Abstract
The storage of information in external tools (e.g., notebook, cellphone) has become increasingly common. Some researchers have defined this behavior as cognitive offloading, which is a type of learning strategy. Studies have indicated that as age increases, children become increasingly capable of calibrating their learning strategies according to the difficulty of learning items. The value of items is also essential in people’s daily learning. However, how children apply both cues of item difficulty and item value for cognitive offloading to regulate their learning process remains unclear. In three studies, we investigated children’s offloading of learning items by manipulating these items’ difficulty and value (Study 1), value alone with difficulty being unvaried (Study 2), and difficulty and value with an emphasis on value (Study 3). The results indicate that children aged 11 years used difficulty cues alone for cognitive offloading when both difficulty and value cues were presented. However, when difficulty was controlled and value was emphasized, the 11-year-old children adopted cognitive offloading strategies based on value cues. The three studies revealed the conditions under which children in middle childhood apply cues of the item value, which are goal-driven cues, for cognitive offloading and provided methods for encouraging children to simultaneously apply item difficulty cues, which are data-driven cues, and item value cues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ariel, R. (2013). Learning what to learn: The effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 39(6), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033091
Ariel, R., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study? Memory & Cognition, 41(3), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0267-4
Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015928
Armitage Kristy, L., Adam, B., & Jonathan, R. (2020). Developmental origins of cognitive offloading. Proceedings of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences, 287. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2927
Berry, E. D., Allen, R. J., Mon-Williams, M., & Waterman, A. H. (2019). Cognitive offloading: structuring the environment to improve children’s working memory task performance. Cognitive Science, 43(8), e12770. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12770
Boldt, A., & Gilbert, S. J. (2019). Confidence guides spontaneous cognitive offloading. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0195-y
Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
Bulley, A., McCarthy, T., Gilbert, S. J., Suddendorf, T., & Redshaw, J. (2020). Children Devise and Selectively Use Tools to Offload Cognition. Current Biology, 30, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.035
Castel, A. D., Humphreys, K. L., Lee, S. S., Galván, A., Balota, D. A., & McCabe, D. P. (2011). The development of memory efficiency and value-directed remembering across the life span: A cross-sectional study of memory and selectivity. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1553–1564. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025623
Chatham, C. H., Frank, M. J., & Munakata, Y. (2009). Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(14), 5529–5533. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810002106
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn755
Cowan, N., Naveh-Benjamin, M., Kilb, A., & Saults, J. S. (2006). Life-span development of visual working memory: when is feature binding difficult? Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1089–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000222
Dufresne, A., & Kobasigawa, A. (1989). Children’s spontaneous allocation of study time: Differential and sufficient aspects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 274–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1988.10532142
Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 98(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918
Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195868
Fandakova, Y., Selmeczy, D., Leckey, S., Grimm, K. J., Wendelken, C., Bunge, S. A., & Ghetti, S. (2017). Changes in ventromedial prefrontal and insular cortex support the development of metamemory from childhood into adolescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(29), 7582–7587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703079114
Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., & Sarris, J. (2019). The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20617
Fiske, A., & Holmboe, K. (2019). Neural substrates of early executive function development. Developmental Review, 52, 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2019.100866
Gilbert, S. J., Bird, A., Carpenter, J. M., Fleming, S. M., Sachdeva, C., & Tsai, P. C. (2020). Optimal use of reminders: Metacognition, effort, and cognitive offloading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7fxrg
Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C. … Thompson, P. M. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(21), 8174–8179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402680101
Gönül, G., Tsalas, N., & Paulus, M. (2021). The effect of time pressure on metacognitive control: developmental changes in self-regulation and efficiency during learning. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09262-y
Hertzog, C., Hines, J. C., & Touron, D. R. (2013). Judgments of learning are influenced by multiple cues in addition to memory for past test accuracy. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 1(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000003
Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Powell-Moman, A., & Dunlosky, J. (2002). Aging and monitoring associative learning: Is monitoring accuracy spared or impaired? Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.209
Hu, X., Luo, L., & Fleming, S. M. (2019). A role for metamemory in cognitive offloading. Cognition, 193, 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104012
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan
Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
Koriat, A. (2017). Agency attributions of mental effort during self-regulated learning. Memory & Cognition, 46, 370–383. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0771-7
Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Adiv, S., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2014). The effects of goal-driven and data-driven regulation on metacognitive monitoring during learning: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 386–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031768
Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). The memorizing–effort heuristic in judgments of learning: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.10.005
Koriat, A., Ma’ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause–and–effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 36–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36
Koriat, A., & Shitzer-Reichert, R. (2002). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy: Insights from the processes underlying judgments of learning in children. In M. Izaute, P. Chambres, & P. J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 1–17). Kluwer.
Laursen, S. J., & Fiacconi, C. M. (2021). Constraints on the use of the memorizing effort heuristic. Metacognition Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09273-9
Lipowski, S., Ariel, R., Tauber, S. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2017). Children’s agenda-based regulation: The effects of prior performance and reward on elementary school children’s study choices. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1142.2010.40521
Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2004). The effects of incentives and instructions on children’s allocation of study time. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620444000085
Lorsbach, T. C., & Reimer, J. F. (2010). Developmental differences in cognitive control: Goal representation and maintenance during a continuous performance task. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11(2), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248371003699936
Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x
Murphy, D. H., & Castel, A. D. (2021). Responsible remembering and forgetting as contributors to memory for important information. Memory & Cognition, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01139-4
Okkinga, M., van Steensel, R., van Gelderen, A. J., van Schooten, E., Sleegers, P. J., & Arends, L. R. (2018). Effectiveness of reading-strategy interventions in whole classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1215–1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9445-7
Redshaw, J., Vandersee, J., Bulley, A., & Gilbert, S. J. (2018). Development of children’s use of external reminders for hard–to–remember intentions. Child Development, 89(6), 2099–2108. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13040
Risko, E. F., & Dunn, T. L. (2015). Storing information in-the-world: Metacognition and cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.014
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive Offloading. Trends in Cognitive Science, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
Runge, Y., Frings, C., & Tempel, T. (2019). Saving-enhanced performance: saving items after study boosts performance in subsequent cognitively demanding tasks. Memory (Hove, England), 27(10), 1462–1467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1654520
Scarampi, C., & Gilbert, S. J. (2021). Age differences in strategic reminder setting and the compensatory role of metacognition. Psychology and Aging, 6(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000590
Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Houghton Mifflin.
Shenhav, A., Musslick, S., Lieder, F., Kool, W., Griffiths, T. L., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2017). Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 40, 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational psychology: Theory and Practice (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 26(1), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.204
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333, 776–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
Storm, B. C., & Stone, S. M. (2015). Saving-enhanced memory: the benefits of saving on the learning and remembering of new information. Psychological Science, 26(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614559285
Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2010). Does the amount of material to be remembered influence judgements of learning (JOLs)? Memory (Hove, England), 18(3), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211003662755
ter Beek, M., Opdenakker, M. C., Spijkerboer, A. W., Brummer, L., Ozinga, H. W., & Strijbos, J. W. (2019). Scaffolding expository history text reading: Effects on adolescents’ comprehension, self-regulation, and motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 74, 101749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.06.003
Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of selfpaced study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25, 1024–1037.
Thomas, A. K., Lee, M. Y., & David, A. (2013). Metacognitive monitoring and dementia: How intrinsic and extrinsic cues influence judgments of learning in people with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 27(4), 452–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033050
Vink, M., Zandbelt, B. B., Gladwin, T., Hillegers, M., Hoogendam, J. M., van den Wildenberg, W. P., & Kahn, R. S. (2014). Frontostriatal activity and connectivity increase during proactive inhibition across adolescence and early adulthood. Human Brain Mapping, 35(9), 4415–4427. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22483
Zhou, C., Liu, X. M., & Zhang, M. (2004). Characteristics of metamemory and control of children with learning difficulties. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36(1), 65–70.
Funding
This research was supported by the Foundation of Liaoning Educational Committee (WJ2020009) and the Social Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China (L21BSH007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and ethics approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the authors’ affiliating university, and parental consent was obtained before the study.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dong, X., Liu, Y. & Lu, H.J. Effects of learning item difficulty and value on cognitive offloading during middle childhood. Metacognition Learning 17, 1097–1115 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09309-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09309-8