Abstract
The evaluation, visualization of environmental data from long-term monitoring, and making them accessible in a processed form in user-friendly interfaces on the Internet are important tasks of our time. The pollution of groundwater resources in settlements is a global phenomenon, the mitigation of which requires a number of environmental measures. In this study, water quality changes following the construction of a sewerage network were examined in the course of long-term monitoring between 2013 and 2022, during which 40 municipal groundwater wells were regularly sampled. Classifying the monitoring data into pollution categories based on water quality index (WQI) and degree of contamination index (Cd), a high degree of contamination was found in the period before the installation of the sewerage network (2014), as the majority of the wells were classified as contaminated and heavily contaminated. In the monitoring period following the installation of the sewerage network, a significant positive change was found in the case of most of the water chemical parameters tested (EC, NH4+, NO2−, NO3−, PO43−). Based on interpolated maps, it was found that an increasing part of the area shows satisfactory or good water quality. This was confirmed by the discriminant analysis as well, as it is possible to determine with an accuracy of 80.4% whether the given sample originates from the period before or after the installation of the sewerage network based on the given water chemical parameters. However, 8 years after setting up the sewerage network, the concentration of inorganic nitrogen forms and organic matter remains high, indicating that the accumulated pollutants in the area are still present. To understand the dynamics of purification processes, additional, long-term monitoring is necessary. Making these data available to members of the society can contribute to appropriate environmental measures and strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The mapping, monitoring, and elimination of the underground sources of pollution in settlements has become a key environmental task of the twenty-first century in both developing and developed countries (Bano et al. 2022b). The importance of the topic is indicated by the fact that the demand for fresh water has increased on a global scale over the past two decades, thanks to population growth, urbanization and intensive industrial and agricultural activities (Kerényi and McIntosh 2020). International studies show that one of the most significant sources of pollution in settlements is municipal wastewater, the treatment of which is often unresolved due to a lack of financial resources (Jumma et al. 2012; Ravikumar and Somashekar 2012; Machiwal and Jha 2015; Richards et al. 2016; Smoroń 2016; Adimalla and Qian 2021; Rather et al. 2023). Several studies find that due to the lack of wastewater treatment systems in rural areas, wastewater is discharged into groundwater, as a result of which groundwater quality is severely degraded (Backman et al. 1998; Rotaru and Răileanu 2008; Nemčić-Jurec et al. 2019). Moreover, the accumulation of pollutants in soils exacerbates water contamination, as it can provide a long-term supply of pollutants (Rather et al. 2022; Bano et al. 2022a). In addition, the increase in the permanent population of settlements, in parallel with the global climatic change have led to the decline in water resources, increasing the vulnerability of groundwater (Nlend et al. 2018; Abdalla and Khalil 2018). The water quality studies following the construction of the sewerage network confirmed the positive changes in groundwater pollution in addition to our previous research, mainly in case studies conducted in urban environments (Fylypchuk et al. 2017; Mester et al. 2017; Bugajski et al. 2019; Schuler et al. 2019; Ahmad and Ghanem 2021).
The scientific basis for the combined qualitative assessment of chemical, physical, and biological parameters describing water quality was first made possible by the water quality index introduced by Horton (Horton 1965). The most important goal of the practical use of indices is to combine the applied water chemical and water physical parameters into a single number that interprets information about the state of water quality (Ball and Church 1980; Bouslah et al. 2017). The water quality index (WQI), developed by Brown et al. (1970), which calculates input parameters by weighted averaging, has been modified or improved several times over the past fifty years by specialists (Brown et al. 1970). Other indices have been developed based on WQI, e.g., US National Sanitation Foundation Water Quality Index (NSFWQI), Oregon and British Columbia indices (OWQI, BCWQI), Smith’s index, overall index of pollution (OIP), The River Ganga Index, recreational water quality index (RWQI), contamination index (Cd), and Dinius Water Quality Index (DWQI) (Prati et al. 1971; Ott 1978; Dunnette 1979; Dinius 1987; Smith 1987, 1990; Sharifi 1990; Backman et al. 1998; CPCB 2000; Cude 2001; Lumb et al. 2006; Swamee and Tyagi 2007; Kannel et al. 2007; Salim et al. 2009). The obtained water quality data, integrated and visualized into modern GIS-based decision support systems, further assist in the designation of new monitoring wells, the design and expansion of the monitoring network, and the elimination of detected pollution (Güler et al. 2002; Majolagbe et al. 2016).
The WMS-based (Web Map Service) data provision of international and national geodatabases related to water quality is of great importance for education, research, and industry. In line with current technological trends, typically cloud-based Web monitoring/forecasting and decision support systems provide access to spatial and temporal data of these databases, and the possibility of analyzing them in real time (Evangelidis et al. 2014; La Guardia et al. 2021; Pasquaré Mariotto et al. 2021; Balla et al. 2022). As a result, the publication of spatial data on the Web has shifted to infocommunication interfaces, where the easy-to-use and interpretable “map-based” query interface is a primary consideration (Jiang and Li 2005; Farkas 2017). The rise of digitalization (referred to as “geoinformatic revolution”) has induced a technological generational change (Balla et al. 2022). Static solutions are replaced now by cloud-based solutions for WebGIS architectures to support the free availability of the results of analysis of robust spatial databases (Schütze and Vatterrott 2007; Pődör and Zentai 2017; Farkas 2017; Rumiński et al. 2019; Pőddör and Szabó 2021). The concept of geovisualization of spatiotemporal data has been present in cartography literature since the 1950s (Philbrick 1953). Nevertheless, it gained more attention in the 1980s when scientists from various disciplines began exploring the possible uses of scientific visualization (Taylor 1991; Maceachren and Kraak 1997; Arabnia 1999). According to McCormick et al., geovisualization aims to visually represent the data collected by researchers, aiding in the interpretation of the information encoded within the data (McCormick et al. 1987). Scientific visualization is not limited to spatiotemporal data and is utilized in various other fields (MacEachren et al. 2004; Munzner 2008). Concepts to scientific visualization include information visualization and geovisualization, which focuses on spatial data. Information visualization primarily revolves around interactive demonstrations to aid human cognition. In contrast, geovisualization involves developing visualization methods for spatial data using GIS techniques and tools. The term geovisualization was coined by MacEachren by contracting the expression “geographic visualization” and involves a new approach to the use of maps. Maps are not created for public use but rather for individual use, primarily to provide new insights from the data. Geovisualization involves an intensive interaction between people and maps, allowing for direct manipulation of spatial data to be mapped. Maps are not used alone but are often combined with other visual aids (MacEachren et al. 2004). As geovisualization accelerated, the ability to navigate in different software environments and on Web maps became also important in the research society, which was gradually included among digital competencies, confirmed by numerous inter- and multidisciplinary research projects (Balla et al. 2022; Yang et al. 2022; Papadopoulou et al. 2022).
Publications have already been published on contamination and the deterioration of water quality caused by wastewater in urban environments; however, comparative water quality studies based on long-term monitoring data have yet to be carried out. To assess changes in the water quality status of a municipality over space and time, knowledge of the reference status is required, although this is not available in most cases. In addition, the lack of spatial and temporal monitoring data covering the settlement and the lack of geodatabases of water quality with local dimensions further complicates the study of the dynamics of the purification processes. For this reason, the primary goal of our research is to present the results of a research related to the above problem. The novelty of our study lies, among other things, in the fact that although the multidisciplinary application of various WebGIS services enjoys great popularity, the complex geospatial processing and cloud-based web geovisualization of water quality data have not been in the focus of research so far. Based on the above, the most important goal aims of the research is to determine whether the quality of groundwater has significantly improved in the settlement in the period following the construction of the sewerage network, with the help of freely available Web-based geovisualization tools and geostatistical data analysis.
Material and methods
Description of study area
The Eastern European settlement included in the study is located in Nagy-Sárrét in the eastern part of the Great Hungarian Plain, Hungary (Fig. 1). Báránd is a typical middle-sized village, with a permanent population of 2491 people (Hungarian Central Statistical Office). As the discharge of sewage in the municipality exceeds 2000 population equivalent (PE), it belongs to the group of municipalities for which the European Union requires the construction of a sewerage network (2000/60/EC 2000). The sewerage network was completed in 2014 with the support of the Environment and Energy Operative Program of the New Hungary Development Plan. By 2022, 8 years after the construction of the sewerage network, more than 90% of households had connected to the grid, but there are still several households that have not complied with the law. Previous significant pollutant emissions have led to a strong contamination of groundwater resources and a significant deterioration in water quality, which is monitored by regular annual sampling to identify potentially contaminated sites and evaluate purification processes (Mester et al. 2017, 2019, 2020; Balla et al. 2022).
Determination and evaluation of water quality indices
In our research 40 groundwater monitoring wells were investigated in the study area. Water samples were collected from the upper 1 m water column of each well. In order to calculated the water quality indices, we were used eight parameters (pH, EC, NH4+, NO2−, NO3−, PO43−, COD, Na+). Water samples were determined using appropriate procedures according to the Hungarian Standards (HS ISO 7150-1 1992; HS 448-18 2009; HS 1484-13 2009).
WQI
Calculation of the WQI was carried out following the “weighted arithmetic index method” using the equation (Brown et al. 1970):
where Qn is the quality rating of the nth water quality parameter, and Wn is the unit weight of the nth water quality parameter. The quality rating Qn is calculated using the equation:
where Vn is the actual amount of the nth parameter present, Vi is the ideal value of the parameter [Vi = 0, except for pH (Vi = 7)], and Vs is the standard permissible value for the nth water quality parameter. The unit weight (Wn) is calculated using the formula:
where k is the constant of proportionality and is calculated using the equation:
Cd
The calculation of the contamination degree, Cd, is made separately for each sample of water analyzed, as a sum of the contamination factors of individual components exceeding the upper permissible value. Hence, the contamination index summarizes the combined effects of several quality parameters considered harmful to household water (Rapant et al. 1995).
The scheme for the calculation of Cd is as follows:
where
- Cfi:
-
contamination factor for the ith component
- CAi:
-
analytical value of the ith component
- CNi:
-
upper permissible concentration of the ith component (N denotes the “normative” value)
The elements and ionic species with analytical values below the upper permissible concentration values are not taken into consideration.
The evaluation of the indices is shown in Table 1.
Geoprocessing and web sharing
The mapping of the water quality status of the settlement and sharing the results on a cloud-based WebGIS platform was realized as a result of three work phases ((I) data collection and forming the database, (II) map editing, and (III) Web geovisualization) (Fig. 2). During the data collection, laboratory measurements of the taken water samples and the determination of the water quality indices (water quality index, contamination degree) were carried out using a proprietary webGIS tool (Balla et al. 2022). Geospatial processing of time-series water quality data exported from the system was performed using ESRI ArcGIS version 10.4.1 (ESRI 2011). Since water chemistry and water quality data from the wells were available in a table along with coordinates, it was necessary to import them into the Geographic Information System (GIS). From the data of the water quality status, distribution maps were made of the area for each time point using kriging interpolation, which were saved as raster files in GeoTiff format using Surfer version 22 software (Surfer® from Golden Software LLC, n.d.). The web sharing of the created raster and vector layers in a QGIS environment was geovisualized and made freely available using the QGIS Cloud module (QGIS n.d.).
Statistical analysis
When developing the time-series water quality database, the measurement and calculation (water quality index values, water quality statuses) results were grouped according to the years, pre-sewerage and post-sewerage periods. In addition to calculating the basic statistical values (mean, lower, upper quartile, mode, median, and standard deviation), the results were plotted on scatterplot, boxplot diagrams for efficient data visualization.
To determine the strength of the relationship between the variables, cross-correlation studies were performed. In the non-permanent Spearman rank correlation study, the correlation was determined by the difference in the rank numbers of the variables (Spearman 1961).
In order to spatially distinguish the state of the monitoring wells of the settlement before and after the construction of the sewerage network discriminant analysis was performed. The examination was performed using Wilks' Lambda method (Nath and Pavur 1985). Fisher’s two-group discriminant analysis is suitable for separating different groups. Based on the discriminant function, the variable that defined the separation the most can be given as well (Fisher 1936).
The differences in the data sets for different dates were investigated using a Wilcoxon test. The test can be used to determine whether the differences in the data sets are random or created by some background process (Wilcoxon 1992).
Statistical processing of the data, as well as visualization of the results, was carried out using IBM SPSS 22 software. The statistical examinations are summarized in Table 2.
Results
Description of investigated parameters
The connection of households to the sewerage network has been carried out continuously in the studied settlement since 2014. The impact of the installation of the sewerage network on water quality was the focus of our research. The reference conditions were determined with the sampling of 40 groundwater wells in the summer of 2013, the year before the construction of the sewerage network. Subsequently, sampling was repeated in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th, and 8th years following the installation of the sewerage network out at the same time of the year, in the summer. Sampling in year 6 (2020) was not possible due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the measurement data of 8 soil chemical parameters (pH, EC, NH4+, NO2−, NO3−, PO43−, COD, Na+) measured in the samples taken in the year before (2013) and in the years after (2017, 2018, 2019, 2021, 2022) the construction of the sewerage network, the minimum, maximum, mean, as well as the lower and upper quartile values (Table 3) of the data were determined.
The pH values in the pre-sewerage period were in a more alkaline range than in the post-sewerage period. The lower quartile had a value of 7.92 while the upper quartile was 8.56. In the post-sewerage years, a significant decrease in pH was detected, which can be explained by a significant decrease in anions. The average of 8.25 in 2013 fell to 7.51 in 2017, 7.26 in 2019 and 7.27 in 2021. The lower quartile of the pH value of the samples was 7.08 in 2022. The difference between the upper quartiles (2013: 8.56 → 2022: 7.5) was almost 1.
The mean values of the concentration of PO43− show the most significant decrease proportionally. The mean concentrations have been reduced from 1.22 mg/L in 2013 to 0.24 mg/L in 2022, decreasing therefore below the limit of 0.5 mg/L set out in the 6/2009 (IV.14.) KvVM-EüM-FVM fell joint decree (6/2009 (IV. 14.) KvVM-EüM-FVM 2009). In 2019, 32.5%, while in 2022, 11.76% of the wells had concentrations above the limit value, compared to 67.5% in 2013. The maximum value of 4.07 mg/L measured in 2013 was reduced to 2.14 mg/L in 2019 and to 0.89 mg/L in 2022.
The value of electrical conductivity after sewerage showed a significant decrease after the construction of the sewerage network until 2018, increasing again from 2019; however, the average value in 2019 (2773.43 μS/cm) was still lower than the average value for the reference year (3032.65 μS/cm). The upper quartile decreased from the pre-sewerage 4310 to 3792 μS/cm in 2019 before rising to 4623.75 by 2022. In 2022, the conductivity value in 64.71% of the wells exceeded the contamination limit of 2500 μS/cm prescribed by the 6/2009 (IV. 14.) KvVM-EüM-FVM joint decree, while it exceeded in 50% of the wells in the pre-sewerage period (6/2009 (IV. 14.) KvVM-EüM-FVM 2009). The decreasing values can be explained by the decrease of wastewater outflow, but soil conditions also contribute to the development of the total ion content and to the high values. This is also supported by an increase in Na+ concentrations in the post-sewerage years.
The average values of Na+ post-sewerage were more than 100 mg/L higher than in the reference year. For the years 2013 and 2022, both the lower quartile (132.18 mg/L → 157.42 mg/L) and the upper quartile (312.78 mg/L → 362.57 mg/L) increased. Presumably the low volumes of monthly rainfall in 2019, 2021, and 2022 could be the cause of the increase.
The amount of organic matter did not show a decreasing trend either, the average values in the post-sewerage years (2017, 2018, 2019) were usually higher than the 6.85 mg/L value in the reference year. The highest average value (7.68 mg/L) was measured in 2019. The high organic matter content measured in the 6th post-sewerage year is further evidence that a significant amount of organic matter has accumulated in the soil in the area, which continues to provide a supply of inorganic pollutants in addition to the organic matter content of groundwater. However, in the 7th and 8th post-sewerage years, the average values of the organic matter content decreased significantly (4.21 mg/L, 2.19 mg/L), which can be explained by the stopped wastewater outflow.
The mean values of NH4+ concentrations were above the limit value except for 2021, but there is a steadily decreasing trend. While in 2013 the average value was 0.69 mg/L, in 2022, the average value was 0.64 mg/L. In 2013, very high values above 1 mg/L were measured in 17.5% of the wells; this decreased to 8.82% by 2022, however, concentrations in 52.94% of wells were still above 0.5 mg/L. The strong contamination of the groundwater resources of the settlement is also indicated by the fact that concentrations below 0.2 mg/L were measured in only 2 wells.
NO2− typically does not accumulate in waters; it is further oxidized into nitrate if a sufficient amount of dissolved oxygen is present. While concentrations above 0.5 mg/L were detected in 22.5% of the studied wells in 2013, such concentrations were found in 11.76% of the wells in 2022. The value of the upper quartile was reduced from 0.42 to 0.25 mg/L, while the value of the lower quartile was reduced from 0.05 to 0.04 mg/L. Based on this, oxidative conditions improved, which is due, among other things, to the stopped wastewater outflow. However, it should also be noted here that the concentration of nitrite is still above 0.2 mg/L in 35.29% of the wells, which indicates contamination.
The decrease in the concentration of NO3− also indicates the elimination of a significant part of the pollutant supply, as the mean value decreased from 187.8 to 109.76 mg/L in 2018, but from 2019 onwards there was an increase in the mean value of concentrations (170.73 mg/L, 164.52 mg/L, 296.4 mg/L). The value of the lower quartile decreased from 50.16 mg/L in 2013 to 43.1 mg/L in 2019 and then increased to 76.1 mg/L in 2022, while the upper quartile decreased from 341.7 to 244.85 mg/L in 2019 and then increased to 377.27 in 2022.
