Advertisement

The effect of pH, sucrose and ammonium sulphate concentrations on the production of bacterial cellulose (Nata-de-coco) by Acetobacter xylinum

  • A. JagannathEmail author
  • A. Kalaiselvan
  • S. S. Manjunatha
  • P. S. Raju
  • A. S. Bawa
Original Paper

Abstract

The effect of pH, sucrose and ammonium sulphate concentrations on the production of nata-de-coco, a form of bacterial cellulose, by Acetobacter xylinum was studied. Comparisons for physical properties like thickness, wet weight, water-holding capacity (WHC), moisture content and hardness, a textural parameter were done on nata-de-coco grown in tender coconut water medium supplemented with varying concentrations of sucrose and ammonium sulphate at different pH values. The results were analysed by fitting a second-order polynomial regression equation. Response surface methodology was used to study the effect of the three variables. The study showed that A. xylinum could effectively use sucrose as the sole carbon source in coconut water medium and that cellulose production was more dependent on pH than either sucrose or ammonium sulphate concentrations. Maximum thickness of nata was obtained at pH 4.0 with 10% sucrose and 0.5% ammonium sulphate concentrations. These conditions also produced good quality nata-de-coco with a smooth surface and soft chewy texture. The study will enable efficient utilization of coconut water, a hitherto wasted byproduct of coconut industry and will also provide a new product dimension to the aggrieved coconut farmers who are not getting the right price for their product.

Keywords

Acetobacter xylinum Bacterial cellulose Nata-de-coco 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to acknowledge the Coconut Development Board, Kochi, India for funding this project.

References

  1. Bae S, Sugano Y, Shoda M (2004) Improvement of bacterial cellulose production by addition of agar in a jar fermentor. J Biosci Bioeng 97(1):33–38Google Scholar
  2. Bourne MC (2002) Food texture and viscosity: concepts and measurements. Academic Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Budhiono A, Rosidi B, Taher H, Iguchi M (1999) Kinetic aspects of bacterial cellulose formation in nata-de-coco culture system. Carbohydr Polymers 40:137–143. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(99)00050-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cannon RE, Anderson SM (1991) Biogenesis of bacterial cellulose. Crit Rev Microbiol 17:435–447. doi: 10.3109/10408419109115207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chao Y, Ishida T, Sugano Y, Shoda M (2000) Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum in a 50-l internal-loop airlift reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 68:345–352. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000505)68:3≤345::AID-BIT13≥3.0.CO;2-MCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung Y, Shyu Y (1999) The effects of pH, salt, heating and freezing on the physical properties of bacterial cellulose-nata. Int J Food Sci Technol 34:23–26. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2621.1999.00231.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Gallardo DEJ, Andres RM, Magno ET (1971) A study on the isolation and screening of microorganisms for production of diverse-textured nata. Philipp J Sci 100:41–49Google Scholar
  8. Embuscado ME, Marks JS, BeMiller JN (1994) Bacterial cellulose. I. Factors affecting the production of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. Food Hydrocoll 8(5):407–418Google Scholar
  9. Forng ER, Anderson SM, Cannon RE (1989) Synthetic medium for Acetobacter xylinum that can be used for isolation of auxotrophic mutants and study of cellulose biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 55(5):1317–1319Google Scholar
  10. Hermansson AM (1986) Water and fat holding. In: Mitchell JR, Ledward DA (eds) Functional properties of food macromolecules. Elsevier Applied Science Publications, London, England and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum: preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58:345–352Google Scholar
  12. Hutchens SA, Leon RV, O’Neill HM, Evans BR (2007) Statistical analysis of optimal culture conditions for Gluconacetobacter hansenii cellulose production. Lett Appl Microbiol 44:175–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02055.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang ST, Ho ML, Lee TC (1985) Optimization of the freezing conditions on mackerel and amberfish for manufacturing minced fish. J Food Sci 50:727–732. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1985.tb13783.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keshk S, Sameshima K (2006) The utilization of sugar cane molasses with/without the presence of lignosulfonate for the production of bacterial cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72(2):291–296. doi: 10.1007/s00253-005-0265-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lacadin AL, Millan ER (1980) Relative effectiveness of coconut, dalanghita, incale and tomato as media for producing nata. TCA Res J 2(3):235–245Google Scholar
  16. Lapuz MM, Gallardo EG, Palo MA (1967) The nata organism-cultural requirements, characteristics and identity. Philipp J Sci 96(2):91–108Google Scholar
  17. Toyosaki H, Kojima Y, Tsuchida T, Hoshino K, Yamada Y, Yoshinaga F (1995) The characterization of an acetic acid bacterium useful for producing bacterial cellulose in agitation cultures: the proposal of Acetobacter xylinum sub sp. sucrofermentans subsp. Nov. J Gen Appl Microbiol 41:307–314. doi: 10.2323/jgam.41.307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vandamme EJ, de Baets S, Vanbaelen A, Joris K, de Wulf P (1998) Improved production of bacterial cellulose and its application potential. Polym Degrad Stab 59:93–99. doi: 10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00185-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Verschuren PG, Carodona TD, Nout MJR, de Gooijer KD, van den Heuvel JC (2000) Location and limitation of cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum established from oxygen profiles. J Biosci Bioeng 89(5):414–419. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1723(00)89089-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Watanabe K, Yamanaka S (1995) Effects of oxygen-tension in the gaseous-phase on production and physical-properties of bacterial cellulose formed under static culture conditions. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59:65–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. White DG, Brown RM Jr (1989) Prospects for the commercialization of the biosynthesis of microbial cellulose. In: Schuerech C (ed) Cellulose and wood-chemistry and technology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Yamanaka S, Watanabe K, Kitamura N (1989) The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci 24:3141–3145. doi: 10.1007/BF01139032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Jagannath
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Kalaiselvan
    • 1
  • S. S. Manjunatha
    • 1
  • P. S. Raju
    • 1
  • A. S. Bawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fruit and Vegetable TechnologyDefence Food Research LaboratoryMysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations