Skip to main content
Log in

Random Errors in Digital Image Correlation Due to Matched or Overmatched Shape Functions

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The random errors of subset-based digital image correlation due to the use of matched or overmatched shape functions are investigated. Governing formulations that can quantitatively predict these random errors are derived. Theoretical results reveal that all these random errors are in linear proportion to the noise level of the speckle images and inverse proportion to the sum of square of subset intensity gradients of the interrogated subsets. However, for matched or overmatched cases, zero-order and first-order shape functions give rise to the same magnitude of random errors, while the random errors induced by second-order shape functions are approximately twice that resulted from the regularly used first-order shape functions. The correctness of the derived theoretical formulations is verified using numerical tests, and also shows good accordance with previously reported experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pan B, Qian K, Xie H, Asundi A (2009) Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas Sci Technol 20(6):062001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pan B (2011) Recent progress in digital image correlation. Exp Mech 51:1223–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier H (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements: basic concepts, theory and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pan B, Wang B, Lubineau G, Moussawi A (2015) Comparison of subset-based local and finite-element based global digital image correlation. Exp Mech 55(5):887–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruck HA, McNeill SR, Sutton MA et al (1989) Digital image correlation using Newton–Raphson method of partial differential correction. Exp Mech 29(3):261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan B, Li K (2011) A fast digital image correlation method for deformation measurement. Opt Lasers Eng 49(7):841–847

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Pan B, Li K, Tong W (2013) Fast, robust and accurate DIC calculation without redundant computations. Exp Mech 53(7):1277–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan B, Tian L (2015) Superfast robust digital image correlation analysis using parallel computing. Opt Eng 54(3):034106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu H, Cary PD (2000) Deformation measurements by digital image correlation: implementation of a second-order displacement gradient. Exp Mech 40(4):393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao Y, Cheng T, Su Y et al (2014) High-efficiency and high-accuracy digital image correlation for three-dimensional measurement. Opt Lasers Eng 65:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bornert M, Brémand F, Doumalin P et al (2009) Assessment of digital image correlation measurement errors: methodology and results. Exp Mech 49(3):353–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Valle V, Hedan S, Cosenza P, Fauchille AL, Berdjane M (2015) Digital image correlation development for the study of materials including multiple crossing cracks. Exp Mech 55(2):379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schreier HW, Sutton MA (2002) Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions. Exp Mech 42(3):303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yaofeng S, Pang JHL (2007) Study of optimal subset size in digital image correlation of speckle pattern images. Opt Lasers Eng 45(9):967–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gates M, Gonzalez J, Lambros J et al (2014) Subset refinement for digital volume correlation: numerical and experimental applications. Exp Mech 55(1):245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu L, Pan B (2015) The errors in digital image correlation due to overmatched shape functions. Meas Sci Technol 26(4):045202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang ZY, Li HQ, Tong JW, Ruan JT (2007) Statistical analysis of the effect of intensity pattern noise on the displacement measurement precision of digital image correlation using self-correlated images. Exp Mech 47(5):701–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pan B, Xie H, Wang Z et al (2008) Study on subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. Opt Express 16(10):7037–7048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang YQ, Sutton MA, Bruck HA et al (2009) Quantitative error assessment in pattern matching: effects of intensity pattern noise, interpolation, strain and image contrast on motion measurements. Strain 45(2):160–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan B, Lu Z, Xie H (2010) Mean intensity gradient: an effective global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 48(4):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schreier HW, Braasch JR, Sutton MA (2000) Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation. Opt Eng 9(11):2915–2921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luu L, Wang Z, Vo M, Hoang T, Ma J (2011) Accuracy enhancement of digital image correlation with B-spline interpolation. Opt Lett 36:3070–3072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pan B (2013) Bias error reduction of digital image correlation using Gaussian pre-filtering. Opt Lasers Eng 51(10):1161–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pan B, Xie HM, Xu BQ, Dai FL (2006) Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation. Meas Sci Technol 17(6):1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reu PL (2011) Experimental and numerical methods for exact subpixel shifting. Exp Mech 51(4):443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolberg G, Sueyllam HM, Ismail MA et al (2000) One-dimensional resampling with inverse and forward mapping functions. J Graph Tools 5(3):11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 11272032, 11322220, and 11427802), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant no. NCET-12-0023), the Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy (Grant no. KF14032) and Beijing Nova Program (xx2014B034).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, B., Pan, B. Random Errors in Digital Image Correlation Due to Matched or Overmatched Shape Functions. Exp Mech 55, 1717–1727 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0080-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0080-7

Keywords

Navigation