Abstract
Welcome to the Special Issue on Applications of Complexity for Resilient Organizations, Management, and Innovation Systems. This Special Issue includes six articles highlighting how complexity science and complex systems approaches can be employed to study resilient aspects in organizations, management and innovation systems. Nowadays, governments, policy-makers, managers, firms, and organizations are requested to face challenges with possible and unpredictable disruptive events always more and more interconnected. Complexity science and complex systems approaches applied to economic and managerial systems allow to model the endogenous dynamics of a system as a whole and composed of heterogeneous interacting agents from the bottom up. Such models open the opportunity for a dynamic and systemic approach to investigate and improve the resilience of organizations and innovation systems. It is crucial to remark that both scholars and decision-makers collaborated on the Special Issue to better understand the advantages of using a systemic approach (i.e., complexity science and complex systems approaches) in areas where such methodologies have not been considered so far, i.e., organization, innovation, and management. To aid in this endeavor, the papers included in the Special Issue investigate different conceptual and methodological aspects applied in different contexts and open a new vista on the opportunity offered by complexity science and complex systems approaches to face research and professional questions in the areas of organization, management, and innovation.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In this world full of challenges and unpredictable and disruptive events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, complexity theory and complex systems approaches are very useful in supporting decision-making processes of governments, policymakers, managers, companies, and organizations (Cincotti et al. 2022; Teglio et al. 2019; Ponta et al. 2018a; Riccetti et al. 2022). Moreover, they permit the modelling of complex system behaviours, reproducing the internal dynamics of the whole system from the bottom-up, focusing on its microelements such as the agents, their attributes, actions, goals, and the network structure (and type of relationships) that connect them. Furthermore, they can deal with uncertainty and resilience including the ability to learn and adapt (Cincotti et al. 2010; Ponta et al. 2011; Cruciani et al. 2017).
Complex systems can be found everywhere in organizations, management, and innovation systems (see Ping et al. 2024). They include multiple scales, from the macro level, referring to industries, markets, and countries, to the micro level, involving firms, work teams, and individuals (Farmer et al. 2012, Villani et al. 2022). Thus, the application of complexity theory spans multiple contexts and areas (Khan et al. 2019; Clementis et al. 2019; Green 2023; Holcombe et al. 2013; Guerci et al. 2005; Petrović et al. 2020).
From a methodological point of view, the study of complexity in modern organizations requires dynamic and systemic approaches. In this regard, methodologies based on agent-based modelling and networks are very suitable (Ponta and Cincotti 2018; Raberto et al. 2012; Mazzocchetti et al. 2020). The agent-based simulations are particularly flexible, allowing for studying—in a well-controlled way—both the consequences of agents’ behaviour, as well as the behaviour of the entire system. Agent-based models are typical tools for studying complex systems and, so far, have mainly been used in economics and finance (Ozel et al. 2019; Raberto et al. 2001, 2019; Teglio et al. 2019; Pastore et al. 2010; Ponta et al. 2018b; Samanidou et al. 2007; Kirman 1997; Caiani et al. 2016; Gatti et al. 2010; Ahrweiler et al. 2011; Gilbert et al. 2014). Recently, they have also been used in many different fields, such as management and organization (Ponsiglione et al. 2021; Giannoccaro 2011; Herrera-Restrepo and Triantis 2019; Ponta et al. 2020, 2023; Jiang et al. 2016; Rand and Stummer 2021; Ma and Nakamori 2005; Amini et al. 2012). However, as noted by Phillips and Ritala (2019), mixed methods with a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches can be also useful in investigating organizations, management, and innovation systems in light of the complex adaptive systems approach. Thus, the main research questions outlined in the special issue address the use of complexity in various economic and management settings.
This special issue collects six papers investigating different conceptual and methodological aspects related to the use of complex systems. Sabol (2024) analyzes the relationship between complexity and innovation. Guida et al. (2024), Morone et al. (2023), and Passavanti et al. (2024), focus on advancing knowledge on methodological aspects suitable to model the complexity of organizations, management, and innovation systems. Cicerelli and Ravetti (2023), and Butkus et al. (2024) explore the relationships between complexity and resilience.
2 The contributions to the special issue
All the papers included in this special issue deal with several innovation topics in management research. In particular, Sabol (2024) investigates innovation dynamics in the context of municipal ecosystems; Guida et al. (2024) study the role of imitation, a less costly alternative to experimentation, with respect to the exploration, exploitation, and organizational learning; Morone et al. (2023) analyze the resilience of socioeconomic systems under conditions of crises and external shocks, considering the impact of social/behavioral rules and social networks structure on the process of knowledge diffusion. Passavanti et al. (2024) investigate the role of information asymmetries and moral hazards in the financing system of New Technology-Based Firms (NTBFs); Cicerelli and Ravetti (2023) investigate the relationship among sustainability, complexity, and organizational resilience in the electrical and electronic equipment industry; Butkus et al. (2024) address the topic of resilience in public sector organizations.
Methodologies and scopes may differ across papers but they all share the idea that complexity theory and the complex systems approach are needed to better understand organizational and innovation systems and to support the design of policy measures and interventions toward resilience.
Sabol (2024) uses a mixed methods approach to build a novel framework supporting the understanding of the innovative behaviors in a Municipal Innovation Ecosystem. Firstly, qualitative data were collected by person-to-person semi-structured interviews to better inform the second stage of quantitative data collection through a survey. The structural model obtained was tested using PLS-Sem Method. Guida et al. (2024) use an agent-based model to perform what-if analyses to explore how two distinct agent types, i.e. those who imitate and those who experiment, interact and influence each other. Morone et al. (2023) adopt an agent-based modelling approach to investigate the impact of different behavioral/sociological rules and social interaction structures on the knowledge diffusion process and economic performances of the system. The study incorporates social network analysis to examine the effects of different social network structures on efficiency, equity, and sustainability-resilience in knowledge diffusion. Passavanti et al. (2024) employ a configurative approach built on five accessible signals in the context of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Cicerelli and Ravetto employ an in-depth longitudinal case study to build a conceptual framework useful to relate sustainability and complexity management to organizational resilience and competitiveness issues in the electrical and electronics industry. Butkus et al. (2024) propose an empirical analysis to present a resilience framework consisting of Planning, Adaptation, and Enhanced learning, which is validated empirically by surveying 401 public sector organizations that can be used as the basis for future simulations.
This Special Issue, therefore, reflects the heterogeneity in terms of analyzed topics and used methodologies that characterize the current state of the art in the field of complexity approach to management, organization, and innovation systems. In the following, we provide a short description of each work included in this publication.
Sabol (2024) analyzes municipal innovation ecosystems focusing on intrapersonal and interpersonal resources. The paper aims to develop a framework and novel constructs to be adopted to assess the innovation behaviours of heterogeneous individuals in the analyzed context of a city ecosystem. A mixed-method methodological approach is adopted, employing qualitative and quantitative data and techniques, to answer the research question. The field research is performed using a specific setting: Mobile, a port city on Alabama’s Gulf Coast. The main results concern the development of a novel framework and related constructs to analyze how moving from an individual level, innovative behaviors can be induced and strengthened in a municipal ecosystem. In particular, findings suggest that the intrapersonal resources of individuals and intense social interactions of these individuals with municipal institutions can contribute to the development of innovation at the city and regional levels.
Developing an agent-based model Guida et al. (2024) explore the role of imitation in the exploration–exploitation dilemma. The results reveal that imitators decrease their performance in the presence of intensified competition, whereas explorers are hindered in their attempts at radical innovation due to the presence of other explorers and clusters of imitators. Thus, Guida et al. (2024) provide novel insights into the dynamics of organizational learning and strategic decision-making.
Morone et al. (2023) analyze how knowledge diffusion processes in socioeconomic systems are affected by different behavioural/sociological rules, studying the implications of diverse social network structures on efficiency, equity, and sustainability or resilience in knowledge diffusion. The knowledge diffusion process is framed as a complex process occurring through social interactions among heterogeneous agents in a society. Using an agent-based model and social network analyses, the research shows that different behavioural/sociological rules induced by diverse social network structures have varying effects on the knowledge diffusion process, with social structures characterized by both strong ties (intense contacts within communities) and weak ties (knowledge spillover across communities) outperforming others during crises in terms of better performances. The paper contributes, from a theoretical and methodological perspective to a better understanding of how the coexistence of weak and strong ties in socioeconomic systems supports the finding of the right trade-off between efficiency and equity towards learning and better economic performances.
Using a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), Passavanti et al. (2024) investigate the influence of information asymmetries and moral hazards in the financing system of New Technology-Based Firms (NTBFs). Results help to improve our understanding of the dynamics between NTBFs and investors, and in particular on the interplay of various factors that influence the financing outcomes.
Cicerelli and Ravetto explore the intricate relationship between different dimensions of complexity, the management of sustainability issues, and the resilience and competitiveness of companies and production systems in the electrical and electronic equipment industry. The study adopts an in-depth longitudinal case study approach applied to an Italian B2B company; results show that three core dimensions of complexity affect sustainability solutions at the company level: internal, supply chain, and external. The research also highlights the challenges and opportunities offered by managing complexities in the production systems in the electronics industry, revealing the higher possibilities of sustainable innovation transfer when adequate metrics and information flows are established in the complex environment under investigation.
Combining a systematic literature review and a quantitative empirical investigation Butkus et al. (2024) propose and test a framework of organisational resilience in the public sector. The empirical investigation analyses the Lithuanian public sector organisations explains the relationships among the model dimensions and identifies Planning, Adaptation, and Enhanced Learning as critical phases to explain organisational resilience. Results offer a model for theory development to understand the dimensions of the resilience of complex adaptive public sector organisations and how they interrelate with each other.
3 Concluding remarks and future directions
Collectively, the papers included in the Special Issue point out how adopting the complexity approach, including adequate conceptual and methodological perspectives, can help in advancing the understanding of organizations, management and innovation systems, particularly under uncertainty and shocks. The papers also show the need for integrated methods, where the traditional methodologies are combined with complex systems typical approaches. For example, Sabol (2024) and Butkus et al. (2024) integrate mixed classical methodologies like surveys and regressions with principles of complex adaptive systems; Cicerelli and Ravetto (2023) and Passavanti et al. (2024) use longitudinal case studies and the configurative approach adopted with the perspective of complexity; Guida et al. (2024) and Morone et al. (2023) develop agent-based models which are very useful for the what-if analyses, including also social network analysis elements.
In addition, the recent advent and spread of the availability of new technologies for massive data collection offers new opportunities to scholars. They permit to measure and evaluate complex system dynamics through data-driven methodologies. By providing automatic and more objective measurements of individual, team, and firm behaviours, these tools can efficiently collect a large amount of real-time data,—increasing the data richness, quality, and reliability. This aspect allows for opening of new scenarios for the advancement of models and tools (like those based on simulations and virtual experimentation) that could help support effectively not only theory building but also policy-making.
References
Ahrweiler P, Gilbert N, Pyka A (2011) Agency and Structure. A social Simulation of knowledge-intensive Industries. Comput Math Organ Theory 17:59–76
Amini M, Wakolbinger T, Racer M, Nejad MG (2012) Alternative supply chain production– sales policies for new product diffusion: An agent-based modeling and simulation approach. Eur J Oper Res 216(2):301–311
Butkus M, Schiuma G, Bartuseviciene I, Volodzkiene L, Rakauskiene OG, Dargenyte-Kacileviciene L (2024) Modelling organisational resilience of public sector organisations to navigate complexity: Empirical insights from lithuania. J Econ Interact Coord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-023-00403-x
Caiani A, Godin A, Caverzasi E, Gallegati M, Kinsella S, Stiglitz JE (2016) Agent based stock flow consistent macroeconomics: Towards a benchmark model. J Econ Dyn Control 69:375–408
Cicerelli F, Ravetti C (2023) Sustainability, resilience and innovation in industrial electronics: a case study of internal, supply chain and external complexity. J Econ Interact Coord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-023-00396-7
Cincotti S, Raberto M, Teglio A (2010) Credit money and macroeconomic instability in the agent-based model and simulator Eurace. Economics 4(1):20100026
Cincotti S, Raberto M, Teglio A (2022) Why do we need agent-based macroeconomics? Rev Evolut Polit Econ 3(1):5–29
Clementi F, Gallegati M, Gianmoena L, Landini S, Stiglitz JE (2019) Mis-measurement of inequality: a critical reflection and new insights. J Econ Interac Coord 14:891–921
Cruciani C, Moretti A, Pellizzari P (2017) Dynamic patterns in similarity-based cooperation: an agent-based investigation. J Econ Interac Coord 12:121–141
Farmer JD, Gallegati M, Hommes C, Kirman A, Ormerod P, Cincotti S, Sanchez A, Helbing D (2012) A complex systems approach to constructing better models for managing financial markets and the economy. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 214:295–324
Gatti DD, Gallegati M, Greenwald B, Russo A, Stiglitz JE (2010) The financial accelerator in an evolving credit network. J Econ Dyn Control 34(9):1627–1650
Giannoccaro I (2011) Assessing the influence of the organization in the supply chain management using NK simulation. Int J Prod Econ 131(1):263–272
Gilbert N, Ahrweiler P, Pyka A (2014) Simulating knowledge dynamics in innovation networks. Springer, Berlin
Green DG (2023) Emergence in complex networks of simple agents. J Econ Interact Coord 18(3):419–462
Guerci E, Ivaldi S, Pastore S, Cincotti S (2005) Modeling and implementation of an artificial electricity market using agent-based technology. Physica A 355(1):69–76
Guida V, Mittone L, Morreale A (2024) Innovative search and imitation heuristics: an agent-based simulation study. J Econ Interact Coord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-024-00406-2
Herrera-Restrepo O, Triantis K (2019) Enterprise design through complex adaptive systems and efficiency measurement. Eur J Oper Res 278(2):481–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.002
Holcombe M, Coakley S, Kiran M, Chin S, Greenough C, Worth D, Cincotti S, Raberto M, Teglio A, Deissenberg C, van der Hoog S, Dawid H, Gemkow S, Harting P, Neugart M (2013) Large-scale modeling of economic systems. Complex Syst 22(2):175–191
Jiang G, Tadikamalla PR, Shang J, Zhao L (2016) Impacts of knowledge on online brand success: an agent-based model for online market share enhancement. Eur J Oper Res 248(3):1093–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.051
Khan TZA, Farooq W, Rasheed H (2019) Organizational resilience: a dynamic capability of complex systems. J Manag Res 6(1):1–26
Kirman A (1997) The economy as an evolving network. J Evol Econ 7:339–353
Ma T, Nakamori Y (2005) Agent-based modeling on technological innovation as an evolutionary process. Eur J Oper Res 166(3):741–755
Mazzocchetti A, Lauretta E, Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2020) Systemic financial risk indicators and securitised assets: an agent-based framework. J Econ Interac Coord 15(1):9–47
Morone P, Caferra R, Lopolito A (2023) Knowledge diffusion in social networks under targeted attack and random failure: the resilience of communities. J Econ Interact Coord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-023-00392-x
Ozel B, Nathanael RC, Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2019) Macroeconomic implications of mortgage loan requirements: an agent-based approach. J Econ Interac Coord 14:7–46
