Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 11011–11022 | Cite as

In situ investigation of heavy metals at trace concentrations in greenhouse soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy

  • Kang Tian
  • Biao Huang
  • Zhe Xing
  • Wenyou Hu
Research Article

Abstract

Soil pollution by heavy metals (HMs) has rapidly become a major threat to vegetable security. Nearly all cultivated soils are at risk of metal accumulation, and greenhouse soils are among the most heavily impacted soils. In this study, a rapid assessment of HMs at trace concentrations was conducted via portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) spectroscopy in Shouguang, China. Measurements were made via PXRF under in situ, ex situ and sieved conditions and by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) after acid digestion. The performance of each PXRF measure relative to the ICP-MS method was assessed by linear regression. Redundancy analysis was performed to quantify the proportion of explained variability between the PXRF and ICP-MS data. Evaluation of the possible sources of HMs and their potential risks was then conducted by multivariate analysis. The results showed that the PXRF data were closely correlated with ICP-MS quantification for Cu, Mn and Zn, whereas no significant correlations were found for As, Ni and Pb. The uncertainties of PXRF measurement derived from soil heterogeneity accounted for 20.02% of total variability and those from moisture and particle size accounted for 20.15%. The geo-accumulation index (Igeo) indicated that the greenhouse soils were potentially contaminated by Cu and Zn (Igeo > 0), which can be attributed to anthropogenic activities. Overall, PXRF spectroscopy is promising as a rapid and nondestructive in situ technique for assessing the potential risks of HMs at trace concentrations in greenhouse soils.

Keywords

Greenhouse soils Heavy metals Potential risk PXRF Source identification 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41473073), the Key Frontier Project of Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. ISSASIP1629) and the Key Science and Technology Demonstration Project of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BE2016812).

Supplementary material

11356_2018_1405_MOESM1_ESM.docx (62 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 62 kb)

References

  1. Bai LY, Zeng XB, Su SM, Duan R, Wang YN, Gao X (2015) Heavy metal accumulation and source analysis in greenhouse soils of Wuwei District, Gansu Province, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(7):5359–5369.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3763-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao SD (2005) Soil analytical methods of agronomic chemistry (in Chinese). China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing, pp 25–210Google Scholar
  3. Bernick M, Kalnicky D, Prince G, Singhvi R (1995) Results of field-portable X-ray fluorescence analysis of metal contaminants in soil and sediment. J Hazard Mater 43(1-2):101–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(95)00030-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boon KA, Ramsey MH (2012) Judging the fitness of on-site measurements by their uncertainty, including the contribution from sampling. Sci Total Environ 419:196–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chai Y, Guo J, Chai SL, Cai J, Xue LF, Zhang QW (2015) Source identification of eight heavy metals in grassland soils by multivariate analysis from the Baicheng-Songyuan area, Jilin Province, Northeast China. Chemosphere 134:67–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakraborty S, Man T, Paulette L, Deb S, Li B, Weindorf DC, Frazier M (2017) Rapid assessment of smelter/mining soil contamination via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and indicator kriging. Geoderma 306:108–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen HM (2005) Environmental soil science (in Chinese). Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen JS, Wei FS, Zheng CJ, Wu YY, Adriano DC (1991) Background concentrations of elements in soils of China. Water Air Soil Pollut 57:699–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen T, Liu XM, Zhu MZ, Zhao KL, Wu JJ, Xu JM, Huang PM (2008) Identification of trace element sources and associated risk assessment in vegetable soils of the urban-rural transitional area of Hangzhou, China. Environ Pollut 151(1):67–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Y, Huang B, Hu WY, Weindorf DC, Liu XX, Niedermann S (2014) Assessing the risks of trace elements in environmental materials under selected greenhouse vegetable production systems of China. Sci Total Environ 470:1140–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chou J, Elbers D, Clement G, Bursavich B, Tian TA, Zhang WD, Yang K (2010) In situ monitoring (field screening) and assessment of lead and arsenic contaminants in the greater New Orleans area using a portable X-ray fluorescence analyser. J Environ Monit 12(9):1722–1729.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0em00012d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooperative Research Group on Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CRG-CST) (2001) Chinese Soil Taxonomy. Science Press, Beijing & New York, pp 1–203Google Scholar
  13. Du GD, Lei M, Zhou GD, Chen TB, Qiu RL (2015) Evaluation of field portable X-Ray fluorescence performance for the analysis of Ni in soil. Spectrosc Spectr Anal 35:809–813.Google Scholar
  14. Fang SZ, Xie LQ, Zhang WQ, Zhang X, Li XM (1991) Background values of nine elements in agricultural soil and crops of brown soil area in Shandong province (in Chinese). Shandong Agricultural Sci 1:24–27Google Scholar
  15. Fujimori T, Takigami H (2014) Pollution distribution of heavy metals in surface soil at an informal electronic-waste recycling site. Environ Geochem Health 36(1):159–168.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-013-9526-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gil C, Boluda R, Ramos J (2004) Determination and evaluation of cadmium, lead and nickel in greenhouse soils of Almerı́a (Spain). Chemosphere 55:1027–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gutiérrez-Ginés MJ, Pastor J, AJ H’a (2013) Assessment of field portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for the in situ determination of heavy metals in soils and plants. Environmental Science-Processes & Impacts 15(8):1545–1552.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3em00078h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hejcman M, Szakova J, Schellberg J, Srek P, Tlustos P (2009) The Rengen grassland experiment soil contamination by trace elements after 65 years of Ca, N, P and K fertiliser application. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 83:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horta A, Malone B, Stockmann U, Minasny B, Bishop TFA, McBratney AB, Pallasser R, Pozza L (2015) Potential of integrated field spectroscopy and spatial analysis for enhanced assessment of soil contamination: a prospective review. Geoderma 241–242:180–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jang M (2010) Application of portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) for heavy metal analysis of soils in crop fields near abandoned mine sites. Environ Geochem Health 32(3):207–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-009-9276-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kilbride C, Poole J, Hutchings TR (2006) A comparison of Cu, Pb, As, Cd, Zn, Fe, Ni and Mn determined by acid extraction/ICP-OES and ex situ field portable X-ray fluorescence analyses. Environ Pollut 143:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kong XL, Cao J, Tang RY, Zhang SQ, Dong F (2014) Pollution of intensively managed greenhouse soils by nutrients and heavy metals in the Yellow River irrigation region, Northwest China. Environ Monit Assess 186(11):7719–7731.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3962-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laiho JV, Perämäki P (2005) Evaluation of portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) sample preparation methods. Special paper-Geological Survey Finland 38:73–82Google Scholar
  24. Li C, Li F, Wu Z, Cheng J (2015a) Effects of landscape heterogeneity on the elevated trace metal concentrations in agricultural soils at multiple scales in the Pearl River Delta, South China. Environ Pollut 206:264–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li YB, Duanp ZW, Liu GL, Kalla P, Scheidt D, Cai Y (2015b) Evaluation of the possible sources and controlling factors of toxic metals/metalloids in the Florida Everglades and their potential risk of exposure. Environ Sci Technol 49(16):9714–9723.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lv J, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Dai J, Dai B, Zhu Y (2015) Identifying the origins and spatial distributions of heavy metals in soils of Ju country (eastern China) using multivariate and geostatistical approach. J Soils Sediments 15(1):163–178.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0937-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McComb JQ, Rogers C, Han FXX, Tchounwou PB (2014) Rapid screening of heavy metals and trace elements in environmental samples using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer, a comparative study. Water Air Soil Pollution 225(12).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2169-5
  28. McLaren TI, Guppy CN, Tighe MK, Forster N, Grave P, Lisle LM, Bennett JW (2012) Rapid, nondestructive total elemental analysis of vertisol soils using portable X-ray fluorescence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76(4):1436–1445.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Müller G (1979) Heavy metals in sediment of the Rhine-changes since 1971. Umschau in Wissenschaft und Technik 79:778–783Google Scholar
