Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Benchmarking Practical RRM Algorithms for D2D Communications in LTE Advanced

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Device-to-device (D2D) communication integrated into cellular networks is an advanced tool to take advantage of the proximity of devices and allow for reusing cellular resources and thereby to increase the user bitrates and the system capacity. However, the introduction of D2D in legacy long term evolution (LTE) cellular spectrum requires to revisit and modify the existing radio resource management and power control (PC) techniques in order to fully realize the potential of the proximity and reuse gains and to limit the interference to the cellular layer. In this paper, we examine the performance of the legacy LTE PC tool box and benchmark it against an utility optimal iterative scheme. We find that the open loop PC scheme of LTE performs well for cellular users both in terms of the used transmit power levels and the achieved signal-to-interference-and-noise-ratio distribution. However, the performance of the D2D users as well as the overall system throughput can be boosted by the utility optimal scheme, by taking better advantage of both the proximity and the reuse gains. Therefore, in this paper we propose a hybrid PC scheme, in which cellular users employ the legacy LTE open loop PC, while D2D users exploits the utility optimizing distributed PC scheme. We also recognize that the hybrid scheme is not only nearly optimal, and can balance between spectral and energy efficiency, but it also allows for a distributed implementation at the D2D users, while preserving the LTE PC scheme for the cellular users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that (2) is valid only in the case when a \(\gamma ^{tgt}\) value exists.

  2. We assume that the G matrix is obtained after Layer-1 filtering, that is typically used for open loop power control, mobility management and other purposes in LTE [31].

  3. We draw a box around equations that need to be implemented by a receiver or transmitter node, as will be summarized in Fig. 3.

  4. We note that BRA can be made completely distributed by skipping the usage of \(\rho _j\) in the algorithm. Simulation results (not shown here) indicate that the impact of skipping \(\rho _j\) in BRA is not significant.

References

  1. Janis, P., Yu, C.-H., Doppler, K., Ribeiro, C., Wijting, C., Hugl, K., et al. (2009). Device-to-device communication underlaying cellular communications systems. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 2(3), 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Doppler, K., Rinne, M., Wijting, C., Riberio, C. B., & Hugl, K. (2009). D2D communications underlaying an lte cellular network. IEEE Communications Magazine, 7(12), 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fodor, G., Dahlman, E., Parkvall, S., Mildh, G., Reider, N., Miklos, G., & Turanyi, Z. (2012). Design aspects of cellular network assisted device-to-device communications. IEEE Communication Magazine, 50(3), 170–177.

  4. Belleschi, M., Fodor, G., & Abrardo, A. (2011). Performance analysis of a distributed resource allocation scheme for D2D communications. In: IEEE workshop on machine-to-machine communications. IEEE.

  5. Reider, N., & Fodor, G. (2011). A distributed power control scheme for cellular network assisted D2D communications. In: IEEE Globecom. Houston, TX, USA, December 5–9, 2011.

  6. Reider, N., & Fodor, G. (2012). A distributed power control and mode selection algorithm for D2D communications. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2012, 266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Corson, M. S., Laroia, R., Li, J., Park, V., Richardson, T., & Tsirtsis, G. (2010). Toward proximity-aware internetworking. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(6), 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ericsson. (2012). RWS-120003 LTE release 12 and beyond. 3GPP Radio Access Network Workshop on Release 12 and Onwards, Ljubljana, Slovenia, http://www.3gpp.org/news-events/3gpp-news/1266-Future-Radio-in-3GPP.

  9. Zheng, K., Hu, F., Wang, W., Xiang, W., & Dohler, M. (2012). Radio resource allocation in LTE-advanced cellular networks with M2M communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50.

  10. Baldemair, R., Dahlman, E., Fodor, G., Mildh, G., Parkvall, S., Selen, Y., et al. (2013). Evolving wireless communications: Addressing the challenges and expectations of the future. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 8(1), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peng, T., Lu, Q., Wang, H., Xu, S., & Wang, W. (2009). Interference avoidance mechanisms in the hybrid cellular and device-to-device systems. In IEEE 20th international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (pp. 617–621).

  12. Janis, P., Koivunen, V., Ribeiro, C., Korhonen, J., Doppler, K., & Hugl, K. (2009). Interference-aware resource allocation for device-to-device radio underlaying cellular networks. In IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC) Spring. IEEE.

  13. Min, H., Lee, J., Park, S., & Hong, D. (2011). Capacity enhancement using an interference limited area for device-to-device uplink underlaying cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(12), 3995–4000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Min, H., Seo, W., Lee, J., Park, S., & Hong, D. (2011). Reliability improvement using receive mode selection in the device-to-device uplink period underlaying cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(2), 413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao, X., Tao, X., & Lu, J. (2011). A QoS-aware power optimization scheme in OFDMA systems with integrated device-to-device (D2D) communications. In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC) Fall. IEEE.

  16. Gu, J., Bae, S. J., Choi, B.-G., & Chung, M. Y. (2011). Dynamic power control mechanism for interference coordination of device-to-device communication in cellular networks. In Third international conference on ubiquitous and future networks (ICUFN) (pp. 71–75). IEEE.

  17. Doppler, K., Yu, C. H., Ribeiro, C. B., & Janis, P. (2010). Mode selection for device-to-device communication underlaying an lte-advanced network. In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) (pp. 1–6).

  18. Hakola, S., Chen, T., Lehtomaki, J., & Koskela, T. (2010). Device-to-device (D2D) communication in cellular network: Performance analysis of optimum and practical communication mode selection. In IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC). IEEE.

  19. Fodor, G., & Redier, N. (2011). A distributed power control and mode selection scheme for device-to-device communications. In IEEE Globecom. IEEE.

  20. Wang, B., Chen, L., Chen, X., Zhang, X., & Yang, D. (2011). Resource allocation optimization for device-to-device communication underlaying cellular networks. In IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC) Spring. IEEE.

  21. Yu, C.-H., Doppler, K., Riberio, C. B., & Tirkkonen, O. (2011). Resource sharing optimization for device-to-device communication underlaying cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(8), 2752–2763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Racz, S., Telek, M., & Fodor, G. (2001). Link capacity sharing between guaranteed and best effort services on an ATM transmission link under GoS constraints. Telecommunication Systems, 17(1–2), 93–114.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Janis, P., Koivunen, V., Ribeiro, C. B., Doppler, K., & Hugl, K. (2009). Interference-avoiding MIMO schemes for device-to-device radio underlaying cellular networks. In IEEE 20th international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (pp. 2385–2389).

  24. Yu, C. H., Tirkkonen, O., Doppler, K., & Ribeiro, C. (2009). Power optimization of device-to-device communication underlaying cellular communication. In IEEE international conference on communications ICC’09 (pp. 1–5).

  25. Xing, H., & Hakola, S. (2010). The investigation of power control schemes for a device-to-device communication integrated into OFDMA cellular system. In IEEE 21st international symposium on personal indoor and mobile radio communications. IEEE.

  26. Lee, N., Lin, X., Andrews, J., & Heath, R. (2014). Power control for D2D underlaid cellular networks: Modeling, algorithms and analysis. arXiv:1305.6161 [cs.IT].

  27. Soldati, P., & Johansson, M. (2009). An optimal and distributed cross-layer design with time-scale separation in MANETs. Royal Insstitute of Technology, TR, TRITA-EE, 2009, 008.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yu, C. H., Tirkkonen, O., Doppler, K., & Ribeiro, C. (2009). On the performance of device-to-device underlay communication with simple power control. In IEEE 69th vehicular technology conference VTC Spring (pp. 1–5).

  29. Fodor, G., Penda, D. D., Belleschi, M., Johansson, M., & Abrardo, A. (2013). A comparative study of power control approaches for device-to-device communications. In IEEE international conference on communications (ICC). IEEE.

  30. Pradini, A., Fodor, G., Miao, G., & Belleschi, M. (2014). Near optimal practical power control schemes for D2D communications in cellular networks. In European conference on networks and communications (EuCNC), Bologna, Italy, June 23–26, 2014.

  31. Simonsson, A., & Furuskär, A. (2007). Uplink power control in LTE: Overview and performance. In IEEE vehicular technology conference Spring. IEEE.

  32. 3GPP (2007). Uplink power control for E-UTRA. R1–074850, RAN WG1, Jeju, Korea.

  33. Kelly, F. P., Maulloo, A. K., & Tan, D. K. H. (1998). Rate control for communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability. Journal of the Operation Research Society, 49(3), 237–252.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Chiang, M. (2005). Balancing transport and physical layers in wireless multihop networks: Jointly optimal congestion control and power control. IEEE JSAC, 23(1), 104–116.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Papandriopoulos, J., Dey, S., & Evans, J. (2006). Optimal and distributed protocols for cross-layer design of physical and transport layers in MANETs. IEEE Transactions of Networking, 3(2), 333.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Belleschi, M., Balucanti, L., Soldati, P., Johansson, M., & Abrardo, A. (2009). Fast power control for cross-layer optimal resource allocation in DS-CDMA wireless networks. In IEEE international conference on communications. IEEE.

  37. Zander, J. (1992). Distributed cochannel interference control in cellular radio systems. IEEE Transactions of Vehicular Technology, 3(2), 333.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Belleschi, M., Detti, P., & Abrardo, A. (2011). Complexity analysis and heuristic algorithms for radio resource allocation in OFDMA networks. In IEEE ICT, Ayia Napa, Cyprus.

  39. Fodor, G., & Racz, A. (2002). Link-level flow control method for an ATM server. US Patent 6438104.

  40. Fodor, G., Telek, M., & Racz, S. (2004). Link capacity sharing for throughput-blocking optimality. US Patent 6788646.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Belleschi.

Additional information

The work of G. Fodor has been partially performed in the framework of the FP7 project ITC 317669 METIS. G. Fodor has also been supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research Strategic Mobility SM13-0008 Matthew Project.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Derivation of Inequality (24)

Constraints in Problem (23) can be elaborated by appealing to the definition of matrix \(\mathbf {H}^T\) in Eq. (21) as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf {H}^T \varvec{\lambda }^{\mathrm{(LP)}}&\succeq - \omega \mathbf {1} \nonumber \\ \sum _k h_{kl} \lambda _k^{\mathrm{(LP)}}&\ge - \omega , \quad \forall l; \nonumber \\ -h_{ll} \lambda _l^{\mathrm{(LP)}} + \displaystyle \sum _{k\ne l} h_{kl} \lambda _k^{\mathrm{(LP)}}&\ge - \omega , \quad \forall l\\ \frac{\lambda _l^{\mathrm{(LP)}}}{\omega } - \displaystyle \sum _{k\ne l} \frac{G_{kl}}{G_{kk}} \gamma _k^{tgt} \frac{ \lambda _k^{\mathrm{(LP)}}}{\omega }&\le 1 ,\quad \forall l. \end{aligned}$$

Appendix 2: Derivation of Inequality (26)

Inequality (26) can be derived by appealing to Eq. (25) as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\lambda _l^{\mathrm{(LP)}}}{\omega } - \displaystyle \sum _{k\ne l} \frac{G_{kl}}{G_{kk}} \gamma _k^{tgt} \frac{\lambda _k^{\mathrm{(LP)}}}{\omega }&\le 1\\ \frac{\lambda _l^{\mathrm{(LP)}}}{\omega } \frac{\gamma _l^{tgt} \sigma _l}{G_{ll}} \frac{G_{ll}}{\gamma _l^{tgt} \sigma _l } - \displaystyle \sum _{k\ne l} \frac{G_{kl}}{G_{kk}} \gamma _k^{tgt} \frac{\lambda _k^{\mathrm{(LP)}}}{\omega } \frac{\sigma _k}{\sigma _k}&\le 1\\ \frac{\mu _l G_{ll}}{\gamma _l^{tgt} \sigma _l}&\le \displaystyle \sum _{k\ne l} \frac{G_{kl}}{\sigma _k}\mu _k +1\\ \gamma _l^{cc} (\varvec{\mu }) \triangleq \frac{\mu _l G_{ll}}{\sigma _l + \sum _{k\ne l} G_{kl} \frac{\sigma _l}{\sigma _k}\mu _k}&\le \gamma _l^{tgt}, \quad \forall l. \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Belleschi, M., Fodor, G., Penda, D.D. et al. Benchmarking Practical RRM Algorithms for D2D Communications in LTE Advanced. Wireless Pers Commun 82, 883–910 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-2258-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-2258-1

Keywords

Navigation