Evaluation of spatial and temporal distribution of groundwater quality and degree of contamination
For sampling times, water samples were ranked based on their quality on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 represents the best and 5 represents the worst water rating and degree of contamination. The results of the rating are presented in Table 4. The water level in 3 and 6 monitoring wells fell below the depth of the well (4–6 m deep) in 2021 and 2022, respectively; therefore, there was a lack of data in these cases. The authors plan to establish deeper monitoring wells in the near future to maintain long-term monitoring.
In the case of pre-sewerage (2013) sampling, no water samples were classified in rank 1 (“Excellent,” “Non-contaminated”), 3 samples were classified in rank 2 (“Low”) based on the Cd index, while no water samples were classified in this rank based on the WQI index. The strong contamination of the water of the monitoring wells is well demonstrated by the fact that 90% (NWQS_2013_Rank4+Rank5= 36) and 70% (NCds_2013_Rank4+Rank5= 28) of the monitoring wells based on the WQI index and Cd index, respectively, were classified in rank 4 and rank 5 (“Unsuitable for any usage, Very poor–high, Very high”).
3 years after the construction of the sewerage network (2017), significant changes in water quality can be observed. For both indices, the number of monitoring wells in rank 5 indicating the most polluted samples (NWQS_2013_Rank5 = 28 >NWQS_2017_Rank5 = 9 and NCds_2013_Rank5 = 18 > NCds_2017_Rank5 = 11) has decreased significantly, while the number of samples in rank 2 (“Good and Low”) and rank 3 (“Poor, Medium”) has increased (NWQS_2013_Rank2 = 0 < NWQS_2017_Rank2 = 11, NWQS_2013_Rank3= 4 < NWQS_2017_Rank3 = 14 and NCds_2013_Rank2 = 3 < NCds_2017_Rank2 = 6, NCds_2013_Rank3 = 9 < NCds_2017_Rank3 = 13). In the case of the WQI index, the number of monitoring wells in the two categories increased from 4 to 25, and from 12 to 19 in the case of Cd index compared to the reference year, in addition, 1-1 monitoring wells were categorized in the best rank 1 category.
Four years after the construction of the sewerage network (2018), no significant change was detected based on the Cd index. In the case of the WQI index, the number of monitoring wells in rank 2 decreased significantly (NWQS_2017_Rank2 = 11 > NWQS_2018_Rank2 = 6), while in rank 4, an increase (NWQS_2017_Rank4 = 5 < NWQS_2018_Rank4 = 13) was found.
Five years after the construction of the sewerage network, the most significant change occurred in 2019 compared to 2018, as the number of monitoring wells in rank 4 decreased in the case of both indices (NWQS_2018_Rank4 =13 > NWQS_2019_Rank4 = 6 and NCds_2018_Rank4 = 11 > NCds_2019_Rank4 = 8), while the number of monitoring wells in rank 5 increased (NWQS_2018_Rank5 = 11 < NWQS_2019_Rank5 = 13 and NCds_2018_Rank5 = 10 < NCds_2019_Rank5 = 13). However, their number remained lower than in the pre-sewerage time in 2013. The proportion of wells in category 2-3 was 35% for the WQI index and 55% for the Cd index, compared to 30–47.5% in 2013.
Sampling was not possible 6 years after the construction of the sewerage network (2020) due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In 2021, compared to the post-sewerage transition period (2017-2018-2019), the number of water samples in rank 1 and rank 2 increased. Positive changes in the water quality of the monitoring wells are well demonstrated by the fact that the samples of 43.24% of the monitoring wells (NWQS_2021_Rank1+Rank2 = 16) were classified in the categories rank 1 and rank 2 according to the WQI index. Based on the Cd index, no significant positive change was found. In addition, the number of wells in rank 5 indicating the most polluted samples decreased in the case of both indices (NWQS_2021_Rank5 = 8 and NCds_2021_Rank5 = 9).
Based on the results of the sampling in the 8th post-sewerage year, the water quality deteriorated slightly compared to the previous year. Only one water sample was classified in rank 1 (“Excellent”) based on WQI. In addition, the number of wells in the categories “Good” or “Low” decreased compared to 2021, but their number (NWQS_2022_Rank2 = 10 and NCds_2022_Rank2 = 7) remains higher than in the year before the construction of the sewerage network in 2013.
In order to give a detailed picture of the state of water quality and the degree of contamination, the index values determined during the water classification of each well were visualized on boxplot diagrams. For the WQS and Cd indices, lower values indicate improved water quality. Changes in the average, minimum and maximum values of both indices indicate positive changes in water quality (Fig. 3, Table 5). For WQI, the pre-sewerage average of 147.31 fell to 72.23 by 2022, and for the Cd index from 6.41 to 6.11 (Table 5).
In order to reveal the spatial and temporal evolution of the water quality status of the monitoring wells and the degree of contamination, each index was plotted on thematic point maps for each sampling year (Fig. 4). Since a large number of samples were available, interpolated time-series distribution maps of water quality status and pollution levels were also made (Fig. 5).
In the year prior to construction of the sewerage network (2013), both indices showed contamination in a significant part of the settlement, while the northern areas of the settlement were moderately contaminated. The differences between WQS and Cd were most noticeable in the extent of heavily polluted–contaminated sites.
In the 3rd year after the construction of the sewerage network (2017), the proportion of heavily contaminated sites decreased significantly. In the inner areas of the settlement, the degree of pollution and the state of water quality decreased from ranks 4–5 to ranks 3–4. For both indices, the “Good” water quality status can be detected in the northern and central parts of the settlement—in the case of WQS, also in the southern areas—at varying magnitudes. The extent of these parts of the settlement is significantly greater in the case of WQS than in the case of Cd. This difference from WQS is more expressed in the southern part of the settlement. Both in terms of water quality status and degree of contamination, a similar pattern emerges in all studied years.
In the 4th year after the construction of the sewerage network (2018), the western part of the settlement can be considered again heavily polluted, but at the same time, the central and eastern parts showed significantly lower levels of pollution (medium and good) in extent compared to 2013. In 2019, there is an improvement in water quality compared to 2018, which is typically seen in the western areas of the settlement. The extent of the low-pollution running across the settlement from north to south increased for both indices.
In the 7th year after the construction of the sewerage network, the contaminated areas decreased significantly, at the same time the improved water quality became more pronounced from the central and N- NE parts of the settlement. The extent of the formerly typical N–S oriented high pollution zone running across the entire area of the settlement, has shrunk further.
In the 8th year after the construction of the sewerage network (2022), the state of water quality and the degree of pollution deteriorated compared to the previous year. For both indices, the extent and spatial configuration of low-pollution areas in the settlement decreased. The “Good” water quality status in the northern and central areas of the settlement can be still detected in varying degrees. However, the extent of these parts of the settlement is more homogeneous in the case of WQS than in the case of Cd.
Cloud-based public access in term of geovisualization
Following the geoinformatic processing and database creation of the water quality data the time series geodatabase was made freely available using the QGIS Cloud module (https://qgiscloud.com/Barand/Project_Barand). The geovisualized vector and raster layers present water quality index and contamination degree index categories with graduated symbols. The published cloud-based Web map shows the water quality and degree of contamination databases in the investigated years which can be zoomed in and out. We can use the Search by location function to the desired area in the Open Street Map base map, thereby informing the user about the spatial and temporal distribution of the water quality status and degree of contamination. In addition to navigating on the web map, we can control the visibility of each vector and raster layers. Metadata and descriptive information about the monitoring wells can be queried, and results geovisualizing from the databases are visible to users (Fig. 6). In the context of geovisualization, a cloud-based web map of a project is typically created not only for the community, but for individual use. As a result, the primary task of visualized spatial data is to provide data on water quality and to describe the purification processes following the construction of the sewerage network. In this sense, the spatial display of water quality data and communication with the user are complementary events in cloud-based map use.
Comparative analysis of WQI and Cd
Following the categorization of the water quality status and contamination degree of the water samples, the difference between the ranking of the same water sample using the two indices was studied. In the course of the analysis the data over the 6 years were not separated they were used as one dataset.
Correlational tests were made in order to determine the strength of the correlation between the water quality indices (Table 6). The results revealed that there is a significant connection (p > 0.01) between both indices. Correlation between WQS and Cd shows moderate strength for the connection (r = 0.557).
The difference between the ranks based on the water quality indices was maximum ± 2 on a scale of five in 97.4% of the cases. A difference of occurred only 6 times out of the 231 cases. The difference between WQS and Cd was − 1.0+1 in 82.7% of the cases (Table 7).
The number of monitoring wells in the same category were examined and the differences between the established ranks for the given category (Fig. 7). In the rank 1 category, representing the best water quality, 5 and 6 monitoring wells were classified based on WQS and Cd, respectively; the category of 2 wells were matching. The most diverse differences were found in rank 2, since all 5 categories, although to varying degrees and differences, appear. There were 53 monitoring wells in the rank 2 category based on WQS and 32 monitoring wells based on Cd, 16 of which were ranked in the same category. The rank 3 category, which indicates moderate contamination, has the second highest number of classifications without category changes (N = 21). The second smallest number of matches is shown by wells in the rank 4 category, where, in addition to the 42 monitoring wells of the WQS, 10 of the 50 monitoring wells of Cd were classified in the same category. The highest number of matches was found in rank 5, which represents the most contaminated category, as 45 monitoring wells were classified that were heavily contaminated based on both WQS and Cd.
Analysis of the impact of sewerage network construction on water quality indices
We also aimed to support the connection between changes in water quality indicators and the sewerage network with geostatistical analyses. In order to determine the changes in water quality after the construction of the sewerage network and the differences in the contamination of the monitoring wells, the data series for the 6 years was divided into pre-sewerage (2013) and post-sewerage (2017–2022) categories.
Using Wilcoxon’s signed rank test significant differences were revealed between the pre- and post-sewerage data series for the indices, which is explained by the impacts of the sewerage network (Table 8, Fig. 8). The strongest significance (p = 0.0000) was found in the case of the WQI index values, where the Z value was − 4.463. For Cd index values, nearly identical values were obtained, which significantly indicate the positive influences of sewerage albeit to a lesser extent (Table 8).
To determine whether the results of the pre-sewerage and post-sewerage periods can be separated from each other, a discriminant analysis was performed. The Wilks-Lambda test showed a significant (p = 0.000) value. 80.5% of the cross-checked values were successfully classified in the appropriate group (Table 9). However, the correct classification of 81.4% of the samples also indicates a significant difference between the pre-sewerage and post-sewerage periods. Based on this, the construction of the sewerage network has led to positive changes in the quality of the monitoring wells. The results of the statistical analyses confirmed that after the construction of the sewerage network the water quality index values of the studied monitoring wells improved due to a significant reduction in wastewater discharge, which was confirmed by research carried out in other urban environments (Fylypchuk et al. 2017; Mester et al. 2017; Bugajski et al. 2019; Schuler et al. 2019; Ahmad and Ghanem 2021).
Limitation of study
The most important task of qualitative assessment of water quality based on monitoring data is to interpret information on the state of water quality (Ball and Church 1980; Backman et al. 1998; Bouslah et al. 2017). Thus, water quality indices are tools that greatly minimize the amount of data and simplify the expression of water quality status. However, they are unsuitable for a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between the physicochemical-biological parameters used for this purpose, and for determining the relationships between the parameters shaping water quality or their natural or anthropogenic origin (Tirkey et al. 2013). According to Uddin et al. (2021), water quality indices generally share similar structures, but the specific details of the four main components (parameters, sub-indices, weightings, and aggregation) can vary significantly (Uddin et al. 2021). Their study also highlighted issues related to water quality indices development, such as eclipsing and uncertainty (Juwana et al. 2016; Sutadian et al. 2018). Although many indices are designed to be easily transferable to different sites, their applications are often specific to the study area. The number and types of parameters included in WQI, the weightings assigned to particular parameters, and the criteria (limit values) used to develop sub-index values can vary greatly (Swamee and Tyagi 2007; Abbasi and Abbasi 2012). Therefore, there is little uniformity among models, making it difficult to compare applications across different study areas (Uddin et al. 2021).
Our study shows a significant positive change in the groundwater quality of the water reservoir of the settlement evaluated on the basis of water quality indicators. A comparative analysis of the applied indices highlights the differences between them, which is also verified by case studies conducted in other settlements (Franz et al. 2022; Pham et al. 2022). The WQI index is more sensitive to changes in certain parameters (e.g., PO43−, NH4+) than the Cd index due to the different weighting of the input data (Mester et al. 2020; Guasmi et al. 2022). The Cd index does not take into account values below the limit, even if they are very close to it (Backman et al. 1998). Due to this, when choosing water quality indices, it is necessary to take into account not only its field of application (agricultural, industrial, urban environment), but also the expected important hydrochemical–water physical parameters for calculating index values.
The Web geovisualization of the water quality data produced during the research was realized using several geoinformatics tools and systems. However, in relation to the geoinformatic processing of raw measurement data, the paradigm shift in traditional GIS-based systems has to be mentioned (Agrawal and Gupta 2017). Cloud-based WebGIS systems are now capable not only of managing geodatabases but also of performing complex tasks (e.g., defining data structure, quality control and validation of input data, Web data visualization) in real time by integrating task-oriented modules. One of the most important benefits of this is that there is no need for the post-processing of data on an additional platform or software environment. Research on WebGIS architectures agrees that in addition to cloud-based technologies, the presence of artificial intelligence and neural nets will be unavoidable in the long run-in innovative developments based on spatial data (Kholoshyn et al. 2019; Lavallin and Downs 2021; Nader et al. 2022).
Conclusion
Our study examined the changes in groundwater quality after the construction of a sewerage network and the elimination of wastewater outflow in a municipal environment, using water quality indices and various geospatial and statistical analyses. The geodatabase obtained on the basis of long-term monitoring between 2013 and 2022 was made available online in WebGIS cloud-based systems in order to make environmental data as widely accessible as possible. The results for the pre-sewerage period highlight the strong contamination of the groundwater resources of the settlement, due to, among other things, improper storage of domestic wastewater and unresolved wastewater treatment until 2014. The applied water quality indices classified the majority of the groundwater wells studied into the contaminated or heavily contaminated categories. During the monitoring period following the construction of the sewerage network (2017–2022), clear purification of the groundwater was found, which is the result of the elimination of local point-like pollution sources. During this period, increasing areas of the settlement showed adequate or good water quality values. The marked positive changes were confirmed with Wilcoxon tests and discriminant analyses. In the discriminant analyses, it was possible to determine with more than 80% probability, whether the given water sample originated in the year before or after the construction of the sewerage network, based on water chemical parameters. However, the level of contamination of the groundwater is still detectable, and values exceeding the limits are encountered in the case of all of the studied parameters. This clearly shows that organic and inorganic substances accumulated in the area are still present. Further, long-term monitoring is necessary to understand the dynamics of the purification processes. Making these available for the society on a Web-based platform may contribute to appropriate environmental measures and strategies.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
6/2009 (IV. 14.) KvVM-EüM-FVM (2009) 6/2009 (IV. 14.) KvVM-EüM-FVM együttes rendelet a földtani közeg és a felszín alatti vízszennyezéssel szembeni védeleméhez szükséges határértékekről és a szennyezések méréséről.
2000/60/EC (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. OJ L327, 22.12.2000
Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2012) Water Quality Indices. Elsevier
Abdalla F, Khalil R (2018) Potential effects of groundwater and surface water contamination in an urban area, Qus City, Upper Egypt. J Afr Earth Sci 141:164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.02.016
Adimalla N, Qian H (2021) Groundwater chemistry, distribution and potential health risk appraisal of nitrate enriched groundwater: A case study from the semi-urban region of South India. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 207:111277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111277
Agrawal S, Gupta RD (2017) Web GIS and its architecture: a review. Arab J Geosci 10:518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3296-2
Ahmad W, Ghanem M (2021) Effect of wastewater on the spring water quality of Sarida Catchment – West Bank. Arab J Basic Appl Sci 28:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2021.1958489
Arabnia H (1999) Reading in information visualization: using vision to Think [Media Review]. IEEE MultiMedia 6:93–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.1999.809241
Backman B, Bodiš D, Lahermo P et al (1998) Application of a groundwater contamination index in Finland and Slovakia. Environ Geol 36:55–64
Ball RO, Church RL (1980) Water quality indexing and scoring. J Environ Eng Div 106:757–771
Balla D, Zichar M, Kiss E et al (2022) Possibilities for Assessment and Geovisualization of Spatial and Temporal Water Quality Data Using a WebGIS Application. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 11:108
Bano H, Malik S, Rather RA et al (2022a) Impact of anthropogenic activities on physico-chemical properties of sediment of Hokersar wetland: a protected wildlife reserve (Ramsar Site No.1570) of Kashmir Himalaya. Bangladesh J Botany 51:83–92. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v51i1.58824
Bano H, Rather RA, Malik S et al (2022b) Effect of Seasonal Variation on Pollution Load of Water of Hokersar Wetland: a Case Study of Queen Wetland of Kashmir, J&K, India. Water Air Soil Pollut 233:518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05988-w
Bouslah S, Djemili L, Houichi L (2017) Water quality index assessment of Koudiat Medouar Reservoir, northeast Algeria using weighted arithmetic index method. J Water Land Dev 35:221
Brown RM, McClelland NI, Deininger RA, Tozer RG (1970) A water quality index-do we dare. Water and sewage works 117
Bugajski PM, Kurek K, Mlyński D, Operacz A (2019) Designed and real hydraulic load of household wastewater treatment plants. J Water Land Dev
CPCB (2000) Water quality status of Yamuna River, Central Pollution Control Board
Cude CG (2001) Oregon water quality index a tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness 1. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 37:125–137
Dinius SH (1987) Design of an Index of Water Quality1. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 23:833–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1987.tb02959.x
Dunnette DA (1979) A geographically variable water quality index used in Oregon. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation) 53–61
ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands
Evangelidis K, Ntouros K, Makridis S, Papatheodorou C (2014) Geospatial services in the Cloud. Comput Geosci 63:116–122
Farkas G (2017) Applicability of open-source web mapping libraries for building massive Web GIS clients. J Geogr Syst 19:273–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-017-0248-z
Fisher (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugenics 7:179–188
Franz HS, Pertille J, Kunst-Valentini MH et al (2022) Assessment of shallow groundwater quality for drinking purposes: an integrated approach based on the water quality index and the use of multivariate statistical analyses, southern Brazil. Environ Earth Sci 81:452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10564-w
Fylypchuk V, Induchny S, Pearce P et al (2017) Application of expanded polystyrene filter for tertiary treatment of domestic waste effluent in the UK. J Water Land Dev 35:41
Guasmi I, Hadji F, Yebdri L (2022) Quality assessment of reclaimed water for irrigation purpose and aquatic life protection in the Mekerra sub-watershed (NW Algeria). Model Earth Syst Environ 8:3399–3412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01305-2
Güler C, Thyne GD, McCray JE, Turner KA (2002) Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeol J 10:455–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-002-0196-6
Horton RK (1965) An index number system for rating water quality. p 300–305. Water quality criteria-stream vs effluent standards J Wat Pollut Contr Fed 37:292–315
HS 448-18 (2009) Hungarian Standard Water Quality. Part 18: Drinking Water Analysis. Determination of Orthophosphate and Total Phosphorus Using Spectrophotometric Method
HS 1484-13 (2009) Hungarian Standard Water Quality. Part 12: Determination of Nitrate and Nitrite. Content by Spectrophotometric Method
HS ISO 7150-1 (1992) Hungarian Standard Water quality. Determination of ammonium. Part 1: Manual spectrophotometric method Hungarian Central Statistical Office
Jiang B, Li Z (2005) Geovisualization: design, enhanced visual tools and applications. Cartogr J 42:3–4
Jumma AJ, Mohd ET, Noorazuan MH (2012) Groundwater pollution and wastewater management in Derna City, Libya. Intl Environ Res J 6:50–54
Juwana I, Muttil N, Perera BJC (2016) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of West Java Water Sustainability Index – A case study on Citarum catchment in Indonesia. Ecol Indic 61:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.034
Kannel PR, Lee S, Lee Y-S et al (2007) Application of Water Quality Indices and Dissolved Oxygen as Indicators for River Water Classification and Urban Impact Assessment. Environ Monit Assess 132:93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9505-1
Kerényi A, McIntosh RW (2020) Sustainable Development in Changing Complex Earth Systems. Springer International Publishing, Cham
Kholoshyn I, Bondarenko O, Hanchuk O, Shmeltser E (2019) Cloud ArcGIS Online as an innovative tool for developing geoinformation competence with future geography teachers
La Guardia M, D’Ippolito F, Cellura M (2021) Construction of a webgis tool based on a gis semiautomated processing for the localization of p2g plants in sicily (Italy). ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 10:671
Lavallin A, Downs JA (2021) Machine learning in geography–Past, present, and future. Geogr Compass 15:e12563. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12563
Lumb A, Halliwell D, Sharma T (2006) Application of CCME water quality index to monitor water quality: a case study of the Mackenzie River Basin, Canada. Environ Monit Assess 113:411–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9092-6
MacEachren AM, Gahegan M, Pike W et al (2004) Geovisualization for knowledge construction and decision support. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 24:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2004.1255801
Maceachren AM, Kraak M-J (1997) Exploratory cartographic visualization: advancing the agenda. Comput Geosci 23:335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00018-6
Machiwal D, Jha MK (2015) Identifying sources of groundwater contamination in a hard-rock aquifer system using multivariate statistical analyses and GIS-based geostatistical modeling techniques. J Hydrol Region Stud 4:80–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.11.005
Majolagbe AO, Adeyi AA, Osibanjo O (2016) Vulnerability assessment of groundwater pollution in the vicinity of an active dumpsite (Olusosun), Lagos, Nigeria. Chem Int 2:232–241
McCormick BH, DeFanti TA, Brown MD (1987) Visualization in scientific computing. Comput Graph 21:1–63
Mester T, Balla D, Karancsi G et al (2019) Eects of nitrogen loading from domestic wastewater on groundwater quality. Water SA 45:349–358
Mester T, Balla D, Szabó G (2020) Assessment of groundwater quality changes in the rural environment of the Hungarian Great Plain based on selected water quality indicators. Water Air Soil Pollut 231:536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04910-6
Mester T, Szabó G, Bessenyei É et al (2017) The effects of uninsulated sewage tanks on groundwater. A case study in an eastern Hungarian settlement. J Water Land Dev 33:123
Munzner T (2008) Process and pitfalls in writing information visualization research papers. In: Kerren A, Stasko JT, Fekete J-D, North C (eds) Information visualization: human-centered issues and perspectives. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 134–153
Nader N, Alexandrou R, Iasonas I et al (2022) Smart out-of-home advertising using artificial intelligence and GIS data. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell 36:13206–13208. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21729
Nath R, Pavur R (1985) A new statistic in the one-way multivariate analysis of variance. Comput Stat Data Anal 2:297–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(85)90003-9
Nemčić-Jurec J, Singh SK, Jazbec A et al (2019) Hydrochemical investigations of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigational purposes: two case studies of Koprivnica-Križevci County (Croatia) and district Allahabad (India). Sustain Water Resour Manage 5:467–490
Nlend B, Celle-Jeanton H, Huneau F et al (2018) The impact of urban development on aquifers in large coastal cities of West Africa: present status and future challenges. Land Use Policy 75:352–363
Ott WR (1978) Environmental indices: theory and practice
Papadopoulou EE, Papakonstantinou A, Vasilakos C et al (2022) Scale issues for geoheritage 3D mapping: The case of Lesvos Geopark, Greece. Intl J Geoheritage Parks 10:435–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.08.006
Pasquaré Mariotto F, Antoniou V, Drymoni K et al (2021) Virtual geosite communication through a webgis platform: a case study from Santorini Island (Greece). Appl Sci 11:5466
Pham TL, Tran THY, Tran TT et al (2022) Assessment of surface water quality in a drinking water supply reservoir in Vietnam: a combination of different indicators. Rend Fis Acc Lincei 33:653–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-022-01086-5
Philbrick AK (1953) Toward a unity of cartographical forms and geographical content. Prof Geogr 5:11–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1953.55_11.x
Pőddör A, Szabó S (2021) Geo-tagged environmental noise measurement with smartphones: accuracy and perspectives of crowdsourced mapping. Environ Plann B: Urban Anal City Sci 48:2710–2725
Pődör A, Zentai L (2017) Educational Aspects of Crowdsourced Noise Mapping. In: Peterson MP (ed) Advances in Cartography and GIScience. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 35–46
Prati L, Pavanello R, Pesarin F (1971) Assessment of surface water quality by a single index of pollution. Water Res 5:741–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(71)90097-2
QGIS QGIS Cloud n.d.
Rapant, Vrana K, Bodis D (1995) Geochemical atlas of Slovak Republic. Bratislava. roundwater, Geofond 1
Rather RA, Ara S, Padder SA et al (2023) Seasonal fluctuation of water quality and ecogenomic phylogeny of novel potential microbial pollution indicators of Veshaw River Kashmir-Western Himalaya. Environ Pollut 320:121104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121104
Rather RA, Bano H, Padder SA et al (2022) Impact of anthropogenic pressure on physico-chemical characteristics of forest soils of Kashmir Himalaya. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 108:1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-022-03458-x
Ravikumar P, Somashekar R (2012) Assessment and modelling of groundwater quality data and evaluation of their corrosiveness and scaling potential using environmetric methods in Bangalore South Taluk, Karnataka state, India. Water Resources 39
Richards S, Paterson E, Withers PJA, Stutter M (2016) Septic tank discharges as multi-pollutant hotspots in catchments. Sci Total Environ 542:854–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.160
Rotaru A, Răileanu P (2008) Groundwater contamination from waste storage works. Environ Eng Manage J (EEMJ) 7
Rumiński D, Maik M, Walczak K (2019) Visualizing financial stock data within an augmented reality trading environment. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 16:223–239
Salim NAA, Wood AK, Yusof AM et al (2009) A study of arsenic and chromium contamination in sediments of freshwater bodies. Fresenius Environ Bull 18:1618–1623
Schuler MS, Canedo-Argüelles M, Hintz WD et al (2019) Regulations are needed to protect freshwater ecosystems from salinization. Philos Trans R Soc B 374:20180019
Schütze E, Vatterrott IH-R (2007) Current state of technology and potential of Smart Map Browsing in web browsers. Dissert Mestrado, Bremen University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück
Sharifi M (1990) Assessment of surface water quality by an index system in Anzali basin. Hydrol Basis Water Resour Manage IAHS Publication 197:163–17l
Smith DG (1990) A better water quality indexing system for rivers and streams. Water Res 24:1237–1244
Smith DG (1987) Water quality indexes for use in New Zealand’s rivers and streams. National Water & Soil Conservation Authority New Zealand, Water Quality Centre Publication
Smoroń S (2016) Quality of shallow groundwater and manure effluents in a livestock farm. J Water Land Dev 29:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwld-2016-0012
Spearman C (1961) The proof and measurement of association between two things. Appleton-Century-Crofts, East Norwalk, CT, US
Surfer® from Golden Software LLC n.d.
Sutadian AD, Muttil N, Yilmaz AG, Perera BJC (2018) Development of a water quality index for rivers in West Java Province, Indonesia. Ecol Indic 85:966–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.049
Swamee PK, Tyagi A (2007) Improved method for aggregation of water quality subindices. J Environ Eng 133:220–225
Taylor DRF (1991) Chapter 1 - Geographic information systems: the microcomputer and modern cartography. In: Taylor F (ed) Modern Cartography Series. Academic Press, pp 1–20
Tirkey P, Bhattacharya T, Chakraborty S (2013) Water quality indices- important tools for water quality assessment: a review. 1
Uddin MG, Nash S, Olbert AI (2021) A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. Ecol Indic 122:107218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107218
Wilcoxon F (1992) Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution. Springer, New York, pp 196–202
Yang J, Yang A, Li J, et al (2022) Three-dimension visualization of environmental scalar data based on GeoSOT-3D Grids. In: 2022 2nd International Conference on Consumer Electronics and Computer Engineering (ICCECE). pp 333–336
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Debrecen. The work of Dániel Balla was supported by the ÚNKP-22-4-II-DE-4 New National Excellence Program of The Ministry of Innovation and Technology. The work of Tamás Mester was supported by the ÚNKP-22-4-II-145 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Dániel Balla, Emőke Kiss, Marianna Zichar, Tamás Mester; methodology: Dániel Balla, Tamás Mester; software: Dániel Balla, Emőke Kiss, Marianna Zichar, Tamás Mester; validation: Dániel Balla, Emőke Kiss, Marianna Zichar, Tamás Mester; formal analysis: Dániel Balla, Emőke Kiss, Marianna Zichar, Tamás Mester; investigation: Dániel Balla, Emőke Kiss, Tamás Mester; resources: Dániel Balla, Tamás Mester; data curation: Dániel Balla, Tamás Mester; writing—original draft preparation: Dániel Balla, Emőke Kiss, Marianna Zichar, Tamás Mester; writing—review and editing: Dániel Balla, Emőke Kiss, Marianna Zichar, Tamás Mester; visualization.: Dániel Balla; supervision: Dániel Balla. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The submitted work should be original and should have not been published elsewhere in any form.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors have consented to publish the article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Xianliang Yi
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Balla, D., Kiss, E., Zichar, M. et al. Evaluation of groundwater quality in the rural environment using geostatistical analysis and WebGIS methods in a Hungarian settlement, Báránd. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28627-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28627-1