Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A deterministic approach for preparation of seismic hazard maps in North East India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method of seismic zonation based on deterministic modeling of rupture plane is presented in this work. This method is based on the modeling of finite rupture plane along identified lineaments in the region using the semi-empirical technique, of Midorikawa [(1993) Tectonophysics 218:287–295]. The modeling procedure follows ω2 scaling law, directivity effects, and other strong motion parameters. The technique of zonation is applied for technoeconomically important NE part of Brahmaputra valley that falls in the seismic gap region of Himalaya. Zonation map prepared for Brahmaputra valley for earthquakes of magnitude M > 6.0 show that approximately 90,000 km2 area fall in the highly hazardous zone IV, which covers region that can have peak ground accelerations of order more than 250 cm/s2. The zone IV covers the Tezu, Tinsukia, Dibrugarh, Ziro, North Lakhimpur, Itanagar, Sibsagar, Jorhat, Golaghat, Wokha, Senapati, Imphal, and Kohima regions. The Pasighat, Daring, Basar, and Seppa region belong to zone III with peak ground accelerations of the order 200–250 cm/s2. The seismic zonation map obtained from deterministic modeling of the rupture is consistent with the historical seismicity map and it has been found that the epicenter of many moderate and major earthquakes fall in the identified zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Litehiser JJ (1989) Attenuation of vertical peak acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:549–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (1974) Geology and mineral resources of the states of India-Assam and adjoining states. Geol Surv India Misc Publ 20:1–24

  • Araya R, Kiureghian AD (1988) Seismic hazard analysis, improved models, uncertainties and sensitivities; Report no. EERC-90/11. Earthquake Engineering Research Center University of California, Berkeley, CA, 155 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motion based on seismological models of radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1865–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB (1991) Estimation of ground motion at deep soil sites in eastern north America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:2167–2185

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia SC, Ravi Kumar M, Gupta HK (1999) A probabilistic hazard map of India and adjoining regions. Ann Geofisica 42:1153–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran AR, Das JD (1992) Strong motion arrays in India and analysis of data from Shillong array. Curr Sci 62:233–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats DA, Kanamori H, Houston H (1984) Simulation of strong ground motion from the 1964 Alaskan earthquake (abs), Earthquake Notes 55, p 18

  • Das JD (1992) The Assam basin: tectonic relation to the surrounding structural features and Shillong plateau. J Geol Soc India 39:303–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Pande P, Ganguly D, Iqbal Z, Sanyal K, Roy A, Das LK, Mishra PS, Gupta H (2000) Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs. Geological Survey of India, India

  • Evans P (1964) The tectonic framework of Assam. J Geol Soc India 5:80–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama E, Irikura K (1986) Rupture process of the 1983 Japan sea (Akita-Oki) earthquake using a waveform inversion method. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76:1623–1640

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley DM, Helmberger DV (1980) Simulation of strong ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:617–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley DM, Helmberger DV, Orcutt JA (1982) Peak acceleration scaling studies. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:959–979

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, McGuire RK (1981) Character of high frequency ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2071–2095

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell SH (1978) Earthquake aftershocks as green functions. Geophys Res Lett 5:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell SH (1982) Simulation of ground accelerations for May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:2381–2387

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton TH, Hartzell SH (1986) Estimation of strong ground motions from hypothetical earthquakes on the Cascadia subduction zone, Pacific Northwest. US Geol Surv Open file Rep 86–328, p 40

  • Housner GW, Jennings PC (1964) Generation of artificial earthquakes. Proc ASCE 90:113–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston H, Kanamori H (1984) The effect of asperities on short period seismic radiation with application on rupture process and strong motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76:19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings L (1985) Modeling earthquakes with empirical green’s functions (abs). Earthquake Notes 56, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  • Imagawa K, Mikami N, Mikumo T (1984) Analytical and semi empirical synthesis of near field seismic waveforms for investigating the rupture mechanism of major earthquakes. J Phys Earth 32:317–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Irukara K (1983) Semi empirical estimation of strong ground motion during large earthquakes. Bull Disaster Prev Res Inst 33:63–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Irikura K, Muramatu I (1982) Synthesis of strong ground motions from large earthquakes using observed seismograms of small events. In Proc of 3rd Int. Microzonation Conf. 1, Seattle, pp 447–458

  • IS 1893 (part1) (2002) Indian standards code of practice for earthquake resistant Design of Structures, Indian Standards Institution, New Delhi

  • Jain SK, Roshan AD, Arlekar JN, Basu PC (2000) Empirical attenuation relationships for the Himalayan earthquakes based on Indian strong motion data. In Proc of 6th Int Conf on Seismic Zonation

  • Joshi A (1997) Modeling of peak ground acceleration for Uttarkashi earthquake of 20th October, 1991. Bull Ind Soc Earthquake Tech 34:75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A (2000) Modelling of rupture planes for peak ground accelerations and its application on the isoseismal map of MMI scale in Indian region. J Seismol 4:143–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A (2001) Strong motion modeling of the source of the Chamoli earthquake of March 29,1999 in the Garhwal Himalaya, India. J Seismol 5:499–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A (2003) Predicting strong motion parameters for the Chamoli earthquake of 28th March, 1999,Garhwal Himalaya, India from simplified finite fault model. J Seismol 7:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A (2004) A simplified technique for simulating wide band strong ground motion for two recent Himalaya earthquakes. Pure Appl Geophys 161:1777–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Midorikawa S (2004) A simplified method for simulation of strong ground motion using finite rupture model of the earthquake source. J Seismol 8:467–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Midorikawa S (2005) Attenuation characteristics of ground motion Intensity from earthquakes of intermediate depth. J Seismol 9:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Patel RC (1997) Modelling of active lineaments for predicting a possible earthquake scenario around Dehradun, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Tectonophysics 283:289–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Singh S, Kavita G (2001) The simulation of ground motion using envelope summation. Pure Appl Geophys 158:877–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner WB, Boore DM (1988) Measurement, characterization and prediction of strong ground motion. In Proc of Earthq Eng and Soil Dyn II, Utah, June 27–30, pp 43–100

  • Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial valley, California earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2011–2038

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaila KL, Narain H (1971) A new approach for preparation of quantitative seismicity maps as applied to Alpide belt-Sunda and adjoining areas. Bull Seismol Soc Am 61:1275–1291

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaila KL, Gaur VK, Narain H (1972) Quantitative seismicity map of India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 62:1119–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameda H, Sugito M (1978) Prediction of strong earthquake motions by evolutionary process model. In Proc. 6th Japan Earthq Eng Symp, pp 41–48

  • Kanamori H (1979) A semi empirical approach to prediction of long period ground motions from great earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69:1645–1670

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relation in seismology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:1073–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal JR (1998) Seismicity of northeast India and surroundings—Development over the past 100 years. J Geophys 19:9–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayal JR, Zhao D (1994) Three-dimensional seismic structure beneath Shillong Plateau and Assam valley, northeast India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:667–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN (1987) Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquake disaster along Himalayan plate boundary. Tectonophysics 138:79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Teotia SS, Khattri KN (1997) The representation of attenuation characteristics of strong ground motions observed in the 1986 Dharamsala and 1991 Uttarkashi earthquakes by available empirical relations. Curr Sci 73:543–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar G (1997) Geology of Arunachal pradesh. Geological Society of India, 217 pp

  • Lai SP (1982) Statistical characterization of strong motions using power density spectral function. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:259–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay T, Wallace TC (1995) Modern global seismology. Academic Press, California, 521 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK, Becker AM, Donovan NC (1984) Spectral estimates of seismic shear waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:2167–2185

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur LD, Evans P (1964) Oil in India, 22nd Int. Geol. Congress, India New Delhi, p 85

  • Midorikawa S (1989) Synthesis of ground acceleration of large earthquakes using acceleration envelope waveform of small earthquake. J Struct Construct Eng 398:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Midorikawa S (1993) Semi empirical estimation of peak ground acceleration from large earthquakes. Tectonophysics 218:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikumo T, Irikura K, Imagawa K (1981) Near field strong motion synthesis from foreshock and aftershock records and rupture process of the main shock fault (abs), IASPEI 21st General Assembly, London, Canada

  • Muguia L, Brune JM (1984) Simulations of strong ground motions for earthquakes in the Mexicali-Imperial valley. In Proceedings of workshop on strong ground motion simulation and earthquake engineering applications Pub. 85- 02 Earthquake Eng Res Inst, Los Altos, California, 21-1-21-19

  • Mukhopadhyay S, Chander R, Khattri KN (1997) Crustal properties in the epicentral tract of the great 1897 Assam Earthquake, northeastern India. Tectonophysics 283:311–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagrajan R (2001) Rapid assessment procedure to demarcate areas susceptible to earthquake - induced ground failures for environment management - a case study from parts of northeast India. Bull Eng Geol Environ 61:99–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy DR (1976) The Assam syntaxis of the Himalaya — A reinterpretation. Geol Surv Ind Misc Publ 24(II):363–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy DR (1980) Tectonic patterns in northeast India. Ind J Earth Sci 7(I):103–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravi Kumar M, Bhatia SC (1999) A new seismic hazard map for the Indian plate region under the global seismic hazard assessment programme. Curr Sci 77:447–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato R (ed) (1989) Handbook of Fault parameters of Japanese earthquakes. Kajima, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma ML (2000) Attenuation relationship for estimation of peak ground vertical acceleration using data from strong motion arrays in India. In Proc of 12th World Conf Earthq Eng. Paper No. 1964

  • Shinozuka M, Sato Y (1967) Simulation of nonstationary random processes, Proc. ASCE 93:11–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Malhotra G (1983) A note on the basic volcanics of Siang valley, Arunachal Himalaya. Indian Minerals 41(4):60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur VC, Jain AK (1975) Some observations on deformation, metamorphism and tectonic significance of the rocks of some parts of the Mishmi Hills, Lohit district (NEFA), Arunachal Pradesh. Himalayan Geol 5:339–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu G, Khattri KN, Anderson JG, Brune JN, Zeng Y (1995) Strong ground motion from the Uttarkashi earthquake, Himalaya, India, earthquake: comparison of observations with synthetics using the composite source model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu G (1994) Some aspects of earthquake seismology: slip portioning along major convergent plate boundaries: composite source model for estimation of strong motion and non linear soil response modeling. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nevada

  • Zeng Y, Anderson JG, Su F (1994) A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions. Geophys Res Lett 21:725–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been done under sponsored project No. DST/23(373)/SU/2003 from the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India. Authors also thank Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra for supporting this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geophysics, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, 136119, Haryana, India

    A. Joshi, Kapil Mohan & R. C. Patel

Authors
  1. A. Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kapil Mohan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. C. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Joshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshi, A., Mohan, K. & Patel, R.C. A deterministic approach for preparation of seismic hazard maps in North East India. Nat Hazards 43, 129–146 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9112-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9112-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation