Abstract
Membrane lipid unsaturation index and membrane fluidity have been related to yeast ethanol stress tolerance in published studies, however findings have been inconsistent. In this study, viability reduction on exposure to 18% (v/v) ethanol was compared to membrane fluidity determined by laurdan generalized polarization. Furthermore, in the determination of viability reduction, we examined the effectiveness of two methods, namely total plate count and methylene violet staining. We found a strong negative correlation between ethanol tolerance and membrane fluidity, indicated by negative Pearson correlation coefficients of − 0.79, − 0.65 and − 0.69 for Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains A12, PDM and K7, respectively. We found that lower membrane fluidity leads to higher ethanol tolerance, as indicated by decreased viability reduction and higher laurdan generalized polarization in respiratory phase compared to respiro-fermentative phase cells. Total plate count better differentiated ethanol tolerance of yeast cells in different growth phases, while methylene violet staining was better to differentiate ethanol tolerance of the different yeast strains at a particular culture phase. Hence, both viability assessment methods have their own advantages and limitations, which should be considered when comparing stress tolerance in different situations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexandre H, Berlot JP, Charpentier C (1994a) Effect of ethanol on membrane fluidity of proptoplast from Saccharomyces cereviseae and Kloeckera apiculata grown with or without ethanol, measured by fluorescence anisotropy. Biotechnol Tech 8(5):295–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428970
Alexandre H, Rousseaux I, Charpentier C (1994b) Relationship between ethanol tolerance, lipid composition and plasma membrane fluidity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kloeckera apiculata. FEMS Microbiol Lett 124(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07255.x
Butcher BA (2008) Yeast adaptation mechanisms. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba
Chi Z, Arneborg N (2000) Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with different degrees of ethanol tolerance exhibit different adaptive responses to produced ethanol. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 24(1):75–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.2900769
Chi Z, Kohlwein S, Paltauf F (1999) Role of phosphatidylinositol (PI) in ethanol production and ethanol tolerance by a high ethanol producing yeast. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 22(1):58–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.2900603
Dinh TN, Nagahisa K, Hirasawa T, Furusawa C, Shimizu H (2008) Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells to high ethanol concentration and changes in fatty acid composition of membrane and cell size. PLoS ONE 3(7):e2623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002623
Dong S-J, Yi C-F, Li H (2015) Changes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell membrane components and promotion to ethanol tolerance during the bioethanol fermentation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 69:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2015.10.025
Fajardo VA, McMeekin L, LeBlanc PJ (2011) Influence of phospholipid species on membrane fluidity: a meta-analysis for a novel phospholipid fluidity index. J Membr Biol 244(2):97–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-011-9401-7
Henderson CM, Block DE (2014) Examining the role of membrane lipid composition in determining the ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(10):2966–2972. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04151-13
Kajiwara S, Suga K, Sone H, Nakamura K (2000) Improved ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains by increases in fatty acid unsaturation via metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Lett 22:1839–1843. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005632522620
Krause EL, Villa-Garca MJ, Henry SA, Walker LP (2007) Determining the effects of inositol supplementation and the opi1 mutation on ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ind Biotechnol 3(3):260–268. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2007.3.260
Learmonth RP (2012) Membrane fluidity in yeast adaptation—insights from fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy. In: Geddes CD (ed) Reviews in fluorescence 2010. Springer, New York, pp 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9828-6_4
Learmonth RP, Gratton E (2002) Assessment of membrane fluidity in individual yeast cells by laurdan generalised polarisation and multi-photon scanning fluorescence microscopy. In: Kraayenhof R, Visser AJWG, Gerritsen HC (eds) Fluorescence spectroscopy, imaging and probes: new tools in chemical, physical and life sciences. Springer series on fluorescence: methods and applications. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56067-5_14
Lewis JG (1993) Physiological aspects of stress tolerance in baking strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. University of New England, Armidale
Lewis JG, Learmonth RP, Watson K (1993a) The role of growth phase and ethanol in freeze-thaw stress resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1065–1071
Lewis JG, Northcott CJ, Learmonth RP, Attfield PV, Watson K (1993b) The need for consistent nomenclature and assessment of growth phases in diauxic cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol 139(4):835–839. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-139-4-835
Lewis JG, Learmonth R, Attfield P, Watson K (1997) Stress co-tolerance and trehalose content in baking strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 18(1):30–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.2900347
Lloyd D, Morrell S, Carlsen HN, Degn H, James PE, Rowlands CC (1993) Effects of growth with ethanol on fermentation and membrane fluidity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 9(8):825–833. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.320090803
Parasassi T, De Stasio G, d’Ubaldo A, Gratton E (1990) Phase fluctuation in phospholipid membranes revealed by laurdan fluorescence. Biophys J 57(6):1179–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82637-0
Parasassi T, Krasnowska EK, Bagatolli L, Gratton E (1998) Laurdan and prodan as polarity-sensitive fluorescent membrane probes. J Fluoresc 8(4):365–373. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020528716621
Piškur J, Rozpędowska E, Polakova S, Merico A, Compagno C (2006) How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends Genet 22(4):183–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2006.02.002
Rodríguez-Vargas S, Sánchez-García A, Martínez-Rivas JM, Prieto JA, Randez-Gil F (2007) Fluidization of membrane lipids enhances the tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to freezing and salt stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(1):110–116. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01360-06
Smart KA, Chambers KM, Lambert I, Jenkins C, Smart CA (1999) Use of methylene violet staining procedures to determine yeast viability and vitality. J Am Soc Brew Chem 57(1):18–23
Steels EL, Learmonth RP, Watson K (1994) Stress tolerance and membrane lipid unsaturation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown aerobically or anaerobically. Microbiology 140:569–576. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-140-3-569
Swan TM, Watson K (1999) Stress tolerance in a yeast lipid mutant: membrane lipids influence tolerance to heat and ethanol independently of heat shock proteins and trehalose. Can J Microbiol 45(6):472–479. https://doi.org/10.1139/w99-033
Wang Y, Zhang S, Liu H, Zhang L, Yi C, Li H (2015) Changes and roles of membrane compositions in the adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ethanol. J Basic Microbiol 55(12):1417–1426. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201500300
You KM, Rosenfield C-L, Knipple DC (2003) Ethanol tolerance in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is dependent on cellular oleic acid content. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(3):1499–1503. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.3.1499-1503.2003
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thanks Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of Education and Culture, Republic of Indonesia for scholarship provided to SI to pursue postgraduate study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ishmayana, S., Kennedy, U.J. & Learmonth, R.P. Further investigation of relationships between membrane fluidity and ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . World J Microbiol Biotechnol 33, 218 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2380-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2380-9