  30. Parsons C, Grabulosa EM, Pili E, Floor GH, Roman-Ross G, Charlet L (2013) Quantification of trace arsenic in soils by field-portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: considerations for sample preparation and measurement conditions. J Hazard Mater 262:1213–1222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paulette L, Man T, Weindorf DC, Person T (2015) Rapid assessment of soil and contaminant variability via portable x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy: Copsa Mica, Romania. Geoderma 243:130–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peinado FM, Ruano SM, Gonzalez MGB, Molina CE (2010) A rapid field procedure for screening trace elements in polluted soil using portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF). Geoderma 159(1-2):76–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.06.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Radu T, Diamond D (2009) Comparison of soil pollution concentrations determined using AAS and portable XRF techniques. J Hazard Mater 171(1-3):1168–1171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramsey MH, Argyraki A (1997) Estimation of measurement uncertainty from field sampling: implications for the classification of contaminated land. Sci Total Environ 198(3):243–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(97)05456-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramsey MH, Boon KA (2012) Can in situ geochemical measurements be more fit-for-purpose than those made ex situ? Appl Geochem 27(5):969–976.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Available at: http://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
  37. Rodríguez Martín JA, Ramos-Miras JJ, Boluda R, Gil C (2013) Spatial relations of heavy metals in arable and greenhouse soils of a Mediterranean environment region (Spain). Geoderma 200:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rouillon M, Taylor MP (2016) Can field portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) produce high quality data for application in environmental contamination research? Environ Pollut 214:255–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rouillon M, Taylor MP, Dong C (2017) Reducing risk and increasing confidence of decision making at a lower cost: in-situ pXRF assessment of metal-contaminated sites. Environ Pollut 229:780–789.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sadys M, Strzelczak A, Grinn-Gofron A, Kennedy R (2015) Application of redundancy analysis for aerobiological data. Int J Biometeorol 59(1):25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0818-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schneider JF, Johnson D, Stoll N, Thurow K, Thurow K (1999) Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry characterization of arsenic contamination in soil at a German military site. J Process Anal Chem 4:12–17Google Scholar
  42. Sharma A, Weindorf DC, Man T, Aldabaa AAA, Chakraborty S (2014) Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 3. Soil reaction (pH). Geoderma 232-234:141–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharma A, Weindorf DC, Wang DD, Chakraborty S (2015) Characterizing soils via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 4. Cation exchange capacity (CEC). Geoderma 239–240:130–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Srek P, Hejcman M, Kunzova E (2010) Multivariate analysis of relationship between potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield, amount of applied elements, their concentrations in tubers and uptake in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Field Crop Res 118:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. State Environment Protection Administration of China (SEPAC) (2007) Environmental quality evaluation standard for farmland of greenhouse vegetables production (HJ 333-2006). Available at: http://kjs.mep.gov.cn/hjbhbz/bzwb/stzl/200611/W020111221530938739315
  46. Sungur A, Özcan H (2015) Chemometric and geochemical study of the heavy metal accumulation in the soils of a salt marsh area (Kavak Delta, NW Turkey). J Soils Sediments 15(2):323–331.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-1013-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swanhart S, Weindorf DC, Chakraborty S, Bakr N, Zhu YD (2014) Soil salinity measurement via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Soil Sci 179:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ulmanu M, Anger I, Gamenţ E, Mihalache M, Plopeanu G, Ilie L (2011) Rapid determination of some heavy metals in soil using an X-ray fluorescence portable instrument. Research Journal of Agricultural Science:235–241Google Scholar
  49. USEPA (2007) Method 6200: Field portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for the determination of elemental concentrations in soil and sediment.Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/6200.pdf
  50. Walkley A (1947) A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils—effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci 63(4):251–265.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194704000-00001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weindorf DC, Zhu YD, Chakraborty S, Bakr N, Huang B (2012) Use of portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for environmental quality assessment of peri-urban agriculture. Environ Monit Assess 184(1):217–227.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-1961-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weindorf DC, Herrero J, Castañeda C, Bakr N, Swanhart S (2013a) Direct soil gypsum quantification via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:2071–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weindorf DC, Paulette L, Man T (2013b) In-situ assessment of metal contamination via portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy: Zlatna, Romania. Environ Pollut 182:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weindorf DC, Bakr N, Zhu YD (2014) Advances in portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) for environmental, pedological, and agronomic applications. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy. Advances in Agronomy, Academic Press, Newark, pp 1–45Google Scholar
  55. Yan ZJ, Liu PP, Li YH, Ma L, Alva A, Dou ZX, Chen Q, Zhang FS (2013) Phosphorus in China's intensive vegetable production systems: overfertilization, soil enrichment, and environmental implications. J Environ Qual 42(4):982–989.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0463 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yu B, Song W, Lang Y (2017) Spatial patterns and driving forces of greenhouse land change in Shouguang City, China. Sustainability 9(3):359.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang CS (2006) Using multivariate analyses and GIS to identify pollutants and their spatial patterns in urban soils in Galway, Ireland. Environ Pollut 142(3):501–511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.10.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhao YC, Wang ZG, Sun WX, Huang B, Shi XZ, Ji JF (2010) Spatial interrelations and multi-scale sources of soil heavy metal variability in a typical urban-rural transition area in Yangtze River Delta region of China. Geoderma 156(3-4):216–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhu YD, Weindorf DC, Zhang WT (2011) Characterizing soils using a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer: 1. Soil texture Geoderma 167–168:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Soil Resources & Biotech Applications, Northwestern Bio-Agriculture Research CenterChinese Academy of SciencesXi’anChina
  3. 3.Xi’an Botanical Garden of Shaanxi ProvinceInstitute of Botany of Shaanxi ProvinceXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations