Northmore-Ball MD, Tanner KE. Acetabular morphology and resurfacing design. J Biomech. 2000;33:1645–1653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tönnis D. Normal values of the hip joint for the evaluation of x-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;119:39–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Vandenbussche E, Saffarini M, Deloge N, Moctezuma JL, Nogler M. Hemispheric cups do not reproduce acetabular rim morphology. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:327–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Vandenbussche E, Saffarini M, Taillieu F, Mutschler C. The asymmetric profile of the acetabulum. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:417–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wagner S, Hofstetter W, Chiquet M, Mainil-Varlet P, Stauffer E, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA. Early osteoarthritic changes of human femoral head cartilage subsequent to femoro-acetabular impingement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11:508–518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wisniewski SJ, Grogg B. Femoroacetabular impingement: an overlooked cause of hip pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:546–549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zumstein M, Hahn F, Sukthankar A, Sussmann PS, Dora C. How accurately can the acetabular rim be trimmed in hip arthroscopy for pincer-type femoral acetabular impingement: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:164–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Robin Richards for developing the software and Louise Brown for statistical advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Imperial College, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK

    Justin Cobb MCh, Kartik Logishetty BSc, Kinner Davda MRCS & Farhad Iranpour MD

Authors
  1. Justin Cobb MCh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kartik Logishetty BSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kinner Davda MRCS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Farhad Iranpour MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Cobb MCh.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Cobb, J., Logishetty, K., Davda, K. et al. Cams and Pincer Impingement Are Distinct, Not Mixed: The Acetabular Pathomorphology of Femoroacetabular Impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468, 2143–2151 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1347-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1347-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation