Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biological indicators for evaluating soil quality improvement in a soil degraded by erosion processes

  • Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Erosion is one of the main soil degradation problems. It diminishes soil biological activity and therefore its quality. The aim of the study was to evaluate if the application of two biostimulation processes could significantly increase biological activity, and therefore productivity, in soils deteriorated by erosion. This was done without synthetic fertilizers but with treatments accessible for farmers, in line with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In particular, the addition of a soil microorganism suspension or Macrocystis pyrifera algae concentrate was evaluated.

Materials and methods

Soil samples were taken from a field area (Bihor County, Romania) affected by surface erosion processes. In particular, microbial mass, dehydrogenase activity (DHA), and the bacteria and fungi presence were analyzed for three soil uses (corn, black locust and uncultivated field with terracing) and in different locations (above a slope, at the midpoint and below it). A bio-stimulation process (addition of a microbial suspension or seaweed concentrate based on the Macrocystis pyrifera algae; incubation for 24 h) was used in order to improve the activity of the soil with the lowest values of activity.

Results and discussion

Statistical differences in DHA, bacterial numbers, and microbial biomass were found depending on field use and the areas from which the soil samples were gathered. Higher values of the biological parameters were in general recorded in the middle part of the slope, because they favor bioaccumulation processes (e.g., actual and potential dehydrogenase activity values of about 3 mg TPF/10 g dry soil). The use of microbial suspensions did not significantly stimulate DHA for the soils with a low biological potential. This activity was stimulated by adding the seaweed concentrate to the soil.

Conclusions

The use of the seaweed concentrate can be a good practice for improving activity in eroded soil. The study provides useful indications for better soil fertility management, in line with many of the goals of the 2030 Agenda For Sustainable Development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alef K (1995) Dehydrogenase activity. In: Alef K, Nannipieri P (eds) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, London, pp 228–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Andjelković M, Van Camp J, De Meulenaer B, Depaemelaere G, Socaciu C, Verloo M, Verhe R (2006) Iron-chelation properties of phenolic acids bearing catechol and galloyl groups. Food Chem 98:23–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arioli T, Mattner VS, Winberg PC (2015) Applications of seaweed extracts in Australian agriculture: past, present and future. J Appl Phycol 27:2007–2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlas RM (2004) Handbook of microbiological media, third edition. Taylor & Francis Inc, Boca Raton, USA

  • Balser T, Kinzig A, Firestone M (2002) The functional consequences of biodiversity. In: Kinzig A, Pacala S, Tilman D (eds) The functional consequences of biodiversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 265–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Battacharyya D, Babgohari MZ, Rathor P, Prithiviraj B (2015) Seaweed extracts as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic 196:39–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berlyn GP, Russo RO (1990) The use of organic biostimulants to promote root growth. Below Gr Ecol 1:12–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunden G, Morse PF, Mathe I, Hohmann J, Critchleye AT, Morrell S (2010) Betaine yields from marine algal species utilized in the preparation of seaweed extracts used in agriculture. Nat Prod Commun 5(4):581–585

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brzezińska M, Stępniewski W, Stępniewska Z, Przywara G (2001) Effect of oxygen deficiency on soil dehydrogenase activity in a pot experiment with Triticale CV. Jago Veg Int Agrophysics 15:145–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos JA, Peco JD, De Toro JA et al (2018) Approach to the potential usage of two wood ashes waste as soil amendments on the basis of the dehydrogenase activity and soil oxygen consumption. J Soils Sediments 18:2148–2156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavigelli MA, Robertson GP (2000) The functional significance of denitrifier community composition in a terrestrial ecosystem. Ecology 81:1402–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craigie JS (2011) Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture. J Appl Phycol 23:371–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dincă L, Spârchez G, Dincă M (2014) Romanian’s forest soil GIS map and database and their ecological implications. Carpathian J Earth Environ Sci 9(2):133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Naggar A, Lee SS, Awad YM, Yang X, Ryu C, Rizwan M, Rinklebe J, Tsang DCW, Ok YS (2018) Influence of soil properties and feedstocks on biochar potential for carbon mineralization and improvement of infertile soils. Geoderma 332:100–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2017) Agri-environmental indicator - greenhouse gas emissions. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Agri-environmental_indicator_-_greenhouse_gas_emissions. Accessed Dec 2018

  • FAO (2015) Global guidelines for the restoration of degraded forests and landscapes in drylands: building resilience and benefiting livelihoods. Forestry paper no. 175. Rome: FAO

  • Fierer N, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2003) Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth proles. Soil Biol Biochem 35:167–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes-Ponce M, Moreno-Espíndola I, Pávela Sánchez-Rodríguez LM, Ferrara-Guerrero MJ, López-Ordaz R (2016) Dehydrogenase and mycorrhizal colonization: tools for monitoring agrosystem soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 100:144–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisseler D, Horwath W, Scow K (2011) Soil moisture and plant residue addition interact in their effect on extracellular enzyme activity. Pedobiologia 54:71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero T (2013) Alternative land management strategies and their impact on soil conservation. Agriculture 3(3):464–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenni P, Rodríguez-Cruz MS, Herrero-Hernández E, Marín-Benito JM, Sánchez-Martín MJ, Barra Caracciolo A (2012) Effects of wood amendments on the degradation of terbuthylazine and on soil microbial community activity in a clay loam soil. Wat Soil Air Poll 223:5401–5412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Ohman MC, Shyamsundar P, Steffen W, Glaser G, Kanie N, Noble I (2013) Policy: sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495(7441):305–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gömöryová E, Střelcová K, Fleischer P, Gömöry D (2011) Microbial characteristics at the monitoring plots on windthrow areas of the Tatra National Park Slovakia.: their assessment as environmental indicators. Environ Monit Assess 174:31–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan W, Rayirath UP, Subramanian S, Jithesh MN, Rayorath P, Hodges DM, Critchley AT, Craigie JS, Norrie J, Prithiviraj B (2009) Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development. J Plant Growth Regul 28:386–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kieft T, Amy P, Brockman F, Fredrickson J, Bjornstad B, Rosacker L (1993) Microbial abundance and activities in relation to water potential in the vadose zones of arid and semiarid sites. Microb Ecol 26:59–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist E, Scow K, Jackson L, Uesugi S, Johnson C (1999) Rapid response of soil microbial communities from conventional, low input, and organic farming systems to a wet/dry cycle. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1661–1675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon SA, Craft CA, Hiltz D, Ugarte R (2010) Improved methods of analysis for betaines in Ascophyllum nodosum and its commercial seaweed extracts. J Appl Phycol 22:489–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malusá E, Sas-Paszt L, Ciesielska J (2012) Technologies for beneficial microorganisms inocula used as biofertilizers. Sci World J 2012:491206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeskops B, Buchan D, Sleutel S, Herawaty L, Husen E, Saraswati R, Setyorini D, De Neve S (2010) Soil microbial communities and activities under intensive organic and conventional vegetable farming in West Java, Indonesia. Appl Soil Ecol 45:112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller A, Bautze L, Meier M, Gattinger A, Gall E, Chatzinikolaou E, Meredith S, Ukas T, Ullmann L (2016) Organic farming, climate change mitigation and beyond. IFOAM EU. Available at: http://www.ifoam-eu.org/sites/default/files/ifoameu_advocacy_climate_change_report_2016.pdf. Accessed Dec 2018

  • Munteanu I (1997) Review of soil and terrain data, human-indiced soil degradation and soil vulnerability assessment in Romania. In: BatjesNH, Bridges EM (Eds). Implementation of a soil degradation and vulnerability database for central and Eastern Europe (SOVEUR project). Proceedings of an international workshop Wageningen, 1–3 October 1997. FAO and ISRIC, pp. 69–72. Available at http://www.isric.org/sites/default/files/2017-03/SOVEUR_Proc97.PDF (Accessed April 2018)

  • Nabti E, Jha B, Hartmann A (2017) Impact of seaweeds on agricultural crop production as biofertilizer. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1119–1134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura T, Nagayama K, Uchida K, Tanaka R (1996) Antioxidant activity of phlorotannins isolated from the brown alga Eisenia bicyclis. Fish Sci 62:923–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Grego S, Ceccanti B (1990) Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. In: Bollag JW, Stotzky G (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol 6. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, USA, pp 293–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Trasar-Cepeda C, Dick RP (2018) Soil enzyme activity: a brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis. Biol Fertil Soils 54:11–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen MN, Winding A (2002) Microorganisms as indicators of soil health. National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark. Technical Report No. 388, 82

  • Norrie J, Keathley JP (2006) Benets of Ascophyllum nodosum marine-plant extract applications to ‘Thompson seedless’ grape production. Acta Hortic 727:243–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obbard JP (2001) Ecotoxicological assessment of heavy metals in sewage sludge amended soil. Appl Geochem 16:1405–1411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onet A, Teusdea A, Boja N, Domuta C, Onet C (2016) Effects of common oak Quercus robur L. defoliation on the soil properties of an oak forest in Western plain of Romania. Annal Forest Res 59(1):33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Possinger AR (2013) Using seaweed as a soil amendment: effects on soil quality and yield of sweet corn Zea mays L. Open access master’s theses. Paper 78

  • Romero E, Fernandez-Bayo J, Diaz J, Nogales R (2010) Enzyme activities and diuron persistence in soil amended with vermicompost derived from spent grape marc and treated with urea. Appl Soil Ecol 44:198–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar S, Sanchez L, Alvarez J, Valverde A, Galindo P, Igual J, Peix A, SantaRegina I (2011) Correlation among soil enzyme activities under different forest system management practices. Ecol Eng 37:1123–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel JP, Gulledge JM, Clein-Curley JS, Lindstrom JE, Braddock JF (1999) Moisture effects on microbial activity and community structure in decomposing birch litter in the Alaskan taiga. Soil Biol Biochem 31:831–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schloter M, Nannipieri P, Sorensen SJ, Dirk Van Elsas J (2018) Microbial indicators for soil quality. Biol Fertil Soils 54:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher BA (2002) Methods for the determination of total organic carbon toc. in soils and sediments. Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center. US. Environmental Protection Agency pp. 23

  • Soan BD (2017) The role of organic matter in soil compactibility: a review of some practical aspects. Soil Tillage Res 16:179–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setboonsarng S, Gregorio EE (2017). Achieving sustainable development goals through organic agriculture: empowering poor women. ADB Southeast Asia working paper series no. 15. Available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/384836/swp-15.pdf. Accessed Dec 2018

  • Stolte J, Tesfai M, Øygarden L, Kværnø S, Keizer J, Verheijen F, Panagos P, Ballabio C, Hessel R (2016) Soil threats in Europe: status, methods, drivers and effects on ecosystem services. A review report, deliverable 2.1 of the RECARE projec EUR 27607 EN. JRC Technical Reports 206 pp. Available at https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/public_path/shared_folder/doc_pub/EUR27607.pdf. Accessed Sept 2018

  • Subhani A, Changyong H, Zhengmiao Y, Min L, El-ghamry A (2001) Impact of soil environment and agronomic practices on microbial/dehydrogenase enzyme activity in soil. A review. Pak J Biol Sci 4:333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tóth G, Stolbovoy V, Montanarella L (2007) Soil quality and sustainability evaluation an integrated approach to support soil-related policies of the European Union – a JRC position paper. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. EUR 22721 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 40 pp. Available at http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ESDB_Archive/eusoils_docs/other/EUR22721.pdf. Accessed Dec 2018

  • Tóth G, Hermann T, da Silva MR, Montanarella L (2018) Monitoring soil for sustainable development and land degradation neutrality. Environ Monit Assess 190(2):57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN) 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 25 September 2015, A/RES/70/1. UN General Assembly: New York

  • Trevors JT (1984) Dehydrogenase activity in soil. A comparison between the INT and TTC assay. Soil Biol Biochem 16:673–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Veen JA, Van Overbeek LS, Van Elsas JD (1997) Fate and activity of microorganisms introduced into soil. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61(2):121–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Vekemans X, Godden B, Penninckx MJ (1989) Factor analysis of the relationships between several physico-chemical and microbiological characteristics of some Belgian agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 21:53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser S, Parkinson D (1992) Soil biological criteria as indicator of soil quality: soil microorganisms. Am J Alternative Agr 7:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall A, Heiskanen J (2003) Water-retention characteristic and related physical properties of soil on afforested agricultural land in Finland. Forest Ecol Manag 186:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Jonsdottir R, Ólafsdóttir G (2009) Total phenolic compounds, radical scavenging and metal chelation of extracts from Icelandic seaweeds. Food Chem 116:240–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M, Lindow SE (1993) Release of recombinant microorganisms. Annu Rev Microbiol 47:913–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolińska A, Stępniewska Z (2011) Microorganisms abundance and dehydrogenase activity as a consequence of soil reoxidation process. In: Miransari M (ed) Soil tillage & microbial activities. Research Singpost, Kerala, India, pp 111–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolińska A, Stępniewska Z (2012) Dehydrogenase activity in the soil environment, dehydrogenases. Canuto RA (ed) InTech, https://doi.org/10.5772/48294. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/books/dehydrogenases/dehydrogenase-activity-in-the-soil-environment. Accessed Dec 2018

  • Zhang N, He X, Gao Y, Li Y, Wang H, Ma D, Zhang R, Yang S (2010) Pedogenic carbonate and soil dehydrogenase activity in response to soil organic matter in artemisia ordosica community. Pedosphere 20:229–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zogg G, Zak D, Ringelberg D, Macdonald N, Pregitzer K, White D (1997) Compositional and functional shifts in microbial communities due to soil warming. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:475–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yergeau E, Bell TH, Champagne J, Maynard C, Tardif S, Tremblay J, Greer CW (2015) Transplanting soil microbiomes leads to lasting effects on willow growth, but not on the rhizosphere microbiome. Front Microbiol 6:1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Yue D (2012) Soil microbial and enzymatic activities across a chronosequence of Chinese pine plantation development on the loess plateau of China. Pedosphere 221:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu CJ, Lee YK (1997) Determination of biomass dry weight of marine microalgae. J Appl Pycol 9:189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Environmental Protection, Romania, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania

    Aurelia Onet, Vasile Laslo & Alin C. Teusdea

  2. National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Dracea”, Brasov, Romania

    Lucian C. Dincă, Diana L. Vasile, Raluca E. Enescu & Vlad E. Crisan

  3. Water Research Institute, National Research Council, Rome, Italy

    Paola Grenni

Authors
  1. Aurelia Onet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucian C. Dincă
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paola Grenni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vasile Laslo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alin C. Teusdea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Diana L. Vasile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Raluca E. Enescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Vlad E. Crisan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Grenni.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Yongtao Li

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 260 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onet, A., Dincă, L.C., Grenni, P. et al. Biological indicators for evaluating soil quality improvement in a soil degraded by erosion processes. J Soils Sediments 19, 2393–2404 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-02236-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-02236-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation