Abstract
Purpose
This literature review aims to present the current methodologies that have been developed to perform a social life cycle assessment (sLCA) and to display the main differences among them. In addition to that, to identify the nexus between sLCA and circular economy (CE) and to what extent this life cycle technique has been involved within CE studies.
Methods
An analysis of scientific literature using online databases was made. A total of 76 publications, including all industry sectors worldwide, were chosen spanning 11 years, from 2009 to 2020. Special attention was made to the methodology used to assess the social impacts, the impact categories analyzed, and whether there is or not a circular economy case. All the impact categories of both UNEP/SETAC and PSIA were taken into account when doing the review, and the top three of the categories are mentioned here.
Results and discussion
The leadership of the UNEP/SETAC methodology is clear with 58 cases. Almost 90% of the case studies are focused on products while the remaining ones are related with services. Workers are the most considered stakeholder when conducting an sLCA research, followed by local communities and society. Regarding the impact assessment, the performance reference point (PRP) was the most common method used. When considering the CE even when some cases included the end-of-life stage in the system boundaries, the studies did not consider the actors from that stage; excluding these cases, one out of four articles has a link with CE, a promising proportion taking into account the early stage of both concepts (i.e., sLCA and CE).
Conclusions
UNEP/SETAC guidelines seem to be the most promising methodology due to its reception among the scientific community. However, a more industry-oriented approach is proposed by the Roundtable for Product Social Metrics (PSIA) in a way to respond to manufacturing companies’ demand. Regardless of the type of methodology to be implemented, workers represent the key stakeholder when assessing social impacts. The change in usual patterns is leading to a change in the way how stakeholders interact and therefore new and more impacts may arise, and that is the reason why it is important to include the CE into the sLCA. A series of challenges such as the feasibility of aggregating all the life cycle techniques to one (life cycle sustainability assessment), data availability, and quality are still present for the moment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Or user.
Or SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises).
Product Sustainability Assessment method.
References
Agyekum EO, Fortuin KPJK, Harst EV, Der. (2017) Environmental and social life cycle assessment of bamboo bicycle frames made in Ghana. J Clean Prod 143:1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.012
Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013a) Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0559-3
Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013b) Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):1106–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0546-8
Arcese G, Lucchetti MC, Massa I (2017) Modeling social life cycle assessment framework for the Italian wine sector. J Clean Prod 140:1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.137
Arcese G, Lucchetti MC, Merli R (2013) Social life cycle assessment as a management tool: Methodology for application in tourism. Sustain 5(8):3275–3287. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083275
Azimi AN, Dente SMR, Hashimoto S (2020) Social life-cycle assessment of householdwaste management system in Kabul City. Sustain 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083217
Balasbaneh AT, Yeoh D, Zainal Abidin AR (2020) Life cycle sustainability assessment of window renovations in schools against noise pollution in tropical climates. J Build Eng 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101784
Chen W, Holden NM (2017) Social life cycle assessment of average Irish dairy farm. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(9):1459–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1250-2
Contreras-Lisperguer R, Batuecas E, Mayo C, Díaz R, Pérez FJ, Springer C (2018) Sustainability assessment of electricity cogeneration from sugarcane bagasse in Jamaica. J Clean Prod 200(2018):390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.322
Daniela, Kolsch Peter, Saling Andreas, Kicherer Anahi Grosse, Sommer Isabell, Schmidt (2008) How to measure social impacts? A socio-eco-efficiency analysis by the SEEBALANCE® method. International Journal of Sustainable Development 11(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2008.020380
Dunmade IS (2019) Potential social lifecycle impact analysis of bioenergy from household and market wastes in african cities. Agron. Res 17(4):1599–1616. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.19.162
Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA - Part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0442-7
Ekener-Petersen E, Höglund J, Finnveden G (2014) Screening potential social impacts of fossil fuels and biofuels for vehicles. Energ Policy 73:416–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.034
Ekener-Petersen E, Moberg Å (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA-Part 2: reflections on a study of a complex product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0443-6
Ekener E, Hansson J, Gustavsson M (2018a) Addressing positive impacts in social LCA—discussing current and new approaches exemplified by the case of vehicle fuels. The Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):556–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1058-0
Ekener E, Hansson J, Larsson A, Peck P (2018b) Developing life cycle sustainability assessment methodology by applying values-based sustainability weighting - Tested on biomass based and fossil transportation fuels. J Clean Prod 181:337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.211
Elkington J (1998) Accounting for the Triple Bottom Line. Meas Bus Excell. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025539
Fan L, Pang B, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Sun Y, Wang Y (2018) Evaluation for social and humanity demand on green residential districts in China based on SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):640–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1166-x
Fan Y, Wu R, Chen J, Apul D (2015) A review of social life cycle assessment methodologies.Environ. Footprints Eco-Design Prod. Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-296-8_1
Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manage 91(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018
Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0447-2
Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0266-x
Gompf K, Traverso M, Hetterich J (2020) Towards social life cycle assessment of mobility services: systematic literature review and the way forward. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25(10):1883–1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01788-8
Hamdar Y, Chehab GR, Srour I (2016) Life-cycle evaluation of pavements: a critical review. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 9(6):12–26. https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.096.02
Hannouf M, Assefa G (2018) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment: a case study of high-density polyethylene production in Alberta. Canada Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(1):116–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1303-1
Heidari MD, Mathis D, Blanchet P, Amor B (2019) Streamlined life cycle assessment of an innovative bio-based material in construction: a case study of a phase change material panel. Forests. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020160
Hoogmartens R, Van Passel S, Van Acker K, Dubois M (2014) Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools. Environ Impact Asses 48:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.05.001
Hoque N, Biswas W, Mazhar I, Howard I (2019) LCSA framework for assessing sustainability of alternative fuels for transport sector. Chem Eng Trans 72:103–108. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1972018
Hu M, Kleijn R, Bozhilova-Kisheva KP, Di Maio F (2013) An approach to LCSA: the case of concrete recycling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1793–1803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0599-8
Ibáñez-Forés V, Bovea MD, Coutinho-Nóbrega C, de Medeiros HR (2019) Assessing the social performance of municipal solid waste management systems in developing countries: proposal of indicators and a case study. Ecol Indic 98:164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.031
Iofrida N, De Luca AI, Silveri F, Falcone G, Stillitano T, Gulisano G, Strano A (2019) Psychosocial risk factors’ impact pathway for social life cycle assessment: an application to citrus life cycles in South Italy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24(4):767–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1482-4
Iofrida N, Stillitano T, Falcone G, Gulisano G, Francesco Nicolò B, Irene De Luca A (2020) The socio-economic impacts of organic and conventional olive growing in Italy. New Medit 19(1):117–131. https://doi.org/10.30682/nm2001h
Karlewski H, Lehmann A, Ruhland K, Finkbeiner M (2019) A practical approach for social life cycle assessment in the automotive industry. Resources 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8030146
Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert M (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resour Conserv Recycl 127(September):221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
Kluczek A (2019) An energy-led sustainability assessment of production systems – an approach for improving energy efficiency performance. Int J Prod Econ 216:190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.016
Kono J, Ostermeyer Y, Wallbaum H (2018) Trade-offbetween the social and environmental performance of green concrete: the case of 6 countries. Sustain 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072309
Kouloumpis V, Azapagic A (2018) Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment using fuzzy inference: a novel FELICITA model. Sustainable Production and Consumption 15:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.03.002
Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3(4):562–577. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3040562
Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies - challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(8):1581–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0594-0
Lu Y-T, Lee Y-M, Hong C-Y (2017) Inventory analysis and social life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from waste-to-energy incineration in Taiwan. Sustain 9(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111959
Luthe T, Kägi T, Reger J (2013) A systems approach to sustainable technical product design: combining life cycle assessment and virtual development in the case of skis. J Ind Ecol 17(4):605–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12000
Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.026
