Advertisement

Journal of Chinese Political Science

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 413–436 | Cite as

Advancing “Ethnic Unity” and “De-Extremization”: Ideational Governance in Xinjiang under “New Circumstances” (2012–2017)

  • Ondřej Klimeš
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

The central role of ideology has been one of the key features of the political system of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since 1949. One of the places where the phenomenon can be observed is the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, a vast, important, and rich borderland area inhabited by some 10 million Turkic Muslim Uyghurs. Since 1949, the central government has managed to win only a limited degree of Uyghur support for its policies, leaving the region riven with protest and violence. The central government has therefore sought to devise and implement policies so as to simultaneously address multiple aspects of Xinjiang’s reality, including ideational affairs. This paper examines the party-state’s ideational governance, i.e. efforts to define and regulate Uyghur values, beliefs, and loyalties so that they are instrumental in maintaining the political stability of the PRC. Firstly, the novel approach to Xinjiang policy adopted by the Xi leadership during its first functional term (2012–2017) is examined, namely its concern with Xinjiang’s growing geopolitical significance and with the security dimension of the Xinjiang problem. Two main focuses of Xinjiang governance are introduced, particularly the advancement of centripetal inter-ethnic relations (officially called “ethnic unity”) and the eradication of religious or cultural practices deemed as potentially subversive (“de-extremization”). Secondly, the ideology relating to Xinjiang is examined within the framework of the CPC’s national-level ideology. Thirdly, new legislation, by which the authorities seek to legitimate Xinjiang policies, is considered. Fourthly, several grassroots “ethnic unity” and “de-extremization” activities are reviewed as examples of the party-state’s efforts to use the Uyghur religion and other intangible domains as ideational apparatuses to inculcate desirable political values. The conclusions reached in this article raise the broader question as to whether the party-state’s resolve to strengthening its ideational governance over the Uyghurs will bring about a change in the security situation in Xinjiang.

