Skip to main content
Log in

A Direct Methodology for Small Punch Creep Test

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small punch creep test (SPCT) has strong advantages in practice compared with traditional uniaxial creep test because a small sheet specimen (10 × 10 × 0.5 mm) can be obtained from in-service facilities or mechanical components without damage. In this paper, a novel investigation is proposed to directly interpret SPCT results in consideration of Chakrabarty’s membrane stretching theory, which features strain analysis on thin sheet material forced by large punch ball, and it is applied to derive equivalent strain and strain rate from SPCT results. Also, the Monkman-Grant model for evaluation of creep life is investigated by using equivalent strain and strain rate data obtained from the Chakrabarty’s membrane stretching theory. To validate this methodology, both uniaxial creep test and SPCT have been performed for STS 316L stainless steel at 650 °C. Displacement and time data in SPCT were converted into equivalent strain and strain rate. The Monkman-Grant models derived from two different creep tests show a great potential such that SPCT with the proposed methodology can be substituted for uniaxial creep test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tanaka N, Wicks R (2010) power generation from coal. IEA. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/power_generation_from_coal.pdf. Accessed October 2010

  2. American Society for Test and Materials (2006) ASTM E139-11: standard test methods for conducting creep, creep-rupture, and stress-rupture tests of metallic materials, book of standards, volume: 03.01

  3. Parker J, James J (1993) Disc-bend creep deformation behaviour of 0.5Cr0.5Mo0.25 V low alloy steel. 5th Int Conf Creep Fract Eng Mater Struct 651–660

  4. Manahan MP (1983) A new postirradiation mechanical behavior test—the miniaturized disk bend test. Nucl Technol 63:295–315

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chakrabarty J (1970) A theory of stretch forming over hemispherical punch heads. Int J Mech Sci 12(4):315–325. doi:10.1016/0020-7403(70)90085-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang Z, Wang Z-W (2003) Relationship between strain and central deflection in small punch creep specimens. Int J Press Vessel Pip 80(6):397–404. doi:10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00069-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen J, Ma YW, Yoon KB (2010) Finite element study for determination of material’s creep parameters from small punch test. J Mech Sci Technol 24(6):1195–1201. doi:10.1007/s12206-010-0327-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hyde TH, Stoyanov M, Sun W, Hyde CJ (2010) On the interpretation of results from small punch creep tests. J Strain Anal Eng Des 45(3):141–164. doi:10.1243/03093247JSA592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. CEN/WS (2005) Small punch test method for metallic materials part 1: a code of practice for small punch testing at elevated temperatures. Report No. CEN/WS 21

  10. Milička K, Dobeš F (2006) Small punch testing of P91 steel. Int J Press Vessel Pip 83:625–634. doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Y, Šturm R (2008) Determination of creep properties from small punch test. In: Proceedings of ASME pressure vessels and piping division conference, Chicago, Illinois, pp 739–750

  12. Alegre J, Cuesta I, Lorenzo M (2014) An extension of the monkman-grant model for the prediction of the creep rupture time using small punch tests. Exp Mech 54:1441–1451. doi:10.1007/s11340-014-9927-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhai PC, Chen G, Hashida T, Zhang QJ (2005) Evaluation on small punch creep test by finite element method. Key Eng Mater 297–300:377–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ling X, Zheng Y, You Y, Chen Y (2007) Creep damage in small punch creep specimens of type 304 stainless steel. Int J Press Vessel Pip 84:304–309. doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Evans M, Wang D (2008) The small punch creep test: some results from a numerical model. J Mater Sci 43:1825–1835. doi:10.1007/s10853-007-2388-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma YW, Yoon KB, Shim S (2009) Assessment of power law creep constants of Gr91 steel using small punch creep tests. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 32:951–960. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01394.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park TG, Shim SH, Yoon KB, Jang CH (2002) A study on parameters measured during small punch creep testing. Trans Korean Soc Mech Eng A 26(1):171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee JH, Oh SG, Lee JG, Kim MK, Kim BJ, Jang TK, Lim BS (2014) Analysis of the small punch creep test results according to the normalized lifetime fraction. Met Mater Int 20(5):835–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dymáček P, Milička K (2009) Creep small-punch testing and its numerical simulations. Mater Sci and Eng A 510–511:444–449. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2008.06.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Im JW (1998) The effect of prior aging on the creep behavior of STS 316. Thesis, Sungkyunkwan University

  21. Kim BJ, Cho NH, Kim MK, Lim BS (2011) Effect of friction coefficient on the small punch creep behavior of AISI 316L stainless steel. Korean J Met Mater 49:515–521. doi:10.3365/KJMM.2011.49.7.515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Monkman FC, Grant NJ (1956) An empirical relationship between rupture life and minimum creep rate in creep-rupture tests. 56:593–620

  23. Chakrabarty J (2010) Applied plasticity, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dunand D, Han B, Jansen A (1999) Monkman-grant analysis of creep fracture in dispersion-strengthened and particulate-reinforced aluminum. Metall Mater Trans A 30:829–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chakrabarty J (1998) Large deflections of a clamped circular plate pressed by a hemispherical-headed punch. Met Mater 4(4):680–684. doi:10.1007/BF03026380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mao X, Shoji T, Takahashi H (1987) Characterization of fracture behavior in small punch test by combined recrystallization-etch method and rigid plastic analysis. J Test Eval 15:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (No. 2011–0020024)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. K. Kim.

Appendices

Appendix

Meridional Equilibrium Equation [23]

In order to derive the meridional equilibrium equation, meridional components of the circumferential and meridional stress are used. The meridional components of meridional and circumferential stress are as follows, respectively,

$$ \left({\sigma}_{\phi } Trd\theta \right) \cos \frac{d\phi }{2}-\left\{\left({\sigma}_{\phi } Trd\theta \right)+\frac{\partial \left({\sigma}_{\phi } Trd\theta \right)}{\partial r}dr\right\} \cos \frac{d\phi }{2} $$
(A1)
$$ \left({\sigma}_{\theta } TRd\phi \right) \sin \frac{d\theta }{2} \sin \left(\frac{\pi }{2}-\left(\phi +\frac{d\phi }{2}\right)\right)+\left\{\left({\sigma}_{\theta } TRd\phi \right)+\frac{\partial \left({\sigma}_{\theta } TRd\phi \right)}{\partial \theta }d\theta \right\} \sin \frac{d\theta }{2} \sin \left(\frac{\pi }{2}-\left(\phi +\frac{d\phi }{2}\right)\right) $$
(A2)

Figure 11(a) shows all stress components of infinitesimal element on the spherical thin vessel. Figure 11(b) and (c) show direction of meridional stress and circumferential stress, respectively. As geometric condition, which is exactly spherical, R and r have the relationship like equations (1) and (2). Also, for small angle of and , \( \sin \frac{d\phi }{2} \) and \( \sin \frac{d\theta }{2} \) can be approximated to \( \frac{d\phi }{2} \) and \( \frac{d\theta }{2} \). Likewise, \( \cos \frac{d\phi }{2} \) and \( \cos \frac{d\theta }{2} \) are to be 0. Each stress component is tilted by \( \frac{d\phi }{2} \) and \( \frac{d\theta }{2} \), respectively, as shown in Fig. 11. The meridional stress is tilted by \( \frac{d\phi }{2} \) to the meridional direction while the circumferential stress is tiled by \( \frac{d\theta }{2} \) to the circumferential direction due to the curvature. Summation of equations (A1) and (A2) is equal to 0 because the element is in stress equilibrium state and, thus, the result of summation is like the left side of equation (3).

Normal Equilibrium Equation [23]

Normal equilibrium can be simply derived by manipulating of equations (A1) and (A2) because meridional direction is vertical to the normal direction, which is p direction. The normal component of meridional and circumferential stress is respectively as:

$$ \left({\sigma}_{\phi } Trd\theta \right) \sin \frac{d\phi }{2}-\left\{\left({\sigma}_{\phi } Trd\theta \right)+\frac{\partial \left({\sigma}_{\phi } Trd\theta \right)}{\partial r}dr\right\} \sin \frac{d\phi }{2} $$
(A3)
$$ \left({\sigma}_{\theta } TRd\phi \right) \sin \frac{d\theta }{2} \cos \left(\frac{\pi }{2}-\left(\phi +\frac{d\phi }{2}\right)\right)+\left\{\left({\sigma}_{\theta } TRd\phi \right)+\frac{\partial \left({\sigma}_{\theta } TRd\phi \right)}{\partial \theta }d\theta \right\} \sin \frac{d\theta }{2} \cos \left(\frac{\pi }{2}-\left(\phi +\frac{d\phi }{2}\right)\right) $$
(A4)

Summation of equations (A3) and (A4) is equal to pdϕRdθr and thus, the normal equilibrium is like the right side of equation (3).

Strain Derivation [23]

True strain calculation is derived as logarithmic expression,

$$ {\displaystyle \underset{l_0}{\overset{l}{\int }}}\frac{dx}{x}= \ln \frac{l}{l_0} $$
(A5)

Where l 0 is the initial length, and l is the final length. Using equation (A5), the circumferential strain can be considered change of hoop circumference like:

$$ \ln \frac{2\pi r}{2\pi {r}_0} $$
(A6)

Likewise, the meridional strain is regarded as that initial length dr 0 is changed to dr sec ϕ, and therefore, ε ϕ in equation (6) can be obtained. ε T in equation (6) is also simply calculated by thickness change, T 0 to T.

The Equivalent Strain Analysis Results

Punch displacement in Fig. 6 is converted to equivalent strain and strain rate. All graphs converted to equivalent strain and strain rate are shown in Figs. 12 and 13, one is for Al 2 O 3 punch ball and the other is for Si 3 N 4 punch ball.

Appendix

Fig. 11
figure 11

Stress state of infinitesimal element on the spherical thin vessel: (a) All stress components; (b) Meridional stress; (c) Circumferential stress

Fig. 12
figure 12

Equivalent strain and equivalent strain rate using Al 2 O 3 punch ball for four different load conditions: (a) 421.83 N; (b) 470.88 N; (c) 549.36 N; (d) 598.41 N

Fig. 13
figure 13

Equivalent strain and equivalent strain rate using Si 3 N 4 punch ball for four different load conditions: (a) 421.83 N; (b) 470.88 N; (c) 549.36 N; (d) 598.41 N

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, T., Ibupoto, F.A., Lee, J.H. et al. A Direct Methodology for Small Punch Creep Test. Exp Mech 56, 395–405 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0108-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0108-z

Keywords

Navigation