Passavanti Carmine, Primario Simonetta, Rippa Pierluigi (2024) A configurative analysis investigating how new technology-based firms gain the first financing round. J Econ Interact Coord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-023-00398-5
Pastore S, Ponta L, Cincotti S (2010) Heterogeneous information-based artificial stock market. New J Phys 12(5):053035
Petrović M, Ozel B, Teglio A, Raberto M, Cincotti S (2020) Should I stay or should I go? An agent-based setup for a trading and monetary union. J Econ Dyn Control 113:103866
Phillips MA, Ritala P (2019) A complex adaptive systems agenda for ecosystem research methodology. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 148:119739
Ping C, Elsner W, Pyka A (2024) Routledge handbook on complexity economics. Routledge, London
Ponsiglione C, Cannavacciuolo L, Primario S, Quinto I, Zollo G (2021) The ambiguity of natural language as resource for organizational design: a computational analysis. J Bus Res 129:654–665
Ponta L, Cincotti S (2018) Traders’ networks of interactions and structural properties of financial markets: an agent-based approach. Complexity 2018:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9072948
Ponta L, Raberto M, Cincotti S (2011) A multi-assets artificial stock market with zero-intelligence traders. Europhys Lett 93(2):28002
Ponta L, Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2018a) An agent-based stock-flow consistent model of the sustainable transition in the energy sector. Ecol Econ 145:274–300
Ponta L, Pastore S, Cincotti S (2018b) Static and dynamic factors in an information-based multi-asset artificial stock market. Physica A 492:814–823
Ponta L, Cainarca GC, Cincotti S (2020) Monetary incentives in Italian public administration: a stimulus for employees? An agent-based approach. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6152017
Ponta L, Puliga G, Lazzarotti V, Manzini R, Cincotti S (2023) To copatent or not to copatent: An agent-based model for firms facing this dilemma. Eur J Oper Res 306:1349–1363
Raberto M, Cincotti S, Focardi SM, Marchesi M (2001) Agent-based simulation of a financial market. Physica A 299(1–2):319–327
Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2012) Debt, deleveraging and business cycles: An agent-based perspective. Economics 6(1):20120027
Raberto M, Ozel B, Ponta L, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2019) From financial instability to green finance: the role of banking and credit market regulation in the Eurace model. J Evol Econ 29(1):429–465
Rand W, Stummer C (2021) Agent‐based modeling of new product market diffusion: an overview of strengths and criticisms. Ann Operat Res 305(1–2):425–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03944-1
Riccetti L, Russo A, Gallegati M (2022) Firm–bank credit network, business cycle and macroprudential policy. J Econ Interac Coord 17(2):475–499
Sabol M (2024) Innovative behavior and interactions in innovation systems. J Econ Interact Coord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-023-00402-y
Samanidou E, Zschischang E, Stauffer D, Lux T (2007) Agent-based models of financial markets. Rep Prog Phys 70(3):409
Teglio A, Mazzocchetti A, Ponta L, Raberto M, Cincotti S (2019) Budgetary rigour with stimulus in lean times: Policy advices from an agent-based model. J Econ Behav Organ 157:59–83
Villani G, Biancardi M (2022) Competition and strategic alliance in R&D investments: a real option game approach with multiple experiments. J Econ Interact Coord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-020-00304-3
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The Author(s) declare(s) the following conflict of interests-either non-financial or financial. Silvano Cincotti is an Associate Editor of the Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination.
Ethical approval
The Author(s) declare(s) that ethics approval is not applicable to the research, as the article does not report on or involve any humans, human data.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cincotti, S., Giannoccaro, I., Ponsiglione, C. et al. Editorial to the special issue on applications of complexity for resilient organizations, management and innovation systems. J Econ Interact Coord 19, 193–200 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-024-00411-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-024-00411-5