Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Removal of organic matter, nitrogen and faecal indicators from diluted anaerobically digested slurry using tidal flow constructed wetlands

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid implementation of anaerobic digestion for renewable energy production has resulted in increased generation of anaerobically digested slurry, which contains a variety of pollutants and therefore has the potential to cause serious environmental problems. Tidal flow constructed wetlands, which could generate beneficial oxygen conditions, were investigated for their success in removing nitrogen, organic matter and pathogens in anaerobically digested slurry. The results indicated that tidal operation had a positive effect on promoting NH4 +-N and organic matter (chemical oxygen demand (COD)) removal. With an average influent NH4 +-N concentration of 288 mg/L and COD concentration of 839 mg/L, the average removal efficiency reached up to 93% (325 g/m2 day) for NH4 +-N and 53% (603 g/m2 day) for COD, with total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) removal efficiency of 51% (226 g/m2 day). The nitrogen removal in the tidal-operated CWs is highly dependent on the flooded and drained (F/D) time ratio. Changing flooded time from 3 to 5 h enhanced denitrification (nitrite reductase-K (nirK) abundance) and further resulted in improved TIN removal efficiency of 62% (237 g/m2 day). The removal of faecal indicators was also examined, with reduction rate of approximately 0.9 log10 CFU/100 mL for both Escherichia coli and total coliforms, which was independent of the influent loadings and differing flooded/drained time ratio. Tidal flow CWs were demonstrated to have the high potential to treat diluted anaerobically digested slurry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin D, Nivala J (2009) Energy requirements for nitrification and biological nitrogen removal in engineered wetlands. Ecol Eng 35(2):184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appels L, Lauwers J, Degreve J, Helsen L, Lievens B, Willems K, Vanlmpe J, Dewil R (2011) Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: potential and research challenges. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(9):4295–4301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA, AWWA, WEF (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (1998). 20th edition. American Public Health Association. American Waterworks Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezbaruah AN, Zhang TC (2005) Quantification of oxygen release by bulrush (Scirpus validus) roots in a constructed treatment wetland. Biotechnol Bioeng 89(3):308–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brix H (1994) Use of constructed wetlands in water pollution control: historical development, present status, and future perspectives. Water Sci Technol 30(8):209–223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Wen Y, Zhou Q, Vymazal J (2014) Effects of plant biomass on denitrifying genes in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Bioresour Technol 157:341–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa R, Tavares C, Cossich E (2007) Stabilization of swine wastes by anaerobic digestion. Environ Technol 28(10):1145–1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daims H, Purkhold U, Bjerrum L, Arnold E, Wilderer P, Wagner M (2001) Nitrification in sequencing biofilm batch reactors: lessons from molecular approaches. Water Science & Technology 43(3):9–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz FJ, O’Geen AT, Dahlgren RA (2010) Efficacy of constructed wetlands for removal of bacterial contamination from agricultural return flows. Agric Water Manag 97(11):1813–1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong X, Reddy GB (2012) Ammonia-oxidizing bacterial community and nitrification rates in constructed wetlands treating swine wastewater. Ecol Eng 40:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng W (2012) Research progress on the processing technology of piggery wastewater [J]. Journal of Agricultural Catastrophology 1:013

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández A, Tejedor C, Chordi A (1992) Effect of different factors on the die-off of fecal bacteria in a stabilization pond purification plant. Water Res 26(8):1093–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo L, He K, Wu S, Sun H, Wang Y, Huang X, Dong R (2016) Optimization of high-rate TN removal in a novel constructed wetland integrated with microelectrolysis system treating high-strength digestate supernatant. J Environ Manag 178:42–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington C, Scholz M (2010) Assessment of pre-digested piggery wastewater treatment operations with surface flow integrated constructed wetland systems. Bioresour Technol 101(20):7713–7723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P (2009) The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour Technol 100(22):5478–5484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Zhao Y, Rymszewicz A (2014) Robust biological nitrogen removal by creating multiple tides in a single bed tidal flow constructed wetland. Sci Total Environ 470:1197–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Zhao Y, Zhao X, Kumar JL (2012) High rate nitrogen removal in an alum sludge-based intermittent aeration constructed wetland. Environmental science & technology 46(8):4583–4590

