Abstract
Purpose
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are well known for their mechanical resistance, durability and flexibility, which make them preferable for a wide variety of applications. The global production volume of CNTs is expected to reach 7,000 tons by 2025. This work performs cradle-to-gate life cycle assessments (LCAs) of industrially preferred single- and multi-walled CNTs synthesis processes. The aim is to evaluate global environmental impacts associated with raw materials acquisition and manufacturing and identify hotspots in CNTs production.
Methods
Eight single-walled and seven multi-walled CNTs synthesis processes are evaluated using LCA. A mass based functional unit is selected as 1 kilogram of CNTs produced, and LCAs are conducted using SimaPro 8.5.2 Software with Tool for Reduction and Assessment of Chemicals and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI 2.1) and Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) impact categories. It is expected that industrial scale production provides significant material and energy savings as well as reduces environmental impacts per unit mass of the product, due to the use of efficient equipment and recycling of reagents. Therefore, hypothetical scaling up scenarios are applied in order to estimate associated impacts. Lastly, industry-based impact projections are developed for industries where the majority of CNTs are used using the Laplace criterion.
Results and discussion
The results showed that chemical vapor deposition is the most impactful route for manufacturing single- and multi-walled CNTs. Whereas, high pressure carbon monoxide route for producing single-walled CNTs, and arc discharge route for manufacturing multi-walled CNTs are found to be the least environmentally impactful techniques among different processes considered. Results indicate that the preference of synthesis process dominates the overall environmental cost of the CNTs as well as CNTs-enabled products. Additionally, using different scaling up scenarios, it is projected that the environmental emissions associated with producing CNTs may be reduced up to 88% globally. As industries use particular routes to synthesize the CNTs to be embedded in their products, it is found that the sectoral environmental impacts are not proportional with the industrial shares.
Conclusions
CNTs offer technological advances to conventional products (e.g. heated jacket). However, thinking from a global scale, manufacturing CNTs has significant environmental impacts. This study provides segmented impact projections for industries, which then may be used to inform sectoral cradle-to-grave environmental impacts as a function of manufacturing processes. Based on the desired characteristics of produced CNTs (e.g. diameter, surface area), manufacturing CNTs with environmentally responsible production routes may help decreasing global environmental impacts significantly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdalla S, Al-Marzouki F, Al-Ghamdi AA, Abdel-Daiem A (2015) Different Technical Applications of Carbon Nanotubes. Nanoscale Res Lett 10:358. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-1056-3
Arvidsson R, Tillman AM, Sandén BA et al (2018) Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA. J Ind Ecol 22:1286–1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12690
Bauer C, Buchgeister J, Hischier R et al (2008) Towards a framework for life cycle thinking in the assessment of nanotechnology. J Clean Prod 16:910–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.04.022
Baun A, Sayre P, Steinhäuser KG, Rose J (2017) Regulatory relevant and reliable methods and data for determining the environmental fate of manufactured nanomaterials. NanoImpact 8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.06.004
Borm PJ, Robbins D, Haubold S et al (2006) The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC. Part Fibre Toxicol 3:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-3-11
Celik I, Mason BE, Phillips AB et al (2017) Environmental Impacts from Photovoltaic Solar Cells Made with Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Environ Sci Technol 51:4722–4732. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06272
Charitidis CA, Georgiou P, Koklioti MA et al (2014) Manufacturing nanomaterials: from research to industry. Manufacturing Rev 1:11. https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2014009
Cucurachi S, van der Giesen C, Guinée J (2018) Ex-ante LCA of Emerging Technologies. Procedia CIRP 69:463–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.005
Das R, Shahnavaz Z, Ali MdE et al (2016) Can We Optimize Arc Discharge and Laser Ablation for Well-Controlled Carbon Nanotube Synthesis? Nanoscale Res Lett 11:510. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1730-0
Deng Y, Li J, Li T et al (2017) Life cycle assessment of high capacity molybdenum disulfide lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles. Energy 123:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.096
DTU Environment, Danish Ecological Council, Danish Consumer Council (2019) The Nanodatabase (Denmark). http://nanodb.dk/en/. Accessed 16 Sep 2019
Eatemadi A, Daraee H, Karimkhanloo H et al (2014) Carbon nanotubes: properties, synthesis, purification, and medical applications. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:393. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-393