Keywords

Xi Jinping Xinjiang Ideology Propaganda Religion 

References

  1. 1.
    Althusser, L. 2014. On the reproduction of capitalism: ideology and ideological state apparatuses. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bellér-Hann, I., and T. Brox. 2014. Introduction. In On the fringes of harmonious society, ed. I. Bellér-Hann and T. Brox, 1–28. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bovingdon, G. 2001. The history of the history of Xinjiang. Twentieth-Century China 26 (2): 95–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bovingdon, G. 2004. Autonomy in Xinjiang: Han nationalist imperatives and Uyghur discontent. Washington DC: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bovingdon, G. 2010. The Uyghurs: strangers in their own land. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brady, M. 2012a. China’s thought management. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brady, M. 2012b. “We are all part of the same family”: China’s ethnic propaganda. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 41 (4): 159–181.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brooker, P. 1995. Twentieth-century dictatorships: the ideological one-party states. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cappelletti, A. 2016. Socio-economic disparities and development gap in Xinjiang: the cases of Kashgar and Shihezi. In Inside Xinjiang: space, place and power in China’s Muslim far northwest, ed. A. Hayes and M. Clarke, 151–182. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chau, A.Y. 2011. Religion in contemporary China: revitalization and innovation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clarke, Michael E. 2011. Xinjiang and China’s rise in Central Asia: a history. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cliff, T. 2012. The partnership of stability in Xinjiang: state – society interactions following the July 2009 unrest. The China Journal 68: 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cliff, T. 2016. Lucrative chaos: interethnic conflict as a function of the economic “normalization” of southern Xinjiang. In Ethnic conflict and protest in Tibet and Xinjiang, ed. B. Hillman and G. Tuttle, 122–150. New York: Columbia University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dwyer, A.M. 2005. The Xinjiang conflict: Uyghur identity, language policy, and political discourse. Washington DC: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ekpar, H. 2016. Health in Xinjiang: Uyghur adolescents’ vulnerability to HIV/AIDS. In Inside Xinjiang: space, place and power in China’s Muslim far northwest, ed. A. Hayes and M. Clarke, 183–205. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elliott, M. 2015. The case of the missing indigene: debate over the “second-generation” ethnic policy. The China Journal 73: 186–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Finley, J.S. 2013. The art of symbolic resistance: Uyghur identities and Uyghur-Han relations in contemporary Xinjiang. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fischer, A.M. 2014. Labour transitions and social inequalities in Tibet and Xinjiang: a comparative analysis of the structural foundations of discrimination and protest. In On the fringes of harmonious society, ed. I. Bellér-Hann and T. Brox, 29–68. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fuller, G.E., and F.S. Starr. 2003. The Xinjiang problem. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute: Washington D. C.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gladney, D. 2004. The Chinese program of development and control, 1978–2001. In Xinjiang: China’s Muslim borderland, ed. F. Starr, 101–119. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grose, T. 2015. (Re)Embracing Islam in neidi: the ‘Xinjiang class’ and the dynamics of Uyghur ethno-national identity. Journal of Contemporary China 24 (91): 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gupta, S. 2016. Bilingual education in Xinjiang in the post-2009 period. China Report 52 (4): 306–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hillman, B., and G. Tuttle. 2016. Ethnic conflict and protest in Tibet and Xinjiang. New York: Columbia University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horowitz, S., and P. Yu. 2015. Holding China’s west: explaining CCP strategies of rule in Tibet and Xinjiang. Journal of Chinese Political Science 20 (4): 451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hung, C. 2005. The dance of revolution. The China Quarterly 181: 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klimeš, O. 2015. Struggle by the pen: the Uyghur discourse of nation and national interest, c. 1900–1949. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lai, H.H. 2006. Religious policies in post-totalitarian China: maintaining political monopoly over a reviving society. Journal of Chinese Political Science 11 (1): 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lattimore, O. 1950. Pivot of Asia. Sinkiang and the Inner Asian frontiers of China and Russia. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leibold, J. 2013. Ethnic policy in China: is reform inevitable? East-West Center: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leibold, J., and D.X. Deng. 2016. Segregated diversity: Uyghur residential patterns in Xinjiang, China. In Inside Xinjiang: space, place and power in China’s Muslim far northwest, ed. A. Hayes and M. Clarke, 122–148. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leibold, J., and T. Grose. 2016. Islamic veiling in Xinjiang: the political and societal struggle to define Uyghur female adornment. The China Journal 76: 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Link, P. 2013. An anatomy of Chinese: rhythm, metaphor, politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ma, R. 2014. Reflections on the debate on China’s ethnic policy: my reform proposals and their critics. Asian Ethnicity 15 (2): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    McMillen, D. 1979. Chinese communist power and policy in Xinjiang, 1949–1977. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Millward, J. 2010. Introduction: does the 2009 Urumchi violence mark a turning point? Central Asian Survey 28 (4): 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Millward, J., and Tursun, N. 2004. Political history and strategies of control, 1884–1978. In Xinjiang: China’s Muslim borderland, ed. F. Starr, 63–98. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Muhabaiti, H [Muhebbet Qasim]. 2002. Research in experimental Chinese-language instruction in Xinjiang minority nationality middle schools [Xinjiang shaoshu minzu zhongxue hanyu jiaoke shijian yanjiu]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Norins, M.R. 1944. Gateway to Asia: Sinkiang: frontier of the Chinese far west. New York: The John Day Company.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Potter, P.B. 2003. Belief in control: regulation of religion in China. The China Quarterly 174: 317–337.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schluessel, E.T. 2007. “Bilingual” education and discontent in Xinjiang. Central Asian Survey 26 (2): 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schluessel, E.T. 2014. Thinking beyond harmony. In On the fringes of harmonious society, ed. I. Bellér-Hann and T. Brox, 318–345. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schurmann, F. 1968. Ideology and organization in communist China. Berkeley and London: University of California Press and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Su, X. 2011. Revolution and reform: the role of ideology and hegemony in Chinese politics. Journal of Contemporary China 20 (69): 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Szadziewski, H. 2014. The Open up the West campaign among Uyghurs in Xinjiang: exploring a rights-based approach. In On the fringes of harmonious society, ed. I. Bellér-Hann and T. Brox, 69–97. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies. Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Terrone, A. 2016. Propaganda in the public square: communicating state directives on religion and ethnicity to Uyghurs and Tibetans in western China. In Ethnic conflict and protest in Tibet and Xinjiang, ed. B. Hillman and G. Tuttle, 40–59. New York: Columbia University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weber, M. 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    White, G. 1995. The decline of ideocracy. In China in the 1990s, ed. R. Benewick and P. Wingrove, 21–33. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhu, Y., and D. Blachford. 2016. ‘Old bottle, new wine’? Xinjiang bingtuan and China’s ethnic frontier governance. Journal of Contemporary China 25 (97): 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oriental Institute of the Czech Academy of SciencesPrague 8Czechia

Personalised recommendations