Abstract
Carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio influences substrate combinations and earthworm performance in vermicomposting systems. To elucidate these factor effects, a comparative evaluation of species, C/N ratio combined with feed rate, was conducted on three local earthworm species: Perionyx excavatus, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Dichogaster annae. Earthworms were stocked at similar densities and fed shredded paper (SP), cattle manure (CM), and lawn clippings (LC) combined to form C/N ratios of 28, 36, and 53. Earthworms were fed at rates of 1, 1.25, and 2 g feed (dry wt.)/g worm/day for a period of 8 weeks. Percent vermiconversion, earthworm adult and juvenile biomass, and vermicast quality were measured. Vermicast production was significantly affected by the combination of C/N ratio and feed rate and varied among species. All treatment combinations resulted in > 70% conversion, except E. eugenaie fed at the medium rate. Vermiconversion increased for P. excavatus and D. annae with increasing C/N ratio but decreased with increasing the feed rate. Vermicast EC, pH, and C/N ratio was strongly affected by species, relative to other experimental factors. D. annae showed the greatest change in biomass, which peaked at the highest feed rate and lowest C/N ratio. Average adult biomass decreased for P. excavatus with increasing feed rate, while differences were nonsignificant for E. eugenaie and D. annae. Significant increases in average juvenile biomass were only evident for D. annae in response to increasing feed rates. Feed rate had a greater influence on earthworm population dynamics and vermicast quality compared to initial feedstock C/N ratio.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aira M, Monroy F, Domínguez J (2006) C to N ratio strongly affects population structure of Eisenia fetida in vermicomposting systems. Eur J Soil Biol 42(SUPPL. 1):127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.039
Atiyeh RM, Domínguez J, Subler S, Edwards CA, (2000) Changes in biochemical properties of cow manure during processing by earthworms (Eisenia andrei, Bouché) and the effects on seedling growth. Pedobiologia 44(6):709–724
Ameta K, Satish RA, Dave D, Ameta SC (2016) Carbon to nitrogen ratio of the combination of feedstocks prepared for composting of Parthenium hysterophorus weed. Int J Chem Sci 14(2):949–954 www.sadgurupublications.com
Bhardwaj P, Sharma RK (2015) Vermicomposting efficiency of earthworm species from Eastern Haryana. J Entomol Zool Stud JEZS 3(33):191–195 http://www.entomoljournal.com/vol3Issue3/pdf/3-3-82.1.pdf
Bhattacharjee G, Chaudhuri PS (2002) Cocoon production, morphology, hatching pattern and fecundity in seven tropical earthworm species—a laboratory-based investigation. J Biosci 27(3):283–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02704917
Blakemore RJ (2015) Eco-taxonomic profile of an iconic vermicomposter ??? The ???African Nightcrawler??? Earthworm, Eudrilus Eugeniae (Kinberg, 1867). Afr Invertebr 56(3):527–548
Bremner, J. M., 1996. Total Nitrogen, in: Sparks, D. L., (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis Part (3), Chemical Methods. SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 1085–1122.
Datar MT, Rao MN, Reddy S (1997) Vermicomposting - a Technological Option for Solid Waste Management. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management 24, 89-93
Dominguez J, Edwards CA (2011) Biology and ecology of earthworm species used for vermicomposting. In: Edwards RL, Arancon CA, Sherman NQ (eds) Vermiculture Technology. pp 30–31. Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10453.
Domínguez J, Edwards CA, Webster M (2000) Vermicomposting of sewage sludge: effect of bulking materials on the growth and reproduction of the earthworm Eisenia Andrei. Pedobiologia 44(1):24–32. https://doi.org/10.1078/S0031-4056(04)70025-6
Edwards CA, Subler S, Arancon N (2011) Chapter 18 quality criteria for vermicomposts. In: Edwards RL, Arancon CA, Sherman NQ (eds) © 2011 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. pp 287–301
Garg VK, Yadav YK, Sheoran A, Chand S, Kaushik P (2006) Livestock excreta management through vermicomposting using an Epigeic earthworm Eisenia Foetida. Environmentalist 26(4):269–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-006-8641-z
Goswami L, Pratihar S, Dasgupta S, Bhattacharyya P, Mudoi P, Bora J, Bhattacharya SS, Kim KH (2016) Exploring metal detoxification and accumulation potential during vermicomposting of tea factory coal ash: sequential extraction and fluorescence probe analysis. Sci Rep 6(July):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30402
Gupta S, Narzary R, Kandagal AS, Khetagoudar MC, Susmita G, Narzary R (2015) Influence of organic wastes on the biology of epigeic earthworm Perionyx excavatus during different seasons. J Environ Biol 36(March):591–597
Hussain N, Singh A, Saha S, Kumar MVS, Bhattacharyya P, Bhattacharya SS (2016) Excellent N-fixing and P-solubilizing traits in earthworm gut-isolated bacteria: a vermicompost based assessment with vegetable market waste and rice straw feed mixtures. Bioresource Technology 222. Elsevier Ltd:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.115
James SW, Guimarae A (2011) Chapter 4 discovery and development of new species for vermiculture. In: Edwards RL, Arancon CA, Sherman NQ (eds) Vermiculture technology. © 2011 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, pp 41–52. Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10453.
Julka, J. M. 1993. Earthworm resources and vermiculture. Edited by Zoological Survey of India The Director. Published by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta. http://faunaofindia.nic.in/PDFVolumes/spb/022/index.pdf
Lim PN, Wu TY, Clarke C, Nik Daud NN (2015) A potential bioconversion of empty fruit bunches into organic fertilizer using Eudrilus eugeniae. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(8):2533–2544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0648-2
Lim SL, Lee LH, Wu TY (2016) Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis. J Clean Prod Elsevier 111:262–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.083
Makhija, M., S. Gajalakshmi, and S. A. Abbasi. 2011. Screening of four species of earthworms for sustainable vermicompostin of Ipomoea Carnea. In: International Conference on Green Technology and Environmental Conservation (GTEC-2011), December. Ieee, 42–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/GTEC.2011.6167639
Manaig EM (2016) Vermicomposting efficiency and quality of vermicompost with different bedding materials and worm food sources as substrate. Res J Agric For Sci 4(1):1–13
Mupambwa HA, Ravindran B, Mnkeni PNS (2016) Potential of effective micro-organisms and Eisenia fetida in enhancing vermi-degradation and nutrient release of fly ash incorporated into cow dung-paper waste mixture. Waste Management 48. Elsevier Ltd:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.001
Nattudurai G, Ezhil Vendan S, Ramachandran PV, Lingathurai S (2014) Vermicomposting of coirpith with cowdung by Eudrilus eugeniae Kinberg and its efficacy on the growth of Cyamopsis tetragonaloba (L) Taub. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 13(1). King Saud University & Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences: 23–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2012.12.003
Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA (2000) Effects of C-to-N ratio on vermicomposting of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 75(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00038-9
Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA (2001) Integrating composting and vermicomposting in the treatment and bioconversion of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 76(2):107–112 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11131792
Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA, Das KC (2000) Effects of stocking density and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 71:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00055-3
Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3-Chemical Methoods. (eds) D.L. Sparks, A.L. Page, P.A. Helmke, and R.H. Loeppert, 5thed., 961–1010. Madison, WI 53711, USA: SSSA Book Ser. 5.3. SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34
Pandit NP, Ahmad N, Maheshwari SK (2012) Vermicomposting biotechnology: an eco-loving approach for recycling of solid organic wastes into valuable biofertilizers. J Biofertilizers Biopesticides 3(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6202.1000113
Parthasarathi K, Balamurugan M, Prashija KV, Jayanthi L, Basha SA (2016) Potential of Perionyx excavatus (perrier) in lignocellulosic solid waste management and quality vermifertilizer production for soil health. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 5(1). Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 65–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-016-0118-6
Pattnaik S, Reddy MV (2010) Nutrient status of vermicompost of urban green waste processed by three earthworm species—Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatus. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2010:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/967526
Rajpal A, Bhargava R, Chopra AK, Kumar T (2013) Vermistabilization and nutrient enhancement of anaerobic digestate through earthworm species Perionyx excavatus and Perionyx sansibaricus. J Mater Cycle Waste Manag 16(2):219–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-013-0167-0
Ravindran, B., and P. N.S. Mnkeni. 2016. Bio-optimization of the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio for efficient vermicomposting of chicken manure and waste paper using Eisenia fetida. Environ Sci Poll Res 23(17). Environmental Science and Pollution Research: 16965–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6873-0
Riggle D, Holmes H (1994) New horizons for commercial vermiculture. Biocycle 35(10):58–62 http://www.slideshare.net/x3G9/adx93
Sharma K, Garg VK (2017) Management of food and vegetable processing waste spiked with buffalo waste using earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Environ Sci Poll Res 24(8). Environmental Science and Pollution Research: 7829–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8438-2
Sharma S, Pradhan K, Satya S, Vasudevan P (2005) Potentiality of earthworms for waste management and in other uses—a review. Am J Sci 1(1):4–16
Sinha RK, Herat S, Agarwal S, Asadi R, Carretero E (2002) Vermiculture and waste management: study of action of earthworms Elsinia foetida, Eudrilus euginae and Perionyx excavatus on biodegradation of some community. Environmentalist 22:261–268. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1016583929723
Sogbesan OA, Ugwumba AAA (2006) Effect of different substrates on growth and productivity of nigeria semi-arid zone earthworm (Hyperiodrilus euryaulos, Clausen 1842 ) ( Oligochaeta : Eudrilinae). World J Zool 1(2):103–112
Suthar S (2007) Influence of different food sources on growth and reproduction performance of composting epigeics: Eudrilus eugeniae, Perionyx excavatus and Perionyx sansibaricus. Appl Ecol Environ Res 5(2):79–92
Suthar S (2008) Bioconversion of post harvest crop residues and cattle shed manure into value-added products using earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae Kinberg. Ecol Eng 32(3):206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.11.002
Suthar S, Singh S (2007) Vermicomposting of domestic waste by using two epigeic earthworms (Perionyx excavatus and Perionyx sansibaricus). Int J Environ Sci Technol 5(1):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326002
Thompson WH, Leege PB, Millner PD, Watson ME (2001) Test methods for the examination of composting and compost. Washington, DC 20250-9410: United States Department of Agriculture and United States Composting Council. http://compostingcouncil.org/wp-content/plugins/wppdfupload/ pdf/34/TMECC Introduction and Contents.pdf
Wu TY, Lim SL, Lim PN, Shak KPY (2014) Biotransformation of biodegradable solid wastes into organic fertilizers using composting or/and vermicomposting. Chem Eng Trans 39:1579–1584. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1439264
Acknowledgements
The authors extend a special thank you to the Head, Department of Food Production, for assisting in providing the necessary resources for completion of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, M., Eudoxie, G. Feedstock composition influences vermicomposting performance of Dichogaster annae relative to Eudrilus eugeniae and Perionyx excavatus. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 17716–17725 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1853-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1853-1