Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Metacognition and Learning
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. A reviewer had asked me to reorder the studies in Fig. 3 as alphabetically. However, I think I accidentally only reordered the study name but not the effect sizes. Thus, Fig. 3 is misleading now. The corrected figure is given below.
Forest plot with effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals for the comparison between larger and smaller fonts in JOLs. Positive effect sizes indicate that items presented in larger fonts were rated with higher JOLs than items presented in smaller fonts. The sizes of the squares in the forest plot are proportional to the weights of the experiments, which are calculated as the inverse sampling variances. RE Model = random-effects model
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, M., Brainerd, C.J. Correction to: Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect. Metacognition Learning 17, 477–478 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09298-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09298-8