Baron, J. (1995). Myside bias in thinking about abortion. Thinking and Reasoning, 1, 221–235.
Baron, J. (2019). Actively open-minded thinking in politics. Cognition, 188, 8–18.
Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2018). On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(3), 353–389.
Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020). Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627.
Bendixen, L. D. (2010). Argumentation, anger, and action: Citizenship education in and out of the classroom. Journal of Peace Education and Social Justice, 4(1), 108–119.
Bermudez, A. (2015). Four tools for critical inquiry in history, social studies, and civic education. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 52, 102–118.
Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994). Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 45–62.
Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Kendeou, P. (2014). The interplay of reader goals, working memory, and text structure during reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 206–219.
Burbridge, J. A., Larsen, R. J., & Barch, D. M. (2005). Affective reactivity in language: The role of psychophysiological arousal. Emotion, 5(2), 145–153.
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153–170.
De La Paz, S., & Felton, M. K. (2010). Reading and writing from multiple source documents in history: Effects of strategy instruction with low to average high school writers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 174–192.
Diakidoy, I. A. N., Christodoulou, S. A., Floros, G., Iordanou, K., & Kargopoulos, P. V. (2015). Forming a belief: The contribution of comprehension to the evaluation and persuasive impact of argumentative text. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 300–315.
Donovan, A. M., Zhan, J., & Rapp, D. N. (2018). Supporting historical understandings with refutation texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 1–11.
Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5–24.
Engle, R. W. (2018). Editor’s introduction: Special issue on racism. Current Directions in Psychological Science., 27(3), 147–147.
Fisher, M., & Keil, F. C. (2014). The illusion of argument justification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 425–433.
Foster, P. S., & Harrison, D. W. (2002). The relationship between magnitude of cerebral activation and intensity of emotional arousal. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112(12), 1463–1477.
Goldberg, T., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Harnessing emotions to deliberative argumentation in classroom discussions on historical issues in multi-cultural contexts. Frontline Learning Research, 4(4), 7–19.
Goldberg, T., Schwarz, B. B., & Porat, D. (2011). “Could they do it differently?”: Narrative and argumentative changes in students’ writing following discussion of “hot” historical issues. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 185–217.
Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of epistemic cognition. Routledge.
Ioannou, K., & Iordanou, K. (2019). Elementary school students’ epistemic perspective and learning strategies in history. Learning: Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2019.1591492.
Iordanou, K. (2016a). From theory of mind to epistemic cognition. A lifespan perspective. Frontline Learning Research, 4(5), 106–119.
Iordanou, K. (2016b). Developing epistemological understanding through argumentation in scientific and social domains. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie., 30(2–3), 109–119.
Iordanou, K., & Kuhn, D. (2020). Contemplating the opposition: Does a personal touch matter? Discourse Processes, 57(4), 343–359.
Iordanou, K., Kuhn, D., Matos, F., Shi, Y., & Hemberger, L. (2019a). Learning by arguing. Learning and Instruction, 63, 101–207.
Iordanou, K., Muis, K., & Kendeou, P. (2019b). Epistemological understanding, prior-knowledge and meta-level processing of evidence during reading in young adolescents and adults. Journal of Experimental Education, 87(4), 531–551.
Kahan, D. M., & Braman, D. (2006). Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale L. & Pol'y Rev., 24, 149.
Kendeou, P., & O'Brien, E. J. (2016). Prior knowledge: Acquisition and revision. In P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in Reading: Reader, text, and context (pp. 151–163). New York: Routledge.
Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571350.
Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know?. Psychological science, 12(1), 1–8.
Kuhn, D. (2019). Why is reconciling divergent views a challenge? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(1), 27–32.
Kuhn, D., & Iordanou, K. (in press). Why do people argue past one another rather than with one another? In N. Ballantyne & D. Dunning (Eds.), Reason, bias, and inquiry: New perspectives from the crossroads of epistemology and psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328.
Kuhn, D., Iordanou, K., Pease, M., & Wirkala, C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23, 435–451.
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2016). Tracing the development of argumentive writing in a discourse-rich context. Written Communication, 33(1), 92–121.
List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Cognitive affective engagement model of multiple source use. Educational Psychologist, 52, 182–199.
Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2014). Fostering multiple text comprehension: How metacognitive strategies and motivation moderate the text-belief consistency effect. Metacognition & Learning, 9, 54–71.
Maier, J., Richter, T., & Britt, M. A. (2018a). Cognitive processes underlying the text-belief consistency effect: An eye-movement study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 171–185.
Maier, J., Richter, T., Nauroth, P., & Gollwitzer, M. (2018b). For me or for them: How in-group identification and beliefs influence the comprehension of controversial texts. Journal of Research in Reading., 41(1), 48–65.
Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 492–509.
Mason, L., Scrimin, S., Zaccoletti, S., Tornatora, M. C., & Goetz, T. (2018). Webpage reading: Psychophysiological correlates of emotional arousal and regulation predict multiple-text comprehension. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 317–326.
McCrudden, M. T., & Sparks, P. C. (2014). Exploring the effect of task instructions on topic beliefs and topic belief justifications: A mixed methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 1–11.
Moshman, D. (2005). Adolescent psychological development: Rationality, morality, and identity. Psychology Press.
Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., & Singh, C. A. (2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 1–20.
Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2013). Situating text, talk, and transfer in conceptual change: Concluding thoughts. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 603–621). New York: Routledge.
Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Interrogating the relation between conceptual change and epistemic beliefs. Handbook of Epistemic Cognition, 439–459.
Murphy, P. K., & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and beliefs. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2, 305–324.
Nordgren, K., & Johansson, M. (2015). Intercultural historical learning: A conceptual framework. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 1–25.
Papadakis, Y. (2008). Narrative, memory and history education in divided Cyprus: A comparison of schoolbooks on the ‘history of Cyprus’. History & Memory, 20(2), 128–148.
Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin., 28(3), 369–381.
Putnam, A. L., Ross, M. Q., Soter, L. K., & Roediger III, H. L. (2018). Collective narcissism: Americans exaggerate the role of their home state in appraising US history. Psychological Science, 29(9), 1414–1422.
Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2010). A framework for critical thinking, rational thinking, and intelligence. Innovations in Educational Psychology: Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Human Development, 195-237.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases. Thinking & Reasoning, 14(2), 129–167.
Stradling, R. (2003). Multiperspectivity in history teaching: A guide for teachers. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
VanSledright, B., & Maggioni, L. (2016). Epistemic cognition in history. Handbook of Epistemic Cognition, 128–146.
Voss, J. F., Fincher‐Kiefer, R., Wiley, J., & Silfies, L. N. (1993). On the processing of arguments. Argumentation, 7, 165–181.
Walton, D. N. (1989). Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation, 3, 169–184.
Wansink, B., Akkerman, S., Zuiker, I., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Where does teaching multiperspectivity in history education begin and end? An analysis of the uses of temporality. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(4), 495–527.
Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495–519.
Zaromb, F. M., Liu, J. H., Páez, D., Hanke, K., Putnam, A. L., & Roediger III, H. L. (2018). We made history: Citizens of 35 countries overestimate their Nation's role in world history. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(4), 521–528.
Zavala, J., & Kuhn, D. (2017). Solitary discourse is a productive activity. Psychological Science, 28(5), 578–586.
Zembylas, M. (2015). Emotion and traumatic conflict: Re-claiming healing in education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zembylas, M., & Kambani, F. (2012). The teaching of controversial issues during elementary-level history instruction: Greek-Cypriot teachers’ perceptions and emotions. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(2), 107–133.
Zembylas, M., Charalambous, C., Charalambous, P., & Kendeou, P. (2011). Promoting peaceful coexistence in conflict-ridden Cyprus: Teachers’ difficulties and emotions towards a new policy initiative. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 332–341.
Zembylas, M., Charalambous, C., & Charalambous, P. (2016). Peace education in a conflict-troubled society: An ethnographic journey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.