Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization of uranium soil decontamination in alkaline washing using mechanical stirring and ultrasound field

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ex situ decontamination of uranium polluted soils was performed by alkaline washing using mechanical agitation and ultrasound field. Two types of polluted soils were considered in terms of texture and organic content. The tests were performed using experimental design: a 23 factorial plan for mechanical washing and Taguchi L18 orthogonal matrix for ultrasound (US)-assisted decontamination. The factors considered in mechanical washing were temperature, duration, and pH. For ultrasound decontamination, the US frequency was added. The optimum was estimated based on statistical analysis and validated by confirmation experiments. The study revealed that in ultrasound field, the decontamination degree is increased with over 25% compared with mechanical stirring, while the duration of the process is drastically reduced (from 120 to 25 min). The most important factor leading to the increase of decontamination is the ultrasound frequency. To refine the result, artificial neural network modeling and subsequent optimization by genetic algorithms were also carried out for the decontamination in ultrasound field, and new optimum operating conditions were identified and validated. The best operating conditions identified were temperature around 50 °C, pH = 8, and ultrasound frequency of 24 kHz. In these conditions, the decontamination degree reached 85% for Soil 1 (characterized by low clay and organic content) and 69% for Soil 2 (with high clay and organic content).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baughman DR, Liu YA (1995) Neural networks in bioprocessing and chemical engineering. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GE, Hunter JS, Hunter G (2005) Statistics for experimenters, design innovation and discovery, 2nd ed. Willey, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley D (1999) An introduction to genetic algorithms for scientist and engineers. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl LO, Gatiboni TL, Mello PA, Muller EI, Duarte FA, Flores EMM (2018) Ultrasound-assisted extraction of rare-earth elements from carbonatite rocks. Ultrason Sonochem 40:24–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El Samad O, Aoun M, Nsouli B, Khalaf G, Hamze M (2014) Investigation of radiological impact on the coastal environment surrounding a fertilizer plant. J Environ Radioact 133:69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furukawa M, Takunagas S (2004) Extraction of heavy metals from a contaminated soil using citrate-enhancing extraction by pH control and ultrasound application. J Environ Sci Health A 39:627–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani Y, Franzidis JP, Petersen J (2016) Heap leaching technology – current state, innovations and future directions: a review. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 37:73–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupt RL, Haupt SE (2004) Practical genetic algorithms 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • John JJ, Kuhn S, Breaker L, Van Gerven T (2017) Temperature controlled interval contact design for ultrasound assisted liquid-liquid extraction. Chem Eng Res Des 125:146–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kettler TA, Doran JW, Gilber TL (2001) Simplified method for soil particle-size determination to accompany soil-quality analyses. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:849–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim I, Kim G-N, Kim S-S, Choi J-W (2018) Development of practical decontamination process for the removal of uranium from gravel. Environ Technol 39:68–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koda S, Kondo T, Mitome H (2003) A standard method to calibrate sonochemical efficiency of an individual reaction system. Ultrason Sonochem 10:149–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács K, Halász G, Takács A, Heltai G, Széles É, Győri Z, Horváth M (2018) Study of ultrasound-assisted sequential extraction procedure for potentially toxic element content of soils and sediments. Microchem J 136:80–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon MJ, Lee G, Hwang YH, Lee M, Yang JS (2016) Effects of soil micro-particles and micro-pores on petroleum hydrocarbons released from contaminated soils during solvent extraction with ultrasound. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllönen H, Pirkonen P, Hintikka V, Parvinen P, Grönroos A, Sekki H (2004) Ultrasonically aided mineral processing technique for remediation of soil contaminated by heavy metals. Ultrason Sonochem 11:211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marafi M, Stanislaus A (2011) Waste catalyst utilization: extraction of valuable metals from spent hydroprocessing catalysts by ultrasonic-assisted leaching with acids. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:9495–9501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merrick D (1984) Coal combustion and conversion technology. Macmillan Publishers, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Panţuru E, Jinescu G, Radulescu R, Filcenco-Olteanu A, Jinescu C (2008) The chemical decontamination process intensification using ultrasound field. Rev Chim 59:1036–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Park B, Son Y (2017) Ultrasonic and mechanical soil washing processes for the removal of heavy metals from soils. Ultrason Sonochem 35:640–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pavel LV, Gavrilescu M (2008) Overview of ex-situ decontamination techniques for soil cleanup. Environ Eng Manag J 7:815–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radu AD, Panțuru E, Woinaroschy A, Isopescu R (2015) Experimental design and process optimization for uranium polluted soils decontamination by acid washing. Water Air Soil Pollut 226:127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusnák R, Halász G, Horváth M, Remeteiová D (2010) Preliminary results on the intensification of the BCR sequential extraction with sonication for sediments, soils, and gravitation dust sediment samples. Toxicol Environ Chem 92:443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Hendry MJ (2013) Solid phase distribution and leaching behaviour of nickel and uranium in a uranium waste-rock pile. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son Y, Cha J, Lim M, Ashokkumar M, Khim J (2011) Comparison of ultrasonic and conventional mechanical soil-washing processes for diesel-contaminated sand. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:2400–2407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Son Y, Nam S, Ashokkumar M, Khim J (2012) Comparison of energy consumptions between ultrasonic, mechanical, and combined soil washing processes. Ultrason Sonochem 19:395–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale A, Bryan ND (2012) Uranyl binding to humic acid under conditions relevant to cementitious geological disposal of radioactive wastes. Mineral Mag 76:3391–3399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabelin CB, Basri AHM, Igarashi T, Yoneda T (2012) Removal of arsenic, boron, and selenium from excavated rocks by consecutive washing. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:4153–4167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thakker MR, Parikh JK, Desai MA (2018) Synergism between ionic liquid and ultrasound for greener extraction of geraniol. Optimization using different statistical tools, comparison and prediction. Chem Eng Res Des 134:162–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ueno S, Fujita T, Kuchar D, Kubota M, Matsuda H (2009) Ultrasound assisted extraction and decomposition of cl-containing herbicide involved in model soil. Ultrason Sonochem 16:169–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black I (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Chen J, Yan X, Wang X, Zhang J, Huang ZJ (2015a) Heavy metal chemical extraction from industrial and municipal mixed sludge by ultrasound-assisted citric acid. J Ind Eng Chem 27:368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Jiang J, Li D, Li T, Li K, Tian S (2015b) Removal of Pb and Zn from contaminated soil by different washing methods: the influence of reagents and ultrasound. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:20084–20091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei M, Cheng J (2016) Influence of multi-step washing using Na2EDTA, oxalic acid and phosphoric acid on metal fractionation and spectroscopy characteristics from contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:23123–23133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JH (1999) Bench- and pilot-scale studies relating to the removal of uranium from uranium-contaminated soils using carbonate and citrate lixiviants. J Hazard Mater 66:67–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raluca Isopescu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Georg Steinhauser

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radu, D.A., Isopescu, R., Panturu, E. et al. Optimization of uranium soil decontamination in alkaline washing using mechanical stirring and ultrasound field. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 5941–5950 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07063-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07063-0

Keywords

Navigation