Abstract
Purpose
Informal recycling is one of the most significant activities within waste management systems in low-income countries. The main aspect of a number of recently implemented waste management systems has been to organise the informal recycling sector. The implementation of formalisation is expected to eliminate social problems related to the informal sector, but this has not been precisely measured and evaluated. A lack of methodology to assess social impacts persists, as does the comparison of different formalisation approaches. The goal of this work is to develop a methodological procedure for assessing the contribution of formalised recycling systems in low-income countries in terms of social impacts, in comparison with informal systems.
Methods
Some existing social assessment approaches were evaluated by a review of literature. This investigation focuses on the development of the social life cycle assessment approach, the analysed social aspects, proposed indicators and characterisation models within this framework.
Results and discussion
This study proposes an approach for the social assessment of recycling systems based on formalisation approaches in low-income countries oriented towards the social life cycle assessment methodology (sLCA). The approach developed considers 3 social impact categories, 9 social subcategories and 26 semi-quantitative indicators for the assessment of the social impacts on formalised recyclers. It includes a characterisation procedure that takes into consideration the application of a score system and the calculation of average scores at both the indicator and subcategory levels.
Conclusions
This research shows that it would be feasible to apply a sLCA-based methodology to evaluate recycling systems based on formalisation of the informal sector. The impact categories and subcategories identified represent the social problems of informal recyclers. The 26 semi-quantitative indicators and the proposed characterisation approach attempt to measure the social impacts that currently are only qualitatively assumed. The applicability and validation of the indicators and characterisation procedure will be determined by further research. The methodology developed will be tested using data from three recycling systems in Peruvian cities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brouwer R, Van Ek R (2004) Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 50:1–21
Countreau S (2006) Occupational and environmental health issues of solid waste management. Special emphasis on middle- and lower-income countries. Urban papers. Urban sector board. The World Bank Group. Washington D.C. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTUSWM/Resources/up-2.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2012
Cozzensa M, Gastal A, Kriebel D (2006) Minor psychiatric disorders among Brazilian rag pickers: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health 5(17):1–10
Dreyer C, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97
Dreyer C, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2010) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 1: development of indicators for labour rights. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:247–259
Gamarra P, Salhofer S (2007) A comparison of waste management in Peru and some Latin-American countries: an overview of major problems, characteristics and needs in the Region. In: Diaz L, Eggert L, Savage G (eds) Management of solid wastes in developing countries. CISA Publisher, Cagliari. ISBN 978 88 6265 000 7
Gutberlet J (2011) Waste to energy, wasting resources and livelihoods. In: Integrated waste management, Volume I. Chapter 12. InTech, pp 219 – 236. ISBN: 978-953-307-469-6. http://www.intechopen.com/books/integrated-waste-management-volume-i/waste-to-energy-wasting-resources-and-livelihoods. Accessed 10 Jan 2012
International Labour Organisation (2004) Addressing the exploitation of children in scavenging (waste picking): a thematic evaluation on action on child labour. ISBN PDF: 92-2-116662-7. http://www.ilo.org/ipecinfo/product/viewProduct.do?productId=459. Accessed 13 June 2012
Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–113
Kijak R, Moy D (2004) A decision support framework for sustainable waste management. J Ind Ecol 8(3):33–50
Klöpffer W, Ciroth A (2011) Is LCC relevant in a sustainability assessment? Answer to a letter to the editor. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:99–101
Klang K, Vikman P, Brattebø H (2003) Sustainable management of demolition waste—an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects. Resour Conserv Recy 38:317–334
Mahadevia D, Pharate B, Mistry A (2005) New practices of waste management—case of Mumbai, working paper N° 35. School of Planning, Center for Environmental Planning and Technology CEPT University Kasturbhai Lalbhai, India.http://spcept.ac.in/pdf/New%20Practices%20of%20Waste%20Management%20-%20Case%20of%20Mumbai.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2012
Manhart A, Grießhammer R (2006) Social impacts of the production of notebooks. Contribution to the development of a Product Sustainability Assessment (PROSA). Beitrag Öko–Institut e.V. Freiburg. Germany. http://www.oeko.de/oekodoc/291/2006-010-de.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2012
Medina M (2000) Scavenger cooperatives in Asia and Latin America. Resour Conserv Recy 31:51–89
MINAM. Ministry of Environment (2011) National Environmental Information System. http://sinia.minam.gob.pe/index.php?accion=verElemento&idElementoInformacion=1191&idformula. Accessed 10 Nov 2012
Ness B, Urbel-Piirsalu E, Anderberg S, Olsson L (2007) Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol Econ 60:498–508
Pimentel H, Countinho C (2005) Economic viability study of a separate household waste collection in a developing country. J Mater Cycles Waste 7:116–123
Rathi S (2006) Alternative approaches for better municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India. Waste Manag 26:1192–1200
Scheinberg A, Anschütz J, Van de Klundert A (2006) Waste pickers: poor victims or waste management professionals? Paper No. 56 Workshop of collaborative working group on solid waste management in low- and middle income countries (CWG). Kolkata, India. http://www.cwgnet.net/prarticle.2006-01-27.9445210332/prarticle.2006-01-27.0949657238/prarticleblocklist.2006-01-27.1370579427/skatdocumentation.2006-01-27.2759111709/file. Accessed 21 June 2012
Scheinberg A, Simpson M, Gupt Y (2010) Economic aspects of the informal sector in solid waste, GTZ, Eschborn, Germany. http://www2.gtz.de/dokumente/bib-2011/giz2011-0116en-informal-sector-solid-waste-management.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2012.
Spillemaeckers S, Mazijn B, Borgo E (2001) An integrated approach to chain analysis for the purpose of chain management by companies. Study executed by the Centre for Sustainable Development. Gent. Belgium. http://www.belspo.be/belspo/organisation/publ/pub_ostc/HL/rHL13s_en.pdf . Accessed 27 June 2012
Terraza H and Sturzenegger G (2010) Organization dynamics of informal recyclers. Three case studies from Latin America. Infrastructure and environment sector. Technical note no. 117. Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=35325785. Accessed 27 June 2012
UN–HABITAT (2010) Solid waste management in the world’s cities. Water and sanitation in the world’s cities. United Nation Human Settlements Program, London. ISBN: 9781849711708. http://www.unhabitat.org/pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?publicationID=2918. Accessed 16 November 2011
UNEP–SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme. Life Cycle Initiative. http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_sLCA.pdf. Accessed 22 April 2010
Wilson D, Velis C, Cheeseman C (2006) Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries. Habitat Int 30:797–808
Wilson D, Araba A, Chinwah K, Cheeseman C (2009) Building recycling rates through the informal sector. Waste Manag 29:629–635
Zurbrügg C, Schertenleib R (1998) Main problems and issues of municipal solid waste management in developing countries with emphasis on problems related to disposal by landfill. Third Swedish landfill research symposia. October 1998. Lulea. Sweden. Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries (SANDEC) and Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science & Technology (EAWAG). http://www.eawag.ch/forschung/sandec/publikationen/swm/dl/swm-problems-disposal.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2012
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Ines Omann for her support and recommendations for this paper and the OEAD–Austrian Agency for Cooperation in Education and Research for the financial support of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Thomas Swarr
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aparcana, S., Salhofer, S. Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18, 1106–1115 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0546-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0546-8