1 Correction to: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (2021) 26: 616–632 http://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01851-4

The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes in the captions of Tables 12, 13, 14, 15. Here are the correct tables given:

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons. Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The original article has been corrected.

Table 12 Proposed format for communicating comparative results in case of more than two products. A cell like “X ↔ Y” contains information about the difference or preference of X with respect to Y
Table 13 Framework for deciding between two products A and B
Table 14 Suitability of the various comparison statistics for answering the two relevant questions
Table 15 Result of the proposed superiority statistics \({K}_{4}\) for the example system, using \({\gamma }_{0}=1.2\)