Abstract
Metacognition refers to the capacity to reflect upon our own cognitive processes. Its contribution to reading development, when children start building their orthographic lexicon, still remains unknown. Here, we evaluate the metacognitive efficiency of children aged between 6 and 7 years old (N = 60) in 5 experimental tasks; four linguistic tasks assessing orthographic lexical processing and a non-linguistic task unrelated to reading skills. First, we investigated how metacognition on the experimental tasks related to standardised on-paper reading performance, hence participants’ general reading level. Second, we assessed whether these developing readers recruited common metacognitive mechanisms across the different experimental tasks. Third, we explored whether metacognition in this early stage was related to the longitudinal improvement in performance on a linguistic vs a non-linguistic task. No association was found between students’ metacognition in the reading-related tasks and performance on the standardised reading tests, notwithstanding first-order performance correlated across these tasks. Remarkably, some negative correlations were noted between students’ metacognitive ability in one task and task performance in another task. Moreover, we found some evidence consistent with shared metacognitive mechanisms for monitoring performance across tasks. Finally, metacognitive efficiency significantly predicted children’s performance improvement across domains 10 months later. These results suggest that the development of metacognitive processing may be dissociated to some extent from reading-related linguistic abilities during the early stages of formal education. Nevertheless, it may play a fundamental role in guiding students’ learning across domains. These data highlight the importance of creating educational programs fostering students’ metacognition as a long-term learning tool.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Raw data and material are available in OSF (https://osf.io/gpmv6/).
Code availability
Analysis scripts are available in OSF (https://osf.io/gpmv6/).
References
Ackerman, R., & Koriat, A. (2011). Response latency as a predictor of the accuracy of children’s reports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025129
Arciuli, J., & Simpson, I. C. (2012). Statistical learning is related to reading ability in children and adults. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01200.x
Bellon, E., Fias, W., & De Smedt, B. (2019). More than number sense: The additional role of executive functions and metacognition in arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 182, 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.012
Bosse, M.-L., Tainturier, M. J., & Valdois, S. (2007). Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition, 104(2), 198–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009
Bosse, M.-L., & Valdois, S. (2009). Influence of the visual attention span on child reading performance: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01387.x
Boukadi, M., Potvin, K., Macoir Jr., J., Laforce, R., Poulin, S., Brambati, S. M., & Wilson, M. A. (2016). Lexical decision with pseudohomophones and reading in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia: A double dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 86, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.014
Brod, G., Bunge, S. A., & Shing, Y. L. (2017). Does one year of schooling improve Children’s cognitive control and Alter associated brain activation? Psychological Science, 28(7), 967–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617699838
Chetail, F. (2017). What do we do with what we learn? Statistical learning of orthographic regularities impacts written word processing. Cognition, 163, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.015
Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E. y Arribas, D. (2014). PROLEC-R. Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores, Revisada (5.ª edición). Madrid: TEA Ediciones
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945.
de Bruin, A. B. H., Thiede, K. W., Camp, G., & Redford, J. (2011). Generating keywords improves metacomprehension and self-regulation in elementary and middle school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(3), 294–310.
De Vos, T. (1992). Tempo Test Rekenen Nijmegen. Berkhout.
Desender, K., Boldt, A., & Yeung, N. (2018). Subjective confidence predicts information seeking in decision making. Psychological Science, 29(5), 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617744771
Destan, N., Hembacher, E., Ghetti, S., & Roebers, C. M. (2014). Early metacognitive abilities: The interplay of monitoring and control processes in 5- to 7-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.04.001
Dunlosky, J., Mueller, M. L., Morehead, K., Tauber, S. K., Thiede, K. W., & Metcalfe, J. (2021). Why Does Excellent Monitoring Accuracy Not Always Produce Gains In Memory Performance? Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 229(2), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000441
Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining Its Facets and Levels of Functioning in Relation to Self-Regulation and Co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287.
Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the Acquisition of Sight Word Reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading: The Official Journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 18(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
Filevich, E., Forlim, C. G., Fehrman, C., Forster, C., Paulus, M., Shing, Y. L., & Kühn, S. (2020). I know that I know nothing: Cortical thickness and functional connectivity underlying meta-ignorance ability in pre-schoolers. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 41, 100738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100738
Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2014). Overconfidence in children’s multi-trial judgments of learning. Learning and Instruction, 32, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.001
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. The American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Fleming, S. M., Weil, R. S., Nagy, Z., Dolan, R. J., & Rees, G. (2010). Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science, 329(5998), 1541–1543. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1191883
Fleming, S. M. (2017). HMeta-d: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of metacognitive efficiency from confidence ratings. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2017(1), nix007. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix007
Fleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014). How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10022405906/.
Geurten, M., Meulemans, T., & Lemaire, P. (2018). From domain-specific to domain-general? The developmental path of metacognition for strategy selection. Cognitive Development, 48, 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.08.002
Ginestet, E., Phénix, T., Diard, J., & Valdois, S. (2019). Modeling the length effect for words in lexical decision: The role of visual attention. Vision Research, 159, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.03.003
Ginestet, E., Shadbolt, J., Tucker, R., Bosse, M., & Hélène Deacon, S. (2021). Orthographic learning and transfer of complex words: Insights from eye tracking during reading and learning tasks. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12341
Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J. (2009). The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 37(7), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.7.1001
Kelly KJ, Metcalfe J., (2011). Metacognition of emotional face recognition. Emotion. 11(4):896–906
Kelly, M., Scholnick, E. K., Travers, S. H., & Johnson, J. W. (1976). Relations among memory, memory appraisal, and memory strategies. Child Development. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1128179
Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103(3), 490–517.
Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive Development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00088
Lecce, S., Caputi, M., & Pagnin, A. (2015). False-belief understanding at age 5 predicts beliefs about learning in year 3 of primary school. The European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2014.949665
Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2007). Knowledge about the mind: Links between theory of mind and later metamemory. Child Development, 78(1), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00990.x
Lyons, K. E., & Ghetti, S. (2010). Metacognitive development in early childhood: New questions about old assumptions. Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research, 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_12.
Lyons, K. E., & Ghetti, S. (2011). The development of uncertainty monitoring in early childhood. Child Development, 82(6), 1778–1787.
Maniscalco, B., & Lau, H. (2011). On a distinction between detection and discrimination: Metacognitive advantage for signal over noise. Journal of Vision, 11(11), 163. https://doi.org/10.1167/11.11.163
Maniscalco, B., & Lau, H. (2012). A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.021
Mano, Q. R., & Kloos, H. (2018). Sensitivity to the regularity of letter patterns within print among preschoolers: Implications for emerging literacy. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 32(4), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2018.1497736
Martinet, C., Valdois, S., & Fayol, M. (2004). Lexical orthographic knowledge develops from the beginning of literacy acquisition. Cognition, 91(2), B11–B22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.002
Masson, M. E. J., & Rotello, C. M. (2009). Sources of bias in the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: Implications for studies of metacognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014876an
Mazancieux, A., Fleming, S. M., Souchay, C., & Moulin, C. (2020). Retrospective confidence judgments across tasks: domain-general processes underlying metacognitive accuracy. PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/dr7ba.
Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x
Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2007). Principles of cognitive science in education: The effects of generation, errors, and feedback. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194056
Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about Knowing. MIT Press.
Meuwissen, A. S., Anderson, J. E., & Zelazo, P. D. (2017). The creation and validation of the developmental emotional faces stimulus set. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 960–966. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0756-7
Narens, T. O. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60053-5
Parrilla, R., Kirby, J. R., and McQuarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal short-term memory, and phonological awareness: longitudinal predictors of early reading development?. Sci. Stud. Read. 8, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0801_2
Peirce, J., & Macaskill. (2019). Building experiments in PsychoPy. Perception, 48(2), 189–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006618823976
Rawson, K. A., O’Neil, R., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Accurate monitoring leads to effective control and greater learning of patient education materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(3), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024749
Rinne, L. F., & Mazzocco, M. M. M. (2014). Knowing right from wrong in mental arithmetic judgments: Calibration of confidence predicts the development of accuracy. PLoS One, 9(7), e98663. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098663
Roebers, C. M., Mayer, B., Steiner, M., Bayard, N. S., & van Loon, M. H. (2019). The role of children’s metacognitive experiences for cue utilization and monitoring accuracy: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 55(10), 2077–2089. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000776
Roebers, C. M., Schmid, C., & Roderer, T. (2009). Metacognitive monitoring and control processes involved in primary school children’s test performance. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(Pt 4), 749–767.
Roebers, C. M., & Spiess, M. (2017). The development of metacognitive monitoring and control in second graders: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000776
Ruby, E., Giles, N., & Lau, H. (2017). Finding domain-general metacognitive mechanisms requires using appropriate tasks. https://doi.org/10.1101/211805.
Samaha, J., & Postle, B. R. (2017). Correlated individual differences suggest a common mechanism underlying metacognition in visual perception and visual short-term memory. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / The Royal Society, 284(1867). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2035.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition., 26(1), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.204
Valdois, S., Roulin, J.-L., & Line Bosse, M. (2019). Visual attention modulates reading acquisition. Vision Research, 165, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.10.011
van den Bergh, D., Clyde, M. A., Gupta, A. R. K. N., de Jong, T., Gronau, Q. F., Marsman, M., Ly, A., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2021). A tutorial on Bayesian multi-model linear regression with BAS and JASP. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01552-2
van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Böhm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Etz, A., Evans, N. J., Gronau, Q. F., Haaf, J. M., Hinne, M., Kucharský, Š., Ly, A., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., Gupta, A. R. K. N., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5
Verhoeven, L., Voeten, M., & Vermeer, A. (2019). Beyond the simple view of early first and second language reading: The impact of lexical quality. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 28–36.
Vo, V. A., Li, R., Kornell, N., Pouget, A., & Cantlon, J. F. (2014). Young children bet on their numerical skills: Metacognition in the numerical domain. Psychological Science, 25(9), 1712–1721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614538458
Vuorre, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2021). Measures of relative metacognitive accuracy are confounded with task performance in tasks that permit guessing. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09257-1
Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler intelligence scale for children–fifth edition (WISC-V). Pearson.
Wickens, T.D. (2001). Elementary signal detection theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195092509.001.0001.
Funding
This project was funded by the “la Caixa” Foundation INPhINIT fellowship program, by the Basque Government through the BERC 2022–2025 program, by the Spanish State Research Agency through the Severo Ochoa programme grant awarded to the BCBL (CEX2020-001010-S), project grants PID2019-105494GB-I00 and RTI2018–096242-B-I00, and also by an RYC-2015-17356 grant from MINECO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The present study involving human participants was approved by the Basque Center on Cognition Brain and Language Ethics Board and the Bioethics Commission of the University of Barcelona.
Consent to participate
Fully informed consent forms were obtained from the legal tutors of the minors and oral consent from the children prior to the study.
Consent for publication
All authors consent to the publication of the present manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 2257 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taouki, I., Lallier, M. & Soto, D. The role of metacognition in monitoring performance and regulating learning in early readers. Metacognition Learning 17, 921–948 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09292-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09292-0