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec R, Wallace S (2009) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRCPress, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Langis R, Zalejko M, Zedler B,J (1991) Nitrogen assessments in a constructed and a natural salt marsh of San Diego Bay. Ecol Appl 1(1):40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Maniquiz MC, Kim L-H (2010) Characteristics of contaminants in water and sediment of a constructed wetland treating piggery wastewater effluent. J Environ Sci 22(6):940–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lv T, Wu S, Hong H, Chen L, Dong R (2013) Dynamics of nitrobenzene degradation and interactions with nitrogen transformations in laboratory-scale constructed wetlands. Bioresour Technol 133:529–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza Huaitalla R, Gallmann E, Xuejun L, Hartung E (2013) Aerial pollutants on a pig farm in peri-urban Beijing, China. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 6(1):36–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf EE, Eddy H (2003) Wastewater engineer treatment disposal, reuse. McGRaw, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivala J, Wallace S, Headley T, Kassa K, Brix H, Van Afferden M, Müller R (2013) Oxygen transfer and consumption in subsurface flow treatment wetlands. Ecol Eng 61:544–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasikala S, Tanaka N, Wah HW, Jinadasa K (2009) Effects of water level fluctuation on radial oxygen loss, root porosity, and nitrogen removal in subsurface vertical flow wetland mesocosms. Ecol Eng 35(3):410–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaglione D, Ficara E, Corbellini V, Tornotti G, Teli A, Canziani R, Malpei F (2015) Autotrophic nitrogen removal by a two-step SBR process applied to mixed agro-digestate. Bioresour Technol 176:98–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sim CH, Yusoff MK, Shutes B, Ho SC, Mansor M (2008) Nutrient removal in a pilot and full scale constructed wetland, Putrajaya city, Malaysia. J Environ Manag 88(2):307–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scatolini Sr, Zedler JB (1996) Epibenthic invertebrates of natural and constructed marshes of San Diego Bay. Wetlands 16:24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Zhao Y, Allen S (2005) Enhanced removal of organic matter and ammoniacal-nitrogen in a column experiment of tidal flow constructed wetland system. J Biotechnol 115(2):189–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner CC, Clayton JS, Upsdell MP (1995) Effect of loading rate and planting on treatment of dairy farm wastewaters in constructed wetlands—II. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Water Res 29(1):27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tunçsiper B, Ayaz SÇ, Akça L (2012) Coliform bacteria removal from septic wastewater in a pilot-scale combined constructed wetland system. Environ Eng Manag J 11(10):1873–1879

    Google Scholar 

  • Valiela I, Teal JM (1979) The nitrogen budget of a salt marsh ecosystem. Nature 280:652–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villamar CA, Cañuta T, Belmonte M, Vidal G (2012) Characterization of swine wastewater by toxicity identification evaluation methodology (TIE). Water Air Soil Pollut 223(1):363–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vymazal J (2007) Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380(1):48–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winward GP, Avery LM, Frazer-Williams R, Pidou M, Jeffrey P, Stephenson T, Jefferson B (2008) A study of the microbial quality of grey water and an evaluation of treatment technologies for reuse. Ecol Eng 32(2):187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Carvalho PN, Müller JA, Manoj VR, Dong R (2016) Sanitation in constructed wetlands: a review on the removal of human pathogens and fecal indicators. Sci Total Environ 541:8–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Wallace S, Brix H, Kuschk P, Kirui WK, Masi F, Dong R (2015) Treatment of industrial effluents in constructed wetlands: challenges, operational strategies and overall performance. Environ Pollut 201:107–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Zhang D, Austin D, Dong R, Pang C (2011) Evaluation of a lab-scale tidal flow constructed wetland performance: oxygen transfer capacity, organic matter and ammonium removal. Ecol Eng 37(11):1789–1795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Feng C, Wang Q, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Sugiura N (2011) Nitrate removal from groundwater by cooperating heterotrophic with autotrophic denitrification in a biofilm–electrode reactor. J Hazard Mater 192(3):1033–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Sun G, Lafferty C, Allen S (2004) Optimising the performance of a lab-scale tidal flow reed bed system treating agricultural wastewater. Water Science & Technology 50(8):65–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financed by grants from the project of “Beijing Nova Program (2015B083)”, “Beijing Science and Technology Council Funds (Z151100001115010 and D16110500600000)” and “National Key Technology R&D Program (2015BAD21B04)”. We likewise greatly appreciate the critical and constructive comments from the anonymous reviewers, which have helped improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shubiao Wu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Gerald Thouand

Luchen Guo and Tao Lv are co-first authors and contributed equally.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, L., Lv, T., He, K. et al. Removal of organic matter, nitrogen and faecal indicators from diluted anaerobically digested slurry using tidal flow constructed wetlands. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 5486–5496 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8297-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8297-2

Keywords

Navigation