Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Structural challenges for seismic stability of buildings in hilly areas

  • Civil Engineering and Sustainable Infrastructures
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buildings on hills behave dynamically, very different from buildings on flatlands. Due to irregularity in horizontal and vertical planes, they inhibit non-uniform mass and stiffness distribution and are subjected to torsional forces. Studies in various Indian cities in hilly terrains have highlighted serious concerns about existing construction practices. Lack of adequate planning and design has resulted in haphazard development in hilly regions. This state-of-the-art review investigates the factors that influence the structural performance of buildings on slopes while explaining reasons that have caused enormous damages and even collapse of hill buildings in the recent earthquake events. The work discusses building configurations, comparison of various vital building regulations, the major problems encountered in building stocks and associated structural deficiencies on hill slopes. The significance of intensification of earthquake-related losses due to soil amplification has been well documented in the past. Insights from experimental and numerical studies focusing on impacts of topographical and geological factors on damage amplification of hillside buildings are fetched, the results of which are in good corroboration with the findings of post-earthquake surveys and reviews. This study establishes that a higher slope gradient necessitates more slope cutting than a lower slope gradient to get the same building footprint, and many times, this value exceeds the permissible height of slope cutting given in existing building byelaws. Such excessive slope cutting makes the slope weak and unstable. Recommendations and solutions to help enhance structural resilience, reduce disproportionate damages and mitigate failure of hill buildings have been delineated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

MSL:

Mean sea level

RVS:

Rapid visual screening

FL-CON:

Flat land configuration

SB-CON:

Setback configuration

ST-CON:

Step-back configuration

SBS-CON:

Step-back setback configuration

SF-CON:

Split-foundation configuration

IDA:

Incremental dynamic analysis

PSHA:

Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis

DSHA:

Deterministic seismic hazard analysis

PHA:

Peak horizontal acceleration

2D, 3D:

Two-dimensional, three-dimensional

FEM:

Finite element method

IS, BIS:

Indian Standard, Bureau of Indian Standard

GIS:

Geographical Information System

UFL:

Uppermost foundation level

FEMA:

Federal Emergency Management Agency

SMRF:

Special moment resisting frame

BM:

Bending moment

SSI:

Soil-structure interaction

F.A.R.:

Floor area ratio

F.O.S.:

Factor of safety

SH:

Shear waves with displacement in the horizontal x–y plane

SV:

Shear waves with displacement in the vertical x–z plane

Nc :

Bearing capacity factor due to soil cohesion

Nq :

Bearing capacity factor due to surcharge pressure

Nγ :

Bearing capacity factor due to unit weight of soil

αh :

Earthquake acceleration coefficient

β:

Slope inclination

ϕ:

Soil friction angle

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely appreciate the support and motivation received from faculty and research scholars in the civil engineering department and the administration at Delhi Technological University (DTU), Delhi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PR was in charge of literature data collection and responsible for reviewing and summarizing literatures in related fields. SP provided guidance on conception, visualisation and editing of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shilpa Pal.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to publish the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roshan, P., Pal, S. Structural challenges for seismic stability of buildings in hilly areas. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 99100–99126 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23263-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23263-7

Keywords

Navigation