Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The trade-environment nexus in light of governance: a global potential

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theme of paper is to explore the trade-environment relationship and the role of institutions for 117 countries from global standpoint and five regions: Sub Saharan, European, Middle East and North Africa, Asia and Pacific, and Latin America and Caribbean, using the panel data span 2002–2014. By considering the endogeneity problem, to validate the nature of trade-environment nexuses, we applied the GMM first difference model in two steps. Likewise, Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality analysis is employed to affirm the causal relationship among the concern variables. The empirical findings of this study validate that the overall trade is significantly good to environment for sample countries (117) of the entire World, Europe, Asia, and Pacific regions. In further assessment, we incorporate interactive terms of institutions with trade, scale effect, and scale-technique effect. The estimated results confirm that institution is the persistent instrument for resolving the environmental problems. Furthermore, we find the evidence of inverted u shape EKC in overall selected sample of the World, Sub-Saharan, Europe, Asia, and Pacific regions. In contrast, there is no confirmation of inverted u shape EKC hypothesis in Middle East and North Africa regions. Similarly, no strong evidence of inverted u-shaped EKC hypothesis is observed in Latin-America and Caribbean region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-2-a&chapter=27&lang=en#7

  2. https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/countries_en

References

  • Abid M (2016) Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa economies. Util Policy 41:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed K, Shahbaz M, Kyophilavong P (2016) Revisiting the emissions-energy-trade nexus: evidence from the newly industrializing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(8):7676–7691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akin CS (2014) The impact of foreign trade, energy consumption and income on CO2 emissions. Int J Energy Econ Policy 4(3):465

    Google Scholar 

  • Amable B (2000) International specialisation and growth. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 11(4):413–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2009) CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 37(8):3282–3286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron J (2000) Growth and institutions: a review of the evidence. World Bank Res Obs 15(1):99–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arouri MEH, Youssef AB, M'henni H, Rault C (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and north African countries. Energy Policy 45:342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogh JM, Jámbor A (2017) Determinants of CO2 emission: a global evidence. Int J Energy Econ Policy 7(5):217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard J, Mandal SK (2016). The impact of trade openness on environmental quality: an empirical analysis of emerging and developing economies. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 203:195-208

  • Bhattarai M, Hammig M (2001) Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a crosscountry analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia. World Dev 29(6):995–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capolupo R, Celi G (2008) Openness and economic growth: a comparative study of alternative trading regimes. Économie internationale 4:5–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang R, Kaltani L, Loayza NV (2009) Openness can be good for growth: the role of policy complementarities. J Dev Econ 90(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chebbi HE, Olarreaga M, Zitouna H (2011) Trade openness and CO2 emissions in Tunisia. MEDJ 3(01):29–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherniwchan J, Copeland BR & Taylor MS (2017) Trade and the environment: new methods, measurements, and results

  • Cole MA (2007).Corruption, income and the environment: an empirical analysis. Ecol Econ 62(3-4):637-647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Elliott RJ (2003) Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. J Environ Econ Manag 46(3):363–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S, Coondoo D (2006) Income and emission: a panel data-based cointegration analysis. Ecol Econ 57(2):167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO 2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutt K (2009) Governance, institutions and the environment-income relationship: a cross-country study. Environ Dev Sustain 11(4):705–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO 2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(20):15663–15676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel JA, Rose AK (2005) Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Rev Econ Stat 87(1):85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson PG, Svensson J (2003) Political instability, corruption and policy formation: the case of environmental policy. J Public Econ 87(7–8):1383–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gani A (2012) The relationship between good governance and carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from developing economies. J Econ Dev 37(1):77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gozgor G (2017) Does trade matter for carbon emissions in OECD countries? Evidence from a new trade openness measure. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(36):27813–27821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM & Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez M, Chunhui Y, Strohmaier D, Ahmed M, Jie L (2018) Does finance affect environmental degradation: evidence from one belt and one road initiative region? Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  • Halkos GE (2003) Environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur: evidence using GMM estimation and random coefficient panel data models. Environ Dev Econ 8(4):581–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG (2013) Carbon dioxide emissions and governance: a nonparametric analysis for the G-20. Energy Econ 40:110–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson A & Masih M (2017) Energy consumption, trade openness, economic growth, carbon dioxide emissions and electricity consumption: evidence from South Africa based on ARDL