Mair S, Druckman A, Jackson T (2018) Investigating fairness in global supply chains: applying an extension of the living wage to the Western European clothing supply chain. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(9):1862–1873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1390-z
Meyer DE, Upadhyayula VKK (2014) The use of life cycle tools to support decision making for sustainable nanotechnologies. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(4):757–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0686-3
Muhammad KI, Muhamad Pauzi MF, Sharaai AH (2015) Social life cycle assessment (SLCA) for palm oil production in Malaysia. Adv Environ Biol 9(23):89–94
Musaazi MK, Mechtenberg AR, Nakibuule J, Sensenig R, Miyingo E, Makanda JV, Eckelman MJ (2015) Quantification of social equity in life cycle assessment for increased sustainable production of sanitary products in Uganda. J Clean Prod 96:569–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.026
Naghshineh B, Lourenço F, Godina R, Jacinto C, Carvalho H (2020) A social life cycle assessment framework for additive manufacturing products. Appl Sci 10(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134459
Nieder-Heitmann M, Haigh KF, Görgens JF (2019) Life cycle assessment and multi-criteria analysis of sugarcane biorefinery scenarios: finding a sustainable solution for the South African sugar industry J Clean Prod 239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118039
Opher T, Shapira A, Friedler E (2018) A comparative social life cycle assessment of urban domestic water reuse alternatives. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(6):1315–1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1356-1
Pashaei Kamali F, Meuwissen MPM, de Boer IJM, van Middelaar CE, Moreira A, Oude Lansink AGJM (2017) Evaluation of the environmental, economic, and social performance of soybean farming systems in southern Brazil. J Clean Prod 142:385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.135
Feschet Pauline, Macombe Catherine, Garrabé Michel, Loeillet Denis, Saez Adolfo Rolo, Benhmad François (2013) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18(2):490–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0490-z
Petit G, Sablayrolles C, Yannou-Le Bris G (2018) Combining eco-social and environmental indicators to assess the sustainability performance of a food value chain: a case study. J Clean Prod 191:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.156
Pozo BF, López AD, López CL, Pastor MC (2009) Economical and social assessments approach on paper recycling. Environ Eng Manag J 8(5):1121–1127. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2009.163
PSIA (2018) Handbook for Product Social Impact Assessment. Product Social Impact Assessment. Available at: https://product-social-impact-assessment.com/handbook/ [Accessed October 30, 2020].
PSIA (2020) Handbook for Product Social Impact Assessment. Product Social Impact Assessment. Available at: https://product-social-impact-assessment.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/20-01-Handbook2020.pdf [Accessed January 30, 2021].
Rafiaani P, Kuppens T, Thomassen G, Van Dael M, Azadi H, Lebailly P, Van Passel S (2020) A critical view on social performance assessment at company level: social life cycle analysis of an algae case. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25(2):363–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01702-x
Ramirez PKS, Petti L, Brones F, Ugaya CML (2016) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 2: application in Natura’s cocoa soap. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(1):106–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0964-x
Ren J, Manzardo A, Mazzi A, Zuliani F, Scipioni A (2015) Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(6):842–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0877-8
Ribeiro I, Sobral P, Peças P, Henriques E (2018) A sustainable business model to fight food waste. J Clean Prod 177:262–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.200
Santos AC, Mendes P, Ribau Teixeira M (2019) Social life cycle analysis as a tool for sustainable management of illegal waste dumping in municipal services. J Clean Prod 210:1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.042
Schau EM, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M (2012) Life cycle approach to sustainability assessment: a case study of remanufactured alternators. J Remanufacturing 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2210-4690-2-5
Schau EM, Traverso M, Lehmannann A, Finkbeiner M (2011) Life cycle costing in sustainability assessment-a case study of remanufactured alternators. Sustainability-Basel 3(11):2268–2288. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3112268
Schlör H, Venghaus S, Zapp P, Marx J, Schreiber A, Hake JF (2018) The energy-mineral-society nexus – a social LCA model. Appl Energy 228(April):999–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.048
Settembre Blundo D, Ferrari AM, Fernández del Hoyo A, Riccardi MP, García Muiña FE (2018) Improving sustainable cultural heritage restoration work through life cycle assessment based model. J Cult Herit 32:221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.01.008
Shin KLF, Colwill J (2017) An integrated tool to support sustainable toy design and manufacture. Prod Manuf Res 5(1):191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2017.1374894
Siebert A, Bezama A, O’Keeffe S, Thrän D (2018a) Social life cycle assessment: in pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):651–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0
Siebert A, Bezama A, O’Keeffe S, Thrän D (2018b) Social life cycle assessment indices and indicators to monitor the social implications of wood-based products. J Clean Prod 172:4074–4084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.146
Singh RK, Gupta U (2018) Social life cycle assessment in Indian steel sector: a case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(4):921–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1427-3
Souza A, Watanabe MDB, Cavalett O, Ugaya CML, Bonomi A (2018) Social life cycle assessment of first and second-generation ethanol production technologies in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):617–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1112-y
Springer SK, Peregovich BG, Schmidt M (2020) Capability of social life cycle assessment for analyzing the artisanal small-scale gold mining sector—case study in the Amazonian rainforest in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25(11):2274–2289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01828-3
Subramanian K, Yung WKC (2018) Modeling Social Life Cycle Assessment framework for an electronic screen product – a case study of an integrated desktop computer. J Clean Prod 197:417–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.193
Teah HY, Onuki M (2017) Support phosphorus recycling policy with social life cycle assessment: a case of Japan. Sustain 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071223
Traverso M, Asdrubali F, Francia A, Finkbeiner M (2012) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(8):1068–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0433-8
Traverso M, Bell L, Saling P, Fontes J (2018) Towards social life cycle assessment: a quantitative product social impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):597–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1168-8
Tsalidis GA, Korevaar G (2019) Social life cycle assessment of brine treatment in the process industry: a consequential approach case study. Sustain 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215945
Umair S, Björklund A, Petersen EE (2015) Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using UNEP SETAC guidelines. Resour Conserv Recycl 95:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.11.008
UN (2015) Sustainable development goals: 17 goals to Transform Our World. United Nations. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/exhibits/page/sdgs-17-goals-transform-world [Accessed October 15, 2020].
UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/7912. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
UNEP/SETAC (2013) The methodological sheets for sub-categories in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/S-LCA_methodological_sheets_11.11.13.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2020
UNEP/SETAC (2020) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products and organisations. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/34554https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/34554. Accessed 21 Jan 2021
United Nations. (2008) United Nations. Retrieved from Economic Statistics: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic
Vinyes E, Oliver-Solà J, Ugaya C, Rieradevall J, Gasol CM (2013) Application of LCSA to used cooking oil waste management. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(2):445–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0482-z
Vitorio Junior PC, Kripka M (2020) Fair wage potential as a tool for social assessment in building projects. Eng Constr Archit Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0024
Wang S-W, Hsu C-W, Hu AH (2017) An analytical framework for social life cycle impact assessment—part 2: case study of labor impacts in an IC packaging company. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22(5):784–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1185-7
Wang Y, Zhou G, Li T, Wei X (2019) Comprehensive evaluation of the sustainable development of battery electric vehicles in China. Sustain 11(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205635
Weidema BP (2018) The social footprint—a practical approach to comprehensive and consistent social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):700–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1172-z
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (The Brundtland Report). Med Confl Surviv. https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783
Yakovleva N, Sarkis J, Sloan T (2012) Sustainable benchmarking of supply chains: the case of the food industry. Int J Prod Res 50(5):1297–1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.571926
Yıldız-Geyhan E, Altun-Çiftçioğlu GA, Kadırgan MAN (2017) Social life cycle assessment of different packaging waste collection system. Resour Conserv Recycl 124:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.04.003
Zamani B, Sandin G, Svanström M, Peters GM (2018) Hotspot identification in the clothing industry using social life cycle assessment—opportunities and challenges of input-output modelling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23(3):536–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1113-x
Zhou Z, Chi Y, Dong J, Tang Y, Ni M (2019) Model development of sustainability assessment from a life cycle perspective: A case study on waste management systems in China. J Clean Prod 210:1005–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.074
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Marzia Traverso.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mesa Alvarez , C., Ligthart, T. A social panorama within the life cycle thinking and the circular economy: a literature review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26, 2278–2291 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01979-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01979-x