Eckelman MJ, Mauter MS, Isaacs JA, Elimelech M (2012) New Perspectives on Nanomaterial Aquatic Ecotoxicity: Production Impacts Exceed Direct Exposure Impacts for Carbon Nanotoubes. Environ Sci Technol 46:2902–2910. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203409a
Endo M, Strano MS, Ajayan PM (2007) Potential Applications of Carbon Nanotubes. In: Jorio A, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS (eds) Topics in Applied Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 13–62
Fan Y-Y, Kaufmann A, Mukasyan A, Varma A (2006) Single- and multi-wall carbon nanotubes produced using the floating catalyst method: Synthesis, purification and hydrogen up-take. Carbon 44:2160–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.03.009
Ganter MJ, Seager TP, Schauerman CM et al (2009) A life-cycle energy analysis of single wall carbon nanotubes produced through laser vaporization. 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology. IEEE, Tempe, AZ, USA, pp 1–4
Garvey T, Moore EA, Babbitt CW, Gaustad G (2019) Comparing ecotoxicity risks for nanomaterial production and release under uncertainty. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:229–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1648-6
Gavankar S, Suh S, Keller AA (2015) The Role of Scale and Technology Maturity in Life Cycle Assessment of Emerging Technologies: A Case Study on Carbon Nanotubes: Carbon Nanotubes Case Study of Scaling and Technology Maturity in LCAs. J Ind Ecol 19:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12175
Ghaffarzadeh K (2018) Graphene, 2D Materials and Carbon Nanotubes: Markets, Technologies and Opportunities 2018-2020. IDTechEx
Gilbertson LM, Busnaina AA, Isaacs JA et al (2014) Life Cycle Impacts and Benefits of a Carbon Nanotube-Enabled Chemical Gas Sensor. Environ Sci Technol 48:11360–11368. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5006576
Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2009) Modeled Environmental Concentrations of Engineered Nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for Different Regions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216–9222. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9015553
Grand View Research (2020) Global Nanomaterials Market Size Report, 2020-2027
Griffiths OG, O’Byrne JP, Torrente-Murciano L et al (2013) Identifying the largest environmental life cycle impacts during carbon nanotube synthesis via chemical vapour deposition. J Clean Prod 42:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.040
Healy ML, Dahlben LJ, Isaacs JA (2008) Environmental Assessment of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Processes. J Ind Ecol 12:376–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00058.x
Heijungs R (2014) Ten easy lessons for good communication of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:473–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0662-5
Hendren CO, Mesnard X, Dröge J, Wiesner MR (2011) Estimating Production Data for Five Engineered Nanomaterials As a Basis for Exposure Assessment. Environ Sci & Techno 45:2562–2569. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103300g
Hischier R, Walser T (2012) Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: State of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps. Sci Total Environ 425:271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.001
International Energy Agency (2020a) World Energy Balances: Total energy supply (TES) by source, World 1990-2018. In: Data and Statistics. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20supply&indicator=Total%20energy%20supply%20(TES)%20by%20source. Accessed 23 Sep 2020
International Energy Agency (2020b) Global CO2 emissions by sector, 2018. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-co2-emissions-by-sector-2018. Accessed 4 Oct 2020
Isaacs JA, Tanwani A, Healy ML, Dahlben LJ (2010) Economic assessment of single-walled carbon nanotube processes. J Nanoparticle Res 12:551–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9673-3
Ishigami M, Cumings J, Zettl A, Chen S (2000) A simple method for the continuous production of carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 319:457–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00151-2
ISO (2006) ISO 14040:2006 - Environmental management -- Life cycle assessment -- Principles and framework. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html. Accessed 23 Sep 2018
Janković NZ, Plata DL (2019) Engineered nanomaterials in the context of global element cycles. Environ Sci: Nano 6:2697–2711. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EN00322C
Kawajiri K, Goto T, Sakurai S et al (2020) Development of life cycle assessment of an emerging technology at research and development stage: A case study on single-wall carbon nanotube produced by super growth method. J Clean Prod 255:120015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120015
Keller AA, Lazareva A (2014) Predicted Releases of Engineered Nanomaterials: From Global to Regional to Local. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 1:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1021/ez400106t
Keller AA, McFerran S, Lazareva A, Suh S (2013) Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 15:1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1692-4
Kuzma J (2005) The Nanotechnology-Biology Interface: Exploring Models for Oversight. Center for Science, Technology, and Public Policy, University of Minnesota
Lamon L, Asturiol D, Vilchez A et al (2019) Computational models for the assessment of manufactured nanomaterials: Development of model reporting standards and mapping of the model landscape. Computational Toxicology 9:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2018.12.002
Liu B-C, Tang S-H, Liang Q et al (2001) Production of Carbon Nanotubes over Pre-reduced LaCoO3 by Using Fluidized-bed Catalytic Reactor. Chin J Chem 19:983–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.20010191013
Maranghi S, Parisi ML, Basosi R, Sinicropi A (2020) LCA as a Support Tool for the Evaluation of Industrial Scale-Up. In: Maranghi S, Brondi C (eds) Life Cycle Assessment in the Chemical Product Chain. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 125–143
Markets and Markets (2018) Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) Market by Type (Single, Multi Walled), Method (Chemical Vapor Deposition, Catalytic Chemical Vapor Deposition, High Pressure Carbon Monoxide), Application (Electronics, Chemical, Batteries, Energy, Medical) - Global Forecast to 2023
Mauron P, Emmenegger C, Sudan P, et al (2003) Fluidised-bed CVD synthesis of carbon nanotubes on Fe2O3yMgO. Diam Relat Mater 6
Moore EA, Babbitt CW, Tomaszewski B, Tyler AC (2020) Spatial perspectives enhance modeling of nanomaterial risks. J Ind Ecol 24:855–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12976
Mueller NC, Nowack B (2008) Exposure Modeling of Engineered Nanoparticles in the Environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–4453. https://doi.org/10.1021/es7029637
Nanotechmag (2014) The Global Market For Carbon Nanotubes. 2:20–22
Nanowerk (2011) Global carbon nanotubes market - industry beckons. https://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=23118.php
NREL (2020) U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database. In: U.S. Life Cycle Inventory (USLCI) Database. https://www.nrel.gov/lci/. Accessed 8 Sep 2020
Pallas G, Vijver MG, Peijnenburg WJGM, Guinée J (2020) Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies at the lab scale: The case of nanowire-based solar cells. J Ind Ecol 24:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12855
Parsons S, Murphy RJ, Lee J, Sims G (2015) Uncertainty communication in the environmental life cycle assessment of carbon nanotubes. Int J Nanotechnol 12:620. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNT.2015.068883
Piccinno F, Gottschalk F, Seeger S, Nowack B (2012) Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J Nanoparticle Res 14:1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1109-9
Piccinno F, Hischier R, Seeger S, Som C (2016) From laboratory to industrial scale: a scale-up framework for chemical processes in life cycle assessment studies. J Clean Prod 135:1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.164
Piccinno F, Hischier R, Seeger S, Som C (2018) Predicting the environmental impact of a future nanocellulose production at industrial scale: Application of the life cycle assessment scale-up framework. J Clean Prod 174:283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.226
Pini M, Cedillo González E, Neri P et al (2017) Assessment of Environmental Performance of TiO2 Nanoparticles Coated Self-Cleaning Float Glass. Coatings 7:8. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings7010008
Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (2013) Consumer Products Inventory. http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi. Accessed 16 Sep 2019
Promentilla MAB, Janairo JIB, Yu DEC et al (2018) A stochastic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for optimal selection of clean technologies. J Clean Prod 183:1289–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.183
Pulidindi K, Pandey H (2018) Carbon Nanotubes Market Size By Product (Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes, Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes), By Application (Polymers, Energy, Electrical & Electronics), Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, Growth Potential, Price Trends, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2018–2024. Global Market Insights Inc, Delaware, USA
Rahman G, Najaf Z, Mehmood A et al (2019) An Overview of the Recent Progress in the Synthesis and Applications of Carbon Nanotubes. Journal of Carbon Research 5:31. https://doi.org/10.3390/c5010003
Ray PC, Yu H, Fu PP (2009) Toxicity and Environmental Risks of Nanomaterials: Challenges and Future Needs. J Environ Sci Health C 27:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590500802708267
Reports and Data (2019) Carbon Nanotubes Market To Reach USD 15.02 Billion By 2026. New York
Research and Markets (2018) The Global Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) Market (2018-2023) is Projected to Grow at a CAGR of 16.7% - Technological Advancements and Decreasing Production Cost is Driving Growth
Revelle CS, Whitlatch EE, Wright JR (2004) Civil and Environmental Systems Engineering, 2nd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Rodriguez-Garcia G, Zimmermann B, Weil M (2014) Nanotoxicity and Life Cycle Assessment: First attempt towards the determination of characterization factors for carbon nanotubes. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 64:012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/64/1/012029
Roes AL, Tabak LB, Shen L et al (2010) Influence of using nanoobjects as filler on functionality-based energy use of nanocomposites. J Nanoparticle Res 12:2011–2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9819-3
Sahu YS (2016) Carbon Nanotubes Market by Type (Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes, Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes), Application (Structural Polymer, Conductive Polymer, Conductive Adhesives, Metal Matrix Composites, Li-ion Battery Electrodes) and End-User (Electricals & Electronics. Aerospace & Defense, Energy, Sporting Goods, Automotive) - Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, pp 2014–2022
Schauer MW, White MA (2015) Tailoring Industrial Scale CNT Production to Specialty Markets. MRS Proc 1752:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2015.90
Schnorr JM, Swager TM (2011) Emerging Applications of Carbon Nanotubes. Chem Mater 23:646–657. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm102406h
Sengupta J (2018) Carbon Nanotube Fabrication at Industrial Scale. In: Handbook of Nanomaterials for Industrial Applications. Elsevier, pp 172–194
Shibasaki M, Fischer M, Barthel L (2007) Effects on Life Cycle Assessment — Scale Up of Processes. In: Takata S, Umeda Y (eds) Advances in Life Cycle Engineering for Sustainable Manufacturing Businesses. Springer, London, pp 377–381
Shibasaki M, Warburg N, Eyerer P (2006) Upscaling effect and Life Cycle Assessment. In: Proceedings of LCE2006. 13th CIRP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, Leuven, Belgium, pp 61–64
Singh A, Lou HH, Pike RW et al (2008) Environmental Impact Assessment for Potential Continuous Processes for the Production of Carbon Nanotubes. Am J Environ Sci 4:522–534. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2008.522.534
Statista (2015) Market size of carbon nanotubes worldwide from 2012 to 2022, by application (in tons). https://www.statista.com/statistics/714708/carbon-nanotube-global-market-size-by-application/. Accessed 25 Jan 2019
StatNano (2019) Nanotechnology Products Database (NPD). http://product.statnano.com/. Accessed 16 Sep 2019
Sun TY, Gottschalk F, Hungerbühler K, Nowack B (2014) Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials. Environmental Pollution 185:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.004
Teah HY, Sato T, Namiki K et al (2020) Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Long and Pure Carbon Nanotubes Synthesized via On-Substrate and Fluidized-Bed Chemical Vapor Deposition. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:1730–1740. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04542
Temizel-Sekeryan S, Hicks AL (2020) Global environmental impacts of silver nanoparticle production methods supported by life cycle assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 156:104676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104676
Trompeta A-F, Koklioti MA, Perivoliotis DK et al (2016) Towards a holistic environmental impact assessment of carbon nanotube growth through chemical vapour deposition. J Clean Prod 129:384–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.044
Tsoy N, Steubing B, van der Giesen C, Guinée J (2020) Upscaling methods used in ex ante life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: a review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:1680–1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01796-8
Upadhyayula VKK, Meyer DE, Curran MA, Gonzalez MA (2014) Evaluating the Environmental Impacts of a Nano-Enhanced Field Emission Display Using Life Cycle Assessment: A Screening-Level Study. Environ Sci Technol 48:1194–1205. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4034638
Upadhyayula VKK, Meyer DE, Curran MA, Gonzalez MA (2012) Life cycle assessment as a tool to enhance the environmental performance of carbon nanotube products: a review. J Clean Prod 26:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.018
US Patent and Trademark Office (2019) Patent Full-Text Databases. http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/index.html
Wu F, Zhou Z, Hicks AL (2019) Life Cycle Impact of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle Synthesis through Physical, Chemical, and Biological Routes. Environ Sci Technol 53:4078–4087. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06800
Zhang Q, Huang J-Q, Qian W-Z et al (2013) The Road for Nanomaterials Industry: A Review of Carbon Nanotube Production, Post-Treatment, and Bulk Applications for Composites and Energy Storage. Small 9:1237–1265. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201203252
Zhang Q, Huang J-Q, Zhao M-Q et al (2011) Carbon Nanotube Mass Production: Principles and Processes. ChemSusChem 4:864–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201100177
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF). This work has not been formally reviewed by the WARF, and the findings of the authors are their own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Chris Yuan.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Temizel-Sekeryan, S., Wu, F. & Hicks, A.L. Global scale life cycle environmental impacts of single- and multi-walled carbon nanotube synthesis processes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26, 656–672 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01862-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01862-1