Skip to main content
Log in

Nexus between environmental quality, institutional quality and trade openness through the channel of FDI: an application of common correlated effects estimation (CCEE), NARDL, and asymmetry causality

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determinants of trade openness are available in the literature; however, no substantial evidence available for the nexus between environmental quality, institutional quality, and trade openness with the presence of FDI as a mediating factor. With this study, we tried to figure out the answer to the question, i.e., whether the relationship between EQ, IQ, and TO is symmetric or asymmetric, provided that FDI is a mediating factor by performing ARDL, CS-ARDL, and nonlinear ARDL for 1982–2019. Furthermore, directional causality also evaluates by following the non-Granger causality test with symmetry and asymmetry of EQ, IQ, and FDI in respective equations. Study findings with ARDL and CS-ARDL document that positive outcomes are running from EQ, IQ, and FDI to trade openness, especially in the long run. Furthermore, asymmetric estimation establishes asymmetry shocks in EQ, IQ, and FDI which are positively linked with trade openness, especially in the long run. Moreover, the Wald test results ascertain the presence of asymmetry both in the long run and short run. The directional casualty with symmetry effects of EQ, IQ, and FDI disclosure feedback hypothesis explains trade openness’s causal effects. Besides, causality test with asymmetry divulges feedback hypothesis available between EQ and trade openness, i.e., [EQ− TO: EQTO] and IQ and trade openness [IQ− TO: IQTO], on the other hand, unidirectional casualty running from positive shocks in foreign direct investment to trade openness [FDITO].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Population haven hypothesis (PHH) refers

References

  • Abdella AB, Naghavi N, Fah BY (2018) The effect of corruption, trade openness and political stability on foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from BRIC countries. Internatl J Adv Appl Sci 5:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdouli M, Hammami S (2017a) The impact of FDI inflows and environmental quality on economic growth: an empirical study for the MENA countries. J Knowl Econ 8:254–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdouli M, Hammami S (2017b) Investigating the causality links between environmental quality, foreign direct investment and economic growth in MENA countries. Int Bus Rev 26:264–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdouli M, Omri A (2020) Exploring the nexus among FDI inflows, environmental quality, human capital, and economic growth in the Mediterranean region. J Knowl Econ:1–23

  • Abler DG, Rodriguez AG, Shortle JS (1999) Trade liberalization and the environment in Costa Rica. Environ Dev Econ 4:357–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson JA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91:1369–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adhikary BK (2011) FDI, trade openness, capital formation, and economic growth in Bangladesh: a linkage analysis. Int J Bus Manag 6:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizenman J, Noy I (2006) FDI and trade—two-way linkages? Q Rev Econ Finance 46:317–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizenman J, Spiegel MM (2006) Institutional efficiency, monitoring costs and the investment share of FDI. Rev Int Econ 14:683–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali S, Yusop Z, Kaliappan SR et al (2020) Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: evidence from OIC countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–12

  • Anderson JE, Marcouiller D (2002) Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation. Rev Econ Stat 84:342–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91:877–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar S, Cooray A (2012) Financial development, political rights, civil liberties and economic growth: evidence from South Asia. Econ Model 29:974–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anyanwu JC (2006) Promoting of investment in Africa. Afr Dev Rev 18:42–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appiah M, Li F, Frowne DI (2020) Financial development, institutional quality and economic growth: evidence from ECOWAS countries. Organ Mark Emerg Econ 11:6–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Asamoah LA, Mensah EK, Bondzie EA (2019) Trade openness, FDI and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa: do institutions matter? Transnatil Corp Rev 11:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asamoah ME, Adjasi CK, Alhassan AL (2016) Macroeconomic uncertainty, foreign direct investment and institutional quality: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Econ Syst 40:612–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asghari M (2013) Does FDI promote MENA region’s environment quality? Pollution halo or pollution haven hypothesis. Int J Sci Res Environ Sci 1:92–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Asiedu E (2013) Foreign direct investment, natural resources and institutions. Int Growth Centre

  • Awan SA, Meo MS, Ghimire A et al (2018) Is trade openness good or bad for environment in Pakistan; an ARDL bounds testing approach. In: 4th Annual International Conference on Management, Economics and Social Development (ICMESD 2018). Atlantis Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz OG (2018) Institutional quality and FDI inflows in Arab economies. Financ Res Lett 25:111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek J, Koo WW (2009) A dynamic approach to the FDI-environment nexus: the case of China and India. East Asian Econ Rev 13:87–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baliamoune-Lutz M, Ndikumana L (2007) The growth effects of openness to trade and the role of institutions: new evidence from African countries. Working Paper

  • Baltagi BH (2008) Forecasting with panel data. J Forecast 27:153–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghin JC, Bowland BJ, Dessus S et al (2002) Trade integration, environmental degradation, and public health in Chile: assessing the linkages. Environ Dev Econ 7:241–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard J, Mandal S (2016) The impact of trade openness on environmental quality: an empirical analysis of emerging and developing economies. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 203:195–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati JN and Srinivasan T. (1995) Trade and the environment: does environmental diversity detract from the case for free trade?

  • Bildirici M, Ozaksoy F (2017) The relationship between woody biomass consumption and economic growth: nonlinear ARDL and causality. J For Econ 27:60–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnal M, Yaya ME (2015) Political institutions, trade openness, and economic growth: new evidence. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 51:1276–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broock WA, Scheinkman JA, Dechert WD et al (1996) A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econ Rev 15:197–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan BG, Le QV, Rishi M (2012) Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: some empirical evidence. Int Rev Financ Anal 21:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butkiewicz JL, Yanikkaya H (2006) Institutional quality and economic growth: Maintenance of the rule of law or democratic institutions, or both? Econ Model 23:648–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri S, Pfaff A (2002) Economic growth and the environment: what can we learn from household data. Columbia University, February

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappini R (2011) FDI and trade: A Granger causality analysis in a heterogeneous panel.

  • Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econ 188:393–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Elliot RJ and Azhar AK. (2001) The determinants of trade in pollution intensive industries: North-South evidence: University of Birmingham.

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-South trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109:755–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) International trade and the environment: a framework for analysis. Natl Bur Econ Res

  • Dang Q, Konar M (2018) Trade openness and domestic water use. Water Resour Res 54:4–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daude C, Stein E (2007) The quality of institutions and foreign direct investment. Econ Polit 19:317–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djulius H (2017a) Energy use, trade openness, and exchange rate impact on foreign direct investment in Indonesia

  • Djulius H (2017b) Energy use, trade openness, and exchange rate impact on foreign direct investment in Indonesia. Int J Energy Econ Policy

  • Dowrick S, Golley J (2004) Trade openness and growth: who benefits? Oxf Rev Econ Policy 20:38–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu E-I, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupasquier C, Osakwe PN. (2003) Performance, promotion, and prospects for foreign investment in Africa: national, regional, and international responsibilities. Eminent Persons’ Meeting on ‘Promotion of Investment in Africa, Tokyo. Citeseer

  • Egyir J, Sakyi D, Baidoo ST (2020) How does capital flows affect the impact of trade on economic growth in Africa? J Internatl Trade Econ Dev 29:353–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahimi A, Saint Akadiri S, Seraj M et al (2018) Testing the role of tourism and human capital development in economic growth. A panel causality study of micro states. Tour Manag Perspect 28:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faiz-Ur-Rehman, Ali A, Nasir M (2007) Corruption, trade openness, and environmental quality: a panel data analysis of selected South Asian countries. Pakistan Dev Rev:673–688

  • Fang W, Miller SM, Yeh C-C (2015) The effect of growth volatility on income inequality. Econ Model 45:212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felbermayr G, Prat J, Schmerer H-J (2011) Trade and unemployment: what do the data say? Eur Econ Rev 55:741–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Arias E, Montiel PJ (1996) The surge in capital inflows to developing countries: an analytical overview. World Bank Econ Rev 10:51–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gani A (2007) Governance and foreign direct investment links: evidence from panel data estimations. Appl Econ Lett 14:753–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao T (2004) FDI, openness and income. J Internatl Trade Econ Dev 13:305–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerman S, Shapiro D (2002) Global foreign direct investment flows: the role of governance infrastructure. World Dev 30:1899–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk R (2006) The Asian drivers: financial flows into and out of Asia–implications for developing countries

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Natl Bur Econ Res

  • Habib M, Zurawicki L (2002) Corruption and foreign direct investment. J Int Bus Stud 33:291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habibullah MS, Yoke-Kee E (2007) Does financial development cause economic growth? A panel data dynamic analysis for the Asian developing countries. J Asia Pac Econ 11:377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi A, Hamdi H (2016) Trade liberalization, FDI inflows, environmental quality and economic growth: a comparative analysis between Tunisia and Morocco. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:1445–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y, Wu Y, Wu H et al (2020) How do FDI and technical innovation affect environmental quality? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:7835–7850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J (2006) Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecol Econ 60:228–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho S-H, Oueghlissi R and El Ferktaji R. (2019) The dynamic causality between ESG and economic growth: Evidence from panel causality analysis.

  • Hoffmann R, Lee CG, Ramasamy B et al (2005) FDI and pollution: a granger causality test using panel data. J Int Dev: The Journal of the Development Studies Association 17:311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Zhu H, Zhang Z (2020) The heterogeneous effect of driving factors on carbon emission intensity in the Chinese transport sector: evidence from dynamic panel quantile regression. Sci Total Environ 727:138578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim M, Sare YA (2018) Determinants of financial development in Africa: how robust is the interactive effect of trade openness and human capital? Econ Anal Policy 60:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayachandran G, Seilan A (2010) A causal relationship between trade, foreign direct investment and economic growth for India. Int Res J Financ Econ 42:74–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econ 90:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2010) Governance indicators for 2000-2008, the worldwide governance indicators (WGI) project. World Bank Policy Res

  • Kaur J. (2017) Impact of FDI on environmental quality in India. CLEAR Int J Res Commerce Manag 8.

  • Kim D-H, Lin S-C, Suen Y-B (2010) Dynamic effects of trade openness on financial development. Econ Model 27:254–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack S, Keefer P (1995) Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Econ Polit 7:207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakwa PA and Aboagye S. (2014) Energy consumption in Ghana and the story of economic growth, industrialization, trade openness and urbanization.

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A et al (1997) Legal determinants of external finance. J Financ 52:1131–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau L-S, Choong C-K, Eng Y-K (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy 68:490–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le T-H, Kim J, Lee M (2016) Institutional quality, trade openness, and financial sector development in Asia: an empirical investigation. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 52:1047–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levchenko AA (2007) Institutional quality and international trade. Rev Econ Stud 74:791–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levchenko AA (2013) International trade and institutional change. J Law, Econ Organ 29:1145–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin C-F, Chu C-SJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Resnick A (2003) Reversal of fortunes: democratic institutions and foreign direct investment inflows to developing countries. Int Organ 57:175–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liargovas PG, Skandalis KS (2012) Foreign direct investment and trade openness: the case of developing economies. Soc Indic Res 106:323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Wang S, Zhang W et al (2018) Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China’s cities? A spatial econometric perspective. Sci Total Environ 613:521–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez R (1994) The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade liberalization. J Environ Econ Manag 27:163–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22:3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumbila KN (2005) What makes FDI work? A panel analysis of the growth effect of FDI in Africa. The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv Z, Xu T (2019) Trade openness, urbanization and CO2 emissions: dynamic panel data analysis of middle-income countries. J Internatl Trade Econ Dev 28:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:631–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruta AA (2019) Trade aid, institutional quality, and trade. J Econ Bus 103:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruta AA, Banerjee R, Cavoli T (2020) Foreign aid, institutional quality and economic growth: Evidence from the developing world. Econ Model 89:444–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrotas G, Kelly R (2001) Old wine in new bottles: testing causality between savings and growth. Manch Sch 69:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méon PG, Sekkat K (2008) Institutional quality and trade: which institutions? Which trade? Econ Inq 46:227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millimet DL, Roy J (2016) Empirical tests of the pollution haven hypothesis when environmental regulation is endogenous. J Appl Econ 31:652–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed SE, Sidiropoulos MG (2010) Another look at the determinants of foreign direct investment in MENA countries: an empirical investigation. J Econ Dev 35:75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munksgaard J, Pedersen KA, Wien M (2000) Impact of household consumption on CO2 emissions. Energy Econ 22:423–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir M, Rehman FU (2011) Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy 39:1857–1864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel S, Aguegboh E, Iheonu C et al (2020) Energy consumption, FDI, and urbanization linkage in coastal Mediterranean countries: re-assessing the pollution haven hypothesis. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  • Nguyen QH (2019) Growth model with financial deepening and productivity heterogeneity. Jpn Econ Rev 70:123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) A transaction cost theory of politics. J Theor Polit 2:355–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:3220–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco RR, Fernandes E (2017) International air passenger traffic, trade openness and exchange rate in Brazil: a Granger causality test. Transp Res A Policy Pract 101:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Int Labour Organ

  • Patrick HT (1966) Financial development and economic growth in underdeveloped countries. Econ Dev Cult Chang 14:174–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (1996) Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels and the case of purchasing power parity. Manuscript, Department of Economics, Indiana University

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econ Theory 20:597–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pernia EM, Quising PF (2005) Trade openness and regional development in a developing country. In: Globalization and urban development. Springer, Berlin, pp 79–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH. (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels.

  • Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74:967–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RP (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94:621–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Smith R (1995) Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econ 68:79–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Ullah A, Yamagata T (2008) A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econ J 11:105–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Pethig R (1976) Pollution, welfare, and environmental policy in the theory of comparative advantage. J Environ Econ Manag 2:160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson J, Johansson L (2013) Aid, aid for trade, and bilateral trade: an empirical study. J Internatl Trade Econ Dev 22:866–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qamruzzaman M, Jianguo W (2020) The asymmetric relationship between financial development, trade openness, foreign capital flows, and renewable energy consumption: Fresh evidence from panel NARDL investigation. Renew Energy 159:827–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94:1002–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo P (2012) Determinants of FDI in South Asia: role of infrastructure, trade openness and reforms. J World Invest Trade 13:256–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakyi D, Egyir J (2017) Effects of trade and FDI on economic growth in Africa: an empirical investigation. Transnatil Corp Rev 9:66–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salman A, Sethi B, Aslam F et al (2018) Free trade agreements and environmental nexus in Pakistan. Policy Perspect 15:179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee R, Stoker TM, Judson RA (1998) World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950–2050. Rev Econ Stat 80:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seker F, Ertugrul HM, Cetin M (2015) The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyoum M, Wu R, Lin J (2014) Foreign direct investment and trade openness in Sub-Saharan economies: a panel data granger causality analysis. South Afr J Econ 82:402–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah SH, Ahmad MH, Ahmed QM (2016) The nexus between sectoral FDI and institutional quality: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Appl Econ 48:1591–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Hoang THV, Mahalik MK et al (2017a) Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Econ 63:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Abbas F et al (2015) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Econ 51:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K et al (2017b) Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ 61:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, pp 281–314

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I et al (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Zhang F, Xu M (2017) Investigation of pollution haven hypothesis for China: an ARDL approach with breakpoint unit root tests. J Clean Prod 161:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suri V, Chapman D (1998) Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir M, Azid T (2015) The relationship between international trade openness and economic growth in the developing economies. J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud

  • Talukdar D, Meisner CM (2001) Does the private sector help or hurt the environment? Evidence from carbon dioxide pollution in developing countries. World Dev 29:827–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian J, Xin Q (2013) An empirical study on the effect of FDI inflows on China’s environmental quality. Manag Eng 90

  • Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econ 66:225–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño LJ, Mixon FG Jr (2004) Strategic factors affecting foreign direct investment decisions by multi-national enterprises in Latin America. J World Bus 39:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twerefou DK, Akpalu W, Mensah ACE (2019) Trade-induced environmental quality: the role of factor endowment and environmental regulation in Africa. Clim Dev 11:786–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valeriani E, Peluso S (2011) The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and development: An empirical study. J Knowl Manag Econ Inform Technol 1:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayakumar N, Sridharan P, Rao KCS (2010) Determinants of FDI in BRICS countries: a panel analysis. Int J Bus Sci Appl Manag (IJBSAM) 5:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang DT, Gu FF, David KT et al (2013) When does FDI matter? The roles of local institutions and ethnic origins of FDI. Int Bus Rev 22:450–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Luo Y (2020) Has technological innovation capability addressed environmental pollution from the dual perspective of FDI quantity and quality? Evidence from China. Journal of cleaner production:120941

  • Westerlund J, Edgerton DL (2008) A simple test for cointegration in dependent panels with structural breaks. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 70:665–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijeweera A, Dollery B (2009) Host country corruption level and foreign direct investments inflows. Int J Trade Global Markets 2:168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolde-Rufael Y (2005) Energy demand and economic growth: the African experience. J Policy Model 27:891–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakubu IN (2020) Institutional quality and foreign direct investment in Ghana. Review of International Business and Strategy

  • Yeboah O-A, Naanwaab CB, Saleem S, et al. (2012) Effects of trade openness on economic growth: the case of African countries

  • You W, Lv Z (2018) Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: a spatial panel approach. Energy Econ 73:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff MB, Nuh R (2015) Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth: empirical evidence from Thailand. Foreign Trade Rev 50:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria M, Bibi S (2019) Financial development and environment in South Asia: the role of institutional quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:7926–7937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata HO, Rambaldi AN (1997) Monte Carlo evidence on cointegration and causation. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 59:285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarsky L (1999) Havens, halos and spaghetti: untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment. Foreign Direct Invest Environ 13:47–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeren F, Konuk F (2016) The nexus between trading volume and stock prices: panel evidence from OECD countries. Bus Econ Res J 7

  • Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y et al (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zomorrodi A, Zhou X (2017) Impact of FDI on environmental quality of China. Int J Bus Econ Manag 4:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Qamruzzaman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

“Not applicable”

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qamruzzaman, M. Nexus between environmental quality, institutional quality and trade openness through the channel of FDI: an application of common correlated effects estimation (CCEE), NARDL, and asymmetry causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 52475–52498 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14269-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14269-8

Keywords

JEL classifications

Navigation