Skip to main content
Log in

Recent Progress in Digital Image Correlation

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we report the following important progress recently made in the basic theory and practical implementation of digital image correlation (DIC) for deformation measurement. First, we answer a basic but confusing question to the users of DIC: what is a good speckle pattern for DIC? We present a simple, easy-to-compute yet effective global parameter, called mean intensity gradient, for quality assessment of the entire speckle pattern. Second, we provide an overview of various correlation criteria used in DIC for evaluating the similarity of the reference and deformed subsets, and demonstrate the equivalence of three robust and most widely used correlation criteria, i.e., a zero-mean normalized cross-correlation (ZNCC) criterion, a zero-mean normalized sum of squared difference (ZNSSD) criterion and a parametric zero-mean normalized sum of squared difference (PSSDab) criterion with two additional unknown parameters, which elegantly unifies these correlation criteria for subset-based pattern matching. Third, we describe an iterative least squares (ILS) algorithm for accurate subpixel motion detection, which is proved to be equivalent to the existing Newton–Raphson algorithm, but the principle and implementation of ILS algorithm is more straightforward and easier. Finally, to overcome the two limitations of existing subset-based DIC technique, we introduce a robust and generally applicable reliability-guided DIC technique, in which the calculation path is guided by the ZNCC coefficients of computed points, to determine the genuine full-field deformation of an object with complex shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pan B, Qian KM, Xie HM, Asundi A (2009) Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas Sci Technol 20:062001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier HW (2009) Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements. Springer

  3. Lecompte D, Smits A, Bossuyt S et al (2006) Quality assessment of speckle patterns for digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 44(11):1132–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haddadi H, Belhabib S (2008) Use of rigid-body motion for the investigation and estimation of the measurement errors related to digital image correlation technique. Opt Lasers Eng 46:185–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun YF, Pang HJ (2007) Study of optimal subset size in digital image correlation of speckle pattern images. Opt Lasers Eng 45:967–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giachetti A (2000) Matching techniques to compute image motion. Image Vis Comput 18:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tong W (2005) An evaluation of digital image correlation criteria for strain mapping applications. Strain 41(4):167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan B, Wang ZY, Xie HM (2009) Generalized spatial-gradient based digital image correlation for displacement and shape measurement with sub-pixel accuracy. J Strain Anal Eng Des 44:659–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pan B, Xie HM, Xu BQ, Dai FL (2006) Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation. Meas Sci Technol 17(6):1615–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jin HQ, Bruck HA (2005) Theoretical development for pointwise digital image correlation. Opt Eng 44:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng P, Sutton MA, Schreier HW, McNeill SR (2002) Full-field speckle pattern image correlation with B-spline deformation function. Exp Mech 42:344–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun Y, Pang JH, Wong CK, Su F (2005) Finite element formulation for a digital image correlation method. Appl Opt 44:7357–7363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Besnard G, Hild F, Roux S (2006) ‘Finite-element’ displacement fields analysis from digital images: application to Portevin-le chaterlier bands. Exp Mech 46:789–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pan B, Xie HM, Wang ZY, Qian KM, Wang ZY (2008) Study on subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. Opt Exp 16(10):7037–7048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang YQ, Sutton MA, Bruch HA, Schreier HW (2009) Quantitative error assessment in pattern matching: effects of intensity pattern noise, interpolation, strain and image contrast on motion measurement. Strain 45:160–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pan B, Lu ZX, Xie HM (2010) Mean intensity gradient: an effective global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation. Opt Lasers Eng 48(4):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pan B, Xie HM, Wang ZY (2010) Equivalence of digital image correlation criteria for pattern matching. Appl Opt 49:5501–5509

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pan B, Xie HM, Guo ZQ, Hua T (2007) Full-field strain measurement using a two-dimensional Savitzky-Golay digital differentiator in digital image correlation. Opt Eng 46(3):033601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruck HA, McNeil SR, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1989) Digital image correlation using newton-raphson method of partial differential correction. Exp Mech 29(3):261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vendroux G, Knauss WG (1998) Submicron deformation field measurements: Part 2. Improved digital image correlation. Exp Mech 38(2):86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu H, Cary PD (2000) Deformation measurement by digital image correlation: implementation of a second-order displacement gradient. Exp Mech 40(4):393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pan B, Asundi A, Xie HM, Gao JX (2009) Digital image correlation using iterative least squares and pointwise least squares for displacement field and strain field measurements. Opt Lasers Eng 47(7–8):865–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pan B (2009) Reliability-guided digital image correlation for image deformation measurement. Appl Opt 48(8):1535–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pan B, Wang ZY, Lu ZX (2010) Genuine full-field deformation measurement of an object with complex shape using reliability-guided digital image correlation. Opt Express 18(2):1011–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by “the National Natural Science Foundation of China (under grant 11002012)” and “the Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy” (under grant KF10041). I am grateful to Prof. Dongsheng Zhang of Shanghai University, China for kindly allowing the use of their experimental images and to Prof. Zhaoyang Wang of The Catholic University of America for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Pan.

Additional information

This paper is based on and modified from an original paper presented as a 40-minute invited talk at 2010 SEM Annual Conference.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pan, B. Recent Progress in Digital Image Correlation. Exp Mech 51, 1223–1235 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-010-9418-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-010-9418-3

Keywords

Navigation