  • Hwang J (2002) A note on the relationship between corruption and government revenue. J Econ Dev 27(2):161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim MH, Law SH (2016) Institutional quality and CO2 emission–trade relations: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. S Afr J Econ 84(2):323–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata H, Okada K, Samreth S (2012) Empirical study on the determinants of CO2 emissions: evidence from OECD countries. Appl Econ 44(27):3513–3519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 37(12):5167–5172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalilian H, Kirkpatrick C, Parker D (2007) The impact of regulation on economic growth in developing countries: a cross-country analysis. World Dev 35(1):87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaunky VC (2011) The CO2 emissions-income nexus: evidence from rich countries. Energy Policy 39(3):1228–1240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econ 90(1):1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A and Mastruzzi M (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No 5430

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2011) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. HJRL 3(2):220–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler M (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade: a south African perspective. Energy Policy 63:1042–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling CH, Ahmed K, Muhamad RB, Shahbaz M (2015) Decomposing the trade-environment nexus for Malaysia: what do the technique, scale, composition, and comparative advantage effect indicate? Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(24):20131–20142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Yuan C, Hafeez M, Yuan Q (2018) The relationship between environment and logistics performance: evidence from Asian countries. J Clean Prod

  • Managi S, Hibiki A & Tsurumi T (2008) Does trade liberalization reduce pollution emissions? Discussion papers, 8013

  • Maryam J, Mittal A, Sharma V (2017) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRICS: an empirical analysis. IOSR-JHSS 22(2):53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercan M, Karakaya E (2015) Energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emission: dynamic panel cointegration analysis for selected OECD countries. Econ Financ 23:587–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Naranpanawa A (2011) Does trade openness promote carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from Sri Lanka. The EEL 10(10):973–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 38(1):661–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir M, Rehman FU (2011) Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy 39(3):1857–1864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nassani AA, Aldakhil AM, Abro MMQ, Zaman K (2017) Environmental Kuznets curve among BRICS countries: spot lightening finance, transport, energy and growth factors. J Clean Prod 154:474–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, Smith RJ (2004) Higher order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators. Econometrica 72(1):219–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onafowora OA, Owoye O (2014) Bounds testing approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Econ 44:47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development

  • Pao HT, Tsai CM (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38(12):7850–7860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(S1):653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20(3):597–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reppelin-Hill V (1999) Trade and environment: an empirical analysis of the technology effect in the steel industry. J Environ Econ Manag 38(3):283–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Ávila D (2008) Questioning the empirical basis of the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2: new evidence from a panel stationarity test robust to multiple breaks and cross-dependence. Ecol Econ 64(3):559–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runar B, Amin K, Patrik S (2017) Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions and the role of growth and institutions: a parametric and non-parametric analysis. Environ Econ Policy Stud 19(2):359–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford M (2001) Institutional economics: then and now. J Econ Perspect 15(3):173–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saud S, Baloch MA & Lodhi RN (2018) The nexus between energy consumption and financial development: estimating the role of globalization in Next-11 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–11

  • Sbia R, Shahbaz M, Hamdi H (2014) A contribution of foreign direct investment, clean energy, trade openness, carbon emissions and economic growth to energy demand in UAE. Econ Model 36:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SS (2011) Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy 88(1):376–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Rao BB (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ 32(1):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari AK, Shahbaz M, Hye QMA (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler D & Martin P (1992) Prices, policies, and the international diffusion of clean technology: The case of wood pulp production. World Bank Discussion Papers[WORLD BANK DISCUSSION PAPER.]

  • World Bank (2016) World development indicator. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/

  • Yang J & Wang Y (2016) FDI and environmental pollution nexus in China

  • Youssef AH, El-Sheikh AA & Abonazel MR (2014) New GMM estimators for dynamic panel data models

  • Zerbo E (2017) Income-environment relationship in sub-Saharan African countries: further evidence with trade openness. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(19):16488–16502

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of International Business, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China

    Rizwana Yasmeen & Yunong Li

  2. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China

    Muhammad Hafeez

  3. National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Haseeb Ahmad

Authors
  1. Rizwana Yasmeen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yunong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Hafeez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haseeb Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haseeb Ahmad.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Nicholas Apergis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yasmeen, R., Li, Y., Hafeez, M. et al. The trade-environment nexus in light of governance: a global potential. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 34360–34379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3390-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3390-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation