Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of trade openness on CO2 emissions using time series data over the period of 1970QI-2011QIV for Malaysia. We disintegrate the trade effect into scale, technique, composition, and comparative advantage effects to check the environmental consequence of trade at four different transition points. To achieve the purpose, we have employed augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and Phillips-Perron (PP) unit root tests in order to examine the stationary properties of the variables. Later, the long-run association among the variables is examined by applying autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach to cointegration. Our results confirm the presence of cointegration. Further, we find that scale effect has positive and technique effect has negative impact on CO2 emissions after threshold income level and form inverted U-shaped relationship—hence validates the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy consumption adds in CO2 emissions. Trade openness and composite effect improve environmental quality by lowering CO2 emissions. The comparative advantage effect increases CO2 emissions and impairs environmental quality. The results provide the innovative approach to see the impact of trade openness in four sub-dimensions of trade liberalization. Hence, this study attributes more comprehensive policy tool for trade economists to better design environmentally sustainable trade rules and agreements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The pollution haven hypothesis argues that since developed countries have stringent environmental regulations, hence the disadvantaged firms relocate their pollution-intensive productions to developing countries where the regulations are soft.
Shahbaz et al. (2015c) examined the validity of EKC for African countries. Their analysis indicated the presence of EKC, and the feedback effect is noticed between economic growth and CO2 emissions.
We have converted annual data into quarter frequency using quadratic match sum method (see, for more details, Shahbaz et al. 2014c).
We have inserted dummy variable for each variable while considering it as dependent variable.
We have not reported a stability test just to conserve space. The long-run and short-run models do not face the problem of non-normality, serial correlation, white heteroskedasticity, and functional form.
References
Agus F, Gunarso P, Sahardjo BH, Harris N, van Noordwijk M, Killeen TJ (2013) Historical CO2 emissions from land use and land use change from the oil palm industry in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, Kuala Lumpur
Ahmed K, Long W (2013) An empirical analysis of CO2 emission in Pakistan using EKC hypothesis. J Int Trade Law Policy 12(2):188–200
Ahmed K, Shahbaz M, Qasim A, Long W (2015) The linkages between deforestation, energy and growth for environmental degradation in Pakistan. Ecol Indic 49:95–103
Ang JB (2008) A survey of recent developments in the literature of finance and growth. J Econ Surv 22(3):536–576
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91:877–908
Arouri M, Shahbaz M, Onchang R, Islam F, Teulon F (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve in Thailand: cointegration and causality analysis. J Energy Dev 39:149–170
Baek J, Koo WW (2008) Identifying macroeconomic linkages to US agricultural trade balance. Can J of Agric Econ/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie 56(1):63–77
Baek J, Cho Y, Koo WW (2009) The environmental consequences of globalization: a country-specific time-series analysis. Ecol Econ 68:2255–2264
Baylis J, Smith S (2005) The globalization of world politics. Oxford University Press, 2005
Begum RA, Sohag K, Abdullah SMS, Jaafar M (2015) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:594–601
Bekhet HA, Yasmin T (2013) Disclosing the relationship among CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and bilateral trade between Singapore and Malaysia: an econometric analysis. Int J Soc Hum Sci Eng 7(9):50–55
Bhattacharyya R, Ghoshal T (2010) Economic growth and CO2 emissions. Environ Dev Sustain 12(2):159–177
Busse M (2004) Transnational corporations and repression of political rights and civil liberties: an empirical analysis. Kyklos 57(1):45–66
Chang C (2010) A multivariate causality test of carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China. Appl Energy 87:3533–3537
Chebbi HE, Olarreaga M, Zitouna H (2010) Trade openness and CO2 emissions in Tunisia. Working Paper 518, Economic Research Forum
Cole G (2004) Personnel and human resource management. Pers Rev 33(3):373–374
Cole MA (2006) Does trade liberalization increase national energy use? Econ Lett 92:108–112
Cole MA, Elliott RJ (2003) Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. J Environ Econ Manag 46(3):363–383
Copeland BR (2005) Policy endogeneity and the effects of trade on the environment. Agric Resour Econ Rev 34(1):1–15
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (1994) North-South trade and the environment. Q J Econ 755–787
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth and the environment (No. 9823). National Bureau of Economic Research
Dean JM (2002) Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. Can J Econ 35(4):819–842
Dietzenbacher E, Mukhopadhyay K (2007) An empirical examination of the pollution haven hypothesis for India: towards a green Leontief paradox? Environ Resour Econ 36(4):427–449
Dinda S, Coondoo D (2006) Income and emission: a panel data-based cointegration analysis. Ecol Econ 57(2):167–181
Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 251–276
Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–14
Forslid R, Okubo T, Ultveit-Moe KH (2011) Does international trade contribute to global CO2 emissions? Third Conference of GIST, International Trade, Firm Location and Services
Frankel JA, Rose AK (2005) Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Rev Econ Stat 87(1):85–91
Gale LR, Mendez JA (1998) The empirical relationship between trade, growth and the environment. Int Rev Econ Financ 7(1):53–61
Ghosh S (2010) Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: a multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy 38(6):3008–3014
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1994) Economic growth and the environment (No. 4634). National Bureau of Economic Research
Gu Z, Gao Y, Li C (2013) An empirical research on trade liberalization and CO2 emissions in China. International Conference on Education Technology and Information System (ICETIS 2013), p 243–246
Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energ Policy 37(3):1156–1164
Harris R, Sollis R (2003) Applied time series modeling and forecasting. Wiley, West Sussex
Hoa TV (2012) Trade, growth and CO2 emissions in China: evidence from an economic integration model. Victoria Institute of Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Australia
Ibrahim MH, Law SH (2015) Institutional quality and CO2 emission–trade relations: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. S Afr J Econ. doi:10.1111/saje.12095
Iwata H, Okada K, Samreth S (2012) Empirical study on the determinants of CO2 emissions: evidence from OECD countries. Appl Econ 44(27):3513–3519
Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energ Policy 37(12):5167–5172
Jena PR, Grote U (2008). Growth–trade–environment nexus in India. Econ Bull 17(11):1–11
Johansen S (1995) Identifying restrictions of linear equations with applications to simultaneous equations and cointegration. J Econ 69(1):111–132
Kearsley A, Riddel M (2010) A further inquiry into the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecol Econ 69(4):905–919
Khalid A, Shahbaz M, Long AQ (2014) The linkages between deforestation, energy and growth for environmental degradation in Pakistan. Ecol Indic 49:95–103
Khalil, S. and Inam, Z. (2006). Is trade good for environment? A unit root cointegration analysis. Pak Dev Rev 1187–1196
Kohler M (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade: a South African perspective. Energ Policy 63:1042–1050
Kukla-Gryz A (2009) Economic growth, international trade and air pollution: a decomposition analysis. Ecol Econ 68(5):1329–1339
Lau L-S, Chee-Keong C, Eng Y-E (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energ Policy 68:490–497
Lee C, Chiu Y, Sun C (2009) Does one size fit all? A re-examination of the environmental Kuznets curve using the dynamic panel data approach. Rev Agric Econ 31:751–778
Levinson A, Taylor MS (2001) Trade and the environment: unmasking the pollution haven effect. Unpublished manuscript, US National Science Foundation
Levinson A, Taylor MS (2008) Unmasking the pollution haven effect. Int Econ Rev 49(1):223–254
Liddle HA (2001) Free trade and the environment-development system. Ecol Econ 39(1):21–26
Low P, Yeats A (1992) Do dirty industries migrate? World Bank Discussion Papers, 1992
Lucas RE, Wheeler D, Hettige H (1992) Economic development, environmental regulation, and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution, 1960–88 (vol. 1062). World Bank Publications
Managi S (2004) Trade liberalization and the environment: carbon dioxide for 1960–1999. Econ Bull 17(1):1–5
Managi S, Hibiki A, Tsurumi T (2009) Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J Environ Econ Manag 58(3):346–363
Mani M, Wheeler D (1998) In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. J Environ Dev 7(3):215–247
McArthur, J. W. and Sachs, J. D. (2001). Institutions and geography: comment on Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2000) (No. w8114). National Bureau of Economic Research
Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. Energy Econ 32(6):1374–1382
Naranpanawa A (2010) Does trade openness promote carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from Sri Lanka. Empir Econ Lett 10(10):973–986
Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energ Policy 38:661–666
Nasir M, Rehman F-U (2011) Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energ Policy 39:1857–1864
Ozturk I (2010) A literature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energ Policy 38:340–349
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RP (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):621–634
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326
Pesaran MH, Smith LV, Smith RP (2007) What if the UK or Sweden had joined the euro in 1999? An empirical evaluation using a Global VAR. International Journal of Finance & Economics 12(1):55–87
Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 97–118
Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energ Policy 60:892–905
Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S (2012) Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energ Policy 51:184–191
Sbia R, Shahbaz M, Hamdi H (2014) A contribution of foreign direct investment, clean energy, trade openness, carbon emissions and economic growth to energy demand in UAE. Econ Model 36:191–197
Shahbaz M, Lean HH (2012a) Does financial development increase energy consumption? The role of industrialization and urbanization in Tunisia. Energy Policy 40:473–479
Shahbaz M, Lean HH, Shabbier MM (2012b) Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:2947–2953
Shahbaz M, Zeshan M, Afza T (2012c) Is energy consumption effective to spur economic growth in Pakistan? New evidence from bounds test to level relationships and Granger causality tests. Econ Model 29(6):2310–2319
Shahbaz M, Khan S, Tahir MI (2013a) The dynamic links between energy consumption, economic growth, financial development and trade in China: fresh evidence from multivariate framework analysis. Energy Econ 40:8–21
Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Mahmood H, Arouri M (2013b) Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ Model 35:145–152
Shahbaz M, Tiwari AK, Nasir M (2013c) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energ Policy 61:1452–1459
Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014a) Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:325–336
Shahbaz M, Sbia R, Hamdi H, Ozturk I (2014b) Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecol Indic 45:622–631
Shahbaz M, Uddin GS, Rehman I, Imran K (2014c) Industrialization, electricity consumption and CO2 emissions in Bangladesh. Renew Sust Energ Rev 31:575–586
Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Mahalik MK, Loganathan N (2015a) Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecol Indic 52:379–393
Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Abbas F, Anis O (2015b) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Econ 51:275–287
Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Sbia R, Bibi S (2015c) Does energy intensity contribute to CO2 emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 50:215–224
Solarin SA (2014) Tourist arrivals and macroeconomic determinants of CO2 emissions in Malaysia. Anatolia 25(2):228–241
Takeda F, Matsuura K (2006) Trade and the environment in East Asia: examining the linkages with Japan and the USA. J Korean Econ 7(1):33–56
Temurshoev U (2006) Pollution haven hypothesis or factor endowment hypothesis: theory and empirical examination for the US and China. CERGE-EI
Tiwari AK, Shahbaz M, Hye QMA (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:519–527
Todaro MP, Smith SC (2002) Economic development pearson education ltd. Edenburg Gate, Essex
Tsurumi T, Managi S (2010) Decomposition of the environmental Kuznets curve: scale, technique, and composition effects. Environ Econ Policy Stud 11(1–4):19–36
Van Beers C, Van Den Bergh JC (1997) An empirical multi‐country analysis of the impact of environmental regulations on foreign trade flows. Kyklos 50(1):29–46
Zivot E, Andrews D (1992) Further evidence of great crash, the oil price shock and unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10:251–270
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ling, C.H., Ahmed, K., Binti Muhamad, R. et al. Decomposing the trade-environment nexus for Malaysia: what do the technique, scale, composition, and comparative advantage effect indicate?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 20131–20142 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5217-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5217-9