Genetic control of growth and shoot phenology in juvenile loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) clonal trials

  • Tania Quesada
  • Liliana M. Parisi
  • Dudley A. Huber
  • Salvador A. Gezan
  • Timothy A. Martin
  • John M. Davis
  • Gary F. Peter
Original Article
  • 178 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Breeding

Abstract

Southern pine genetic improvement programs have selected for faster early growth which has often increased yields over unimproved material, and some of this improvement is likely attributable to variation in growth phenology among genotypes. However, the genetics of shoot growth phenology traits are not well characterized. Loblolly pine cuttings and seedlings from parents originating in the Atlantic coastal plain (ACP) and Florida and grown on sites established in Palatka, FL and Cuthbert, GA were assessed for shoot phenology and growth traits during the second year and for growth in year 6. Individual-tree clonal repeatability in different growth and shoot phenology traits varied from 0.09 to 0.79 in cuttings, and was lower in Palatka than Cuthbert. Non-additive components of heritability were lower, with a few exceptions, than additive effects. Additive and genotypic correlations across sites were high (>0.6) for all traits measured in cuttings and for most seedling traits, suggesting low genotype × environment interactions between these two sites. Compared with progeny from crosses between ACP parents, progeny of Florida parents started growth earlier in the season and ended later. Strong genetic correlations were observed between second-year phenology traits and sixth-year height and diameter. This suggests some two-year traits could be useful for early selection of high-performing genotypes.

Keywords

Clones Cuttings Dominance Non-additive effects Genetic correlations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present work was funded by the Forest Biology Research Cooperative, the Cooperative Forest Genetic Research Program, and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Coordinated Agricultural Project Award #2011-68002-30185. In addition, financial support to L.M.P. was provided by the Fulbright-Bunge and Born fellowship and the National Institute of Agriculture Technology (INTA) of Argentina. The authors further acknowledge Greg Powell and Fabian Hergenreder who took the measurements during the second growth season, as well as Plum Creek Timber Company and Mead Westvaco Corporation for providing the land and general management for the study sites in Palatka and Cuthbert, respectively, and for providing the measurements from the sixth growth season. Finally, the authors would like to thank Ronald Lanner for his guidance and feedback on shoot terminology, as well as the reviewers for their suggestions to improve this manuscript.

Data archiving statement

The data is included as supplementary material in this manuscript.

Supplementary material

11295_2017_1143_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (1.9 mb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 1912 kb)
11295_2017_1143_MOESM2_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Table S1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Adams JP, Matney TG, Land SB, Belli KL, Duzan HW (2006) Incorporating genetic parameters into a loblolly pine growth-and-yield model. Can J For Res 36:1959–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey DB, Feret PP (1982) Short note: shoot elongation in Pinus rigida x taeda hybrids. Silvae Genetica 31:209–212Google Scholar
  3. Balocchi CE, Bridgwater FE, Zobel BJ, Jahromi S (1993) Age trends in genetic parameters for tree height in a nonselected population of loblolly pine. For Sci 39:231–251Google Scholar
  4. Baltunis BS, Huber DA, White TL, Goldfarb B, Stelzer HE (2005) Genetic effects of rooting loblolly pine stem cuttings from a partial diallel mating design. Can J For Res 35:1098–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltunis BS, Huber DA, White TL, Goldfarb B, Stelzer HE (2007) Genetic gain from selection for rooting ability and early growth in vegetatively propagated clones of loblolly pine. Tree Genet Genomes 3:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baltunis BS, Huber DA, White TL, Goldfarb B, Stelzer HE (2006) Genetic analysis of early field growth of loblolly pine clones and seedlings from the same full-sib families. Can J For Res 37:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borders BR, Bailey RL (2001) Loblolly pine—pushing the limits of growth. South J Appl For 25:69–74Google Scholar
  8. Boyer WD (1970) Shoot growth patterns of young loblolly pine. For Sci 16:472–482Google Scholar
  9. Bridgwater FE, McKeand SE (1997) Early family evaluation for growth of loblolly pine. For Genet 4:51–58Google Scholar
  10. Bridgwater FE, Talbert JT, Jahromi S (1983) Index selection for increased dry weight in a young loblolly pine population. Silvae Genetica 32:157–161Google Scholar
  11. Burdon RD (1977) Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genetica 26:168–175Google Scholar
  12. Chmura DJ, Tjoelker MG (2008) Leaf traits in relation to crown development, light interception and growth of elite families of loblolly and slash pine. Tree Physiol 28:729–742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Comstock RE, Moll RH (1963) Genotype—environment interactions. In: Hanson W, Robinson H (eds) Statistical genetics and plant breeding: a symposium and workshop. National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp 164–194Google Scholar
  14. Cornelius J (1994) Heritabilities and additive genetic coefficients of variation in forest trees. Can J For Res 24:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorado FC, Dieguez-Aranda U, Anta MB, Rodriguez MS, von Gadow K (2006) A generalized height-diameter model including random components for radiata pine plantations in northwestern Spain. For Ecol Manag 229:202–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dougherty PM, Whitehead D, Vose JM (1994) Environmental influences on the phenology of pine. In: Gholz H, Linder S, McMurtrie R (eds) Ecological bulletins, 43, Environmental Constraints on the Structure and Productivity of Pine Forest Ecosystems. Wiley, Copenhagen, pp 64–75Google Scholar
  17. Emhart VI, Martin TA, White TL, Huber DA (2006) Genetic variation in basal area increment phenology and its correlation with growth rate in loblolly and slash pine families and clones. Can J For Res 36:961–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emhart VI, Martin TA, White TL, Huber DA (2007) Clonal variation in crown structure, absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and growth of loblolly pine and slash pine. Tree Physiol 27:421–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredericksen TS, Allen HL, Wentworth TR (1991) Competing vegetation and pine growth response to silvicultural treatments in a six-year-old Piedmont loblolly pine plantation. South J Appl For 15:138–144Google Scholar
  20. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2009) ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSNInternational Ltd., Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
  21. Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Wheeler NC, Ersoz E, Nelson CD, Neale DB (2007) Association genetics in Pinus taeda L. I. Wood property traits. Genetics 175:399–409CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Green DS (2007) Controls of growth phenology vary in seedlings of three, co-occurring ecologically distinct northern conifers. Tree Physiol 27:1197–1205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gwaze DP, Bridgwater FE, Byram TD, Lowe WJ (2001) Genetic parameter estimates for growth and wood density in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) For Genet 8:47–55Google Scholar
  24. Gwaze DP, Bridgwater FE, Byram TD, Woolliams JA, Williams CG (2000) Predicting age-age genetic correlations in tree-breeding programs: a case study of Pinus taeda L. Theor Appl Genet 100:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gwaze DP, Bridgwater FE, Williams CG (2002a) Genetic analysis of growth curves for a woody perennial species, Pinus taeda L. Theor Appl Genet 105:526–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gwaze DP, Harding KJ, Purnell RC, Bridgwater FE (2002b) Optimum selection age for wood density in loblolly pine. Can J For Res 32:1393–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanninen H, Tanino K (2011) Tree seasonality in a warming climate. Trends Plant Sci 16:412–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hendry LC, Gholz HL (1986) Above ground phenology in North Florida slash pine plantations. Forensic Sci 32(3):779–788Google Scholar
  29. Hodge GR, White TL (1992) Genetic parameter estimates for growth traits at different ages in slash pine and some implications for breeding. Silvae Genetica 41:252–262Google Scholar
  30. Hook DD, McKee WH Jr, Askew JL (1983) Responses of loblolly pine (mesophyte) and swamp tupelo (hydrophyte) seedlings to soil flooding and phosphorus. Plant Soil 71:387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Isik F, Whetten RW, Zapata-Valenzuela J, Ogut F, McKeand SE (2011) Genomic selection in loblolly pine—from lab to field. BMC Proc 5:I8CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Jayawickrama KJS, McKeand SE, Jett JB (1998) Phenological variation in height and diameter growth in provenances and families of loblolly pine. New For 16:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaya Z (1993) Genetic variation in shoot growth components and their correlations in Psuedotsuga menziesii var menziesii seedlings. Scand J For Res 8:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaya Z, Sewell MM, Neale DB (1999) Identification of quantitative trait loci influencing annual height- and diameter-increment growth in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) Theor Appl Genet 98:586–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kayihan GC, Huber DA, Morse AM, White TL, Davis JM (2005) Genetic dissection of fusiform rust and pitch canker disease traits in loblolly pine. Theor Appl Genet 110:948–958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kayihan GC, Nelson CD, Huber DA, Amerson HV, White TL, Davis JM (2010) Clonal evaluation for fusiform rust disease resistance: effects of pathogen virulence and disease escape. Can J For Res 40:1042–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kremer A (1981) Déterminisme génétique de la croissance en hauteur du Pin maritime (Pinus pinaster Ait). Ann For Sci 38:199–122Google Scholar
  38. Kremer A (1992) Predictions of age-age correlations of total height based on serial correlations between height increments in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait). Theor Appl Genet 85:152–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kremer A, Lascoux DM (1988) Genetic architecture of height growth in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) Silvae Genetica 37:1–8Google Scholar
  40. Kumar S, Lee J (2002) Age-age correlations and early selection for end-of-rotation wood density in radiata pine. For Genet 9:323–330Google Scholar
  41. Lester DT, Barr GR (1966) Shoot elongation in provenance and progeny tests of red pine. Silvae Genetica 15:1–6Google Scholar
  42. Li B, McKeand SE, Allen HL (1991) Seedling shoot growth of loblolly pine families under 2 nitrogen levels as related to 12-year height. Can J For Res 21:842–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li B, McKeand SE, Weir R (1999) Tree improvement and sustainable forestry—impact of two cycles of loblolly pine breeding in the U.S.A. For Genet 6:229–234Google Scholar
  44. Li P, Adams WT (1993) Genetic control of bud phenology in pole-size trees and seedlings of coastal Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 23:1043–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li X (2009) Breeding for improved growth, wood quality, and chemistry for southern pines by combining quantitative genetics and association mapping. Forest Resources and Conservation. University of Florida, Gainesville, p 174Google Scholar
  46. Magnussen S, Yeatman CW (1989) Height growth components in inter- and intra-provenance jack pine families. Can J For Res 19:962–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCrady RL, Jokela EJ (1996) Growth phenology and crown structure of selected loblolly pine families planted at two spacings. For Sci 42:46–57Google Scholar
  48. McGarvey RC, Martin TA, White TL (2004) Integrating within-crown variation in net photosynthesis in loblolly and slash pine families. Tree Physiol 24:1209–1220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Mirov NT, Duffield JW, Liddicoet AR (1952) Altitudinal races of Pinus ponderosa—a 12-year progress report. J For 50:825–831Google Scholar
  50. Monroe KW (2007) Soil survey of Randolph County, Georgia. In: United States Department of Agriculture NRCS (ed) United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., p 289Google Scholar
  51. Mrode RA (2005) Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values, 2nd edn. CABI Publishing, OxfordshireCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Munoz PR, Resende MFR, Huber DA, Quesada T, Resende MDV, Neale DV, Wegrzyn JL, Kirst M, Peter GF (2014) Genomic relationship matrix for correcting pedigree errors in breeding populations: impact on genetic parameters and genomic selection accuracy. Crop Sci 54(3):1115–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nikinmaa E, Messier C, Sievanen R, Perttunen J, Lehtonen M (2003) Shoot growth and crown development: effect of crown position in three-dimensional simulations. Tree Physiol 23:129–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Notivol E, Garcia-Gil MR, Alia R, Savolainen O (2007) Genetic variation of growth rhythm traits in the limits of a latitudinal cline in Scots pine. Can J For Res 37:540–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Parisi LM (2006) Shoot elongation patterns and genetic control of second year height growth in Pinus taeda L. using clonally replicated trials. Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, p 93Google Scholar
  56. Pelgas B, Bousquet J, Meirmans PG, Ritland K, Isabel N (2011) QTL mapping in white spruce: gene maps and genomic regions underlying adaptive traits across pedigrees, years and environments. BMC Genomics 12Google Scholar
  57. Perry TO, Chi-Wu W, Schmitt D (1966) Height growth for loblolly pine provenances in relation for photoperiod and growing season. Silvae Genetica 15:61–64Google Scholar
  58. Quesada T, Gopal V, Cumbie WP, Eckert AJ, Wegrzyn JL, Neale DB, Goldfarb B, Huber DA, Casella G, Davis JM (2010) Association mapping of quantitative disease resistance in a natural population of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) Genetics 186:677–686CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Readle EL (1990) Soil survey of Putnam County area, Florida. In: United States Department of Agriculture SCS (ed) United States Department of Agriculture, p 235Google Scholar
  60. Resende MF, Munoz P, Resende MD, Garrick DJ, Fernando RL, Davis JM, Jokela EJ, Martin TA, Peter GF, Kirst M (2012) Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) Genetics 190:1503CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Riemenschneider DE (1981) Height and seasonal growth pattern of jack pine full-sib families. In: Guries RP (ed) Proceedings of the second north central tree improvement conference. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, pp 174–158Google Scholar
  62. Rossi S, Anfodillo T, Cufar K, Cuny HE, Deslauriers A, Fonti P, Frank D, Gricar J, Gruber A, King GM, Krause C, Morin H, Oberhuber W, Prislan P, Rathgeber CB (2013) A meta-analysis of cambium phenology and growth: linear and non-linear patterns in conifers of the northern hemisphere. Ann Bot 112:1911–1920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Rossi S, Morin H, Deslauriers A (2012) Causes and correlations in cambium phenology: towards an integrated framework of xylogenesis. J Exp Bot 63:2117–2126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Rötzer T, Grote R, Pretzsch H (2004) The timing of bud burst and its effect on tree growth. Int J Biometeorol 48:109–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Royce EB, Barbour MG (2001) Mediterranean climate effects. II. Conifer growth phenology across a Sierra Nevada ecotone. Am J Bot 88:919–932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Rweyongeza DM, Yeh FC, Dhir NK (2003) Genetic variation in stem growth components in white spruce seedlings and its implications to retrospective early selection. For Genet 10:299–308Google Scholar
  67. SAS Institute Inc (2011) Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
  68. Schmidtling RC (1994) Use of provenance tests to predict response to climate change: loblolly pine and Norway spruce. Tree Physiol 14:805–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Schultz RP (1999) Loblolly—the pine for the twenty-first century. New For 17:71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith CK, White TL, Hodge GR, Duryea ML, Long AJ (1993) Genetic variation in 1st year slash pine shoot components and their relationship to mature field performance. Can J For Res 23:1557–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sprinz PT, Burkhart HE (1987) Relationships between tree crown, stem, and stand characteristics in unthinned loblolly pine plantations. Can J For Res 17:534–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. St Clair JB, Mandel NL, Vance-Borland KW (2005) Genecology of Douglas fir in western Oregon and Washington. Ann Bot 96:1199–1214CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Sweet GB, Bollmann MP (1976) The terminology of pine shoot growth. N Z J For Sci 6(3):393–396Google Scholar
  74. Tepper B (1963) Leader growth of young pitch and shortleaf pines. For Sci 9:344–353Google Scholar
  75. Van Den Berg DA, Lanner RM (1971) Bud development in lodgepole pine. For Sci 17:479–486Google Scholar
  76. Vargas-Hernandez J, Adams WT (1992) Age-age correlations and early selection for wood density in young coastal Douglas-fir. For Sci 38:467–478Google Scholar
  77. Vergara R, White TL, Huber DA, Shiver BD, Rockwood DL (2004) Estimated realized gains for first-generation slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii) tree improvement in the southeastern United States. Can J For Res 34:2587–2600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Way DA (2011) Tree phenology responses to warming: spring forward, fall back? Tree Physiol 31:469–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. White TL, Ching KK, Walters J (1979) Effects of provenance, years, and planting location on bud burst of Douglas-fir. For Sci 25:161–167Google Scholar
  80. Wu RL (1994) Quantitative genetics of yield breeding for Populus short rotation culture. II. Genetic determination and expected selection response of tree geometry. Can J For Res 24:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wu R, Stettler RF (1994) Quantitative genetics of growth and development in Populus. I. A three-generation comparison of tree architecture during the first 2 years of growth. Theor Appl Genet 89:1046–1054CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tania Quesada
    • 1
  • Liliana M. Parisi
    • 1
  • Dudley A. Huber
    • 1
  • Salvador A. Gezan
    • 1
  • Timothy A. Martin
    • 1
  • John M. Davis
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Gary F. Peter
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Forest Resources and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology ProgramUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Genetics InstituteUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations