In the current study, we evaluated the effect of daily PM2.5 concentrations on the CVD deaths in Shanghai, China, using GAM analysis with three different approaches for controlling for collinear confounding variables while simultaneously taking into account the linear and nonlinear relationships between meteorological confounding variables and the number of deaths. The daily average PM2.5 concentration level in our data was 55 μg/m3, and this was much higher than the recommended levels for PM2.5 yearly average below 10 μg/m3 or 25 μg/m3 by the World Health Organization or the European Union, respectively (Thunis et al. 2017). There was a 1.7% elevated risk for CVD death per 10 μg/m3 PM2.5 concentration in the unadjusted model, but after adjustment for meteorological variables and temporal trend, the exposure to PM2.5 was no longer associated. The results were consistent in the three modelling techniques we used.
A body of research has shown that an increase in PM2.5 was linked to an elevated risk of stroke (Franklin et al. 2008; Leiva et al. 2013; Lin et al. 2017; Lisabeth et al. 2008; Shah et al. 2015; Wellenius et al. 2012), ischemic heart disease (Pope et al. 2002), myocardial infarction (Peters et al. 2001), and cerebrovascular mortality (Gutierrez-Avila et al. 2018), and recent reviews showed that PM2.5 was associated with approximately 1% elevated risk of cerebrovascular mortality by every 10 μg/m3 increase (Shah et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2014). These studies revealed an increased risk of CVD associated with short-term exposure to PM2.5 in Europe, the USA, Asia, Africa, and South America. The excessive risk per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 concentration ranged from 0.7% in mortality to 1.3% in hospital admission. In our data, the unadjusted association was similar but higher (1.7% excessive mortality per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 concentration). It has been proved difficult to quantify premature mortality related to air pollution, notably in regions where air quality is not systematically monitored, and also because the toxic particles from various sources may vary (Tuomisto et al. 2008). The estimated effect of PM2.5 on premature mortality largely depends on the toxicity regarding the inhaled particle components. In China, emissions from residential energy use such as heating and cooking have the largest contribution to PM2.5, whereas in much of the USA and in a few other countries, emissions from traffic and power generation are important. In the eastern United States, Europe, Russia, and East Asia, agricultural emissions make the largest relative contribution to PM2.5 (Lelieveld et al. 2015). It might partially explain the difference in the findings between our study and other studies. On the other hand, the difference might be in part due to the profoundly different demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, or environmental conditions. For example, Shanghai is a megacity with a dense population and high temperature and humidity all the year round, and PM2.5 may impact public health differently from other studied areas. Like the aforementioned studies, our study also controlled for the temporal trend of deaths and confounding from meteorological variables. However, we notice that when we adjusted for quite a few meteorological variables, the association became no longer statistically significant. The results were consistent across different modelling strategies, while the nonlinear association of CVD mortality with the meteorological variables retained. The observed PM2.5 concentrations in Shanghai were substantially higher than those in Europe or the USA where most of the current studies have been conducted and conclusions derived. The high ambient PM2.5 concentration level in itself might mask triggering effect of exposure, and the meteorological factors were only contributing to exacerbation of a PM2.5 exposure effect, which might be a potential reason that no statistically significant effect was observed for PM2.5 and deserves further investigation in the comparative studies using data from regions with low PM2.5 pollution..
The strengths of our study include, first, the adjustment using the rich information of meteorological variables enabled us for detailed control for weather conditions. Weather conditions and time-varying risk factors such as days of the week may cause a significant modification on PM2.5 levels and cerebrovascular events (Zhang et al. 2014). Second, multicollinearity among meteorological variables was handled using different approaches of PCA, shrinkage smoothers, and LASSO regularization, and the results were consistent in all the methods. Third, the use of two types of smoothing splines for the GAM model allowed us to compare results to minimize the bias from spline selection, and the results were, again, consistent regardless of types of smoothing splines. In the multicollinearity context, shrinkage methods, such as ridge regression, may reduce the dimensionality of the data by shrinking some coefficient estimates towards zero but not exactly to zero. While in LASSO, one of the correlated coefficients is usually zeroed and the other is assigned the entire impact. Because of this, ridge regression is expected to work better if there are many large parameters of about the same value. LASSO, on the other hand, is expected to come on top when only a few factors actually have impacts (James et al. 2013)
However, our study also has limitations. First, the relatively shorter time period for the analysis limited us to fully assess the long-term time trend in both PM2.5 pollution levels and cerebrovascular disease mortality. Second, only city-level PM2.5 concentrations from one air monitoring station were available in our study, but the concentration of PM2.5 may differ within the city and change during the day, and people’s location would also not be constant. As a megacity with a population of about 24 million and an area of 6,340 km2, Shanghai has vastly different PM2.5 concentrations and meteorological conditions across the city. Although deaths from 16 administrative districts in Shanghai were available, only aggregated deaths of the whole city and the PM2.5 concentrations, as well as meteorological variables, from a single monitoring station were available in the study. It may mask and obscure the spatial and temporal variability of PM2.5 effects at particular exposure hotspots, such as the heat island effect in some parts of the city may exacerbate the effects of PM2.5 due to high temperatures that may also affect the outcomes. To overcome the lack of spatial variability in PM2.5 concentrations and/or meteorological data, a land use regression approach could be incorporated in the future (Liu et al. 2016). Of course, air pollution and mortality data from multisite would be more helpful for adjusting for the confounding from the spatiotemporal variability in PM2.5 concentrations and mortalities. Although many studies relied on air pollution information assuming a constant location of people at, for example, their residential addresses, the quantification of exposure using time and activity patterns of individuals will also enhance the understanding (Reis et al. 2018). Third, cerebrovascular mortality risk may vary by age, sex, and socioeconomic factors, but these characteristics were not controlled for in the current study. However, these characteristics tend to be stable within the city given our relatively short study period, thus confounding is unlikely (Pope et al. 2002). Fourth, we focused on the same day’s effect of a single pollutant and did not include multiple pollutants (Wang et al. 2014) or lagged effects (Gutierrez-Avila et al. 2018). Although it is possible that air pollution may cause death after a certain period of time, a systematic review indicates that the risk appeared hardly different by the inclusion of lags (Shah et al. 2015).